Israel Launches Air Strikes On Syria And Assad's "Waiting Game"

Immediately after Israel's latest unprovoked strike on Syria we posed the question, did Benjamin Netanyahu just panic? The answer is yes, Israel is now acting from a position of desperation as it has failed in its goal of regime change in Syria. Overnight (Wed. evening/Thursday early morning), Israel attacked a Syrian military base near the town of Masyaf at about 3:00 a.m. which Syria has now confirmed in a statement that warns of "serious repercussions". Syria reported two troop deaths in the attack. It appears to have been a massive strike - grainy photos show a large fireball lighting up the night sky outside of Masyaf.

Israel appears to have timed its attack to occur on the very night a controversial U.N. report was released earlier in the day (Wednesday) which blames the Assad government for using chemical weapons against civilians at Khan Sheikhoun in April. A number of Israeli analysts and media reports purport the Masyaf base to be a site for chemical and non-conventional weapons storage (such as "barrel bombs") while claiming the attack was motivated by "humanitarian" concern for Syrian civilians.


First image produced from Israeli strike on Al-Tala'i facility near Masyaf. Via Twitter.

But this is the reason for Israeli media and defense officials quickly claiming that the strike at Masyaf was on a chemical weapons facility: they know the "humanitarian" angle sells in the West, especially when coupled with allegations of civilians being gassed. Currently, this is putting the dubious and contested claim that the Syrian government attacked Khan Sheikhoun with sarin gas back in the spotlight at a time when Israel is eager to sell war for regime change while casting its actions in terms of protecting and defending civilians from a brutal dictator. In typical fashion the big newsrooms, which rarely report from inside Syria but instead opt for the comfort of Beirut, are uncritically echoing the "humanitarian airstrike" narrative. The New York Times, in a report filed from Jerusalem, narrates the attack as follows while relying on unnamed "former Israeli officials" and a single Syrian pro-opposition outlet:

Israeli officials did not comment on the strike, but a Syrian monitoring group and two former Israeli officials said it had targeted an installation of a government agency that produced chemical weapons and a military base that produced advanced missiles.

 

The strike came a day after a United Nations commission accused the Syrian government of using chemical weapons in an attack in April that killed dozens in the town of Khan Sheikhoun and flooded clinics with victims gasping for breath.

Initially some Syria observers questioned how the Israeli Air Force could strike so deep inside Syria with no response from the country's advanced Russian made S-400 anti-aircraft system. But it appears Syrian airspace was never violated as the Israeli jets reportedly fired from over Lebanon. Masyaf lies west of Hama and just north of the Lebanese border. While Israel's incursion into sovereign Lebanese airspace is illegal according to international law, Lebanon cannot respond as it has no air force nor does it possess adequate anti-aircraft missiles.


Close-up of the Israeli airstrike aftermath. Image source: Al-Masdar News

It is further significant that Israel chose to fire from over Lebanon (not for the first time) even though it has routinely violated Syrian air space in previous attacks. It appears that Israel calculated it's strike position to be in the vicinity of Russian military presence yet without forcing a Russian response by directly violating air space. The attack comes just over two weeks after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met with Vladimir Putin in Sochi. By many accounts the meeting was contentious as Netanyahu warned Putin that Israel would not tolerate Iranian presence in Syria. It was further revealed that a senior Israeli official accompanying Netanyahu on the trip threatened to assassinate Syrian President Assad by bombing his palace in Damascus, while further adding that Israel will seek to derail the US-Russia brokered de-escalation deal reached in Astana, Kazakhstan earlier this summer.

Russia’s Pravda described a frantic and upset Netanyahu at the Sochi talks with the following: “according to eyewitnesses of the open part of the talks, the Israeli prime minister was too emotional and at times even close to panic. He described a picture of the apocalypse to the Russian president that the world may see, if no efforts are taken to contain Iran, which, as Netanyahu believes, is determined to destroy Israel.”

