Bill Gates Urges End To Generosity, Fears African Refugees Will Decimate Europe

In an interview published Saturday, Bill Gates told German newspaper Welt am Sonntag that Europe will be devastated by African refugees if they don’t “make it more difficult for Africans to reach the continent,” and the solution lies in European nations committing billions of taxpayer money towards overseas aid.

According to Gates, the combination of explosive population growth in Africa combined with Europe’s notoriously generous open-border migrant welfare programs – as illustrated by the ‘German attitude to refugees’ have incentivised migrants to flood into Europe.

“On the one hand you want to demonstrate generosity and take in refugees, but the more generous you are, the more word gets around about this - which in turn motivates more people to leave Africa.


While Germany has been one of the pioneers of the open door policy, it cannot “take in the huge, massive number of people who are wanting to make their way to Europe.”


Thus Gates advised European nations to take action in order to make it “more difficult for Africans to reach the continent via the current transit routes.”

–Bill Gates

How to stop them?

Gates, whose third world vaccination programs have contributed to Africa’s population explosion, suggested that heaping tons of money onto Africa while taking steps to prevent transit into Europe is the best solution.

After calling Germany’s commitment to allocate 0.7% of GDP towards foreign aid ‘phenomenal,’ Gates encouraged ‘other European nations to follow its example.”

(Because Africa is of course known for efficiently managing billions in foreign aid without corruption to ensure that their people are taken care of. Surely Europe’s donations will create an Africa that rivals downtown Hamburg.)


Gates’ comments come as European leaders discuss the surge of Africans washing up on Italy’s shores every week, with Rome calling on other EU nations to accept more refugees.

On Sunday, Italy’s interior minister Marco Minniti begged for help – telling an EU summit in Tallinn “We are under enormous pressure”S

"If the only ports where refugees are taken to are Italian, something is not working. This is the heart of the question” –Marco Minniti

Italy has taken in over 82,000 migrants in the first six months of 2017, 19% more than the same period last year.

Meanwhile, a spokesperson for the rescue organization SOS Mediterranee which runs an aid vessel along with Doctors Without Borders said that it would be logistically difficult to redirect migrants to other European ports.

If the order came “we would have no choice, we would obey. But it would be completely impossible with more than 1,000 people on board,” Mathilde Auvillain told AFP.

So there you have it

After years of liberal open-border policies predictably resulted in a flood of North African (economic) migrants into Europe, the EU is panicking. And the solution to preventing millions of migrants from upgrading their lifestyle by picking up sticks and moving is to throw more money at Africa…

Meanwhile, President Trump is in Poland this week – one of the only European nations to refuse refugees.

However, as SHTFplan's Mac Slavo asks, does this represent a major shift in the way globalists view immigration? And if so, why would this shift occur?

If I were to guess, it has nothing to do with the fact that mass migration is ruining Europe and Western civilization. The globalists have always advocated for the disintegration of Western values and borders. It has to do with the indirect results of mass immigration.

The refugee crisis is what has spurred the most resistance to globalism in recent years. It has ignited countless nationalistic political parties in Europe. It has contributed to Brexit, the election of Donald Trump, and the slow motion fracturing of the EU.

What Bill Gates is saying, is a sign that the globalist may have realized that they’ve made a fatal mistake. By promoting open borders, they’ve sown the seeds for their own destruction. Their decision to allow millions of refugees into Europe has solidified populist conservative movements across the West that threaten to dethrone them. Now they’re trying to close this can of worms.

Unfortunately for them and us, it may to be too late.



NoDecaf kliguy38 (not verified) Wed, 07/05/2017 - 20:34 Permalink

No he is not an advocate for European nationalism now, read between the lines. He just wants to finish the destruction by extracting whatever wealth is left and sending it to Africa. The dilution process of white Europe is already well under way, no need to push that agenda anymore is what he is basically saying, just take their money.

