Democrats Distance Themselves From Hillary: "New" DNC Denies Knowledge Of Trump Dossier Funding

Following the shocking (to some) revelations from WaPo with regard Hillary Clinton and the 'old' Democratic National Committee's financing of the infamous "Trump Dossier," the 'new' DNC has rushed out a press release denying any involvement as Democrats begin rapidly distancing themselves from this un-fake news.

In a brief statement from DNC Comms Director Xochitl Hinojosa,

"Tom Perez and the new leadership of the DNC were not involved in any decision-making regarding Fusion-GPS, nor were they aware that Perkins Coie was working with the organization."

Of course, the DNC then added - for good measure...

"But let's be clear, there is a serious federal investigation into the Trump campaign's ties to Russia, and the American public deserves to know what happened."

All of which is quite ironic following Perez' comments during the week:

“We have the most dangerous president in American history and one of the most reactionary Congresses in American history,” Democratic Chairman Tom Perez said during his speech.

 

Perez also labeled Trump an “existential threat” with no apparent worry that his words could be taken, along with those by Waters and other liberals in the media, as ammunition for a crazy leftist to once again attack Congress or even the White House.

And even more ironic in light of the increasing evidence and investigation surrounding Hillary Clinton's dealing with the Russians over Uranium One.

But back to the Hillary Clinton crisis of the night, Fox News' Brooke Singman noted:

As The 'New' DNC itself said: "the American people deserve to know what happened."

While it is unclear whether CNBC's John Harwood, or anyone on MSNBC, will touch this topic, The White House is already asking questions...

...which must mean "it's a vast right wing conspiracy."

Comments

ACP Manthong Wed, 10/25/2017 - 00:47 Permalink

The thing is, Trump is so transparent, eveyone knows who he is, what he's done, everybody knows all the dirt and everything about him, no secrecy whatsoever, and the more the globalists fight him, the more they lose.How is this even possible?It seems the truth really does set you free.

In reply to by Manthong

KrazyMax ACP Wed, 10/25/2017 - 03:42 Permalink

Having once worked at a NIDA drug testing lab, responsible for maunfacturing "spiked" (and tested) specimens, used to check the accuracy (quality control) of other NIDA drug testing labs, I can tell you that stale urine smells considerably worse than fresh urine!

In reply to by ACP

ACP philipat Wed, 10/25/2017 - 00:57 Permalink

Because he's stuck in the 1850s when gentlemen had duels.The guy still lives in an era where people let bygones be bygones and people agree to let things go. He doesn't realize that the left is out for blood, and will not stop and not let bygones be bygones. He's also obviously in over his head and a pussy when it comes to confrontation. 

In reply to by philipat

aurum4040 philipat Wed, 10/25/2017 - 03:53 Permalink

The DOJ is discuusing it now. I dont think theres a way around it though because the precedent was already set in a previous case. Meaning the NDA is not binding in the event Congress wants to question him. They will, this time its real - Wapo has turned against her. We need make sure shes imprisoned for life.

In reply to by philipat

MisterMousePotato wcole225 Wed, 10/25/2017 - 02:14 Permalink

Just a day or two ago, I was pondering why people believe things that are not true, and then I realized that that was not the question. The mystery is why do people (the left, especially) believe things that they know to be false?For instance (I have a half dozen examples), they believe in global warming, despite (or maybe because - I don't get it) the fact that Messrs. Mann and Hanson, et al., all have said, "We're lying to you, and here's the proof."I find this strange.

In reply to by wcole225

MoreFreedom MagicHandPuppet Wed, 10/25/2017 - 16:28 Permalink

I especially liked Tucker Carson's report last night, that Paul Manafort (temporarily Trump's campaign manager) was working for Russian interests to get the US uranium deal, and spending a lot of time at the Podesta Group to do it. In other words, Manafort worked for the Russians and Hillary who both wanted to get the uranium sale done, while the FBI was investigating Russian corruption in the US in the form of bribes and money laundering (to politicians and their friends) to facilitate that sale. We'll see if the swamp tries to cover up the uranium deal shennigans and how.  Mueller, who personally delivered a uranium sample to Russians, really should recuse himself.  But he might stay on to offer up some other criminal to satisfy the GOP and keep the heat off the large number of swamp people who profited from the deal.

In reply to by MagicHandPuppet