Democratic Campaign Tells Voters Not To Vote For A Man (Because He Has A Penis)

Authord by Alex Thomas via,

Despite losing the 2016 election largely because the Democrat Party refused to move away from divisive identity based politics they have apparently not learned their lesson, with at least one powerful female Democrat deciding to piggyback off the wave of sexual assault allegations sweeping the country by openly telling Michigan voters to vote for her because she is a women.

Democratic candidate for Michigan’s Attorney General, Dana Nessel, has released an ad for her campaign that directly implies that voters should choose her simply because she does not have a penis and therefore cannot sexually assault someone she works with like many male politicians (on both sides of the aisle) have been accused of over the past month.

“Who can you trust most not to show you their penis in a professional setting? That would be the candidate who doesn’t have one,” Nessel says with a straight face as headlines of male sexual harassment play across the screen.

Nessel attempted to explain the fact that she is now attempting to guilt voters into voting for her as a way to show that they are against sexual harassment in an interview with a local news outlet.

“If you get more women in office, if you get more women in positions of authority, you’re less likely to have issues where someone is pulling out their penis at an inappropriate time in the the workplace,” she told WWJ’s Charlie Langton.


“I’m not saying that all men harass and I’m certainly not saying that women are incapable of sexually harassing, but I know from many years serving as an assistant prosecutor prosecuting sex crimes, honestly, the vast, vast majority of those cases do involve men. So I thought that point needed to be made.”

So there you have it.

The Democrats apparently plan to run on a platform that uses guilt to force Americans to vote for them or risk making it look as if they do not care about the issue of sexual harassment.

Absolutely disgusting.


nmewn Eyes Opened Sat, 12/02/2017 - 07:34 Permalink

That seems to be what the progs want, moar thought/speech crimes. Imagine, sitting in a dimly lit bar around closing time..."it"...has enough makeup on to make Picasso proud but you're just unsure because you can't get a good look at "its" adams you lean over and don't have a penis do you?The next thing you know you're being tazed, muscles alternately frozen then, involuntarily twitching as a group wearing similar makeup, dressed mini skirts are kicking you and you're being screamed at to roll over & put your hands behind your back.You've been caught in a Speech Crime Sting ;-)

In reply to by Eyes Opened

TungstenBars Government nee… Fri, 12/01/2017 - 20:41 Permalink

I've had my crotch and ass grabbed by older women my entire life. The idea that it is only men doing it is ridiculous. I'd assume women are more prevailant at grabbing because they are not called out. Men just don't care enough to react. Contrary to popular belief it is not usually enjoyable to have some 45 year old, or older, random lady grab your junk on a busy subway but the discomfort is nothing more than a nuissance. People should focus on their lives not some jackass they come into contact with for a few seconds of life. This outrage seems like boredom and a call for attention.

In reply to by Government nee…

nmewn A Sentinel Sat, 12/02/2017 - 07:47 Permalink

Oh yeah, she (and they) are a trip when they get all the husbands learned long ago don't ever agree with one of them when she says her sister did something bad...cuz then ragging on my sister buddy?!Then she (or all) descend on the hapless victim with fangs & fully extended talons and are not satisfied until blood is drawn.Its kinda cool, they stick together like glue, through thick & thin ;-)

In reply to by A Sentinel