"He Shivved Me": Angry Hillary Lashes Out At Comey And Assange In Australian TV Interview

An angry Hillary Clinton has been making the rounds in recent weeks blaming all the usual suspects for her election loss last year...you know, Assange, Comey, the unfortunate mall cop who tripped over a microphone cord and ruined her speech at the Little Rock Mall food court in 1984...

But we can't remember a recent interview in which the former presidential candidate came off quite so bitter as when she sat down with Australian anchor Sarah Ferguson of 4 Corners for an interview that aired earlier today.

On Assange, Clinton described him as a "tool of Russian intelligence" and scoffed at the idea that he's a "martyr for free speech and freedom of information."

Clinton “I think Assange has become a nihilistic opportunist who does the bidding of a dictator [Putin]."


Ferguson:  "Lots of people, including in Australia, that that Assange is a martyr for free speech and freedom of information.  How would you describe him?"


Clinton:  “I mean, he’s a tool of Russian intelligence.  If he’s such a martyr for free speech, why doesn’t WikiLeaks ever publish anything coming out of Russia?”


Ferguson:  “Isn’t he just doing what journalists do which is publish information when they get it?”


Clinton:  “I don’t think so.  I think for number one, it’s stolen information, and number two, if all you did was publish it, that would be one thing, but there was a concerted operation between WikiLeaks and Russia and most likely, people in the United States to, as I say, weaponized that information.”


On Comey, Hillary is apparently convinced that "shivving someone" and "investigating a series of federal crimes" are phrases that can be used interchangeably.

Ferguson:  "You say Jim Comey shivved me."


Clinton:  "Oh, he did.  Well he did shiv me.  Yeah.  There's never been a good explanation as to why he did what he did."


Meanwhile, and not terribly surprisingly, Hillary says that Trump is the most "dangerous President the U.S. has ever had" and she suggests that "the whole world should be concerned."

"I think he is because he is impulsive.  He lacks self control.  He is totally consumer by how he is viewed and what people think of him.  He is vindictive."


"I think the whole world should be concerned."


Finally, Hillary shares her opinion that Fox News has morphed into an "advocacy outfit" that is just not "journalism anymore."

"I think Fox News has been a pernicious influence on our elections, ever since it came into being, back in the early 90s and I think that they're an advocacy outfit, they're not journalism anymore."


And while she didn't specifically share her opinions on MSNBC, WaPo, CNN and the New York Times, we presume she sees those 'outfits' as something other than liberal advocacy groups?

For those interested, the full interview can be enjoyed here:


