Donna Brazile Says Clinton Campaign Officials Made Her Feel Like "Patsey The Slave"

The Democratic Party's nominal support for "identity politics" has once again been exposed as little more than hollow virtue-signaling...

By now, it’s become clear that the Democratic party establishment installed Donna Brazile has the head of the DNC expecting her to be an obedient stooge who would turn a blind eye to the endemic corruption and mismanagement inside America’s oldest major political party. Unfortunately for them, Brazile had no intention of keeping quiet when she discovered that Obama’s negligence had left the party in debt, effectively allowing the Clinton to play a deciding role in doling out resources, setting strategy and myriad other issues.

A year after Trump’s upset victory over Clinton poleaxed the Washington establishment and smug Democratic elitists who felt it was their candidate’s god-given right to effortlessly slide into office despite being one of the most unpopular major-party candidates in recent memory, Brazile is speaking out in a new book, excerpts from which have been published in Politico and the Washington Post.

In one detail printed today by WaPo, Brazile recounts how Clinton’s top aides repeatedly disrespected and demeaned her, which she equated to being treated like a slave.

Brazile alleges that Clinton’s top aides routinely disrespected her and put the DNC on a “starvation diet,” depriving it of funding for voter turnout operations.


As one of her party’s most prominent black strategists, Brazile also recounts fiery disagreements with Clinton’s staffers — including a conference call in which she told three senior campaign officials, Charlie Baker, Marlon


Marshall and Dennis Cheng, that she was being treated like a slave.


“I’m not Patsey the slave,” Brazile recalls telling them, a reference to the character played by Lupita Nyong’o in the film, “12 Years a Slave.” “Y’all keep whipping me and whipping me and you never give me any money or any way to do my damn job. I am not going to be your whipping girl!”

Over the past two days, Brazile has revealed how former DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz effectively ceded control of the party to the Clinton campaign, which looted funds from state party organizations and restricted the money flowing into the DNC after agreeing to pay off most of its debt.

She also revealed that she considered replacing Clinton with Joe Biden after she collapsed during a ceremony at the 9/11 memorial. But most shockingly of all, she said that she feared for her life after the murder of DNC staffer Seth Rich, which she feared may have been planned by nefarious elements from within the party.


NoDebt bamawatson Sat, 11/04/2017 - 22:47 Permalink

You get the feeling that maybe the Clintons made a few enemies along the way?  I'm quietly hoping that as the Clinton machine stumbles and sputters to a crawl those people will come out of the woodwork and "Weinstein" them.  God knows Hillary will never be brought up on charges, but maybe... just maybe... she and her husband get eaten by their own. 

In reply to by bamawatson

Antifaschistische NoDebt Sat, 11/04/2017 - 23:27 Permalink

This hardcore Left Wing that took over the DNC is amazing.  I've got a few of them in my circles.  There's a McDonalds not too far from our office...and even libs love McD's.  But they will NOT go to this one.  They will say it's dirty, the service is poor, yada yada yada.  "I would never go there!!" they exclaim.These are the people that told me I was a racist for noticing that the drivers in our Chinatown (Houston, Bellaire area) are terrible.  Ironically, I'm there all the time, because i love the food, and I enjoy hanging out around all the Chinese.The truth about my lib friends is that they won't go to McD's because the Greyhound station is near, and there's a lot of black people there.  Mostly black actually but not all.  It's the greyhound crowd...whatever that is.  I've never taken a bus...but I do McD's in a pinch, or when we're working until 10.deep inside...they project their own prejudices onto everyone else...and if their verbal proclamations are loud enough, it somehow purges their own guilt.  Ridiculing us for even NOTICING someone looks different "hey Jerome, do you ever sunburn?" while insisting that put a 'black' box on every application in the US for EVERYTHING!.Donna B' new hero.  It takes a lot of courage in that circle to come of the closet.

