Corporate Leverage Has Never Been Higher

With the following chart from Goldman's Robert Boroujerdi, we can finally close the book on whether US corporate leverage is at all time highs. It is... and it's even higher on a "normalized" basis.

As the Goldman strategist writes, even as corporate defaults remain near historically low levels, froth (there's that word again) "has been building in the form of corporate leverage. While this may not present a near-term risk, the widespread increase in debt resulting in stretched leverage metrics bears watching, in our opinion."

Goldman adds that while the pullback in Energy earnings in recent years has stressed aggregated Net Debt/EBITDA, even excluding that sector, the ratio is at the highest point since the financial crisis.

Finally, Boroujerdi makes an interesting caveat: "Given we are 8+ years into an economic expansion, we believe it’s prudent to also view this via a “normalized EBITDA” lens (i.e., median NTM 2007Q1-2017Q1). On this basis, aggregate leverage (ex- Energy) would move up to 2.1x, roughly 20% higher than current levels and 18% above the prior cycle peak."

As an aside, Goldman also notes that even as leverage, both gross, net and normalized, hits all time high, the scramble for high yield paper, represented by near record low HY spreads and yields, has never been greater. Here are Goldman's thoughts on the matter:

While much is rightfully made of the leadership of Tech, the promise of Financials and the conundrum of Low Vol, an area to which we believe investors should pay closer attention is the High Yield (HY) space. A combination of the search for yield, lack of supply and a benign default environment has driven HY spreads to near their tights. Meanwhile, much like the VIX, these spreads are diverging versus increased Policy Uncertainty – a historically strong relationship. Further, many equity market factors are increasingly correlated with HY spreads while the options market suggests concern on the come (e.g., elevated skew versus other fixed income markets). It is against this backdrop that we showcase the extremes forming and the historical “playbook” in terms of factor performance if spreads do widen. Hint: You sell growth.

  • TINA, at least when it comes to yield: US HY spreads have tightened 60bp in 2017 and are near the lowest level since the Great Recession. In yield terms, this equates to a yield-to-worst (YTW) of 5.5%, which is near multi-decade lows.
  • Fundamentals: Leverage stretched, defaults benign: Low rates have incentivized companies to raise debt and leverage is elevated. That said, defaults have been benign at about 2% over the last year (ex Energy, Metals & Mining), which is significantly below the 30-year average of 4.7% on the back of sustained, if uninspiring economic growth.
  • A word on technicals: The search for yield along with the recent lack of supply is also likely playing a role. Almost 1/3 of the YTD tightening occurred in July alone as primary market issuance was basically nonexistent ($9 bn, the 2nd slowest July since 2010).
  • Equity investors are paying attention: While low yields/tight spreads indicate that credit investors do not see much risk in their market, the strong performance of our Balance Sheet factor (Low Net Debt/EBITDA vs. High) this year suggests equity investors are increasingly nervous. Notably, this has been driven by both legs of the trade working – in plain English, this mean that names with low leverage have outperformed the average stock while those with weak balance sheets have underperformed.

And if anyone is still wondering whom to thank for this market distortion, read this.


LawsofPhysics Tue, 08/08/2017 - 09:40 Permalink

"At this point" I say fuck it, let corporations create their own digital currencies!  I mean why the fuck not? I'd much rather see a corporation that can make things of real value have access to money for free (ZIRP/NIRP) than all those useless fucks in banking and finance!!! "Full Faith and Credit" same as it ever was!!!

Too-Big-to-Bail (not verified) Tue, 08/08/2017 - 09:42 Permalink

Stock buybacks at 1% interest or even less -- it seems a cheap price to pay to maintain the illusion of Ponzi USA and also allow more dividends to be paid to yourself

Too-Big-to-Bail (not verified) LawsofPhysics Tue, 08/08/2017 - 09:47 Permalink

I always like reading your posts -- especially your unique signature "Tick, Tock motherfuckers!!" --- I hope you are right with that though, as the banksters are masters at controlling perceptions and have always been able to divide and conquer the masses to make them impotent to serve them the justice they deserve

In reply to by LawsofPhysics

Byrond Tue, 08/08/2017 - 09:49 Permalink

I see that US markets are red this morning. Seems a little ominous. Makes me wonder if the big borrowers have been waiting to tank the markets and alter interest rates. And I'm reminded of when I was in the Utah airport sometime in what I guess was 2008. CNN was displayed in the TVs, and the DOW had just dropped 800 points. And nobody seemed to have a clue. 

buzzsaw99 Tue, 08/08/2017 - 10:05 Permalink

the matt king thing is hardly a revelation.  central banks will always be there to guarantee that the wealth of the 1% is ever rising. always and forever.  amen.

Hal n back Tue, 08/08/2017 - 10:16 Permalink

imagine, if you will, interest rates go up and stocks go down.and then imagine all the companies that borrowed short term at 1% to buy back stocks-now cannot afford high interest rates so they have to issue stock at lower prices to raise cash to pay off debt.The Boards and officers of these companies wil be different people than those that carried out the scheme to give them highers valued stock options. But they will be blamed.An what if non gaap reporting went back to just being a footnote like it was 40 years ago to explain non recurring extraordinary items. which by the way the exercise of optiosn shoudl be an expense for compensation and I think its treated as and adjustment to ge tto non gaap. Ya need a full time staff to break down 10-k's and 10-Q's to see whats going on under the hood.and that staff has to be honest.