Imran Awan Subscribed To Pedo-Centric YouTube Channel Exposed By Tosh.0

Content originally published at iBankCoin.com

 YouTuber Tracy Beanz has discovered that the Pakistani DNC IT Staffer arrested Monday night for bank fraud while attempting to flee the country was subscribed to several pedo-centric YouTube channels - including one featured on Comedy Central's Tosh.0 program.

Imran Awan, the long-time employee and friend of Debbie Wasserman Schultz - currently under investigation by the FBI and DC Capitol Police for a variety of alleged crimes unrelated to his Monday arrest (and whose lawyer oddly mentioned 'pizzagate' in a post-arrest statement), subscribed to YouTube channel "Seven Super Girls" - which has over 12 billion views, and features sexualized children performing 'bits.' 

 

  

Some of the sites Awan is subscribed to also fit the description of #Elsagate, which is a growing number of child-oriented fetish websites disguised as innocent children's videos.

Seven Super Girls

Per The Free Thought Project

"At first glance, the Seven Super Girls YouTube homepage, arguably, looks like one’s favorite porn site. Each under-18 girl has her own subchannel. To the unwitting, however, the site may look like girls dressed like girls, engaging in activities which girls enjoy — going to camp, hanging with friends by the pool, and playing dress up.

But to a pedophile, the site is a smorgasbord of smut, carefully crafted to serve as eye candy for adults and teenagers to indulge in their child-sex fantasies. After we clicked on the entire list of videos and selected to sort by most popular, it became clear to us at The Free Thought Project, the videos are in no way innocent.

The first video titled “Lucy’s Morning Routine” shows a young girl licking a cream pie. The video has 138 million views, yet never rises above the level of a bad Pee Wee Herman episode. Why so many views? Tosh believes it’s simply a visual feast for pedophiles." 

After the Daniel Tosh segment aired, the Seven Super Girls channel announced a hiatus from publishing new content - which never happened.

See the Tosh.0 segment on Seven Super Girls below or click here

And while it's certainly possible that one of Awan's three school-aged children subscribed to Seven Super Girls and similar channels while logged in through Imran's Google Plus account, one would think that a highly skilled devout Muslim IT professional would monitor his children's internet usage more closely for sexualized underage infidels.


Follow on Twitter 
@ZeroPointNow § Subscribe to our YouTube channel

Comments

Thom Paine Fri, 07/28/2017 - 07:48 Permalink

Seven Super Girls - never heard of it, and it has 12 billion views.. ?? :oI wonder if he attended Spirit Cooking sessions, pizza nights.Hurry up and get the new FBI head in and McCabe out.

jeff montanye Automatic Choke Fri, 07/28/2017 - 23:26 Permalink

what i saw was ultra tame and didn't appear sexualized at all.  with very little trouble i could find much more inflammatory material.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GjFUJJMR-hQbut as they say, it couldn't happen to a better guy.  now he's under arrest his phone and computer are subject to forensic search, right?  let's go.and while we are at it, can we at least take a fucking look at the dnc servers and seth rich's phone and computer?  that the fbi claims not to have looked at either is:1.  unbelievable and2.  evidence of incompetence or3.  evidence of corruptionwhich is it?  get to the bottom of at least this president trump.  this is where the russian hacking story started. 

In reply to by Automatic Choke

NihilistZerO___ Pineneedle Fri, 07/28/2017 - 14:12 Permalink

It always makes me laugh how CA gets painted with such a broad brush. LA and SF are shit. The rest of California is beautiful and full if agriculture. California hosts some of the most active Right Wingers. Take away LA and the Bay Area and the illegals who live and vote there and you're left with what California used to be. A libertarian leaning conservative state.

In reply to by Pineneedle

allgoodmen knukles Fri, 07/28/2017 - 16:10 Permalink

They are ensconced in pot. It's literally the only thing they care or think about. The only reason most of them vote Liberal, aside from peer pressure, is that they fear conservatives would take their pot away (and they are absolutely right about that). I think you could swing millions of votes in CA, OR and WA by getting off the pot issue and stop threatening what they literally think is their life blood. They wouldn't become Rebublicans, they simply wouldn't bother voting once they are secure in their Pot.

In reply to by knukles

Theosebes Goodfellow Fri, 07/28/2017 - 08:18 Permalink

Get them girls in burqas NOW!

Seriously, so the guy likes to look at pretty young white girls. Is everyone pissed off he isn't into unshaved, angry, femnazi womyn? These girls are very well aware of whom they are marketing themselves to on YouTube. I'm sure that they are going to pay for college with the proceeds.

