Another Woman Accused Conyers Of Sexual Harrassment

Update: In a lawsuit unearthed by Buzzfeed, a second woman accused Conyers of sexual harassment, but later abandoned efforts to hold him accountable. According to Buzzfeed, a former scheduler for the Democrat said she faced daily harassment from the congressman in a suit she later dropped after a court denied her request to keep it sealed. The behavior dscribed in the suit took place between 2015 and 2016, meaning it happened after Conyers settled with the previous, unnamed, former staffer.

“These behaviors and actions were so common and pervasive that they created a hostile work environment,” she alleged. Unlike the settlement agreement that was published by Buzzfeed earlier Monday, this lawsuit is a public document. BuzzFeed News was not able to reach the woman for comment and also decided against releasing her name.

Asked by Buzzfeed to comment on the lawsuit Tuesday, a Conyers spokesman said: “[The former staffer] voluntarily decided to drop her case.” The congressman “vehemently” denied the previously reported allegations.

Though the staffer expressed admiration for Conyers' civil rights record in the suit, his harassment quickly became too much for her to tolerate. She even convinced a former staffer to be her "fake boyfriend". He would stop by the office once in a while in an attempt to head off Conyers' advances.

In the lawsuit filed earlier this year, the former staffer said she had a “fatherly affection” for Conyers, as well as “extreme admiration and respect for his legislative work as a Civil Rights icon.” It was because of this that “Plaintiff was extremely uncomfortable addressing this inappropriate behavior with Defendant Conyers nor did Plaintiff wish to embarrass or disparage Defendant Conyers by sharing her concerns with other members of the office staff."

She also cited his “age and failing mental capacities” in the suit, saying she was hired, in part, to keep track of his “whereabouts,” call to wake him up every morning, and deliver his medication, including on weekends. She said she asked a male staffer she’d earlier dated to be her “fake boyfriend” and make regular stops by the office in the hopes of halting Conyers’ advances.

* * *

Update: After bizarrely denying that allegations of sexual harassment ever led him to agree to a settlement with a former staffer, Conyers has finally confirmed that the documents published last night by Buzzfeed are authentic.

However, that's about all the ground Conyers is willing to give. Because in the same statement, he denied that he ever sexually harassed staffers, according to the Washington Post.

“I expressly and vehemently denied the allegations made against me, and continue to do so,” Conyers said Tuesday in a formal statement, his first since BuzzFeed reported details of the settlement late Monday.

“My office resolved the allegations — with an express denial of liability — to save all involved from the rigors of protracted litigation. That should not be lost in the narrative,” he stated.

* * *

Update: Despite one anonymous staffer's claim that Conyers is "untouchable" because of his longstanding status as a civil-rights icon who marched with Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., senior Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee are calling for an ethics probe into the Dean of the House following a report revealed that staffers have accused the senior lawmaker of sexual harassment.

Reps. Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) and  Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), the second and third most-senior Democrats on the powerful committee said early that the House Ethics Committee should investigate the validity of the BuzzFeed News report published late Monday night.

"The reports about Congressman Conyers are as serious as they get. The Committee on Ethics should take up this matter immediately with a goal of promptly assessing the validity of the news account. This reported behavior cannot be tolerated in the House of Representatives or anywhere else," Lofgren said in a statement Tuesday morning, the Hill.

Nadler issued a statement around the same time calling the allegations against Conyers "extremely serious and deeply troubling."

“Obviously, these allegations must be investigated promptly by the Ethics Committee. There can be no tolerance for behavior that subjects women to the kind of conduct alleged," Nadler said.

Conyers continues to deny that the settlements happened.

* * *

Update: Conyers has told The Associated Press that he hasn't settled any sexual harassment complaints with any staff members. Conyers, who answered the door at his Detroit home Tuesday morning, says he knows nothing about any claims of inappropriate touching and learned of the story just hours earlier. Referring to allegations of sexual harassment and assault being made against politicians and others, the veteran lawmaker says he's "been looking at these things with amazement."

Meanwhile, Paul Ryan - who Cernovich blamed for enabling Conyers' settlement - called the settlement “extremely troubling” and vowed to continue reviewing House policy on sexual harassment in the workplace.

“People who work in the House deserve and are entitled to a workplace without harassment or discrimination,” Ryan said, outlining the recent steps the House has made to combat sexual misconduct in Congress.

