'Communist' Drexel Professor Blames Texas Church Massacre On "Whiteness"

Authored by Alex Thomas via SHTFplan.com,

A controversial Drexel University professor, who is already suspended from campus over comments he made following the Las Vegas Massacre, is now arguing that the recent Texas church shooting was specifically caused by “whiteness” while also attacking news outlets who reported on his previous disgusting comments about the attack in Vegas.

In an interview with the left-wing show Democracy Now!, professor George Ciccariello-Maher once again shared his disgust for all white people while specifically pinning the blame for the church attack on the existence of whiteness itself.

“Whiteness is never seen as a cause, in and of itself, of these kinds of massacres,” Ciccariello-Maher said before adding, “despite the fact that whiteness is a structure of privilege and it’s a structure of power, and a structure that, when it feels threatened, you know, lashes out.”

The discussion, titled “What Makes White Men So Prone to This Kind of Behavior?”, then goes into a sort of rant about the dangers of white people feeling vilified which apparently causes them to conduct mass shootings.

Ciccariello-Maher was previously suspended from campus for a series of Tweets that blamed white people in general for the horrific Las Vegas attack.

Amazingly, Ciccariello-Maher has a history of attacking white people, having spent the last few years publicly doing so in a number of ways. In 2016, for example, the admittedly communist professor openly called for white genocide on Christmas.

You truly can’t make this stuff up folks...

As I reported for Intellihub at the time,

“A white professor of political science at Philadelphia’s Drexel University has publicly called for white genocide on Christmas.”

 

“The openly Communist professor, George Ciccariello-Maher, has caused a massive uproar with his late Christmas Eve Tweet calling for what could amount to the murder of untold millions of people.”

Ciccariello-Maher later went on to not only double down his calls for genocide, but also attack American Veterans – all the while being supported by the likes of Salon.com.

Comments

nmewn Bud Dry Fri, 11/10/2017 - 19:15 Permalink

So, ummm..."professor" (lmao!)...George Ciccariello-Maher, you appear to be very "white" and what about the "white guy" who shot the killer twice and along with another "white guy" chased down the ATHEIST "white" guy who had just killed a bunch of other innocent church going "white" people? Are they pre-mass killing lunatics too, like say...Mugabe? ;-)

In reply to by Bud Dry

NoDebt jcaz Fri, 11/10/2017 - 19:36 Permalink

"A white professor of political science at Philadelphia’s Drexel University has publicly called for white genocide on Christmas."I'll be right over, professor.  This guy honestly thinks he's in the elite that won't be affected by the exact shit he's calling for.  That is the definition of delusional.  I mean, honest to God, this guy thinks he's important.  Can you imagine? 

In reply to by jcaz

Normalcy Bias NoDebt Fri, 11/10/2017 - 19:45 Permalink

Well, don'tcha know that when TSHTF, the .0001% and The Pentagon are going to be falling all over themselves to protect the 'Brain Trust' at Drexel University!This reminds me of the super rich jews who are the real drivers behind this sudden pro-white genocide movement.Do they actually think that the average moron who buys their propaganda is going to differentiate between jews and their families, and the average WASP?ALL white people look the same to them!They're a bunch of super arrogant fucking morons.

In reply to by NoDebt

NiggaPleeze Never One Roach Fri, 11/10/2017 - 21:20 Permalink

 Ironically this board lights up when someone blames a terror attack on Islam.Granted, whiteness is a racial feature and Islam an ideology, but the good professon is saying that white privilege has created an ideology of white supremacy that these whites are acting out; he is not saying it is a biologically programmed behavior (it obviously isn't since European whites manage to avoid engaging in mass shootings, and not just the vast vast majority of them).  So he is referring to "White culture" in the US.The theory that Islam causes terror attacks is equally absurd, but spouted by many here because ... they belong to White culture but  not Islam.  "White culture" doesn't drive White mass murderers and Islam does not drive Muslim mass murderers.  

In reply to by Never One Roach

NiggaPleeze UmbilicalMosqu… Sat, 11/11/2017 - 02:00 Permalink

 Where to you get that information?  Ciccariello is southern Italian and Maher is Irish.  He grew up in poverty in rural Maine without electricity.  Doesn't sound like the typical (((Bolshevik))), does it?Indeed there's a lot of posts calling him a Jew on this thread.  On what basis is this claimed?  I have found no evidence of it, maybe I missed something.  (His "White genocide" tweet was sarcasm, a response to a #WhiteGenocide Twitter campaign in response to a State Farm ad showing a black man proposing to a white woman.  Essentially he was wishing for more miscegenation, which from his "radical Marxist" ideology, is about equality and equal dignity for all, foolish as that may be.  Point is, that doesn't make him a tribalist.)

In reply to by UmbilicalMosqu…

NiggaPleeze NiggaPleeze Sat, 11/11/2017 - 01:58 Permalink

 Truth is never popular when it hits home.The man is saying White supremacist "culture" is responsible for White terrorism.ZH'ers repeatedly claim Islamic "culture" is responsible for Muslim terrorism.Both comments are equally outrageous.But most people who heartily and unfairly criticize billions of others take the most bitter offense when the same criticism is leveled at the group they identify with.  Standard human hypocrisy / lack of empathy.In a way I like what this guy is saying, maybe it will get some of you ignorant Islamophobes to open your minds a bit and see the raw ugliness of your own ignorant prejudices.Nahhh....

