Who Killed President Kennedy And Why?

Via Oriental Review,

In late October President Trump ordered that “the veil be lifted” from the investigation into the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in 1963. More than 3,000 new, previously classified FBI, CIA, and Congressional documents were released to the public. A quick overview of the material shows that the bulk of it pertains either to the CIA’s covert operations against Cuba (one of the most popular theories about JFK’s assassination focuses on the ties between Lee Harvey Oswald and anti-Castro paramilitary groups that were upset about Kennedy’s “soft” policy toward the island) or the CIA’s search for a “Soviet fingerprint” in the crime – as can be seen in Langley’s fruitless but determined attempts to turn the defector Yuri Nosenko into a key source of information (although, truth be told, he adamantly refused to give the required “testimony” and was for this reason long suspected of being a KGB double agent). We cannot avoid the impression that these huge document dumps – along with the scores of “investigations” conducted over the last 54 years, in addition to the books and movies about this cryptic murder – have one goal: to keep whoever really ordered the JFK assassination from being brought to justice.

All of these materials focus in one way or another on the figure of the unhappy “psychopath,” known as Lee Harvey Oswald, the lone gunman who shot the 35th US president on Nov. 22, 1963, from the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository in Dallas, using a 6.5mm Mannlicher-Carcano Italian rifle with telescopic sight. Each new batch of released documents (and there have been three just this year: on July 24, Oct. 26, and Nov. 3) triggers another round of furious debate, all over the world, about his motives, connections, and the facts of the crime.

Oswald being led from the Texas Theatre following his arrest

Oswald being led from the Texas Theatre following his arrest, Nov 22 1963

The narrative of the murder would seem quite straightforward. Just a few minutes after the fatal shots were fired, the security services were already combing through the depository building. On the 6th floor, they discovered an open window, three shell casings, and a rifle bearing Oswald’s fingerprints. Forty minutes after Kennedy’s death, the cops already had a name, physical description, and address for his alleged killer. The crime of the century was easily solved. The police surrounded the Texas Theatre building where Mr. Oswald was hiding, and he was arrested barely an hour after the president was assassinated.

But not everything was quite so simple. A 26-second movie, made that day by Abraham Zapruder, shows the exact moment of the murder, which has made it possible to dissect the instant of Kennedy’s death, frame by frame.

According to the official story, three shots were fired (the first missed, the second passed through the president’s neck and ricocheted into the chest, wrist, and thigh of Texas Governor John Connally, and the third bullet struck Kennedy in the head). But the film clearly shows that the second bullet (frame 225) and third bullet (frame 313) are of completely different types: the second passed through the president’s neck without serious tissue damage, while the third was obviously an expanding bullet, the impact of which shattered the American leader’s skull! A mix of different types of bullets within a single clip of a semi-automatic gun would be a game-changer for shooters. But the most likely explanation is that there were at least two snipers involved.

A number of recognized probe inconsistencies (missing bullets, improper autopsy procedure, faked autopsy photos & notes, to point out a few) that led to repeated official and inofficial attempts to reconsider the case for the past decades, eventually resulted in the fact that today only 24% of Americans believe that LHO had acted alone.

An analysis of the Zapruder film prompts even more awkward questions. It turns out that the killer took about five seconds to fire all the shots. That seems quite unlikely for this model of rifle with a telescopic sight, because the bolt has to be cycled with each firing. If you look at the video below, a professional is taking a few shots using the same type of rifle, but without the telescopic sight.

If you time the video carefully, you can see that this expert rifleman takes just about five seconds to get off three shots, but you’ll notice that he’s making no attempt to aim! Is it possible to believe that a second-rate marksman like Lee Harvey Oswald could have performed with robot-like precision in such an extreme situation?

And so Oswald was arrested. I did not kill President Kennedy … I didn’t kill anybody … I don’t know anything about what you are accusing me, he said. Nor for that matter was he allowed to call a lawyer. He never admitted to murdering Kennedy. And two days after the president’s death, while Oswald was being transferred between jails, he was shot at close range by a Texas underworld figure named Jack Ruby (Jacob Rubenstein), who was also, according to the Warren Commission, “a lone gunman.” You don’t have to dig too deeply into the man’s background to realize that he had very deep ties to the police and American security agencies.