In reply to by NoDebt

Ex-Oligarch Richard Chesler Sun, 11/05/2017 - 10:53 Permalink

It's the same with illegal immigration in California.  All those democrats of modest means who acquired latino maids, gardeners, nannies and handymen over the past two decades while paying sub-minimum wage under the table really, really don't want to go back to doing their own laundry, mowing the lawn, cleaning the pool or changing diapers again.  Point out the systemic economic displacement of native unskilled laborers, and their eyes will glaze over and they'll start mumbling about how nice Estrellita and Manuel are and how well they do their jobs and how they are "just like family."*  *(until they start cutting corners or stealing, at which point they will be cast out in favor of new hired "family").

In reply to by Richard Chesler

The Wizard vato poco Sun, 11/05/2017 - 07:56 Permalink

Little does Donna realize we are all debt slaves to the 14th amendment that was created post War of Northern Aggression for blacks to become citizen persons of the "United States" corporation. Eventually, the corporate government was successful getting all Caucasians classified in the slave citizenship category.I always ask the question of how was one a Citizen of the "United States" prior to the 14th amendment.I place "United States" in parentheses because there are three definitions in law for United States.

In reply to by vato poco

The Wizard curbjob Sun, 11/05/2017 - 08:38 Permalink

When did slavery become an issue during the War of Northern Aggression? This what it was called in a number of history books written prior to 1920's. Go do a search on Thomas DiLorenzo, a history prof at Loyola University in La.All Wars are Banker's Wars. What was going on with the cotton trade and railroads prior to the war.FYI, there is nothing civil about war."The word "person" in legal terminology is perceived as a general word which normally includes in its scope a variety of entities other than human beings". See, 1 U.S.C. Sect. 1. Church of Scientology v. U.S. Dept. of Justice, 612 F.2d 417, 425 (1979) Congressional Record: June 13, 1967, pp. 15641-15646: A citizen of the United States? is a civilly dead entity operating as a co-trustee and co-beneficiary of the PCT (Public Charitable Trust set up for the welfare of freed plantation slaves in the wake of the Civil War), the private constructive, cestui que vie trust of US Inc. under the 14th Amendment, which upholds the debt of the USA and US Inc. in Section 4.

In reply to by curbjob

curbjob The Wizard Sun, 11/05/2017 - 09:06 Permalink

Here are the Declarations of Causes of Seceding States of Georgia, Mississippi ,  South Carolina, Texas and Virginia.The astute reader will notice that all 5 of the seceding states mention "slaves or slavery" within the first paragraph.… carry a copy in your wallet; revisionist history can be lethal.

In reply to by The Wizard

The Wizard curbjob Sun, 11/05/2017 - 23:51 Permalink

There is no doubt slavery was an issue, but for the Confederacy as a whole it was secondary. Three states, mainly cotton producing states, were more adamant about the Northern states not enforcing the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850. However, the bottom line is the federal government wanted control of the states. Observing what took place in the post War of Northern Aggression, the Reconstruction Era, it becomes obvious the federal government wanted to centralize power and authority over the states. How did DC gain the power to control the states? The banksters don't much appreciate local control.Slavery was a central point of contention, but as an example of state sovereignty versus federal authority. The war was fought over state’s rights and the limits of federal power in a union of states. The perceived threat to state autonomy became an existential one through the specific dispute over slavery. The issue was not slavery per se, but who decided whether slavery was acceptable, local institutions or a distant central government power. That distinction is not one of semantics: this question of local or federal control to permit or prohibit slavery as the country expanded west became increasingly acute in new states, eventually leading to that fateful artillery volley at Fort Sumter.As I have said over and over, you can dump all of the labels since it gets down to a primary issue centralization of power and authority and decentralization of power and authority of governmental bodies.

In reply to by curbjob

robobbob curbjob Sun, 11/05/2017 - 13:15 Permalink

no, not really. it was a war over trade tariffs and banking laws that helped the north east establishment at the expense of southern economies.
slavery was floating around like many social issues of today. good for moral posturing or riling up the crowds, but was largely an issue of economics.
there was plenty of big moralizing on slavery in the rich and fancy new england salons or southern plantation parlors, but no poor white northern irish immigrant or poor white southern subsistence farmer was out on the firing line dying over that cause.
slavery is just a convenient moral issue for politicians to paper over all of the destruction and justify the federal government destroying states' rights. without that, just what are they left with for an explanation for killing 600,000 americans to stop one region from deciding to leave a supposedly democratic country?