In reply to by NiggaPleeze

NiggaPleeze Bendromeda Strain Sat, 11/11/2017 - 14:51 Permalink

 There's nothing in the Koran calling for terrorist attacks.  Indeed it violates numerous explicit tenets.  And don't quote me standard mis-characterization of Mohammed's instructions during the war with the Medinites, that was one war, and in point of fact after the Muslims won they didn't harm any of the Medinites.You want to see explicit instructions for mayhem and murder?  Let's turn to the pillar of this "Judeo-Christian" religion, Deuteronomy:

13 Deuteronomy 6-10: If your very own brother, or your son or daughter, or the wife you love, or your closest friend secretly entices you, saying, “Let us go and worship other gods” (gods that neither you nor your ancestors have known, 7 gods of the peoples around you, whether near or far, from one end of the land to the other), 8 do not yield to them or listen to them. Show them no pity. Do not spare them or shield them. 9 You must certainly put them to death. Your hand must be the first in putting them to death, and then the hands of all the people. 10 Stone them to death, because they tried to turn you away from the Lord your God, who brought you out of Egypt, out of the land of slavery. 20 Deuteronomy 10-15: 10 When you march up to attack a city, make its people an offer of peace. 11 If they accept and open their gates, all the people in it shall be subject to forced labor and shall work for you. 12 If they refuse to make peace and they engage you in battle, lay siege to that city. 13 When the Lord your God delivers it into your hand, put to the sword all the men in it. 14 As for the women, the children, the livestock and everything else in the city, you may take these as plunder for yourselves. And you may use the plunder the Lord your God gives you from your enemies. 15 This is how you are to treat all the cities that are at a distance from you and do not belong to the nations nearby.

That's far worse than anything in the Koran. Indeed ISIS' savage behavior can be traced to these commandments, not the Koran.

In reply to by Bendromeda Strain

newdoobie NiggaPleeze Sat, 11/11/2017 - 08:29 Permalink

Not so sure about "truth" but I thought Islamic schools (Ashrams?) taught basic Islamic tenets. 5 pillars of Islam, guidance of the prophet, rules for Jihad, how to treat your wife. stuff like that. So, it taught that you only have to be honest and upright to others of the same faith. (sounds like the Jewish religion)how do you expect goodness and light to prevail? Sounds like "culture" might have something to do with it.

In reply to by NiggaPleeze

NiggaPleeze newdoobie Sat, 11/11/2017 - 14:56 Permalink

 Five pillars are something else but jihad does not mean terrorist attack.  Jihad means different things to different people, but generally is taken as submission to Allah and repelling invaders.Frankly White Christians don't have any claim to being pacifists.  Quite contraire.  History is replete of Whites killing each other and anyone they could locate throughout the planet.   Here is a list of wars during the Middle Ages of White Christians attacking and killingi each other, generally over nothing.

In reply to by newdoobie

Government nee… NiggaPleeze Sat, 11/11/2017 - 11:01 Permalink

Your comment shows the all-too-usual level of moral relativism in its inherent judgement that Western culture is no better or worse than Islam.  Dreadfully sorry to remind you that Western culture, and specifically its Judeo-Christian underlying values, is responsible for harnassing the creative enenrgy that has led to most of what we consider advanced/modern in our lifestyles.  Islam is inherently tyrannical, enslaving its subjects.  If you desire to have an honest conversation about ethnicity and crime, the numbers are readily available.  Those numbers show that whites ARE NOT the problem.  Now, if you continue to drip your poison, there will be an increasing number of individuals who will disagree.  The magnitude of that disagreement is largely up to you.  Choose wisely.

In reply to by NiggaPleeze

NiggaPleeze Kelley Sat, 11/11/2017 - 15:02 Permalink

 "Allahuh Akbar" is about as religious as "god damn it".  Doesn't mean the speaker believes in God.Now there are some highly Western-supported "sects" of what one might arguably call Islam, such as Saudi's Wahhabism, that is fairly violent.  But that is not what most Muslims believe.  Unfortunately Saudis use Western money to spread their Wahhabist views worldwide through their madrassahs, but that doesn't make Islam any more responsible than it makes you responsible."Beliefs can and do animate actions."   Oh gee, that's precisely what the good professor was saying.  So you agree with him? Typical primitive reptilian thinking is to blame an entire group (as long as they don't identify with it) for the crimes of any member of a group.  So all blacks are responsible for all black crimes, all Muslims for all crimes of Muslims, etc.  But, obviously, each White is not responsible for the crimes of other Whites, or each Christian for the crimes of all other Christians, that would be crazy talk! 