And then within the next two years, an astonishing number of people (more than 50!) who possessed some kind of information about the Kennedy assassination died under mysterious circumstances. The Navy officer Lt. William Pitzer, who managed the closed-circuit camera in the autopsy room at the at Bethesda Naval Hospital and filmed the proceeding, was later discovered to have “shot himself”, and the tape of the film had vanished. A week later, the taxi driver who drove Oswald home from the book depository on the day of the president’s assassination, William Whaley, was killed in a car crash. The same fate befell one of the witnesses to the Kennedy assassination, Lee Bowers, who saw “two men shooting from behind the fence.” Three of the five people who were present in Jack Ruby’s house on the evening of Nov. 24, 1963 were shot to death (the lawyer Tom Howard and reporters Bill Hunter and Jim Koethe) … And on Nov. 8, 1965, Dorothy Kilgallen, who was the only journalist granted a private interview with Jack Ruby after Oswald’s assassination, died of a “drug overdose,” although she had never taken drugs. There are dozens of such examples, and the names involved have never been a secret, but is it even worth pointing out once again that these people are never mentioned in the declassified files from the US National Archives?

On Nov. 29, 1963, Lyndon Johnson, the former vice president who had automatically risen to head of state upon JFK’s death, ordered a special commission to be established to investigate the assassination of President Kennedy. The chief justice of the US Supreme Court, Earl Warren, was asked to head the seven-man panel, which also included two senators, two members of the House of Representatives, the former director of the CIA Allen Dulles, and the banker John McCloy. The commission listened to testimony from 552 witnesses and obtained more than 3,000 reports from courts and law-enforcement agencies, which, in turn, had conducted approximately 26,000 interviews, collected in 26 volumes of documentation.

However, the final report, which was intended to shed light on the mysterious details of the “crime of the century,” merely offered withering criticism of the CIA, the FBI, and the Dallas police for not being able to prevent the death of the president, who had been shot by a deranged lone gunman...

Hale Boggs, a Democratic Representative from Louisiana, was the only member of the Warren Commission who did not buckle to Earl Warren and his disciples and disagreed with the conclusion. In October 1972 he was killed in a plane crash over frozen Alaska...

Rep. Hale Boggs

One of the last photos of Rep. Hale Boggs

The findings of the investigation, which ignored a whole slew of facts and the death of almost all the witnesses, were so obviously bizarre that in 1976 the US Congress created a new special commission on the Kennedy case. In 1979 it issued its verdict: Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy.” The HSCA determined, based on available evidence, that the probable conspiracy did not involve the governments of the Soviet Union or Cuba. The committee also added that no organized crime group, anti-Castro group, or the FBI, CIA, or Secret Service was mixed up in that conspiracy. Is it any wonder that following this report, the FBI and the US Department of Justice “raised numerous concerns regarding perceived inadequacies in the Committee’s experts’ methodology, which led to the conclusion of a conspiracy”?

So, who ordered the murder of President Kennedy and then covered up the tracks? Obviously the masterminds were not merely some group of conspirators or Mafiosi, but rather individuals who wield immense and very real power in the American government. So immense that they could force the entire US law-enforcement system to do everything necessary to keep this crime from being solved and to compel the Kennedy family to obediently close their eyes to it!

Who would have been capable of doing this? The Mafia? Cuban emigrants? Anyone could pull the trigger, but not just anyone could force the investigation to overlook obvious facts and turn a blind eye to what any of us can see in the films and photos. Nor did the CIA or FBI command such power. If it were simply a matter of liquidating an undesirable foreign political figure or an out-of-control drug baron, then either of these agencies could contain the scandal on its own. But even they would be in over their heads in any attempt to assassinate a US president in his own country.

In order to get closer to unraveling one of the most mysterious political murders of the 20th century, we should turn our attention to an obscure document signed by that resident of the Oval Office less than six months before his death.

On June 4, 1963, President John F. Kennedy signed Executive Order 11110, authorizing the US Treasury to issue paper currency that could be redeemed for silver held by the treasury.

As a result, this US currency was printed in denominations of $2 and $5 and inscribed with the words “United States Note” instead of “Federal Reserve Note.”

United States Note 1963

United States Note 1963 5 dollars

Kennedy’s order was intended to wean the Federal Reserve System away from printing money, beginning a smooth transition toward returning the printing press to the hands of the American government.

He was correcting a clear violation of the US Constitution and an absurd situation in which the US government could not print its own money. It was a quiet and inconspicuous coup d’état. For the bankers who had founded the Federal Reserve, their greatest fear was about to come true. Now with one stroke of the pen, their plans to establish complete control over the US government and American society were faced with a clear and present danger. Because the fact was that the issuance of these small banknotes was to be followed by the complete suspension of the Fed’s right to print money. So what was that agency to do then? Regulate the financial market, monitoring it so as to forestall any crises? Fine, regulating and monitoring is all well and good. Just stop printing money ...