In reply to by curbjob

The Wizard curbjob Mon, 11/06/2017 - 00:00 Permalink

Yes, your link was read but you are missing the main point of emphasis of the war. Centralization of power and authority vs. Decentralization. The morons who took down Lee's statue ought to become familiar with what he wrote prior to the war.

 Robert E. Lee letter dated December 27, 1856:

       I was much pleased the with President's message. His views of the systematic and progressive efforts of certain people at the North to interfere with and change the domestic institutions of the South are truthfully and faithfully expressed. The consequences of their plans and purposes are also clearly set forth. These people must be aware that their object is both unlawful and foreign to them and to their duty, and that this institution, for which they are irresponsible and non-accountable, can only be changed by them through the agency of a civil and servile war. There are few, I believe, in this enlightened age, who will not acknowledge that slavery as an institution is a moral and political evil. It is idle to expatiate on its disadvantages. I think it is a greater evil to the white than to the colored race. While my feelings are strongly enlisted in behalf of the latter, my sympathies are more deeply engaged for the former. The blacks are immeasurably better off here than in Africa, morally, physically, and socially. The painful discipline they are undergoing is necessary for their further instruction as a race, and will prepare them, I hope, for better things. How long their servitude may be necessary is known and ordered by a merciful Providence. Their emancipation will sooner result from the mild and melting influences of Christianity than from the storm and tempest of fiery controversy. This influence, though slow, is sure. The doctrines and miracles of our Savior have required nearly two thousand years to convert but a small portion of the human race, and even among Christian nations what gross errors still exist! While we see the course of the final abolition of human slavery is still onward, and give it the aid of our prayers, let us leave the progress as well as the results in the hands of Him who, chooses to work by slow influences, and with whom a thousand years are but as a single day. Although the abolitionist must know this, must know that he has neither the right not the power of operating, except by moral means; that to benefit the slave he must not excite angry feelings in the master; that, although he may not approve the mode by which Providence accomplishes its purpose, the results will be the same; and that the reason he gives for interference in matters he has no concern with, holds good for every kind of interference with our neighbor, -still, I fear he will persevere in his evil course. . . . Is it not strange that the descendants of those Pilgrim Fathers who crossed the Atlantic to preserve their own freedom have always proved the most intolerant of the spiritual liberty of others?

In reply to by curbjob

847328_3527 Griffin Sun, 11/05/2017 - 10:15 Permalink

Another bitter loser who felt she was "entitled" to moar.Bitter at her Bro, Obama, for not recognizing how impotent hse is.Bitter at Hilary for treating her 'like a slave."Bitter at egoist Biden for completely ignoring her most likely.Bitter at the DNC for just about everything.Angry black lasoer.Hillary lost the election by a historic landslide.

In reply to by Griffin

CONCEPTPOLITICO Antifaschistische Sun, 11/05/2017 - 01:00 Permalink

Donna should of read Malcolm X speech on WHITE LIBERALS before she allowed herself to be used and abused by The Clinton tribe, the worst WHITE LIBERALS who ever existed.   The only thing Malcolm X got wrong was that he didn't live long enough to develop his analysis to understand that even WHITE LIBERALS just like WHITE CONSERVATIVES in the political football game are both just teams playing on a astroturf football field wholly owned by the ANGLO-ZIONIST and not white people per se.  I think with time he would of come to understand this.  Without further ado, below is a exerpt from a Malcolm X speech:  In this deceitful American game of power politics, the Negroes (i.e., the race problem, the integration and civil rights issues) are nothing but tools, used by one group of whites called Liberals against another group of whites called Conservatives, either to get into power or to remain in power. Among whites here in America, the political teams are no longer divided into Democrats and Republicans. The whites who are now struggling for control of the American political throne are divided into "liberal" and "conservative" camps. The white liberals from both parties cross party lines to work together toward the same goal, and white conservatives from both parties do likewise.The white liberal differs from the white conservative only in one way: the liberal is more deceitful than the conservative. The liberal is more hypocritical than the conservative. Both want power, but the white liberal is the one who has perfected the art of posing as the Negro's friend and benefactor; and by winning the friendship, allegiance, and support of the Negro, the white liberal is able to use the Negro as a pawn or tool in this political "football game" that is constantly raging between the white liberals and white conservatives.Politically the American Negro is nothing but a football and the white liberals control this mentally dead ball through tricks of tokenism: false promises of integration and civil rights. In this profitable game of deceiving and exploiting the political politician of the American Negro, those white liberals have the willing cooperation of the Negro civil rights leaders. These "leaders" sell out our people for just a few crumbs of token recognition and token gains. These "leaders" are satisfied with token victories and token progress because they themselves are nothing but token leaders.

