These 8 Places Around The World Are Actively Preparing For Nuclear War

Authored by Daisy Luther via The Organic Prepper blog,

Everywhere, it seems like officials are actively preparing for the possibility of nuclear war.

Tensions are high in practically every corner of the world but somehow, despite the proliferation of imminent threats, many people are still blithely unaware of the hell that could be unleashed.

Due to tensions between the US and North Korea, the world is frantically preparing for the possibility of a nuclear attack. The US, China, Russia, North Korea, and South Korea have all shown force with bombers and destroyers, and it seems that it will only be a matter of time before one incident sparks a cascading explosion.

The governments of these 8 places are making preparations, but they’ll be to little avail if people don’t participate and just expect to be rescued.

1) South Korea

In South Korea, their government has urged citizens to get prepared for war, and prepping is becoming mainstream for North Korea’s nearest neighbor and sworn enemy.

The government of South Korea is making every effort to turn its citizens into a country of survivalists. With the ever-increasing threats from the North, South Korean preppers are becoming mainstream, instead of a quirky fringe element…

The South Korean President isn’t taking this lying down. In case North Korea undertakes provocations against us or our ally, we have the power to destroy (the North) beyond recovery.” This threat most likely will not please the Dear Leader of North Korea, so it’s probably safe to predict even greater hostilities on the horizon.

The South Korean Ministry of Public Administration and Security has issued guidelines for a variety of attacks to their citizens due to the ever-increasing risk of an attack by North Korea…

…An article published in the South Korean Times states, “The number of doomsday pessimists is rapidly growing here, as is shown from the number of relevant YouTube videos and their views.”

The article goes on to describe a video by a popular female comedian that teaches watchers how to create a bug-out bag. But that’s not all. South Korean preppers are becoming mainstream. (source)

2) China

A Chinese newspaper from an area that shares a border with North Korea published a series of articles advising people how to prepare for a strike.

Bloomberg summarized the advice:

The Jilin Daily — the government newspaper of Jilin province on North Korea’s northeastern border — published articles on page 5 explaining how nuclear weapons work and the damage they cause. The paper used cartoons to offer advice on what residents can do about radiation exposure and provided instructions on how to respond during an attack.

One article listed essential items for emergency kits, including fire extinguishers and breathing masks. Another warned that air raids could mean nuclear, chemical and biological attacks, and used the 1945 atomic bombing of Hiroshima as an example.

The cartoon images illustrated how residents should clean their bodies, boots, and coats after being exposed to radiation. They suggested taking iodine tablets if there is radiation nearby. (source)

3) Japan

Millions of people in Japan have taken part in (or soon will) nuclear attack evacuation drills, and the Prime Minister is urging local authorities to designate the best sturdy, underground sites to be used as potential shelters.

…Tokyo isn’t the first city to conduct these types of large-scale drills: Towns facing the Korean Peninsula have conducted similar drills in recent months. 

The national and city governments are to carry out a series of exercises between January and March to prepare for a potential attack on Tokyo, the Sankei Shimbun newspaper reported, the first time that a major Japanese city will have carried out responses to a simulated attack.

Towns facing the Korean Peninsula have in recent months conducted similar drills, with residents instructed to seek shelter in response to sirens warning of an imminent missile strike.

Prime Minister Shinzo Abe has called on local governments throughout the country to identify underground facilities or buildings that are sufficiently sturdy to withstand a missile attack and to designate those facilities as shelters. source()

But it isn’t just Asia that is preparing for the possibility of a nuclear strike.

4) Australia

Australia recently received a warning from North Korea, calling the country a “vassal” of the United States.

A spokesman for the North Korean Foreign Ministry told the country’s state-run Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) [said] that Australia’s support for the United States in opposing North Korea was a “suicidal act.”
 
“Australia will be unable to avoid a disaster if it keeps toeing the US line of military, economic and diplomatic pressure upon the DPRK despite its repeated warnings,” the Foreign Ministry spokesman was quoted as saying.
 
