Yellen's Big Goodbye (And What She's Leaving Behind)

Authored by Kevin Muir via The Macro Tourist blog,

The past three Fed Chairs before Yellen all had their own crisis to deal with.

Volcker had the disaster of the early 1980’s as he struggled to tame inflation with double digit interest rates. That helped contribute to the Latin American debt crisis, and the subsequent global bear markets in stocks.

He handed over the reins to Greenspan in the summer of ‘87 and within months, the new Fed Chairman faced the largest stock market crash since the 1920’s. That trial by fire was invaluable for Greenspan, as he faced a second crisis when the DotCom bubble burst at the turn of the century.

His successor, Ben Bernanke also did not escape without a record breaking financial panic when the real estate collapse hit the global economy especially hard in 2007.

But Yellen? Nothing. Nada. She has presided over the least volatile, most steady, market rally of the past century. Was she lucky? Or was this the result of smart policy decisions? I tend to attribute it more to luck, but it’s tough to argue that she made any large mistakes. Sure you might quibble about the rate of interest rate increases. And her critics will argue that economic growth, and more importantly, wage increases have been especially anemic under her watch, but to a large degree, those variables are out of her hands.

I don’t want to argue about Yellen’s legacy. Chances are your view is heavily influenced by your opinion about proper monetary policy. I doubt I could change your mind, but more importantly, it won’t help us decide where the markets are headed even one little bit.

Yellen’s last meeting

Yet the lack of a market crisis under her watch might play an important influence on the last meeting she chairs.

Think about what she is leaving for Jerome Powell. It is quite clear that the ‘animal spirits’ have been ignited. All you need to do is look at the price of Bitcoin, or the last eleven months of gains in global stocks.

Look closely at that chart. Try to find another year without a red month.

Or take a gander at the market capitalization of the various crypto currencies.

Say what you want about the investing merits surrounding Bitcoin and all the other crypto currencies, but it’s safe to say that without the massive Central Bank science experiment of massive balance sheet expansion and negative rates, it would have been considerably more difficult for crypto currencies to reach this sort of popularity. Try blowing a crypto currency bubble with positive real rates. Tough. Try again with negative real rates throughout the world. Much easier.

Look at the Developed Market countries. They all have a negative real Central Bank rate. Wonder why the public is clamouring for an alternative store of value? It’s because Central Bankers are engaging in offensive amounts of financial repression.

I have this buddy who used to be a big time credit trader, but is now a semi-retired student of the markets. He is a massive crypto bull. Since way back when. And the reasons for his bullishness center around the absurdity of the amount of Central Bank printing. He has seen first hand the fragility of the financial system and is convinced we will be debased to oblivion. Ok, I might be paraphrasing a little. But here are a couple of blog posts he wrote on LinkedIn (yeah, I know, LinkedIn?) that go into his reasoning for owning cryptos - The Last Ten Years of Fiat Money Math and I am a Bitcoin Fan. Now I can’t bring myself to buy bits-in-the-sky because the Central Bankers are all insane, but I am sympathetic to his arguments that the end game is for all this to be debased.

The reason I bring this up? This is Janet Yellen’s last press conference. Yeah, it appears as though she has made it through her term without causing an equity crash. But could it be that her legacy will be tarnished by presiding over the end of the public’s faith in Central Banks’ ability to preserve the value of money? Rightly or wrongly, we might be on the verge of a dramatic change in the global financial system.

It’s the right thing to do

Given the environment, the most logical tack for Yellen is to err on hawkishness. She has a chance to give a final warning about the current exuberant attitude sweeping across the nation.

Let’s face it, the Federal Reserve was practically begging the Federal Government to loosen the fiscal purse strings in the years following the Great Financial Crisis, yet the Tea Party made sequestration and other cuts a priority. Now, some eight years into a recovery, the Federal Government is aggressively cutting taxes and planning on making a big infrastructure spending push. The timing is terrible.

The animal spirits have been roused, and it’s clear it’s the Federal Reserve’s job to tame them.