If you're into underage white teen girls prancing around then go watch. If not, get a life. Is Anwan a pedophile? In the strictest sense, probably yes. He likes and is attracted to young teenage girls. Is he a child molester? Not until he molests a child. As of yet, you cannot throw someone in jail for the thoughts that are in his or her head. So short of forcing all your underage girls to wear burqas and censoring their right to market themselves and their images, take a powder.

Theosebes Goodfellow iamrefreshed Fri, 07/28/2017 - 09:01 Permalink

These girls are marketing themselves. Undoubtedly with their parents permission. I point out the distinction between a pedophile and a child molester, (something glossed over completely in today's courts of public opinion). They are not synonymous.Do I like that these girls are doing this or that this guy, (and many others), are watching? Not a bit, but it's not for me to say. There is no crime being committed. Salaciousness is not a crime and despite the best intentions of people, you cannot legislate morality. It's never worked save with repression. So what rights are you willing to surrender to curb this presumed moral offense?

In reply to by iamrefreshed

LyLo Theosebes Goodfellow Fri, 07/28/2017 - 09:33 Permalink

Oh no: that little "distinction" is quite often pointed out.  Salon and Voxx had several pieces on it, by a paedophile that claimed he did not act on the impulse.  Salon eventually got shamed into pulling it down, but to my knowledge they are still available on Voxx.  It's something that happens about every 15-20 years in the UK and US, so if you go back you'll find interesting articles from both countries periodically on the subject.As far as rights I'm willing to surrender, while I get your point: I'm a female of parenting age, fucking sell it somewhere else.  I firmly believe everyone with the impulse should just be put down.  I shouldn't have to surrender any rights because they do not have the right to live in my not-so-humble opinion, so I'm not going to go surrendering any hard-fought civil liberty gains so they can use it for cover to diddle children.  If we could at least get the actual molesting to result in the death penalty, we wouldn't have so many "paedophiles that don't molest" in our midst as suddenly no you can't just admit to that as one step further is now a capital offense.Sorry.  I know it's not very libertarian or even very logical, but again: it's protection of children and I'm a breeding-age woman, so I tend to get illogical and emotion-driven on the subject very quickly.  (Bear in mind, we are currently as a nation threatening a guy with 99 years in prison for sending a tweet.  In that society, I think it's fairly just to go ahead and kill all the paedophiles.)

In reply to by Theosebes Goodfellow

MsCreant LyLo Fri, 07/28/2017 - 10:26 Permalink

I am a mother too. I feel what you are saying. If there is a snake in the village, kill it. No negotiation. I get it. Here is the ugly truth. Men are biologically programed to be attracted to very young women. They want to impregnate the fittest. Young = fit. They also are trained socially to be dominant; it easier to act that out with a teenager. Fashion magazines know this and use teens to sell women's clothing. We have to police that reality. REALITY. We have to train our daughters about what is going on. We have to love and respect them enough that they love and respect themselves. The mothers letting their daughters do this are fucking OUT OF THEIR GODDAMN MINDS. I have not watched, so I do need to own that I am commenting on something I have not looked at. I am afraid to. If the men are hetero, they all have it in their heads, a little bit. We would have to kill them all to do as you say. I have listened to dads with girls who play on the highschool volley ball team. They laugh about how hard it can be to be appropriate. They know to be. Most of them will be. And if they are getting their needs met with their partners or if they are really emotionally healthy, they can look at the attraction, not invest energy in it, and move on. Men are attracted to young women. End of it. As mothers we have to cope with reality, not demand a fantasy that cannot exist.

In reply to by LyLo

Herd Redirecti… cookies anyone Fri, 07/28/2017 - 12:44 Permalink

Boys get abused too.  Women abuse too.  Boys by women....  Not so much. Any way, I think any one guilty of molesting a boy should have his balls chopped off, esp. under the age of 12 (difficult to say why it is worse if the victim is younger, because either way is horrific). Girls over 14...  Much tougher to generalize, because some individuals will be PHYSICALLY quite close to sexually mature. 

In reply to by cookies anyone

Automatic Choke Herd Redirecti… Fri, 07/28/2017 - 14:40 Permalink

Missy, you are correct (mostly) biologically, but as members of society, we adults must be able to separate attraction from action.  We are not animals sniffing pheromones in the barnyard and humping anything that smells right.  Men may joke about what attracts them, but most would be horrified at the idea of acting out with kids.  There are also biological imperatives that compel men to protect kids.  You have to separate the sick from the not-sick.