As Talking Points Memo pointed out, last month the Committee on House Administration reviewed its procedures related to workplace harassment and discrimination, and last week that committee issued a new policy requiring “mandatory training for all members and staff,” he said.

* * *

Last week, we reported how Congress’s Office of Compliance paid out $17 million for 264 settlements with federal employees over 20 years for various violations, including sexual harassment – information that was brought to light by California Rep. Jackie Speiers, who claimed that two men with a history of sexual harassment continued to serve in the House – one of whom was a Republican and one a Democrat.

Now, thanks to Buzzfeed News, the mystery Democrat has been identified as Michigan Rep. John Conyers, the ranking member on the powerful House Judiciary Committee and the longest-serving member of the House of Representatives. In 2014, a former Conyers staffer filed a complaint claiming she was fired for refusing his sexual advances, and that she had been subsequently blackballed from working with Congress.

The woman received a $30,000 settlement, which was paid out of Conyers’s taxpayer-funded office budget.

The woman who settled with Conyers launched the complaint with the Office of Compliance in 2014, alleging she was fired for refusing his sexual advances, and ended up facing a daunting process that ended with a confidentiality agreement in exchange for a settlement of more than $27,000. Her settlement, however, came from Conyers’ office budget rather than the designated fund for settlements.


Congress has no human resources department. Instead, congressional employees have 180 days to report a sexual harassment incident to the Office of Compliance, which then leads to a lengthy process that involves counseling and mediation, and requires the signing of a confidentiality agreement before a complaint can go forward.


After this an employee can choose to take the matter to federal district court, but another avenue is available: an administrative hearing, after which a negotiation and settlement may follow.

A law clerk who represented the woman, who was not named by Buzzfeed and has never come forward with her story, said the settlement process was like “being abused twice” for the poor woman.  In the settlement papers, other staffers in Conyers’ office discuss acting as couriers who transported women with who Conyers was allegedly having affairs.

The process was “disgusting,” said Matthew Peterson, who worked as a law clerk representing the complainant, and who listed as a signatory to some of the documents.


“It is a designed cover-up,” said Peterson, who declined to discuss details of the case but agreed to characterize it in general terms. “You feel like they were betrayed by their government just for coming forward. It’s like being abused twice."


Other lawyers named as representing the accuser could not be reached for comment. The Office of Compliance did not confirm or deny that it had dealt with the case.

The documents were first provided to BuzzFeed News by Mike Cernovich, who said he gave the documents to BuzzFeed News for vetting and further reporting, and because he said if he published them himself, Democrats and congressional leaders would “try to discredit the story by attacking the messenger.” He provided them without conditions. BuzzFeed News independently confirmed the authenticity of the documents with four people directly involved with the case, including the accuser.

In a series of tweets published last night, Cernovich explained why he leaked the story to Buzzfeed, and also blamed House Speaker Paul Ryan for covering up Conyers’ harassment.





In her wrongful dismissal complaint, the former employee said Conyers repeatedly asked her for sexual favors and often asked her to join him in a hotel room. On one occasion, she alleges that Conyers asked her to work out of his room for the evening, but when she arrived the congressman started talking about his sexual desires. She alleged he then told her she needed to “touch it,” in reference to his penis, or find him a woman who would meet his sexual demands.

As Buzzfeed pointed out, Congress has no human resources department. Instead, congressional employees have 180 days to report a sexual harassment incident to the Office of Compliance, which then leads to a lengthy process that involves counseling and mediation, and requires the signing of a confidentiality agreement before a complaint can go forward. After this, the complainant can choose to either pursue the matter in federal district court or seek a settlement through an administrative hearing.

In the complaint, which is available in full below, the woman alleges that Conyers sexually harassed her by asking her to touch his penis, or find another woman who would meet his sexual demands. Conyers also made her work nights, weekends and holidays on occasion to “keep him company.”

In her complaint, the former employee said Conyers repeatedly asked her for sexual favors and often asked her to join him in a hotel room. On one occasion, she alleges that Conyers asked her to work out of his room for the evening, but when she arrived the congressman started talking about his sexual desires. She alleged he then told her she needed to “touch it,” in reference to his penis, or find him a woman who would meet his sexual demands. She alleged Conyers made her work nights, evenings, and holidays to keep him company.