“It should be prudent in speech and conduct with its own principle, instead of blindly following the US’ policy of aggression, and realize that working to develop friendly relations with other countries is the best way to its security.” (source)
The minister for defense personnel, Dan Tehan, said that they “will not be cowed” by North Korea’s threats.

5) Hawaii

Hawaii recently tested their nuclear sirens that have not been used since the 1980s. The island is the closest American state to Hawaii, which makes it geographically vulnerable.

But here’s the bummer about the siren test. They were going for 20 whole minutes and hardly anyone even noticed them.

It’s hoped that the 385 sirens dotted around Hawaii will give residents and tourists a 20-minute warning if North Korean nuclear missiles are inbound.

But the sirens, which have been silent since the Cold War, were barely heard in the busy tourist areas of Waikiki, where most people obliviously went about their day.

…Disturbed by the underwhelming results of the tests, officials are now investigating whether the sirens were operating as they are supposed to. (source)

One of my dearest friends lives in Hawaii and has attended the nuclear preparedness meetings that have been held on Maui. According to her, hardly anyone shows up. No one is interested.

With that in mind, one must wonder if the issue with the lack of response to the nuke siren is one of decibels or one of cognitive dissonance.

6) Guam

As a US territory and the closest to North Korea, Guam could find itself in the crosshairs. Officials have issued guidelines to all its residents to prepare them for the possibility of a nuclear strike. (Here’s a link to the fact sheet.)

There’s some excellent advice, such as:
  • “Make a list of potential concrete shelters near your home, workplace or school.”
  • “Do not look at the flash or fireball — It can blind you.”
  • “Lie flat on the ground and cover your head. If the explosion is some distance away, it could take 30 seconds or more for the blast wave to hit.”
  • “When possible, take a shower with lots of soap and water…do not scrub or scratch the skin.”
  • “Do not use conditioner in your hair because it will bind radioactive material to your hair.”

7) The US Mainland

Here on the mainland, California is making preparations, but one notable factor is that residents should not expect help from the government any time soon should such a catastrophe occur. (This, of course, is something that preppers have known for a long time and is clearly evidenced in the slow response to Puerto Rico.)

It also warns of the difficulties government authorities would likely encounter in dealing with the aftermath of a blast. The public will need to evacuate, the report says, but with “limited understanding of radiation risks, they will experience high anxiety and may be non-compliant…”

“…The consequences of a nuclear attack in Southern California would be catastrophic,” the report says. “Nonetheless, government entities and first responders are expected to remain operational to preserve human life, maintain order, and aid in the recovery process.”

The report, which is largely directed at local, state, and federal agencies and first responders located in the Los Angeles region, notes that the federal government will likely be of limited help immediately after a nuclear blast.

“[T]here will be no significant federal assistance at the scene for 24-72 hours following the attack,” the bulletin says. (source)

The Pentagon is planning missile defense bases along the coast.

Congressman Mike Rogers, who sits on the House Armed Services Committee and chairs the Strategic Forces Subcommittee which oversees missile defence, said the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) was aiming to install extra defences at West Coast sites.

“It’s just a matter of the location, and the MDA making a recommendation as to which site meets their criteria,” the Alabama Congressman and Republican said.

When asked about the plan, MDA Deputy Director Rear Admiral Jon Hill said in a statement: “The Missile Defense Agency has received no tasking to site the Terminal High Altitude Air Defense System on the West Coast.”

The MDA is a unit of the US Defense Department. Congressman Rogers did not reveal the exact locations the agency is considering but said several sites are “competing” for the missile defense installations. source()

The goal, of course, is to shoot down the missiles before they can land in the United States and cause untold damage and death tolls. It may not be that easy though. Alarmingly, several experts have raised concerns about our ability to shoot down nukes before they hit.