In reply to by Herd Redirecti…

MsCreant Automatic Choke Fri, 07/28/2017 - 15:09 Permalink

"I have listened to dads with girls who play on the highschool volley ball team. They laugh about how hard it can be to be appropriate. They know to be. Most of them will be. And if they are getting their needs met with their partners or if they are really emotionally healthy, they can look at the attraction, not invest energy in it, and move on."To be clear, I am not saying men cannot manage it. I am saying they are attracted. Your perspective is that of a mature male. You and I agree 100%. I'll take it one step further. Girls will flirt. They are trying on their femininity, not asking to get pinned and fucked. A mature male knows how to ignore that, or validate it without "going after her because she is asking for it." I was a terror at 15. A problem at 14.I was out front of my house one evening, recently. I saw a young man I had not seen in a while. I watched him grow up, may have had him on my hip, or rocked him at one point. I look over his head, examining his height. He pulls himself up tall and spreads his chest. He is a good looking kid. I grin. I pull my head up higher, but alas, he is now taller than I am, and a young man. I say "Alright now! Niiiice!" We laugh, he may have blushed, then we talk about his college plans, his relationship with his father (a druggie) all kinds of issues. His status as a young man, not a child, is affirmed. I am an appropriate mother, indeed we return to that role (his friend's mother), but for a second, I am a woman noting he is a male. The kid has such a baby face. If I knock men for anything, it is not seeing how baby the girls' faces are. The babyness turns me right off.

In reply to by Automatic Choke

Automatic Choke MsCreant Fri, 07/28/2017 - 15:50 Permalink

indeed, you and i do agree 100%.   your first comment sounded dangerously like condemming all men, and in the same breath excusing pedophiles males because 'they can't help it".  glad you clarified.yes...baby faces are cute on kids, but we do outgrow them.   not sure how old i was when scantily clad pre-teen females in the mall prompted me to think "i bet her mom is hot...where is her mom?"   doubt that I was much over 30 by then.  long time ago in any case. 

In reply to by MsCreant

herbivore MsCreant Fri, 07/28/2017 - 15:57 Permalink

At least you recognize part of reality. The area of reality you ignore are your own cultural biases which you presume are Universal Law, or Natural Law, or God's Law, rather than mere figments of your particular cultural biases, which at this moment in history are dominant. And, you deem your cultural biases worthy of emulation by everyone, be they Americans or Asians or Europeans or anywhere else.  Society is a freaking mess and if you think it has anything to do with men desiring young women, you've got it ass-backward. Having said that, it makes me happy knowing that Zerohedge is attracting (some) females. I usually assume it's 99% male viewers.

In reply to by MsCreant

herbivore MsCreant Fri, 07/28/2017 - 19:05 Permalink

You are caught up in what you define as emotional maturity. As you see it, an emotionally mature man will observe the attraction to pubescent girls and "move on". Look but don't fantasize. Look but for god's sake don't touch. Look, observe the attraction, and remember that there are thousands of prosecutors salivating at the prospect of destroying your life. It is written in the ten commandments "thou shalt not covet a pretty girl unless she is above a certain age mandated by the State, whatever that age happens to be, regardless of whether she consents, because she has no right to consent because she's too young and immature to give consent; moreover, thou shalt not engage in conjugal activites with someone half your age unless you have many pieces of gold and you are sufficiently well-known; lastly, all the aforementioned prohibitions are null and void if your surname is Clinton or your occupation is in the arts and entertainment industry"

In reply to by MsCreant

MsCreant herbivore Fri, 07/28/2017 - 20:07 Permalink

I agree with most of what you say. I was trouble and had a great time as a teen. Many men would have been arrested. Meanwhile, isn't there an age where you believe they are too young and can be exploted because they don't understand?Should we let folks put their dicks in infants? If you buy into the idea that there is an age too young, and we know that folks mature at a different rate physically and mentally, then there will need to be a cut off point that gets agreed on because we can't do it on a case by case basis.If you are okay with folks putting their dicks in infants, then indeed, we have nothing to discuss.I think dicks in children hurts them. And they don't get to choose because there can be no informed consent. BTW, fantasy is okay in my book.

In reply to by herbivore

herbivore MsCreant Fri, 07/28/2017 - 21:27 Permalink

Regarding "informed consent": I spent the first 40 years of my life giving profoundly ill-informed consent to women with whom I was in relationships. So, as an adult, I was hapless when it comes to "informed consent". What does that even mean? I was oblivious to the present and blind to the future consequences of my ill-informed consent. One might argue that the age of consent, in my case, should have been 40 years old, because it wasn't until that age that I began manifesting anything resembling informed consent. The point being, each person is unique and yet the government shoves everyone into a one-size-fits-all legal straitjacket.  In these matters I don't know what's right or wrong and I'm confident neither does the government. But the girls pictured above do not look to me like they need the government preventing them from engaging in consensual interactions. You know, there are these strange things called parents. I think they should determine for their children what's right or wrong, and yes, there will always be bad parents and bad things will keep happening despite all the laws in the world.