In another incident, the former employee alleged the congressman insisted she stay in his room while they traveled together for a fundraising event. When she told him that she would not stay with him, she alleged he told her to “just cuddle up with me and caress me before you go.”


“Rep. Conyers strongly postulated that the performing of personal service or favors would be looked upon favorably and lead to salary increases or promotions,” the former employee said in the documents.

Three other staff members provided affidavits submitted to the Office Of Compliance that outlined a pattern of behavior from Conyers that included touching the woman in a sexual manner and growing angry when she brought her husband around.


One affidavit from a former female employee states that she was tasked with flying in women for the congressman. “One of my duties while working for Rep. Conyers was to keep a list of women that I assumed he was having affairs with and call them at his request and, if necessary, have them flown in using Congressional resources,” said her affidavit. (A second staffer alleged in an interview that Conyers used taxpayer resources to fly women to him.)

One male employee who corroborated the victim’s claims in an affidavit said he witnessed Conyers touch his staffers in an inappropriate, sexual manner. The women in his office said it was widely known that Conyers had sexual relationships with his staff, something the women felt undermined their credibility.

The employee said in her affidavit that Conyers also made sexual advances toward her: “I was driving the Congressman in my personal car and was resting my hand on the stick shift. Rep. Conyers reached over and began to caress my hand in a sexual manner.”


The woman said she told Conyers she was married and not interested in pursuing a sexual relationship, according to the affidavit. She said she was told many times by constituents that it was well-known that Conyers had sexual relationships with his staff, and said she and other female staffers felt this undermined their credibility.


“I am personally aware of several women who have experienced the same or similar sexual advances made towards them by Rep[.] John Conyers,” she said in her affidavit.


A male employee wrote that he witnessed Rep. Conyers rub the legs and other body parts of the complainant “in what appeared to be a sexual manner” and saw the congressman rub and touch other women “in an inappropriate manner.” The employee said he confronted Conyers about this behavior.


“Rep. Conyers said he needed to be ‘more careful’ because bad publicity would not be helpful as he runs for re-election. He ended the conversation with me by saying he would ‘work on’ his behavior,” the male staffer said in his affidavit.

One reason Conyers’ staffers tolerated his behavior, as Buzzfeed points out, was the Congressman’s status as a civil rights icon, something his staffers believed insulated him from criticism. He is also incredibly popular among his constituents in Detroir.

Conyers is a civil rights icon. He was lauded by Martin Luther King Jr. and is a founding member of the Congressional Black Caucus.


“Your story won’t do shit to him,” said the staffer. “He’s untouchable.”

Representatives for Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and former Speaker John Boehner said both lawmakers were unaware of the settlements because of the confidentiality agreements. Paul Ryan’s office didn’t return Buzzfeed’s request for comment.

To help rectify Congress’s broken system, Rep. Speiers has introduced legislation to overhaul the complaint process, including requiring the Office of Compliance to publicly name the office of any member who enters into a settlement. The bill would also allow complainants to waive mediation and counseling, set up a victims' counsel, and require all congressional offices to go through harassment training every year.

In the meantime, we imagine this won’t be the last bombshell disclosure implicating a high-ranking member of Congress. Indeed, if recent trends are any guide, it’s only a matter of time, we believe, before the Republican whom Speiers alluded to is unmasked.

Read the complaint in its entirety below:


2017.11.21buzzfeed by zerohedge on Scribd




GUS100CORRINA Life of Illusion Tue, 11/21/2017 - 10:30 Permalink

"It's A Designed Cover-Up" - Powerful Democratic Congressman John Conyers Sexually Harassed StaffersMy response: More ''OBOZO'' ROTTEN FRUIT. These people get away with this in your face tyrannical lawlessnes because WE THE PEOPLE let them get away with it. The fact that this kind of CORRUPT, VILE, EVIL behavior is happening is simply a reflection of the values of America at large. In this case, the MARXIST PROGRESSIVE LIBERALs and RINOs are at the heart of the CRAP. Truly SAD that the real face of America is now on display for the world to see. These kind of news events really hurt the republic and undermine America's sovereignty.We need a WHITE NIGHT to right the SHIP. The DOJ has proven in many instances to be as corrupt as the people that commit the crimes.