The Federal Reserve’s monopoly on the issuance of its own dollar, which is for some reason considered to be the “US dollar,” hinges on a single act of legislation that was signed by President Woodrow Wilson in December of 1913. Consequently, a single, different act of legislation would be enough to destroy this monopoly. But John F. Kennedy failed to realize his agenda. Executive Order 11110 was not revoked but was never actually implemented. For the owners of the Fed, however, the threat remained that the order could be revived by a new US president, potentially JFK’s brother Robert, who in his position as US Attorney General fully grasped the implications of what was happening. And the equally enigmatic murder of Robert Kennedy, who was a leading candidate headed into the Democratic primary for the 1968 presidential election, occurred exactly five years after the signing of the very executive order that killed his brother. It looks like the very influential bankers from the Federal Reserve sent a clear signal: the clan whose representatives tried to betray the System will no longer be allowed to play a significant role in US politics. And they haven’t.

We still can’t reliably assess President Trump’s motivation in releasing the JFK files. The plenitude, relevance and authencity of this archive are highly questionable. Nevertheless, he might have intuitively felt that the draining of Washington’s swamp should eventually be completed at the Constitution Avenue...


Francis Marx Sat, 11/11/2017 - 20:28 Permalink

As a child at the time I always believed LBJ knew about it and was part of the conspiracy.No one ever impressed that belief on me, it just was and I never discussed it with anyone.I still believe that today.

Manthong Mango327 Sat, 11/11/2017 - 22:34 Permalink

/* Style Definitions */
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
 I won’t accept any explanation until I see special agent GHW Bush’s expense report for his mission to Dallas then.

In reply to by Mango327

Tarzan pods Sun, 11/12/2017 - 08:09 Permalink

THE SPEECH THAT NEVER WAS     The persistent rumor regarding the bankers' role in JFK's death was reinforced by several books circulated in conservative circles. They contained an ominous passage from Kennedy's speech at Columbia University, just ten days before his assassination. He is quoted as saying: "The high office of President has been used to foment a plot to destroy the Americans' freedom, and before I leave office I must inform the citizen of his plight." [Quoted by M.L. Beckman, Born Again Republic, Billings, Montana, Freedom Church, 1981, p. 23; also by Lindsay Williams, To Seduce A Nation, Kasil of, Arkansas: Worth Publications, 1984, p. 26.] However, when Columbia University was contacted to provide a transcript of the speech, it was learned that Kennedy never spoke there - neither ten days before his assassination nor at any other time! Ronald Whealan, head librarian at the John Fitzgerald Kennedy Library in Boston, provides this additional information: "Ten days prior to the assassination he was at the White House meeting with, among others, the ambassador to the United States from Portugal." [Source: Hollee Haswell, Curator at the Low Memorial Library, Columbia University.]       It is possible that the President did make the remarks attributed to him on a different date before a different audience. Even so, it is a cryptic message that could have several meanings. That he intended to expose the Fed is the least likely of them all. Kennedy had been a life-long collectivist and internationalist. He had attended the Fabian London School of Economics; participated in the destruction of the American money supply; and engineered the transfer of American wealth to foreign nations. (See page 109 of The Creature from Jekyll Island.) There is little reason to believe that he had suddenly "seen the light" and was reversing his life-long beliefs and commitments.   G. Edward GriffinOctober 15, 2000

In reply to by pods

jbvtme Tarzan Sun, 11/12/2017 - 09:00 Permalink

as soon as the limo emerges beyond the road sign kennedy's hands are at his throat. watch connelly turn around to his right. now watch jackie (who looks like she is on automatic pilot). her left hand is firmly grasping jfk's neck tie (as if she is trying to hold his body upright). watch her eyes which are at all times focused on connelly (the "point man"). she never cries out in alarm that jfk has been shot or  exhibits any  distress. then she looks at jfk's head, her right hand extends up behind the left side of his head just behind his ear. immediately the opposite side of his head explodes on the right side and his body lurchers away from jackie. this is how exit wounds react.  a split second later files's shot from the grassy knoll drives jfk's body back towards her. she pushes jfk's body away to the floor of the car and climbs out on to the rear trunck. jackie was "manchurianed" at onnassis's house in greece during the previous two weeks before the assassination.

In reply to by Tarzan

wildbad spanish inquisition Sun, 11/12/2017 - 05:07 Permalink

despite the fact that C. Edward Griffin has credibly debunked the "Silver Certificate" motive it still attracts we conspiracy theorists as it feeds our globalist bankster predilictions.