In reply to by MsCreant

MsCreant herbivore Sat, 07/29/2017 - 01:51 Permalink

At what age should Jerry Sandusky be allowed to seduce boys, with the parents' permission?If things were as you suggest, leave it to the parents to decide, what happens when they go against the parents' wishes? Is a law broken then? Are you back to square one again, only this time you say "That's not fair that the state is involved and backs up the parent's right to decide for their kid. We are in love dammit, no matter what her father says." And you would have to determine an age where the parents don't decide any more. Can't be still deciding for her when she is 30. Otherwise bad parents will be bad actors on this end of the spectrum too. "I won't let you have sex or marry outside our religion. I don't care if you are 40 and still single." Oh Shit! Another rule to be backed by a government. The thing you are trying to escape rears it's ugly head and bites you, with what you propose.  

In reply to by herbivore

herbivore MsCreant Sat, 07/29/2017 - 10:09 Permalink

"At what age should Jerry Sandusky be allowed to seduce boys, with the parents' permission?"There's no 'allowing' in my ideal world. It's the parents' responsibility to monitor the child's activities and be wary of situations where the children are outside their control. "If things were as you suggest, leave it to the parents to decide, what happens when they go against the parents' wishes? Is a law broken then?"No law is broken, but the parent-child trust is violated. I leave it to them to work things out."Are you back to square one again, only this time you say "That's not fair that the state is involved and backs up the parent's right to decide for their kid. We are in love dammit, no matter what her father says." See above."And you would have to determine an age where the parents don't decide any more. Can't be still deciding for her when she is 30. Otherwise bad parents will be bad actors on this end of the spectrum too. "I won't let you have sex or marry outside our religion. I don't care if you are 40 and still single." Oh Shit! Another rule to be backed by a government."I would have an emancipation clause whereby a person could free themselves of the yoke of the State and its strictures by passing a test designed to demonstrate their understanding of the consequences of sexual activity. The test would be simple and would consist of questions along the lines of: do you realize that sex can lead to pregnancy, disease, etc. The test could be like the written part of a drivers license test and would of course be completely voluntary. As for parental control, I don't have a solution- it's more fuzzy, for sure. There already exists in current law an emancipation option for children who want to be emancipated from their parents."The thing you are trying to escape rears it's ugly head and bites you, with what you propose."Yes, life is fraught with risks and uncertainties and contradictions. Government is force- real or threatened violence. If there's any way to remove that odious influence from consensual behavior, I'm all for it. Come up with a definition for informed consent, offer a test for it, and I think society would be better off. 

In reply to by MsCreant

MsCreant herbivore Sat, 07/29/2017 - 14:45 Permalink

You and I are real close on these issues.This one is killer:"At what age should Jerry Sandusky be allowed to seduce boys, with the parents' permission?"There's no 'allowing' in my ideal world. It's the parents' responsibility to monitor the child's activities and be wary of situations where the children are outside their control. There is going to be some fuckwad parents out there that LOVE their football team so much, they will let Jerry do this, or find out he did this and let it slide. I want them in jail, with Sandusky. The kid has no advocate in this position the way you lay it out.It is indeed complicated.I want the state out your bedroom, my bedroom, your wallet, and my banking. We are not far off. This topic is tough.If the government was only there to defend life, property, and against physical harm, we would come up with something that would work regarding sex, along those lines. I don't think an 18 year old boy should be on a sex offender's list for having sex with a 14-15 year old girl. I really do get your point. The fact that there are predators out there must be dealt with collectively.  

In reply to by herbivore

highly debtful MsCreant Fri, 07/28/2017 - 22:23 Permalink

Men are attracted to young women. End of it.Sorry, not me. My wife is three months older than I am. Quite frankly I've never felt attracted to any woman significally younger (say more than 5-10 years) than me. Why? Generation gap, I gues. I'm only interested in my own generation and for 22 years now that interest has been limited to one and the same woman. What in God's name could I - as a 52 year old male - have in common with a girl who could be my daughter? What could she have in common with me? I have two daughters - 16 and 21 - who often bring along their friends, so I get to see and talk to quite a lot of pretty young girls at home, but the thought of me taking a serious physical and/or emotional interest in someone half my age or even younger is just... well, pretty revolting (and I guess even much more so for the girl). My wife does not have to police anything in that regard and she knows it. Also, I'm sure I'm not the only guy with that mindset.  Bottom line: you should be careful with such generalisations, although I do not disagree with your call for caution.    

In reply to by MsCreant