In reply to by Antifaschistische

chiswickcat Antifaschistische Sun, 11/05/2017 - 02:46 Permalink

it may take courage. But, as with most of these 'tell all' revelations, they come after the fact, and try ingratiate themselves with the outraged reader. After they could have spoken out during, and prevented the crimes. She is motivated not by the wrong doings of the Clintons and DNC execs, but by a grudge, of being disrespected by them, and probably to try and distance herself from the DNC / Clinton implosion. "yeah, i was right there when the kid was getting beat black and blue by her parents. But I dindu nufin wrong" Yeah, now the kids dead, she feels she ought to write a book about it. Why the fuck didn't you say something at the time? Spineless. Now she will be rewarded by book sales and possibly even some paid speeches. Nothing but a rat leaving a sinking ship. Did she tell the FBI at the time she was suspicious about Seth Rich's death??? Sorry, Buffalo gal, you are one of them. Your tell all, is just a display of your duplicitous, deceitful and weak moral character.

In reply to by Antifaschistische

jcaz chiswickcat Sun, 11/05/2017 - 07:37 Permalink

Exactly.   This isn't "courage"- it's opportunism.  This is the same chick that thought nothing of repeatedly violating election laws- if she was truly a hero, she'd have said "no" at the time,  not when it's clear that the Clinton Cartel is crumbling.Someone ask Donna what she's doing for a job these days-  my guess is that it's not as glamorous as what she's trying to sell herself off as here;Once a slave, always a slave, Donna.......

In reply to by chiswickcat

aurum4040 chiswickcat Sun, 11/05/2017 - 08:37 Permalink

I agree. Also, I think this has something to do with the 2020 election. She is going to meld herself into a 'courage to act' Presidential candidate. She will be the one that risked her life (coming out against Clintons) to save the DNC. While the reality of the situation is that she is just as guilty as the rest of the DEMS involved. Shes trying to save herself as well to prevent jailtime. 

In reply to by chiswickcat

Quinvarius Antifaschistische Sun, 11/05/2017 - 08:10 Permalink

So the Grey Hound bus stations are like that in every city?  I thought it was just mine.  What is the deal with that?  I have a couple theories involving drug smuggling networks and cities putting their own homeless on busses to get rid of them.  I feel bad for the dudes.  But they are kinda aholes too.  I can't really ask them.  Maybe I should just rent a van and abduct one to interrogate.  I probably don't need the van, but it seems more professional to have a van.

In reply to by Antifaschistische

LithiumWarsWAKEUP Antifaschistische Sun, 11/05/2017 - 09:45 Permalink

Hey Jerome, you brought it up, and uh,,,,uh,,,I sorta want your answer. DO you sunburn? I'm wonderin'...  I mean, like a red big ol' sunburn,,,or is it a more brownish sunburn. I mean, does it hurt like a white boy sunburn like i get. Well, I guess you really can't answer that since you ain't...  Nevermind. You like to get high too? Good. Keep the faith brother. Don't let 'em get you down. 'get down'....get it? yeah.

In reply to by Antifaschistische

343 Guilty Spark NoDebt Sun, 11/05/2017 - 12:55 Permalink

It is already happening.  The MSM is starting to distance themselves from her, the DNC is, and her allies in Hollywood are silent due to the Weinstein bombshell (and fallout).I predict that the DNC will have a major split in the near future with Bernie supporters forming their own party (Democratic Socialist Party or something like that).  After that the Republican party may see the same with the more constitutionalist types leaving and forming a new party as well (Bull Moose Party or maybing bring back the Democratic-Republican Party for smaller government and stronger constitutional adherance).

In reply to by NoDebt