8) Russia

Russia has been preparing for nuclear possibilities for quite a while now. Last year, it was reported that Russia was building fallout shelters all over the country and that 40 million citizens participated in a defense drill shortly before the US election, when tensions were running high over Syria.

But it didn’t end with the election because now Russia is up to its eyeballs trying to defuse the US/North Korea situation. Russian president Vladimir Putin recently received a letter from Kim Jong Un that stated they could launch an attack on the US “at any day” and could reach the mainland.

As well, Russia has voiced concerns about the animosity with NATO and recently drilled for the possibilities of nuclear or biological attacks. Russia has alleged that the US and Europe are developing nuclear weapons use procedures at their borders.

Preparing for a scenario in which Russia was attacked by “weapons of mass destruction by a hypothetical enemy,” soldiers were deployed in hazmat suits and gas masks.

Units specializing in chemical weapons were deployed in the Krasnodar and Stavropol regions, while at least 100 personnel in the neighboring Rostov region launched a parallel decontamination drill on Monday. It followed similar exercises held by Russian overseas troops in nearby Armenia over the weekend.

Also deployed were mobile laboratories and radioactive- and chemical-tracing reconnaissance vehicles capable of quarantining, assessing and potentially eliminating a chemical or nuclear threat. 

In recent weeks, Russia’s nuclear-capable forces practiced missile launches and flyovers in apparent offensive measures for a conflict scenario. (source)

Here is what would happen if a 10 kiloton nuclear strike occurred.

As I have written numerous times, if you aren’t at Ground Zero, a nuclear strike is very survivable. It isn’t one of those situations like The Road, where the whole world is a nuclear wasteland and people start eating each other to survive.

(This is an excerpt from my article, How to Prepare for a Nuclear Attack.)

Contrary to popular belief, a nuke won’t kill everyone within hundreds of miles. If you aren’t in the immediate blast radius, a nuclear strike is absolutely survivable.

The one-mile radius around the blast will be virtually unsurvivable. Within two miles, people will suffer 3rd-degree burns from the intense wave of heat.

If you are within two miles of the blast, the winds will be coming at about 600 miles per hour. This will take down buildings and cause a tremendous amount of pressure. Some experts recommend that you keep your mouth open to try and reduce the pressure on your eardrums. Looking at the blast could cause permanent blindness.

According to the DHS (source), 10 kilotons is the approximate size of nuclear weapon we could expect.

  • Nearly everyone within a half-mile radius of the point of impact would die and most of the buildings would be demolished. This would be considered Ground Zero.
  • The area within the next half mile would suffer extensive damage, fires, and serious injuries.
  • Areas within three miles could see minor injuries to people and slight damage to their homes.
  • The fallout would kill even more people. According to the DHS:
  • Within 10 to 20 miles of the explosion, radioactive exposure would cause nausea and vomiting within hours and death without medical treatment.
  • But for those near enough to the blast, experiencing more than 800R of radiation, not seeking shelter immediately would cause deaths with or without medical treatment, the study found.
  • People would not be able to evacuate this area as fallout would arrive within just 10 minutes.

People upwind of the strike and outside the 20-mile radius would be unlikely to suffer any effects. People downwind would need to take shelter. Deaths from cancer that is related to the fallout could occur for many years after.

With all of these governments spending oodles of money trying to prepare their citizens for the unthinkable, it would be extremely wise to get ready, just in case.

You’ll need to plan to hunker down for 14-21 days. That means you’ll need food, a way to cook it, water, sanitation supplies, and other essentials to last for that amount of time. You should invest in a potassium iodide supplement to stave off the possibility of thyroid cancer. (Learn how to use them in this article with a printable version.)

*  *  *

In times like this, it’s more essential than ever to keep well-informed. (Sign up here for my daily emails and follow my website, Preppers Daily News.) Most importantly, go to this article to learn in-depth what you should do to prepare for the possibility of a nuclear attack. If the missiles are in the air, it’s far too late.