At first glance it does appear that Netanyahu is now making good on his threats, but is this latest flagrant aggression against Syria a sign of more attacks to come? Will Netanyahu pursue escalation in the hope of dragging the US and other allies into war? It's not likely. Realistically that possibility ended when Syria retook Aleppo and with the US-Russia Astana 'de-escalation' deal which tacitly legitimized Iranian presence in Syria. Even some within the pro-opposition regime change crowd took to social media after the strike to say "too little, too late".  Simply put, Israel lost the covert war and is now left "holding the bag" while its more powerful allies pull out of the full push for regime change.

But what is clear is that Israel remains deeply uncomfortable with the Syrian Army's overwhelming momentum of late (just this week the army initiated the liberation of Deir Ezzor from ISIS) and seeks to keep the fires burning in Syria, at least enough to bog down Assad and Iran. Worse for Netanyahu, Hezbollah seems stronger than ever, along with the so-called 'resistance axis' that stretches from Tehran to South Lebanon.

Israeli officials have gone so far as to declare their preference for Islamic State terrorists on their border rather than allies of Iran. But as we've repeatedly pointed out, Israel is acting from a position of weakness and desperation. All that Netanyahu can hope for now is that an Israeli provocation leads to a direct Syrian military response, but it appears that Assad is not taking the bait.

In 2013 when Israel launched a massive missile attack against a Syrian defense technology facility in Jamraya outside of Damascus, it claimed to be attacking a parked Hezbollah weapons convoy. Perhaps more brazen was the 2016 attack targeting Damascus International Airport, which killed a well-known Hezbollah commander. And in a significant admission earlier this month, the head of Israel's air force acknowledged nearly one hundred IDF attacks on convoys inside Syria over the course of the past 5 years.

Netanyahu himself was recently caught on a hot mic bragging that Israel had struck Syrian targets at least "a dozen times". And this is to say nothing of Israel's covert support to al-Qaeda linked groups in Syria's south, which has reportedly involved weapons transfers and treatment of wounded jihadists in Israeli hospitals, the latter which was widely promoted in photo ops involving Netanyahu himself. As even former Acting Director of the CIA Michael Morell once directly told the Israeli public, Israel's "dangerous game" in Syria consists in getting in bed with al-Qaeda in order to fight Shia Iran.

Indeed Assad has not taken the bait for years now. While pro-government Syrians have themselves at times complained about Israel's seeming ability to strike inside sovereign Syrian territory with impunity, Assad has the long-game in mind of "survival now, retaliation later". It was clear from the start that Israel's attacks on largely non-strategic targets were more about provocation: should Damascus lob missiles back in Israel's direction Netanyahu would launch an all-out assault while Syria was at its weakest in the midst of a grinding and externally funded al-Qaeda insurgency.

Israel has also been careful to frame its actions in terms of counter-terror strikes on Hezbollah targets for the sake of maintaining an air of legitimacy to its aggression. But as the Astana agreement demonstrates (a strategic victory for Russia-Iran-Syria),  Syria's ability to absorb Israel's repeat provocations seems to be part of a strategic "waiting game" born of an accurate self assessment of past and current vulnerabilities. As The Century Foundation concludes:

Syria’s contemporary leaders seem to have adopted a simplified version of the “long breath strategy” of the former president—and father of Syria’s current leader—Hafez al Assad. This strategy was named for Syria’s ability to draw a deep breath and weather short-term pain and setbacks in pursuit of a better deal.

And this strategy seems to be working, resulting in a shift in perspective which is even beginning to permeate at least part of the Israeli defense establishment

A formerly very high-placed source in Israel’s security system spoke to Al-Monitor last week. He said on condition of anonymity, “It’s high time to admit that perhaps all our assessments were erroneous. The prevailing consensus of the last five years was that Syria will never return to its former state. We thought that however this turns out, the Syrian state as we knew it had passed from the world. But evidently we were wrong.”

 

Israel’s top decision-makers have not changed course, but it is likely that such arguments are heard in private discussions, and top-secret intelligence assessments see it as a real possibility that Assad is capable of outsmarting those who prematurely eulogized him and Syria as we knew it.