Nevertheless there is no shortage of motives and that one is not required. The kennedy oil depletion allowance curtailment, LBJs hating the kennedys and wanting to stay out of jail for his murderous past, kennedy's intentions to stop the vietnam feeding frenzy and the threatened breakup of the CIA, the kennedy's hatred ot the FBI under Hoover.

That hoover, LBJ the oil billionaires, met the night before at an oil magnates' party for hoover whereupon LBJ bragged to his mistress that those kennedy fucks wont be bothering him any more.

Given all of the subsequent withness deaths its a wonder that she survived. Marina Oswald finally gave an interview years later and credibly points out that Oswald was a CIA patsy and a hero. I agree with that.

Oliver Stone's JFK film owes much to the BBC documentary "THE MEN WHO KILLED KENNEDY". It can be viewed on Youtube and brings much reason and credibility to the table.

Not mentioned in the above article is that in the most recent doc. release it was proven that kennedy's wounds were definitely both from the front and the frontal neck shot passed through the windshield.

The coverup began immediately. Johnson forced the on plane swear in although it was not necessary. Jackie and Bobby both knew who and why. Bobbie's childishly arranged murder in LA is so thoroughly debunked at this point that its ridiculous to think Sirhan did it alone. Event the Zapruder film that we know is an alteration.

Since JFKs murder, one of my earliest memories, his murderers and their deep state progeny have know they could fuck us over and with the help of a compliant media could do anything they want. This they are brazenly doing and will continue until we start anew.

Reset the constitution and start the tribunals starting with the clintons. Dissemble the deep state criminal enterprise and devolve power to the states, counties and cities and the people.

In reply to by spanish inquisition

doctor10 wildbad Sun, 11/12/2017 - 07:03 Permalink

the JFK assasination marks the unofficial formation of the DC Uniparty-with LBJ and GHWB at the polesIt remains the glue that binds the USA criminal oligarchy together in a series of subsequent national fairytales-with 911 as the masterpiece- all subordinate to the one in Dallas.

In reply to by wildbad

caconhma J S Bach Sun, 11/12/2017 - 11:43 Permalink

The murder of JFK was the very complex operation. The JFK killing itself and the cover-up have involved almost all highest echelons of the US government (including the Secret Service, FBI, CIA, military, intelligence as well as federal and local law enforcement agencies), the political establishment of both major political parties, and the mass media.Such complex operation requires a long and very extensive preparation process with a large number of participants. The cover-up undoubtedly was done by US participants but, to reduce leaks and traceability, a foreign participation in the JFK assassination itself is a must. Mossad is the most suited participant taking into account its US connections.

In reply to by J S Bach

SMG ThorAss Sat, 11/11/2017 - 21:36 Permalink

The Satanic Globalist Deep State killed Kennedy for going against their various agendas.  Globalist LBJ orchestrated it because he had the contacts within the Dallas police department to make it happen, and the assassination would make him president. That's the truth, period.

In reply to by ThorAss

J S Bach ThorAss Sat, 11/11/2017 - 20:59 Permalink

Those you listed, sir, all fall under the umbrella of those entities I named.  All one has to do is look at motives.Mossad - JFK did not want the illegitimate state of Israel to attain nuclear bomb capabilities - motive.CIA - JFK wanted to reign in the powers being executed extra-judiciously by this rogue agency - motive.Fed - JFK wanted to lessen if not eliminate the powers of the illegitimate jewish Federal Reserve by re-instating silver certificates tied to the U.S dollar - motive.jewish mafia - they were the muscle resorted to and used when and wherever possible to execute any goy agitating against jewish interests.It's all so simple and logical.  Also, consider how secretive the FBI and other government agencies have been about revealing files germane to this topic/era.  If there's nothing to hide, then there'd be no hesitance in regard to release of classified information.  Aye, there's the rub.  They quiver and quake with every facet of this tragic event.  Use your brains... use your souls... use your intelligence to ascertain the guilty in the case of John Fitzgerald Kennedy.

In reply to by ThorAss

WernerHeisenberg SMG Sat, 11/11/2017 - 21:29 Permalink

Same thing.  The Talmudist/Kabbalist are (((Something's))) chosen people.  And the thing they worship is associated with a burning bush, a pillar of fire, the genocide of the Canaanites, Purim celebration, ritual male genital mutilation, and the ideology that the rest of us on Earth are meant to be their slaves.Not to mention human sacrifice and cannibalism.  Not my website, book by one of their academics: https://bloodpassover.com/

In reply to by SMG

svayambhu108 WernerHeisenberg Sun, 11/12/2017 - 05:33 Permalink

Just learned from that book that Podesta means magistrate.Saudi are same morderous Satanists motherfuckers. And the fact a jew wrote this book means that medieval mentality is to be blamed and not the people.Because as it happened always with antisemitism the inoncent jews were sacrificed especially the poor ones. The money people are to blame of every color the PIMPs, the mafiosi, the corrupt, etc 

