Maxine Waters Threatens To "Go And Take Out 'Moron' Trump", The Most "Dangerous President Ever"

It's been a big weekend for California Congresswoman Maxine Waters.

Having slammed White House Chief of Staff John Kelly on Saturday for defending President Donald Trump's conversation with a Gold Star family, demanding that he apologize for his remarks toward Democratic Rep. Frederica Wilson of Florida...

"Gen. Kelly has been tainted by Trump lying in the face of facts. Hasn’t he seen the same video of Rep. Wilson that everyone else has seen?"

 

“If the wife and family of Sgt. Johnson feel they were disrespected by Trump, then they were disrespected. Period!”

Waters quickly turned her attention back to President Trump, calling him a 'moron'...

“Gen. Kelly, you earned 4 stars & had a successful career. Now you’ve fallen prey to a ‘moron’ in an effort to protect his career. Apologize.”

Then, later in the day, as SHTFplan.com's Alex Thomas reports, during an appearance at the Ali Forney Center gal in New York City, Congresswoman and “impeachment minstrel” Maxine Waters promised a roaring crowd that she would “take out” the president that very night – a statement that has left many wondering if this was a direct threat on President Trump’s life or whether it was some sort of sick joke. (especially in the wake of Rep. Steve Scalise being shot by a liberal).

Waters made the promise to the group, which benefits homeless LGBTQ youth, amid the backdrop of violence against conservatives and the mainstream media literally picking apart every single thing Trump says or does for any hint of something to attack him over. Its safe to assume they won’t be doing the same after Waters disgusting remarks.

“I’m sitting here listening, watching, absorbing, thinking about Ali even though I never met him. And with this kind of inspiration, I will go and take out Trump tonight,” Waters stunningly said.

Amazingly, according to a report in The American Mirror, YouTube quickly deleted the original video showing Waters remarks. The above video was uploaded as a replacement and could be deleted by the left-wing company at any time.

At the same time that a high-profile Democratic Congresswoman is openly joking(?) about taking out the president, the head of the Democratic Party is ramping up the rhetoric against him as well, telling a DNC committee gathering that Trump was the most dangerous president ever while urging his fractured party to unite against all things Donald Trump.

“We have the most dangerous president in American history and one of the most reactionary Congresses in American history,” Democratic Chairman Tom Perez said during his speech.

Perez also labeled Trump an “existential threat” with no apparent worry that his words could be taken, along with those by Waters and other liberals in the media, as ammunition for a crazy leftist to once again attack Congress or even the White House.

Perez’s comments come as he reorganizes the DNC to better serve establishment candidates, pushing out several prominent Bernie Sanders supporters while pretending the shuffle was about diversity when in reality it was a transparent move to make sure he can control who the party supports for president in 2020.

Going back to liberals seemingly embracing violent rhetoric against the president, it is important to keep in mind that the mainstream media themselves are also directly complicit in this move towards violence as they have either contributed to the vicious rhetoric or refused to call out those that have.

One can only hope that another attack doesn’t actually happen. If it does, we know who to blame.

Comments

Escrava Isaura Richard Chesler Sun, 10/22/2017 - 12:31 Permalink

/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin-top:0in;
mso-para-margin-right:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt;
mso-para-margin-left:0in;
line-height:115%;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}
Wonder why Trump married Easter European women instead American? American women wants nothing to do with the Trump’s like. And these women have a long list why not.  

In reply to by Richard Chesler

Bay of Pigs loebster Sun, 10/22/2017 - 13:03 Permalink

"Maxine Waters was born in St. Louis, Missouri, the fifth of 13 children reared by a single mother. She began working at age 13 in factories and segregated restaurants. After moving to Los Angeles, she worked in garment factories and at the telephone company. She attended California State University at Los Angeles, where she earned a Bachelor of Arts degree. She began her career in public service as a teacher and a volunteer coordinator in the Head Start program."

https://waters.house.gov/about-maxine/biography

One question. How does a "single mother" have 13 children and raise them all by herself? And who paid for all these kids to stay alive? Certainly not her "single mother". Impossible.

In reply to by loebster

cheeseheader ReturnOfDaMac Sun, 10/22/2017 - 14:44 Permalink

I imagine BofPs, and myself, and most all others on this board had a hand in helping Max's momma feed her and her siblings as I also imagine there was welfare involved...since so-called devoted daddy(s) - -that would be responsible father - -flew the coop.  Clever?...I think not. Prohibit birth control?? No, we just don't want to pay for others' birth control.  We normal citizens are all about personal accountability.

In reply to by ReturnOfDaMac

ReturnOfDaMac cheeseheader Sun, 10/22/2017 - 23:49 Permalink

Understand your sentiment cheesehead.  In the real world, humans are sexual beings. No matter what we think, no matter how much jeebus you preach, humans are going to have sex. If you have sex, its possible to create little people.  Little people have to eat, it matters not how they came to be or even if they "should" have come to be at all.  They simply are.  Realizing this, what is the better option, pay a tiny amount to help support birth control, or pay a very very large amount to feed little people.  My rational mind says its better to help women pay for birth control than to support accidental people creation for 18 years or more (if they wind up in prison).Thats how I reason.  I think this  is a little more realistic in the dealing with the real world and what really happens as opposed to what I "wish" would happen.  I've seen you post, you're a smart guy. What do you really think?

In reply to by cheeseheader

ReturnOfDaMac ThanksChump Mon, 10/23/2017 - 00:16 Permalink

Never been a democrat in my life. I'm pro-life, always.  Thats my belief system, but I'm 100% against goobermint busybodies dictating what families do in their reproductive choices.  In other words, I truly hate using state power to impose my belief system on others.  It's between the woman, the man, and whatever sky-gawd (if any) they believe.  That is the most anti-American thing I can imagine.  As for squirrel holing, to me simplification is a good human characteristic.  Boils through the bullshit and gets to the core.  My reloonican friends practice "obfuscation" in other words, disguising their theocratic bullshit intentions with flowery rhetoric.

In reply to by ThanksChump

doctor10 loebster Sun, 10/22/2017 - 13:43 Permalink

You still have your hand out to Soros and the CGI/CF looking for the same peice of actionsome of the Black Congressional Caucus was obviously getting?A race war at home is second best to war with Russia for obscuring a whole messa nonsense and criminal Bolshevik RICO activity over a coupla decades. 

In reply to by loebster