 

Syria is returning, that is clear now,” said the source. “It’s not about the quantity of territory, it’s about central rule. If nothing unexpected happens, in the near future, Assad will be declared the final, unequivocal winner of this war. Following that, the path to Syria’s rebuilding and reconstruction will be short.”

Concerning Israel's adventurist military action this week, contrary to the claims of unnamed "Israeli officials" who say the latest attack was against a branch of Syria's Scientific Studies and Research Center (SSRC), it is likely that this week's air strike was yet another "routine" attack on a Hezbollah weapons depot.

According to Elijah Magnier - a veteran Kuwait-based Middle East journalist, fluent Arabic speaker, and one who reports from on the ground in Syria (and has done so for years) - Israel in truth hit another Hezbollah weapons storehouse (not a chemical weapons production facility). But with renewed claims that Syrian government possesses and has used sarin gas, Israel is seeking to maximize the propaganda value of the strike. After all, the world's attention now seems far away from Syria and the Israeli gloves are off. Israel will do and say whatever it can to get the wheels of internationally backed regime change in motion again.

Comments

Swampster (not verified) Fri, 09/08/2017 - 07:27 Permalink

DEATH TO RACIST ANTI-SEMITIC ISRAEL  The destruction of cultural heritage by ISUS.....https://www.google.com/search?q=ISIS+DESTROYS+STATUES&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8… when the jew run media ran videos of ISUS destroying cultural heritage sites in Syria and other Arabic countries, and pretended to be outraged?Well how stupid are you GOYIM not to see that ISUS IS DOING THE SAME THING IN AMERICA?DESTROYING WHITE CULTURAL HERITAGE SITES AND DEMONIZING WHITES NIGHTLY ON THE 'NEWS'The 'nazi jews want whites and all white culture DEAD! Look around you, stupid GOYIM!THE SAME NAZI JEWS ARE BEHIND BOTH CAMPAIGNS...ISUS ....because it IS ISrael, and UShttps://www.google.com/search?q=DESTROYING+CONFEDERATE+HISTORY+STATUES&…

MillionDollarBonus_ Déjà view Fri, 09/08/2017 - 08:09 Permalink

I absolutely share congress’s strong, bipartisan support for Israel. Israel is our greatest ally in the whole wide world, and if they’re engaging in this conflict, we should assist them unquestioningly. Some relationships are too important to break, simply for the sake of petty “principles”.An Exciting Update From Presidential Candidate Abu Berete

In reply to by Déjà view

J S Bach Took Red Pill Fri, 09/08/2017 - 08:59 Permalink

Can one imagine ANY other country indiscriminately bombing Dimona in Israhell because of an allegation that they might be producing illegal weapons there?  Of course not.  But, when you're God's self-chosen... well, you can just do whatever you damn-well please and the rest of the world has to suck it up.When will this double-standard lunacy end regarding this insane, hubristic and arrogant tribe of neanderthals?

In reply to by Took Red Pill

JSBach1 MillionDollarButter Fri, 09/08/2017 - 11:47 Permalink

"... By many accounts the meeting was contentious as Netanyahu warned Putin that Israel would not tolerate Iranian presence in Syria. It was further revealed that a senior Israeli official accompanying Netanyahu on the trip threatened to assassinate Syrian President Assad by bombing his palace in Damascus..." Make no mistake about it, if all else fails, this will be the last resort -- in the form of some type of accident or self-afflicted deed of course --, but not before a massive distraction somewhere else.

In reply to by MillionDollarButter

HowdyDoody JSBach1 Fri, 09/08/2017 - 14:52 Permalink

It looks like the IAF aircraft flew almost all the way through Lebanese airspace to launch its 60km range glidebomb. So did the Zionist stooges in the Lebanese government give the OK for this? /rhetoricalIsrael is really panicking about the capabilities of Hezbollah and the Palestine militias, not to mention Iran. Their glorious plan to takeover more of the Golan whilst further weakening neighboring Arab states has gone totally wrong. 