In reply to by kliguy38 (not verified)

greenskeeper carl NoDecaf Wed, 07/05/2017 - 20:41 Permalink

Funny how he recognizes what we have been saying or a decade or more, now that its too late to stop it short of a massive amount fo violence. He is wrong, too. You don't have to enrich them so they will stay, you stop allowing them in, and enforce harsh penaties on those that sneak in. Theres another angle to this, though. He is saying we need to send Africa aid money, meaning western governments need to, not he is going to do so personally, at least not with a significant % of his money. These people support this mass immigration for a variety of reasons, one of whom is becasue they need more western consumers to sustain their companies growth and profitabilities. Since westerns aren't reproducing enough, they import new ones, make sure they are handed free money, and thus more western consumers are born. How many new laptops will a Nigerian living in Niger buy, vs one living in a western country on welfare? Same with iphones, refridgerators, etc. Africans are useless as consumers absent money given to them by someone else. Perhaps Gates et al are sensing that the pushback against this is growing rapidly, and are slightly changing tactics. Leave them in Africa, but still hand them money. Just speculation, and for sure not the only angle to this, but one that I rarely see addressed anywhere.

In reply to by NoDecaf

Vatican_cameo Fish Gone Bad Wed, 07/05/2017 - 21:32 Permalink

 They didn't lose Anybody.  It's more like a Ransom Demand.  Your options are send Billions of Dollars to Robert Mugabe, or Africa will keep sending over boatloads of Savages (sounds like a "Morton's Fork" actually).  They either get your money or they get your money.  I vote for Option #3 which is a line anti-ship mines along the Euro coast where these vagrants tend to gravitate.  It has to be cheaper than writing a check.

In reply to by Fish Gone Bad

greenskeeper carl techpriest Wed, 07/05/2017 - 23:17 Permalink

Essentially the same thing. Consumers aren't consuming enough, corporate profits in many sectors are shrinking, etc. Bring in more 'westerners' from poor parts of the world, hand them money, and they will spend it. Disguise this corporate greed in the cloth of humanitarianism, and you have a huge % of the population in most western countries who will praise you for it while you rob them blind and disposses them.

In reply to by techpriest

risk.averse greenskeeper carl Wed, 07/05/2017 - 23:19 Permalink

How many new laptops will a Nigerian living in Niger buy, vs one living in a western country on welfare? 

Even if the welfare recipient is on a fraction of the money that the guy in Niger is on the welfare recipient is more likely to make discretionary purchases like laptops and most  of the other stuff that fuels our consumer "paradise" (sic). Why? Because welfare is GUARANTEED, STEADY INCOME. If you don't know where your next paycheck is coming from you don't spend willy-nilly.

In reply to by greenskeeper carl

waspwench NoDecaf Thu, 07/06/2017 - 02:06 Permalink

And why should it Europe's responsibility to pay out billions in foreign aid?   What about the rest of the world?Europe's only responsibility is to Europe.   Close the flood gates and repatriate those already arrived.Europe has a responsibility to it's own people to preserve Western Civilization and to uphold the values of that culture.  If Gates had used his wealth to promote population control in Africa it would have made a great deal more sense than what he has done.   There are far too many people for that continent to support and Gates has added to the burden.The Africans cannot feed themselves, they cannot govern themselves, they are largely dysfunctional and Gates helps them to breed themselves into extinction.

In reply to by NoDecaf

El Vaquero nmewn Wed, 07/05/2017 - 20:24 Permalink

Isn't it funny.  We provide food aid to Africa, and what do they do with it?  Have lots and lots of kids so that we have to provide even more food aid, and I guarantee that the dumbest are popping out the most kids.  We have created an African idiocracy.  There are no kind solutions to this issue, and we have actually increased the number of people who will suffer unimaginably with our aid.   Let them starve.  Let nature sort them out.  We cannot keep supporting them.  

In reply to by nmewn

MEFOBILLS El Vaquero Wed, 07/05/2017 - 20:36 Permalink

Letting them starve is a passive viewpoint.  The actual problem requires ACTIVE viewpoint.  That means building a wall, sinking ships, shooting people.... basically declaring war.Why?  The negroid apocalypse approaches:The current African population is about 1.1 billion and it is now expected to reach 4.2 billion, nearly a fourfold increase, by 2100 U.N report means that the negroids will kill all life on their continent, then move out it waves.   Bill  Gates is partly responsible for delivering white man medicine and vaccines to the natives.  If you feed they will breed.  Gates is too liberal, and hence stupid, to understand the natural laws of man and the earth.At least Gates is telling other liberals in coded language that negro apocalypse is upon them, but he won't admit culpability.

