Why Doesn't Janet Yellen Resign?

Authored by Raul Ilargi Meijer via The Automatic Earth blog,

You would think, certainly if you were as naive and innocent as I am, that when you get offered the job of Chair of the Federal Reserve, you must be sure, before accepting, that you have the credentials and the knowledge required. If you don’t, it looks as if you don’t take the job seriously. Janet Yellen, who’s been Chair since January 2014, doesn’t seem to agree.

In a speech Tuesday for the National Association for Business Economics Yellen ‘honestly’ admitted that she doesn’t understand inflation, control of which is the Fed’s no.1 task (it’s debatable whether that’s a good idea). She doesn’t understand a bunch of other issues either. Those are her own words, not mine. Here are these own words:

“My colleagues and I may have misjudged the strength of the labor market, the degree to which longer-run inflation expectations are consistent with our inflation objective, or even the fundamental forces driving inflation..”

Clear enough, you would think. But she didn’t offer her resignation. And for an important post like Fed chair, that is a major problem. As she undoubtedly does. So why is she keeping her job? Doesn’t she realize that when you don’t understand the issues you deal with, you’re prone to make disastrous mistakes?

Yellen and her colleagues work with models, and the models are wrong. The Fed’s predictions for things like inflation are ridiculously off, all the time. That may be news to her, but it’s old hash for many people in her field. So that she’s surrounded solely by people who don’t understand these things either is not an excuse.

So what does she expect now? That she will start to understand them all of a sudden, after years and years of not being able to? That reality will change to comply with her models? We can discount the option that she will suddenly begin using entirely different models, they’re all she has. But what then?

Under her predecessor Ben Bernanke, who never conceded he had no idea either but still didn’t, the Fed lowered interest rates to near zero Kelvin and bought trillions of dollars in bonds and securities. Now Yellen for some reason thinks it’s time to get rid of the stuff.

But on what basis does she make such a decision, if she self-admittedly doesn’t even understand the fundamental forces in play? How is that different from handing a box of matches to a 3-year old? Isn’t she really simply an academic dropped in a casino? From CNBC:

Yellen said a regular pace of rate hikes ahead is likely still warranted, though Fed officials are looking closely at the assumptions underlying those projections. While conceding that the Fed may need to slow the removal of accommodation, she also said the central bank “should also be wary of moving too gradually.”

There comes a point when naive innocent me starts asking: what does that even mean? Rate hikes are warranted but we don’t know why? Accommodative policies have been going too fast but they shouldn’t be too slow? Based on what? It can only be based on models that have proven faulty, can’t it, because they have no others.

*  *  *

Here are a few pointers for the occupants of the Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building.

Inflation is money velocity multiplied by money and credit supply. MV = PY. M is money supply, V is velocity, P is price level and real GDP is Y.

Velocity of money means consumer spending. 70% of US GDP is consumer spending. But American consumers are neck deep in debt and have very little money left to spend. Much of what they spend, they must borrow.78% of Americans live paycheck to paycheck. So forget about money velocity.


Moreover, as for the Fed’s second mandate after inflation, full employment, they don’t get that one either.

They seem to act on the presumption that any one job is just like the other. And then bleat: “My colleagues and I may have misjudged the strength of the labor market”.

But America has turned into a nation where the gig economy (the natural successor to first the knowledge economy, then the service economy), waiters, greeters and people working 3 jobs just to make ends meet have become the norm. When in the present circumstances you claim to have almost ‘achieved’ full employment, as Yellen and the Fed do, you must really be blind as a bat.

The other side of the equation is money supply. Interestingly, the Fed has issued tons of it, but handed it all to its owner banks. If they had spent it inside the economy itself, we could have been looking at a whole other picture. If those trillions would have gone to investment, manufacturing etc., instead of propping up banks and companies buying their own shares, Yellen might have actually seen some inflation.

If Americans have no money to spend, there can not be inflation. Simple. But the same stupid faulty predictions just keep coming:


So why is anybody still paying attention to Janet Yellen? Well, because she has her finger on the biggest financial trigger on the planet. No matter how shaky and uneducated that finger may be. Or do we pay attention exactly because we know what’s behind that shaky finger? Do we all put everything on red just because grandma does it too?

The craziest thing of all is that in reactions in the media to Yellen’s speech, she’s praised for admitting she has no clue what she’s doing. That takes the cake. And eats it too. Praised for admitting you’re terribly unfit for your job. That’s just great. That’s Bizarro world.

It’s well past best before time to get rid of Janet Yellen, and all the intellectual but idiots who work at the Fed. What is it, 1,000 PhDs, or was that 10,000? But the only thing that makes any real sense of course, the only thing that can save the nation, is to get rid of the Fed and its braindead mandates, interests and occupants altogether.

Hedgeye got this one painfully right:

And yeah, I know Yellen could be fired too if she doesn’t resign, but with Goldman Sachs all over the White House, what are the odds? And who would come in when she goes? She’s ideal, who’s going to get angry at a barely 5′ grandmother even is she clearly out of her depth and league?


hongdo illuminatus Wed, 09/27/2017 - 14:38 Permalink

Exactly.  Just focus on what they do and the consequences and ignore what they say.  I know it can be hard to finally really believe that some people lie blatently in spite of the facts and their own actions, but it is in plain sight over and over again. Commenting on what people say is being too lazy (or self-serving talking your own book) to actually look at the actions and effects and having enough confidence in your own analysis to put it out there and take responsibility.   "I know I was wrong but that is what they told me."The entire govt is full of Bagdad Bobs and the MSM is full of Bagdad Bob regurgitation.  If someone lies to you, why do you even listen the next time they open their mouth?