In reply to by JSBach1

Escrava Isaura beemasters Sat, 09/09/2017 - 08:11 Permalink

/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin-top:0in;
mso-para-margin-right:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt;
mso-para-margin-left:0in;
line-height:115%;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}
Distract Attention? Wonder what Trump will do when is his turn. Let me guess? Anyway, Israel after having their temples destroyed, and their people killed a few times over, made a leap into the future by protecting its future: Attack them first. It sounds a pretty conservative approach to avoid a big war.  

In reply to by beemasters

veritas semper… J S Bach Fri, 09/08/2017 - 12:39 Permalink

I think ,pretty soon. They lost the war in Syria. They have a panick attack ,as illustrated by Bibi's hysteria when meeting with Mr. Putin. The zionist entity is exposed for the world to see its true nature,and no MSM make up is going to save it. No uncle Sam BS is going to matter any more. They are all covered in blood,and everybody knows the US,UK,Israel created ISIS. Indisputable.This attack was done to boost the moral of the losing ISIS/Alqaeda. Israel never attacked them.But, the three bloody stooges ,the creators of the terrorists(plus the 4th ,their spiritual leader,Saudi Arabia) are LOSERS. I can not tell you how much satisfaction I get when I say this.

In reply to by J S Bach

Shemp 4 Victory Took Red Pill Fri, 09/08/2017 - 08:28 Permalink

 

A number of Israeli analysts and media reports purport the Masyaf base to be a site for chemical and non-conventional weapons storage (such as "barrel bombs") while claiming the attack was motivated by "humanitarian" concern for Syrian civilians.

Made me laugh. Did Samantha Power write this drivel? Israeli analysts are now scraping the bottom of the barrel (bomb). Everyone knows that "barrel bombs" are made in the same fantasy factory as The White Helmets and Bana the Seven-year-old Tweeter from Aleppo

In reply to by Took Red Pill

fleur de lis Gazooks Fri, 09/08/2017 - 08:48 Permalink

The Israelis really need to do something about their nantional paranoia.Launching attacks for something that might happen is not a sign of mental health.Launching attacks on the basis of past history is even worse.They see Nazis under the bed then lash out with weapons.Weapons that are paid for with American tax money.That money would be better used by paying psychaiatrists to treat neurotic paranoia that seeem to be so widespread.  

In reply to by Gazooks

Killdo smacker Sat, 09/09/2017 - 13:42 Permalink

yes - one of the things psychopaths love to do is to make others feel sorry for them - described nicely inthis good book:  https://www.amazon.com/Psychopath-Test-Journey-Through-Industry-ebook/d… that's also a good way to identify psychopaths: trying to elicit sympathy while at the same time being ruthless towards others, especially the weaker ones. Serbs were also killed in Nazi concentration camps - but I have never seen or heard anyone in Serbia actually mention it since I was a kid decades ago. my throry is that Zionists are psychopaths aggreagated as a country (kind o flike corporations) to understand how they operate you have to understand how psychopaths work

In reply to by smacker

Jim in MN Took Red Pill Fri, 09/08/2017 - 09:42 Permalink

The REAL problem appears to be....peace!!!I am going to do some independent research but I think that all the major cities in the Middle East are now at peace.This may be the first time in decades, or possibly a generation.....Still killing people in Yemen and Afghanistan, but it's a pretty remarkable change overall.Thank you President Trump, and the populist revolution, for saving many, many innocent lives.Warmongers can go straight to Hell--the only question being the rate of travel.

In reply to by Took Red Pill

TheGardener Jim in MN Fri, 09/08/2017 - 13:25 Permalink

"Peace in the Middle East " is considered an anti-semitic statement as it might imply the removal of one of the responsible semitic tribes bearing trouble for millenia. What´s the fun of being universally hated ? Living up to to it to the bit !Israel proper could be admired for their blood and honour defiance but why have the US suffer not only this intellectual holocaust support upon their white inhabitants but the added insult of it being lead apparantely by said compromised Americans which display themselfes as a renewed Jewish problem but with an American magnitude ?

In reply to by Jim in MN