Trouble is, the market does not believe the Fed has the guts to follow through with their projections. Have a look at the difference between market expectations of future Fed Funds policy versus the FOMC’s “infamous” dot plot.

The purple line is the market’s expectation of Fed funds, while the green line is the FOMC’s median projection.

The other day on Bloomberg TV, I heard a great explanation of the difference between these two series. A former Fed staffer argued that the FOMC projection represents the modal path, while the market is pricing a probability weighted mean. The market is worried about an accident causing the Fed to slash rates aggressively, and even if it is not probable, they still need to reflect this possibility in their pricing. By that argument, it would seem that the Fed’s Dot Plot will always be higher than the market.

But what about the alternative scenario? What if the Fed has to jack up rates because of inflation?

Well, the market obviously doesn’t view that outcome as realistic.

Yellen is going to surprise on the hawkish side

Back to Yellen. She is leaving, the markets are going bezerk. Put yourself in her shoes. You haven’t had even the slightest hint of a crisis under your watch. You are about to hand over the keys of the Federal Reserve. What would be the honourable thing to do?

Delivering the most hawkish press conference one could reasonably deliver under the circumstances would be the correct course of action. Maybe the market will ignore you. But at least you tried.

I know the markets are not at all concerned about tomorrow’s FOMC meeting, but I think there is a decent chance that Yellen & Co. end up erring with a significantly more hawkish statement than expected.

My suspicion is that Central Banks throughout the globe have not only passed their period of peak easiness, but are going to surprise in the coming quarters by aggressively reducing monetary stimulus. Nothing would help this campaign more than a Federal Reserve leading the way. This will be Yellen’s parting gift to Powell and the world. Let’s just hope that doesn’t cause a repeat of Greenspan’s first few months on the job…


NoDebt Wed, 12/13/2017 - 09:38 Permalink

The car might be wrecked, but Yellen always made sure it had plenty of gas in it.  That photo is absolutely CLASSIC.  I don't normally come to ZH for the pictures, but somebody had a moment of genius on that one.Filling up the tank on a wrecked car.  Absolutely nailed it.  Pitch-perfect. 

aloha_snakbar Wed, 12/13/2017 - 09:40 Permalink

Whatever else, we should not support her via taxpayer funded pension. Trump should sign an EO requiring Barky Obozo to adopt and support her, as she was his baby...

LawsofPhysics Wed, 12/13/2017 - 09:42 Permalink

Don't overthink this folks.  Only ONE thing you need to think about, who do you trust.Remember, when fraud is the status quo, possession is the only "law". Can you maintain possession of the productive capital and resources that are required to maintain a decent standard of living? Get you tribe in order!"Full Faith and Credit"Same as it ever was!!!!!!!!

GunnerySgtHartman Wed, 12/13/2017 - 09:48 Permalink

Was she lucky? Or was this the result of smart policy decisions? I tend to attribute it more to luck, but it’s tough to argue that she made any large mistakes.I wouldn't go so far as to say that a "lack of large mistakes" is the same as "making smart policy decisions."

Hugh_Jorgan GunnerySgtHartman Wed, 12/13/2017 - 10:06 Permalink

The way I see it is that Yellen's biggest mistake/failing was that she didn't begin the inevitable process of repair on what was obviously broken and easily remedied (albeit with some very unattractive economic & political consequences).

She took the car in a very similar shape as what you see now. I always thought she was going to be a fall-guy (along with Trump) which they could still be. But it looks like she might have just been a time-marker, a puppet, a place holder.

In reply to by GunnerySgtHartman

wmbz Wed, 12/13/2017 - 09:48 Permalink

The only thing Jack Yellen is leaving behind, is the same thing they all do, one giant and always growing stinking pile of debt.She gets to collect her gold watch, for a job well done. Banksters Inc. has it all under their control.