In reply to by illuminatus

lester1 Wed, 09/27/2017 - 12:38 Permalink

Ole Yeller is just like Hillary. She thinks too highly of herself. She thinks she's entitled to the position.Plus someone has to run the PPT.

NickyGall Wed, 09/27/2017 - 12:24 Permalink

As shown in this article, the Federal Reserve and other central banks are facing an issue that they cannot defeat: https://viableopposition.blogspot.ca/2017/07/demographics-central-banke…
/* Style Definitions */
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
 Ms. Yellen is well aware that central bankers have no way to reverse the changes in the global economy.

chestergimli JRobby Wed, 09/27/2017 - 14:11 Permalink

These people are, for the vast most part Jews. What were they called in the thousands of years past? Who knows. They are just spitting a bunch of Jabbertalky at the rest of us. They, as well as their predecessors in the far distant past, know and knew that their monetary system was a failure. But by utilizing it, they made themselves kings for a day.

In reply to by JRobby

NoWayJose Wed, 09/27/2017 - 12:30 Permalink

She only has a few months anyway. If she can hold the economy and stocks and debt bubble from collapsing until then, she can leave peacefully and be hailed as the Fed Chair for a long expansion without a market crash. Lots of well paid speaking gigs, then good words for her obit and history books.

shizzledizzle Wed, 09/27/2017 - 12:34 Permalink

I try to be mindful of the little indicators that are easily overlooked... I was just checking my email and saw the subject of "Fed News | Rates Stay Low | Lock Yours" from quicken loans. Now not only is my news saturated with what the FED is doing but now personal communications telling me what they are doing... I'm relectant to call a top but it sure seems that their jawboning is losing efectiveness and they are getting desperate. Ready for this Job to end so I can go to the farm, disconnect myself from communications and not have to listen about these thieves day in and day out. Ready for some fishing and hunting.   

hanekhw Wed, 09/27/2017 - 12:39 Permalink

Her mirror tells her every morning who she is and she's always ready with that poison apple and her disguise should any competition arise. The apple isn't red. It's a golden delicious with a bitcoin sticker.

Zepper Wed, 09/27/2017 - 12:56 Permalink

Resign? Are you fucking kidding me! The Jew Tribe is going to start giving her medals... the woman tribe is going to start building statues of her to place in parks.  Job well done Mrs. Stroke Victim. You have thoroughly fucked the middle class, while saving the wealthy and poorly run corporations. Mr. and Mrs. Jones are 65 and have yet to pay off their home and their children are still living with them working part time jobs at McDonalds with Bachelor degrees no less.

rejected earleflorida Wed, 09/27/2017 - 14:08 Permalink

All they had to do was revalue the price of gold.FDR did this, debasing gold from $20.67 to $35 about 60%.People in 1933, just as people now, believe whatever the government utters and pay little to no attention to what government does. Why? Because it's easier and requires no action.Government,,, once established,,,  is no better than the Mafia or other organized crime syndicates. Often much worse.

In reply to by earleflorida

rejected Wed, 09/27/2017 - 13:17 Permalink

The People deserved the FRB for not preventing its passage in the early 1900'sThe present day People deserve the FRB for not demanding it's elimination.

Madison's_Ghost Wed, 09/27/2017 - 13:23 Permalink

When you are driving a tank through daisies, it doesnt matter how good a driver you are, the daisies get crushed regardless. short version:  The FED is the problem, not the its Chair.

KingTut Wed, 09/27/2017 - 13:24 Permalink

Yellen would never resign, because she cannot understand why she should.  She is surrounded with people who think and believe exactly as she does.  They're all PhD economists, trained in the same theories and doctrines as she.  She worked her way up the Fed ladder by being a peacemaker and consensus builder, which to her way of thinking is exactly how the Fed should be run.

FlKeysFisherman Wed, 09/27/2017 - 16:45 Permalink

The author needs to understand that just because Yellen says something doesn't make it the case. She could be, wait for it, LYING.The naivety in this country never ceases to amaze.

gregga777 Wed, 09/27/2017 - 18:48 Permalink

The sole, true mandate of Goldman Sachs' Feral Reserve System is to make the rich richer, by stealing from the poor and middle class, thereby greatly increasing income and wealth inequality. Any muppets, er, I mean suckers, er, whatever, that did not not lose everything in the bursting of the previous two bubbles, are scheduled for pauperization in the upcoming planned bursting of the third Feral Reserve System boom-bust cycle this century. The Feral Reserve System criminals are extremely proficient at enriching their obscenely rich masters. They will lie to anyone and everyone about their true purposes but, their actions shows all that anyone needs to understand their evil purposes.

The Goldman Sachs Feral Reserve System's motto is:

"We steal from those who can least afford it and give to those who least deserve it."

much obliged Thu, 09/28/2017 - 13:24 Permalink

Quote: "...when you get offered the job of Chair of the Federal Reserve, you must be sure, before accepting, that you have the credentials and the knowledge required."I would have thought that whoever offered the job would make sure that the recipient had credentials.