In reply to by WernerHeisenberg

BobEore SMG Sat, 11/11/2017 - 22:05 Permalink

It's not a Jewish conspiracy, it's Satanic.  You do a disservice blaming the wrong people.Disservice? Honors all round! But let's peck away at the grain of truth hidden within yours!If a 'conspiracy' to kill JFK involved people who described themselves as "jews" ... consisted at it's heart, in a coterie of persons who - thru long family tradition - adopted that label as a method of aligning themselves with a sect of Abrahamic  followers of the "Yahweh" kind...yet, in secrecy veiled by that same tradition, were themselves part of a neo-gnostical, antinomian cult, with roots in the ravings of Sabbatai Tzevi(the original '666' guy - since his prophetic outpourings about the 'new jerusalem' appeared in 1666!), and the more tempered yet insidious musings of Jakob Frank ... \and following the dictate of the latter - dropped all overt relationship to "judaism" in favor of 'conversion' into catholic or protestant denominations ...the better to thereby serve and disguise the long term strategy by which the Frankist-Sabbateans who now control the major part of the world's financial and political infrastructures could thereby form a centuries-long program to integrated themselves into those very targets - marryinig into nobility, making themselves indispensable financial agents of royals, catering to the fascination for the arcane and mysteries of the 'orient' on the part of the European intelligenstia and landed classes...all the while adhering to the core principles of talmudist kabbalism - by which the 'forces of the universe' are manipulated thru the fusion of the most primitive of Babylonian magic with the most advanced scientific methods and technological achievements ... to thereby acquire power and influence over the material world and at the same time becoming the cruel and implacable task masters of the actual 'jewish' religions by means of the rabbinical-enforced 'ghetto-ization of that group both physically, and then - even more effectively - pyschologically...then the extent of their power could evolve to be virtually unbounded, and their opaque methods of control from behind scences - impenetrable. Throw in their eventual sequestering of the entire world of academia... the medias... and the serial blackmailing/bullying/bribery of all persons of influence left in the 'non-jewish' world - to go alongside their doing the same to those within it...and you have a complete full-specturm dominance situation... such as actually exists at this time. In sum then...a "jewish" conspiracy led by 'jews who are not jews'... an entire country carved out of the palestinian homeland to be populated by ashkenazi converts to a secretive sect rooted in the marches of eastern europe and russia... a criminal empire formed from within elements of that sect - whose beginnings as liquor peddlers led them to the grander ambition of 'intoxicating' the entire world with rancid visions of 'social revolutions' and phony worker-led ideologies the better to disquise their neo-feudalist programs which seek to enslave all of us in an endless matrix of false realities ... such as appear on these very pages daily - in the guise of predictive programmings proclaiming the rise of new 'white hat' eastern empires to replace the dying 'black hat' western ones ... the classic style of dialectical deceits which are honed to perfection bySATANIC forces of kabbalist talmudist working in conjunction with their GOLEMIZED media minions to move the goalposts every moment... closer to the arrival of a 'new jerusalm' where no power outside that of their false gods is ever again allowed to exist.

Quite correctly then, [Adam]Smith’s name is commonly counter-posed with that of Marx, because through his transposition of the rules of conduct from the sacred performance of duties pleasing to “God” to those imposed by the ‘hidden hand’ of market forces this professed Christian theologian and Deist of the C18th becomes the link to the professed Satanist and chief theoretician of the Hegelian“Dialectical Materialism” of the C19th. Creating new “laws” governing our ‘economic’ lives would become therefore the work a new priestly caste – who raised themselves up under the banner of “science” to be disciples of an academic religion in no way different than religions of the past… funded, indeed, in their pursuit of theoretical ‘laws’ by the same shadowy financial power which had worked their magic of debt usury from within the temples of past times!and...Marx saw the stratification of society into continuously warring labor versus capital as a useful tool in the mobilization of the ‘working classes’ into a force which would overthrow society. His goal was the destruction of the western culture, not emancipation of the poor and oppressed. This comes through clearly in his own writings, prior to his being chosen by Moses Hess to lead a culture war against “Christendom.” In these writings, he avows his allegiance to the satanic, to destruction as a value in itself, and seeks vengeance upon “God.”https://storify.com/SuaveBel/moral-sentiments-part-one-the-myth-of-capi…

What are you going on about then pal> blaming the wroing people? I begin to suspect sir! Are you a 'dissembler' of truths?

In reply to by SMG