IH8OBAMA Hugh_Jorgan Mon, 10/16/2017 - 17:57 Permalink

Sorry for posting this long letter from an unknown writer but it's worth reading. My Leftist friends (as well as many ardent #NeverTrumpers) constantly ask me if I’m not bothered by Donald Trump’s lack of decorum. They ask if I don’t think his tweets are “beneath the dignity of the office.” Here’s my answer: We Right-thinking people have tried dignity. There could not have been a man of more quiet dignity than George W. Bush as he suffered the outrageous lies and politically motivated hatreds that undermined his presidency. We tried statesmanship. Could there be another politician on this earth who so desperately prized “collegiality” as John McCain? We tried propriety – has there been a nicer presidential candidate ever than Mitt Romney? And the results were always the same. This is because, while we were playing by the rules of dignity, collegiality and propriety, the Left has been, for the past 60 years, engaged in a knife fight where the only rules are those of Saul Alinsky and the Chicago mob. I don’t find anything “dignified,” “collegial” or “proper” about Barack Obama’s lying about what went down on the streets of Ferguson in order to ramp up racial hatreds because racial hatred serves the Democratic Party. I don’t see anything “dignified” in lying about the deaths of four Americans in Benghazi and imprisoning an innocent filmmaker to cover your tracks. I don’t see anything “statesman-like” in weaponizing the IRS to be used to destroy your political opponents and any dissent. Yes, Obama was “articulate” and “polished” but in no way was he in the least bit “dignified,” “collegial” or “proper.” The Left has been engaged in a war against America since the rise of the Children of the ‘60s. To them, it has been an all-out war where nothing is held sacred and nothing is seen as beyond the pale. It has been a war they’ve fought with violence, the threat of violence, demagoguery and lies from day one – the violent take-over of the universities – through today. The problem is that, through these years, the Left has been the only side fighting this war. While the Left has been taking a knife to anyone who stands in their way, the Right has continued to act with dignity, collegiality and propriety. With Donald Trump, this all has come to an end. Donald Trump is America ’s first wartime president in the Culture War. During wartime, things like “dignity” and “collegiality” simply aren’t the most essential qualities one looks for in their warriors. Ulysses Grant was a drunk whose behavior in peacetime might well have seen him drummed out of the Army for conduct unbecoming. Had Abraham Lincoln applied the peacetime rules of propriety and booted Grant, the Democrats might well still be holding their slaves today. Lincoln rightly recognized that, “I cannot spare this man. He fights.” General George Patton was a vulgar-talking, son-of-a-bitch. In peacetime, this might have seen him stripped of rank. But, had Franklin Roosevelt applied the normal rules of decorum then, Hitler and the Socialists would barely be five decades into their thousand-year Reich. Trump is fighting. And what’s particularly delicious is that, like Patton standing over the battlefield as his tanks obliterated Rommel’s, he’s shouting, “You magnificent bastards, I read your book!” That is just the icing on the cake, but it’s wonderful to see that not only is Trump fighting, he’s defeating the Left using their own tactics. That book is Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals – a book so essential to the Liberals’ war against America that it is and was the playbook for the entire Obama administration and the subject of Hillary Clinton’s senior thesis. It is a book of such pure evil, that, just as the rest of us would dedicate our book to those we most love or those to whom we are most indebted, Alinsky dedicated his book to Lucifer. Trump’s tweets may seem rash and inconsiderate but, in reality, he is doing exactly what Alinsky suggested his followers do. First, instead of going after “the fake media” — and they are so fake that they have literally gotten every single significant story of the past 60 years not just wrong, but diametrically opposed to the truth, from the Tet Offensive to Benghazi, to what really happened on the streets of Ferguson, Missouri — Trump isolated CNN. He made it personal. Then, just as Alinsky suggests, he employs ridicule which Alinsky described as “the most powerful weapon of all.” ... Most importantly, Trump’s tweets have put CNN in an untenable and unwinnable position..... They need to respond. This leaves them with only two choices. They can either “go high” (as Hillary would disingenuously declare of herself as the fake news would disingenuously report as the truth) and begin to honestly and accurately report the news. Or they can double-down on their usual tactics and hope to defeat Trump with twice their usual hysteria and demagoguery. The problem for CNN (et al.) with the former is that, if they were to start honestly reporting the news, that would be the end of the Democratic Party they serve. It is nothing but the incessant use of fake news (read: propaganda) that keeps the Left alive. Imagine, for example, if CNN had honestly and accurately reported then-candidate Barack Obama’s close ties to foreign terrorists (Rashid Khalidi), domestic terrorists (William Ayers), the mafia (Tony Rezko) or the true evils of his spiritual mentor, Jeremiah Wright’s Church.  Imagine if they had honestly and accurately conveyed the evils of the Obama administration’s weaponizing of the IRS to be used against their political opponents or his running of guns to the Mexican cartels or the truth about the murder of Ambassador Christopher Stevens and the Obama administration’s cover-up. So, to my friends on the Left — and the #NeverTrumpers as well — do I wish we lived in a time when our president could be “collegial” and “dignified” and “proper”? Of course I do. These aren’t those times.  This is war. And it’s a war that the Left has been fighting without opposition for the past 50 years. So, say anything you want about this president - I get it - he can be vulgar, he can be crude, he can be undignified at times. I don’t care. I can’t spare this man. He fights for America!

In reply to by Hugh_Jorgan

Manthong espirit Mon, 10/16/2017 - 20:04 Permalink

  "He Shivved Me"   OK, you evil twat…. You mean like with a cloth? ..or maybe like with a bayonet AS YOU IMPLIED...  “we came, we saw” WE SHIVVED HIM UP THE ASS WITH A LONG KNIFE.  ..that kind of evil punishment should only be reserved for the likes of Dimons, Blankf*cks, Bloomenbergens undt Soros.   

In reply to by espirit

Blue Steel 309 IH8OBAMA Mon, 10/16/2017 - 18:17 Permalink

+1 for some good points.

"We" needs to be understood as the people voting for the people we THOUGHT were representing us.

Now we know the Uniparty exists and there is rarely (and by rarely I don't mean that they are all bad except for "your guy") a person in feral (scratch that for political) office that wouldn't destroy this country to avoid exposure/or a quick buck.

In reply to by IH8OBAMA

So It Goes smithcreek Mon, 10/16/2017 - 17:35 Permalink

Just started watching the whole interview.  She has aged so much since that pic of her at Trump's inauguration.  Aged 10 years in one year.And such inappropriate smiling and facial grimacing - totally not in touch with feelings.  A true psychopath - fascinating.  We escaped her by the skin of our teeth.Bombard's body language could have a field day with this interview.  Although very sad - I am truly entertained.  Like Nixon, she will never admit to anything and will die a limited and unsatisfied life.  RIP Hillary.

In reply to by smithcreek