Pol Pot Wed, 12/13/2017 - 09:50 Permalink

Yellen is leaving behind a big smoldering pile of economic shit that will only be cleaned up by confiscating the wealth of the working class.... The way I see it, if you are not a 1 percenter than you better get on welfare while you still can....

wide angle tree Wed, 12/13/2017 - 09:52 Permalink

The Fed Chair could be filled with a monkey. It makes no difference. The Federal Reserve is a device politicians rely on to divest responsibility from themselves. The Fed has done what it can to keep the government controlled economy going. Don't be fooled the banking system is government.

newJesus Wed, 12/13/2017 - 09:51 Permalink

........and ladies and gentlemen, let me present to you the great acheivemnt of russian auto-industry ......lada. russians can go to space, roam the bottom of the oceans, but a car? nah, fuck that, here is the square block of metal, just put some wheels on it. 

Calculus99 Wed, 12/13/2017 - 09:59 Permalink

All I hear is Bitcoin. Hardly ever a mention of Monero. A clue perhaps?Folks the future is digital. Therefore a digital CASH is needed. Bitcoin isn't that (but I still like it). Monero is.Do yourself a favour, when in bed tonight think for 20 mins SOLID about a digital cash alternative that's got a GLOBAL market. And that cash has ZERO government control instead of the digital cash you know they want to introduce. Which would you rather own? A free market digital cash or one that's controlled by your government? The ban on cash war has officially ended before it's even started...

One of these i… Calculus99 Wed, 12/13/2017 - 11:14 Permalink

Actually, according to a company memo I once red in a banking job I once had, the plan was to completely replace cash with "bank credit & digital payment systems" in the UK by the mid 90's.They had the prototype "market trader" visa machines built and everything ready to go, it seemed...(((They))) aren't omnipotent, you know.

In reply to by Calculus99

Blankfuck Wed, 12/13/2017 - 10:02 Permalink


Conax Wed, 12/13/2017 - 10:04 Permalink

She will leave behind the aroma of tuna gone bad and mothballs.  Oh, and the most corrupt, rotten, crooked, fake 'markets' the world has ever known.

moneybots Wed, 12/13/2017 - 10:11 Permalink

"The past three Fed Chairs before Yellen all had their own crisis to deal with. But Yellen? Nothing. Nada." Only due to luck. Yellen said she didn't see the 2008 crisis until it happened. Like with Greenspan, she is leaving before the next crisis, which she has fueled by way of the everything bubble.  

moneybots Wed, 12/13/2017 - 10:15 Permalink

"Let’s face it, the Federal Reserve was practically begging the Federal Government to loosen the fiscal purse strings in the years following the Great Financial Crisis" FED motto- dig a deeper hole.

moneybots Wed, 12/13/2017 - 10:18 Permalink

"But could it be that her legacy will be tarnished by presiding over the end of the public’s faith in Central Banks’ ability to preserve the value of money?" The FED doesn't preserve the value of money. A 2% inflation target is the destruction of the value of money.

rejected Wed, 12/13/2017 - 11:19 Permalink

Inflation is whatever the parasites and their media want the slugs to believe. Calculating inflation changed 3 times.In 1983, housing prices were removed and "owner equivalent rent" was substituted.In 1998 Hedonics was introduced to estimate a products value as technology advanced.In 1999 product substitutions was introduced.We're all mushrooms now! We believe whatever the government puts out regardless of how skeptical. The CPI is changed to meet the government criteria. you can see some of the changes.Example in 2012 food was indexed at 15.26%.... In 2016 at 14.65%. Obviously this would cause food inflation to be lower in the index.And check out the medical component.... 8%. You gott be Fkn kidding.Yes,,, They play us like a well tuned violin.…

koan Wed, 12/13/2017 - 12:08 Permalink

Yes think about it, the cat lady can waltz out leaving a financial bomb waiting to go off for the non-Jew taking the position.See how it works?

Exponere Mendaces Wed, 12/13/2017 - 13:10 Permalink

Central Bankers are awesome.They are ensuring via their robbing of future generations, the fuel that every cryptocurrency needs to reach the outer solar system in valuations.Thanks, you money-printing assholes! 

any_mouse Wed, 12/13/2017 - 15:10 Permalink

All investments are affected by negative interest rates.

There is no real price discovery in anything.

13 months of gains in global equities back to November 2016.

Up, up, up, and away. The beautiful balloon.