In reply to by El Vaquero

Dilluminati El Vaquero Wed, 07/05/2017 - 20:38 Permalink

Imagine sending Paris Accord (global warming dollars) so that these same leaders of 3rd world shitholes would clean their environment?  And if we did and if they cleaned things up? There would be no more funds, so paying for dependence creates that dependence when in fact you want capitalism instead.  The people who make these ridiculous suggestion of aid to these nations are simply ignorant of simple facts.  The policy is sooo bad, just so damned stupid it almost seems to be a conspiracy when in fact it is just really emotive posturing without any actual thought.Merkel went from:Angela Merkel comforts sobbing refugee but says Germany can't help everyone…To destroying a continent and trying to win an election on it.  Never in all of history, nothing close to a historical blunder than what this woman did.  And it does defy common sense and Merkel knew better and welcomed this upon Europe anyway.  And guess what?  With robotics and other pressures it's going to get ugly when AI and tech makes even more people obsolete or "displaced" within an economy.  Charity starts at home and already we see the threads of society getting torn assunder as people who constributed to the social safety net are denided access to help while foreigners show up and are cared for with few if any real reason to imagine they are anything but an economic drag upon the state.So Merkel??  WTF???  WTF were you thinking.. Time person of the year?  No better yet idiot of the ages!  We have people in Appalachia and coal country that need help.  Close the borders in the USA! 

In reply to by El Vaquero

MEFOBILLS Dilluminati Wed, 07/05/2017 - 20:51 Permalink

So Merkel??  WTF???  WTF were you thinking.. Time person of the year?  No better yet idiot of the ages!  We have people in Appalachia and coal country that need help.  Close the borders in the USA! Childless white women don't think.  They FEEEEEEEL.  They project their maternal instincts onto the brown hoardes because they are children they never had.  Meanwhile all the white men who rejected her, are the real enemy.  No real man put her in her place, and she never fulfilled her biological imperative.In evolutionary terms, women never had to guard the frontier against enemies, that was the man's job.  Women are not happy in the man's world, and they don't belong there.  They want it, but men need to tell them hell no... you are not qualified.  Get back to the kitchen and raise children, which is your primary function.White men invented all kinds of labor savings devices, and then granted white women their freedom... look what women have done with it.  Yes, the Jew was always in the background whispering insidious lies, but white women took the bait.No matriarchy in history has survived. 

In reply to by Dilluminati

Green2Delta El Vaquero Wed, 07/05/2017 - 20:45 Permalink

I've been saying this exact same thing for years.A few months ago my dad showed me something he'd recorded. It was of this Africa village at the base of an active volcano. This is the type of volcano that has small eruptions on a constant basis. The rocket surgeons aren't smart away to move away from something like that. Then they show this dindu breast feeding a newborn at the base of said volcano while both of them are covered in flies. And when I say covered I mean covered.You can't help people that fucking stupid. Feeding them now only hurts future generations.   

In reply to by El Vaquero

greenskeeper carl El Vaquero Wed, 07/05/2017 - 20:47 Permalink

I don't think we have 'created' an African idiocracy, I think that phrase is kind of redundant. Simply 'African' will suffice. But, I do believe we have allowed it to grow well past their Malthusian ceiling. Absent Western aid, the population will either have to figure out how to grow food and exploit their insanely abundunt resources, or starve. More aid will serve the opposite purpose. They will just keep growing, with millions more cramming into slums all over the continent, looking for any possible way to live in a white country that will support them and their huge families. As you say, cutting them off is the only way. After all, we are rapidly approaching a time when we will HAVE to stop sending them dree shit, because we won't even be able to care for ourelves. All we are doing now is increasing the number of people that will eventually suffer. While I may often sound callous and indiferent to the various problems of Africans, both here and there, I don't like seeing people suffer.

In reply to by El Vaquero