Comments

J S Bach bobcatz Sat, 12/09/2017 - 23:19 Permalink

How can you "prepare" for nuclear war?!  It's absurd.If there's a full-on exchange, we're all toast.  Even those in the hinterlands would eventually be subjected to the radiation and effects on the food chain.  And when the last billionaire jews emerge from their cockroach bunkers... whose going to do their slave work for them?  Having to fend for themselves will be THEIR downfall as well.

In reply to by bobcatz

Luc X. Ifer erkme73 Sun, 12/10/2017 - 00:08 Permalink

Finally a close to scientific accurate presentation by 0hedge of how a nuclear war would unravel vs the gloomy fear porn using as reference the arsenal of 1970's. A nuclear war in 2017 wouldn' be worse than the 2nd world war, maybe even less damaging however, would unraveal way, way faster, just a matter of hours - of course, that's doesn't make it less despicable or desirable. 

In reply to by erkme73

Doña K Luc X. Ifer Sun, 12/10/2017 - 01:41 Permalink

It realy does not matter to me, as I would not want to live in such a society. The truth however, is that the elites only want to scare the masses for gain as nuclear war affects them as well.Not to say that it may not happen as two countries (Israel and NoKo) will use nukes if their existense is about to end by a conventional war.

In reply to by Luc X. Ifer

Majestic12 Doña K Sun, 12/10/2017 - 16:06 Permalink

"Not to say that it may not happen...end by a conventional war"

Let's all remember...WWII was a "nuclear" war.

It was just that the opponent had both hands tied behind its back...

Classic American fighting.

In the next nuclear war, all players will have to be aware that a small nuke scuffle can be a distraction to launch a surprise overwhelming attack.

Russia (with a superior nuke force) has the most resources of any country to lose.

They have already integrated their response strategy with the world's desire to "obtain" the Russian land mass.

MMA folks...every move counts...there can be no "war room" discussion, because in a global nuclear exchange, you can't "tap out".

A small scuffle will quickly escalate to a preemptive strike or global exchange....or there will be no "winner".

Stop dreaming.

In reply to by Doña K

Zoltanne Luc X. Ifer Sun, 12/10/2017 - 06:39 Permalink

Why do you accept such low standards? This author has no scientific background whatsoever, uses a nom-du-plume, lives in the burbs while chortling about being a 'homesteader', and puts her little articles on some of the worst doom-porn sites out there. Oh wait! I just read this garbage you wrote: "A nuclear war in 2017 wouldn' be worse than the 2nd world war"Are you fucking KIDDING?You DESERVE the Daisy Luther Schmuck Award.

In reply to by Luc X. Ifer

Perimetr Zoltanne Sun, 12/10/2017 - 10:53 Permalink

All these prepper articles, as well as many that come from FEMA,tell you what to do in the event of a 10 to 15 kiloton detonationSince when is China, Russia, or the US going to use Hiroshima-size weapons against each other if there is a nuclear war?Even North Korea has tested a thermonuclear weapon with a yield of at least 100 kiilotons.China has ICBMs with 5000 kiloton warheads.The consequences of a large nuclear war are inescapable http://www.nucleardarkness.org/warconsequences/hundredfiftytonessmoke/

In reply to by Zoltanne

DisorderlyConduct Perimetr Sun, 12/10/2017 - 11:18 Permalink

I think the 'normal' strategy in mind is to use MIRVs,  which may represent a total of 100kt, but are spread out in 10-15 reentry vehicles.So point taken. I think the article fails to address multiple hits, which would be dotted over a target area. The chaos of multiple blast waves from multiple directions surely means even more chaos.And let's be real. If someone is contemplating nukes, they aren't gonna lob a 10kt warhead at Duluth. They are going to have to try to wipe out our retaliatory capability. Launch one, you may as well launch a dozen. Either way, if the US can retaliate, they will....and probably at the wrong target, too...

In reply to by Perimetr

Majestic12 Perimetr Sun, 12/10/2017 - 16:17 Permalink

"China has ICBMs with 5000 kiloton warheads."