In reply to by Kelley

401K of Dooom NiggaPleeze Sat, 11/11/2017 - 20:05 Permalink

Hi Nigga, please think out your arguments before posting them and revealing to us that you are a blue-pilled, Beta-Cuck.  If "White" ( and I put white in quotes and capitalized to promote my self-esteem) people where given everything that they would want in life.  IF this is the case, how come there were many "White" people who lived in poverty for their lives?  Tell me how everybody in the South lived in a mansion and after the war, their mansions were confiscated by the liberated slaves?  In the North, the poor Irish had to put up with discrimination and when they took over from the English and Dutch, they were just as bad in what they pullled.  I once met a guy whose ancestors were iron miners in the upper peninsula of Michigan.  He told me about the conditions that these people had to work in were just as bad as anyone had to put up with. In my own family, I have enough relatives who went through so much horrible stuff that it is a miracle that they did not commit suicide or go on a rampage.  For myself, I had to deal with something just as bad.  My parents divorced after a long and bitter marriage.  My mother remarried and the step-father that I had was ok.  When my mother died, we spoke at length and she told me what she wanted to leave for me.  I agreed but asked her to concentrate on her chemotherapy.  Just for the record, I know I should have asked her to setup a will but I wanted her to work on getting better and not come across as greedy.  She died and after she was buried, I talked to my step father and told me that she did not have a will and I was only receiving a few paintings that she had. The reason why I am letting you know about this is because I and my mother are Caucasians and my step-father is black.  Let that sink in.  A brother did something incredible nasty to me and who marched on my behalf?  Would Jesse Jackson lead a protest to get my former soul-brother step-father was allowed to take the inheritance that my mother wanted to leave for me.  Her best friend confided in me that the week before she died, my mother said that my step-father had been very generous to her.  My mother was raised in the era of second-wave feminism and would have made her own heart stop if a white man made any demands of her. Who will rectify this injustice that I went through.  Will you admit that the race situation has changed or do you think you are still a victim of the white race?  I want to know if your fellow soul brother was justified in doing this?  Oh and former brother in question said that he was justified in doing this because he helped her earn all the money she had when she died.  So the next time you start talking about how "White" people are keeping you down, just remember what happened to me and I don't take shit from people like you ever again! 

In reply to by NiggaPleeze

poetic justice Delving Eye Sat, 11/11/2017 - 11:57 Permalink

Who can we hire for the job? If I didn't live so far away, I could personally go sort this cretin out... So on to Mexico, across the porous /wall-less border, find the guy smack him in both legs with a baseball bat and in the head for good measure. As it appears he is a totally brainless idiot, he probably wouldn't feel it anyway, so a crossbow bolt through the back of the head may be the only solution (note: that isn't going to effect the gun control stance). I've said it quite a few times recently that it is the treasonous "white people" who need to be eliminated post-haste. Oh yeah, and back out across that porous Mexican Border, without anyone even knowing I have ever been there.If I wanted to I could probably even get a job as an unlicensed Security Guard at the Mandalay Bay whilst I'm figuring out how to go about doing all this. Appears to be that easy...When are we all going to be able to arm our selves with laser weapons? Then who will give a shit about guns. We are then of course going to have TPTB bitching about laser weapons control?Postscript: purchase your awesome stainless steel crossbows in Thailand.

In reply to by Delving Eye

joshnyce Kassandra Sat, 11/11/2017 - 09:39 Permalink

These people are hillarious. He "works" for drexel, which is not a real college. It's like a community college for people who plan on working menial jobs that don't really require college degrees. These idiots wasting their parents' money to be indocrinated on whining about racism aside, who gives a fuck about this imbecile who couldn't get a real job, so he decided to teach, and couldn't get a job at a half-decent school. I mean he's bascially an overpaid babysitter who thinks he's an underpaid academic.Academics used to write books based on research and real work, which was barely adding value as it was. Now those who can't do that use twitter. Thanks twitter for living up to your name and giving a platform to total twits and twats. And I guess that mustache couldn't get him enough attention from the fags he sucks off (philly is truly the city for brotherly love), so he resorts to this shit like the baby he is. He should spend some time in north philly where they'll beat his ass for being white in a second, before he can offer to give them moustache rides.

In reply to by Kassandra

MEFOBILLS Gaius Frakkin'… Fri, 11/10/2017 - 21:59 Permalink

These Boleshiviks could migrate to Africa if they have a problem with Whites. You've hit upon the solution, as I see it.  A new Havarra plan, which funds the transfer of undesireable Bolsheviks.  Their transfer is to Africa.  These two groups will dissipate each other, with the Negro eventually gaining the upper hand.Hitler made an egregious error when he went along with Havarra, and moved Jews to Palestein.  At the time, Zion was also considering Uganda.  The problem - Uganda was a British Colony. The "practical country" for Zion is Patagonia.  Of these three regions, Uganda would have been the right choice.  Today's world would be different (and better) if parasites had been ejected to Uganda on a continuous basis.  There, they would be re-educated by harsh reality. Since parasite transfer is funded, there could be no cries of immorality from the soft headed.But, alas, as long as the money system is private banker money, and not sovereign - then funding difficult things will not happen.  www.sovereignmoney.eu

In reply to by Gaius Frakkin'…