In reply to by Life of Illusion

Ramesees John Kerry-Heinz Tue, 11/21/2017 - 11:54 Permalink

They've been shoving this sexual harassment BS down our throats for 30 years. Middle America has been scared to death of pissing off a female colleague because they were worried about being accused and summarily fired. It's so, so fitting that those doing the shoving are now being fried by the same oil they poured on us serfs.  I'm an optimist, so I predict that the end result of this Salem-like hysteria will be that we go back to a reasonable standard, where an unwanted advance is just turned down and a grope is met with a slap in the face, not a lawsuit.  

In reply to by John Kerry-Heinz

two hoots JimmyJones Tue, 11/21/2017 - 16:14 Permalink

Fuck you Congress, Ryan/McConnell and you other assholes for having any kind law/rule/BS where you can use my tax dollar to cover your irresponsible, fucked up behavior.  To think I paid your sorry asses for my work when I could have used that for my family goes against anything American/constitutional/right/honorable I was taught or believed.   You are sucking the life, duty, honor, country out of the citizens.  Get your fucking asses back on humble ground.   And in case you missed it, FUCK YOU CONGRESS.  Now fix this shit you plastic Ken doll asshats.

In reply to by JimmyJones

wildbad Life of Illusion Tue, 11/21/2017 - 10:35 Permalink

buzzfeed was used masterfully as a tool by Mike.

he leveraged his information by knowing buzzfeed could not resist the scoop and could not supress the story while simultaneously short circuiting the "fake news" meme by stooging one of their own.

masterful Mike

i don't see the sex harassment as such a big deal in and of itself but it does show that the holy talk from all of these fake puritans is just a veneer over their black souls and true characters.

everything does not have to be about sex offenses but on the other hand we big kids can handle more than one story at a time so keep this devolution of power going on all fronts.

destroy the republicrats!

In reply to by Life of Illusion

CaptainObvious wildbad Tue, 11/21/2017 - 11:22 Permalink

Yes, that was a master stroke.  I mean, this is the "news" site that published the Pissgate dossier, for fuck's sake.  He knew there was no way Buzzfeed wouldn't publish the story.  Only problem is, he gave Buzzfeed a veneer of credibility that they in no way deserve.  But, if it was the only way to start exposing the congresspervs for what they are, then yeah, I guess Buzzfeed's an acceptable medium.

In reply to by wildbad

MoreFreedom Killtruck Tue, 11/21/2017 - 12:09 Permalink

I agree.  I personally think it's great that women are finally fighting to be free of sexual harassment from powerful men, espeically Democrats who've shown they don't really support women because they've done everything in their power to trash every one who's accused powerful Democrats of abusing them, and they continue to abuse women, because after all they didn't support Bill Clinton's accusers. I salute Juanita Broderick, Kathleen Wiley, Paula Jones and Rose McGowan.  Karma is finally "rewarding" sexual abusers, and I hope the same for those who falsely accuse others as well.  After all, we've seen lots of examples of Democrats who "find" women who are willing to accuse Republicans at the last minute before an election or appointment and whose stories often have proveably false information.  It's not hard to get women to make such accusations years after the fact, when there's no penalty for doing so, and it often brings favorable attention to the person (and unfavorable attention as well, but typically not among her friends).  A little cash or threats of exposing secrets from the past is all it takes.People can make their own judgments based on provable facts. 

In reply to by Killtruck

Bryan BJPershing Tue, 11/21/2017 - 11:24 Permalink

So to hold power and trust you have to have lived a perfect life since birth, then?  Is that your point?  Many of these accusations flying around are decades old.  I can only assume that there is a political motivation for making the accusations public, which is my point.  If the purpose of airing someone else's dirty laundry is to gain a political or other power edge over them, then is the accuser any better than the transgressor?

In reply to by BJPershing

how_this_stuff_works Bryan Tue, 11/21/2017 - 12:27 Permalink

"So to hold power and trust you have to have lived a perfect life since birth, then? Is that your point? Many of these accusations flying around are decades old. I can only assume that there is a political motivation for making the accusations public, which is my point."

You must be AMAZINGLY naive. What difference does it make if allegations are decades old? The point is that this is a PATTERN of behavior. And for there to be no repercussions only encourages continued--bad--behavior not only in the individual but others.

There is a difference between banter, which could be ignored, and "Touch my penis (if you want to keep your job)."

Anyone who discounts or dismisses the pressure women (or men) may be under to perform sexual acts at the whim of the boss may well be guilty of it themselves.

In reply to by Bryan