MIRVs....ahh, bigger "is" better....

What we really need to do is just heed the wise words of Brittany Spears..

"Keep dancin' til' the world ends...."

Oh, wait....that's what we "are" doing....

Ok then, add some drinking and fucking...

Oh wait...that is also what we're doing...

Ok, then everyone vape weed daily, even to work...who cares if we kill people being high while driving a semi truck...

Oh, wait....

Ok then...get mad and go out and "vote"!!! that'll change things...!!!

In reply to by Perimetr

Luc X. Ifer Zoltanne Sun, 12/10/2017 - 12:27 Permalink

Hello sucker - I've read lots of scientific reference material on the theme and I can tell you that the author actually summarizes the conclusions of that papers.
Even MSM finally accepted that spreading false nuclear doom porn is worthless in 2017, both CNN and BBC published articles about how a potential nuclear would unraveal now vs the 1970s.
Simple truth is - if you are not in the main impact zone, you have very high chances to survive with the condition you do the right things.
There are two reasons for being a nuclear doom porn junkie in 2017 - ignorant sucker exploited by the doom porn sellers or being actually one of the doom porn sellers. By my position I can't belong to any of these two but you, trough your attitude certainly hash yourself as one so, which are you - the ignorant sucker or the doom porn seller?!

In reply to by Zoltanne

Cloud9.5 Luc X. Ifer Sun, 12/10/2017 - 07:41 Permalink

Precisely that mind set will flip the switch that turns out the lights.  You do realize that half the country lived on a farm in 1941 and a good many of them were still plowing with mules and most of them did not have electricity.  Much of the 19th century technology and skills were still up and running.  Turn out the lights today and we will lose 90% of our population within the first year.  That is nothing like WW II.

In reply to by Luc X. Ifer

Luc X. Ifer Cloud9.5 Sun, 12/10/2017 - 12:33 Permalink

You are wrong - I agree, high probability 90% or more will not make it due to the lack of basics skills *BUT*, they would have also perished during the 2nd WW due to the same cause. You confuse the cause with the effect. The cause is the lack of skills - lost historically due to transformation of cattle from farmers and low skilled industrial workers into office swine, not the level of surrounding infrastructure damage - in that environment the ones still having the proper skills will survive and thrive same as the ones who did it after the 2nd WW. Everything is just a choice but it must be an informed one.  

In reply to by Cloud9.5

Crassus tattmaster Sun, 12/10/2017 - 01:51 Permalink

I find the idea of nuclear war refreshing. I'm tired of the MRE, the horrific daytime and nighttime temperature range (what to wear?) the noise, the dust, the smell and the people, the people are just awful!As for preparations, I recommend a pitcher of Martinis with this recipe:Vermouth poured in a shaker filled with ice, shake, pour out the vermouth;add Plymouth Gin (Navy strength), shake:pour into glasses;add one drop (not two) of Pernod for each glass;garnish and serve:voila, the Nato Martini!Enjoy.

In reply to by tattmaster

Crassus tattmaster Sun, 12/10/2017 - 02:56 Permalink

ZH is total agitprop territory.Also what I find fascinating about this primitive war we fight;the bodies of those treated to 3200 degrees F. run a silver-rust stream of a mixture of blood, lymph and fat, from the charred carcass; in two streams:one from the upper torso, one from the thigh/loin region and they always seem to mingleinto one at about twelve feet away.

In reply to by tattmaster

Luc X. Ifer Crassus Sun, 12/10/2017 - 12:41 Permalink

I'm optimist because I understand the facts of reality and I know I'm skilled enough to deal with the probable consequences - fear comes from lack of confidence in handling a critical situation and lack of confidence in handling a critical situation come from lack of skills and preparation - makes sense? If one is prepared properly there is no place for fear, fear is one's enemy not ally - Sun Tzu's 'Art of War'.  

In reply to by Crassus