Loretta Lynch Plot Thickens As New Details Emerge Of Her Dealings With The Hillary Campaign

Last night we asked a very simple question about why the DNC has failed to cooperate with Russia investigators by handing over their infamous email server to either the FBI or Robert Mueller's team (see: DNC Server: Most Critical Evidence To Proving "Russian Hacking" Is Being Withheld From Mueller, Why?).  Afterall, if Russia did "hack the election", as we've been told 24/7 by CNN going on 8 months now, then the evidence could very well be on that server.  Which prompted us to ask this very simple question:

All of which brings us back to our original question: If the DNC is in possession of actual tangible evidence that could prove once and for all that Russians hacked their servers and attempted to undermine the campaign of Hillary Clinton, why not share that evidence with investigators and enjoy the blissful vindication that its public release would provide?

We concluded by wondering whether the stonewalling from the DNC just might have something to do with this "purely coincidental' meeting between Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton on a tarmac in Phoenix and/or Loretta Lynch's 'assurances' to members of the Clinton campaign that the FBI's investigation (or, "matter" if you prefer) of Hillary Clinton "wouldn't go too far"?  Afterall, if evidence of "Russian hacking" were on that server, so to would there be evidence of Lynch's transgressions...if they existed, of course.

But we're not the only ones wondering whether there's more to the Lynch story.  According to an article in the New York Post, some testimony that Lynch offered under oath before the Senate Judiciary Committee last year could come back to haunt her.  In that testimony, Lynch said that she had "not spoken to anyone on either the campaign or transition or any staff members affiliated with them."

That said, and as we've reported before, that statement seems to contradict reports that Lynch personally assured members of Clinton's campaign, potentially Amanda Renteria, that the FBI's investigation "wouldn't go too far"...more from the Post:

When former Attorney General Loretta Lynch testified last year about her decision not to prosecute Hillary Clinton for mishandling classified information, she swore she never talked to “anyone” on the Clinton campaign. That categorical denial, though made in response to a series of questions about whether she spoke with Clintonworld about remaining attorney general if Hillary won the election, could come back to haunt her.


The Senate Judiciary Committee, which has launched a bipartisan investigation into Lynch for possible obstruction of justice, recently learned of the existence of a document indicating Lynch assured the political director of Clinton’s campaign she wouldn’t let FBI agents “go too far” in probing the former secretary of state.


Lynch’s lawyer says she is cooperating with committee investigators, who are seeking answers to several questions, as well as relevant documents. Among other things, they want to know if she or any of her Justice Department staff “ever communicated with Amanda Renteria,” who headed Clinton’s political operations during the campaign. Renteria, who has been identified in the document as the senior Clinton campaign aide with whom Lynch privately communicated, has also been asked to testify.

And then there is that inconvenient Comey testimony in which the former FBI director says that he was instructed by Lynch to refer to the Clinton investigation as a "matter" rather than what it actually was, an investigation. 

Now, as The Post points out, there are new developments which would suggest that Comey confronted Lynch about the alleged communication with Amanda Renteria and promptly asked to leave.

And it will press her to explain the discrepancy — along with why she reportedly asked former FBI Director James Comey to leave her office when he confronted her with the document.

And then there is that meeting with Bill Clinton on that Phoenix tarmac that just happened to get noticed by a local reporter who just happened to be on scene.


After all the drama around the Clinton email investigation, which included multiple people being offered immunity and the revelation of what appeared to be numerous federal crimes committed by several people on Clinton's staff, wouldn't it be ironic if Obama's Attorney General were the only one to take the fall?  Scandal free administration indeed...


rbg81 Killtruck Sat, 07/08/2017 - 07:48 Permalink

Whatever they find, Lynch will skate.  Why?  Because there is no way they will charge, let alone convict, the first female African-American AG.  Regardless of what the facts are, that would be RACIST.  So, it won't happen.  If Lynch were to get indicted, the MSM would scream she was being lynched.

In reply to by Killtruck

fleur de lis rbg81 Sat, 07/08/2017 - 23:44 Permalink

Agreed.Loretta is too well connected to the DC Swamp matrix.She knows too much.If they lean on her and she spills the beans the whole thing will move in all directions exponentially.They will open a can of worms the size of pythons.All kinds of nasties will start crawling out of the woodworks.Does anyone really think that the Fibbies are ready to confront this?Becase too much of it leads back to Hellish and the Fibbies know better than to tempt her.Nope.No way will Loretta get charged with a parking ticket let alone indicted or jailed for some stupid crime. She skates. 

In reply to by rbg81

jcaz fleur de lis Sun, 07/09/2017 - 11:07 Permalink

Probably, but the reason that Lynch was created by Clinton Inc way back when was because she was too stupid to ask questions, and would always do exactly what she was told;Just because she's been along for the ride doesn't mean that she knows any more than Mammie the Upstairs Maid, and that's by design;That also makes her disposable.

In reply to by fleur de lis

chubbar NugginFuts Fri, 07/07/2017 - 17:58 Permalink

Everyone, by now, knows the FBI is as crooked and corrupt as they come. There isn't anyway any of these criminals get prosecuted, period. Comey let the cat out of the bag with his actions and now anyone believing their bullshit is completely naieve! Even the lower level FBI dudes don't have a set of nuts to go after these fuckers, all of them are either ball less idiots or in on the corruption.

In reply to by NugginFuts

DontNeedNoStin… chubbar Sat, 07/08/2017 - 20:39 Permalink

Yep !!  Corrupt or scared.     Just look at the questioning of the Boston Bombing Patsies friend down in Florida. . . .  "Shit he might know something (I'm presuming) that derails the official story".  And bang bang he's dead. Incident Report states " there were 4 -5 heavily armed men questioning suspect, - we all became so fearful for our safety that we had to shoot him multiple times" . . . Probably in the back.  I have been calling them the F.I.B. for some time now & see no reason to do otherwise.

In reply to by chubbar

GUS100CORRINA vortmax Fri, 07/07/2017 - 10:00 Permalink

Loretta Lynch Plot Thickens As New Details Emerge Of Her Dealings With The Hillary CampaignMy response: This lady like all who served in the Obama administration are dirty. May justice be served on this day.This is the kind of CRAP that makes me ASHAMED to be an AMERICAN. Truly sad.

In reply to by vortmax

GUS100CORRINA null Fri, 07/07/2017 - 11:43 Permalink

Hi ... null ...I am not hard to please. I am just sick and tired of seeing the HRC, LYNCH, OBAMA, etc. parade of corruption. It is hard to believe that any of these people ever held office in the USA. The kind of corrupt behavior we have seen from US government at times over the last 16 years is a real stain on the republic.I continually ask myself: What is wrong with Americans who elected OBAMA, etc. to office? Are these Americans who elected these corrupt people so vile, evil and lost that there is no hope for them? Makes me wonder at times.

In reply to by null