Women's March Organizer Linda Sarsour Accused Of Enabling Sexual Assault Of Female Employee

Feminist activist and Women's March organizer, Linda Sarsour, has been accused of enabling the sexual assault of a female employee who worked for her in 2009 at the Arab American Association, two sources "directly familiar" with the matter tell the Daily Caller


Linda Sarsour

According to Sarsour's accuser Asmi Fathelbab, a 37 year old New York native and devout Muslim - a man named Majed Seif who lived in the same building as the Arab American Association began stalking Fathelbab. Asmi tells the Daily Caller that one of Seif's favorite activities was "sneaking up on her with a full erection.

“He would sneak up on me during times when no one was around, he would touch me, you could hear me scream at the top of my lungs. He would pin me against the wall and rub his crotch on me.”

 

"depending on what floor I was on, you could hear me scream at the top of my lungs.

“It was disgusting,” Fathelbab told the Caller. “I ran the youth program in the building and with that comes bending down and talking to small children. You have no idea what it was like to stand up and feel that behind you. I couldn’t scream because I didn’t want to scare the child in front of me. It left me shaking.”

When Fathelbab went to Linda Sarsour to report the sexual assaults, she was dismissed and shamed. “She [Sarsour] called me a liar because ‘Something like this didn’t happen to women who looked like me,'” Asmi says. “How dare I interrupt her TV news interview in the other room with my ‘lies.'”


Fathelbab says Sarsour "regularly body-shamed her" and enabled the sexual assaults, and Sarsour threatened to legal and professional damage if she went public with the sexual assault claims. “She told me he had the right to sue me for false claims,” said Asmi, adding that her abuser “had the right to be anywhere in the building he wanted.”

"I cannot stand by any longer and watch everyone praise a woman that claims to be for women’s rights and someone that fights for women when she herself allowed for abuse to occur to women," wrote Fathelbab. When Fathelbab went to the president of the Arab American Association's board of directors, Ahmed Jaber, he too shut her down. 

Jaber told me my stalker was a ‘God-fearing man’ who was ‘always at the Mosque,’ so he wouldn’t do something like that,” Fathelbab claims. “He wanted to make it loud and clear this guy was a good Muslim and I was a bad Muslim for “complaining.” -Daily Caller

In response to these claims, Sarsour attacked Fathelbab - telling her that if she continued to report sexual assaults by Jajed Seif, her allegations would result in disciplinary action. Fathelbab told the Daily Caller that she was once forced to talk to a dectective from the community liaison division about the consequences of making false claims to the authorities. 

Two sources who knew Fathelbab while she was employed with the Arab American Association told the Daily Caller that Asmi would return from work "emotionally distressed and in a panic," describing it as an "unsafe" work environment. Another source who has worked with the Arab American Association for 12 years and spoke on the condition of anonymity said that Sarsour was "militant against other women," and that they remember witnessing Fathelbab being harassed in the building. 

They made it about her weight, saying she was not attractive enough to be harassed and then swept it under the rug,” the source said. “It was Linda Sarsour, Ahmad Jaber and Habib Joudeh who took care of it.” Habib Joudeh is the vice president of the Arab American Association of New York. -DC

Fathelbab says that she's now unemployable as a result of going public with her claims. 


Linda Sarsour with supporters at Women's March

Sarsour - a self-proclaimed "racial justice & civil rights activist," made headlines during the Women's March for attacking Ayyan Hirsi Ali, a former Muslim who was forced to suffer female genital mutilation. After the 9/11 attacks, Hirsi Ali renounced Islam and ran for Dutch parliament in 2003, winning. In 2006, she rallied against Iran's development of nuclear weapons, and in 2015, she railed against the Islamic State.

In a now-deleted tweet from 2011, Sarsour - who posed with an alleged Hamas financier in January, said of Hirsi Ali: "I wish I could take their vaginas away - they don't deserve to be women." 

In July, Sarsour called for a Jihad against the Trump administration "fascists reigning in the White House" at the Islamic Society of North America Convention. 

I hope that we when we stand up to those who oppress our communities that Allah accepts from us that as a form of jihad. That we are struggling against tyrants and rulers not only abroad in the Middle East or in the other side of the world, but here in these United States of America where you have fascists and white supremacists and Islamophobes reigning in the White House,” Sarsour said.

 

“Our number one and top priority is to protect and defend our community, it is not to assimilate and please any other people and authority,” she said. “Our obligation is to our young people, is to our women, to make sure our women are protected in our community.”

 

Our top priority and even higher than all those other priorities is to please Allah and only Allah,” Sarsour declared.

Watch here: 

The Daily Caller received no response from Sarsour in regards to Asmi Fathelbab's allegations.

Comments

Theosebes Goodfellow Bastiat Mon, 12/18/2017 - 09:45 Permalink

What the god in Mohammad's head said to women:

Qur’an 33:32 “Consorts of the Prophet! You are not like any of the (other) women. Fear and keep your duty, lest one in whose heart is a disease should be moved with desire. Stay quietly
in your apartment. Make not a dazzling display like that of the former times of Ignorance. Perform the devotion, pay the zakat; and obey Allah and His Messenger. And Allah wishes to cleanse you with a thorough cleansing. And bear in mind that which is recited in your houses of the revelations of Allah and the wisdom.”

Qur’an 4:23 “Prohibited to you are: your mothers, daughters, sisters.... Also (prohibited are) women already married, except slaves who are captives.” [Rape is okay with Team Islam.]

And young boys too!

Qur’an 76:5 “As for the righteous, they will drink a cup of wine from a spring, making it gush forth abundantly.”

Qur’an 76:19 “And round them shall serve immortal boys of perpetual freshness, never altering in age. If you saw them, you would think they were scattered pearls.”

This is what Sansour supports.

In reply to by Bastiat

eclectic syncretist Richard Chesler Mon, 12/18/2017 - 09:53 Permalink

This is the way that Islamists generally think, after all. In my book, it's unacceptable. A little eye for an eye is all these people seem to understand, so either send them to places where everyone else holds the same beliefs, or start treating them as they would treat others (Golden rule for fuckwits). Let the violated woman pronounce sentence on this witch.

In reply to by Richard Chesler

Ghordius Hillarys Server Mon, 12/18/2017 - 09:27 Permalink

good onethe problem with feminism is that there are several "generations" of themsee Waves of feminism - Wikipedia

now forget for a moment that 4th and 5th gen stuff which is more or less quite murky anyway. but unfolding right nowyour grandmother might have been a first gen feminist asking for owning property without a male custodian deciding, even after a divorce, how she is allowed to spend her own money or not (divorce being another feminist request in many countries in the first place). do you have a problem with that? my point: it's hard to find people that are not ok with 1st or 2nd gen feminism, even here

In reply to by Hillarys Server

Socratic Dog Ghordius Mon, 12/18/2017 - 10:53 Permalink

Just a wild guess, but I wonder if there's a common theme running through those 5 generations?  You know, something to do with with their ethnic/religious background.  Something almost tribal in its nature, perhaps.Nah.  Couldn't be.  Just a coincidence.  Move along, chaps.Edit: BTW, you think most here support abortion, Ghordius?  Not my read.

In reply to by Ghordius

Ghordius Socratic Dog Mon, 12/18/2017 - 12:10 Permalink

I find the concept of the State forbidding abortion an abominationI find that if you really want to forbid abortion, and I understand the urge extremely well... you have to be in a very personal contact with the person you are forcing to carry the pregnancyso basically I would support a "Pro Life" stance... if that decision was made by a group to which those girls/women would join or belong to from birth on and very, very small, local, immediate. like the parish, or the street/neighbourhood. on a practical side, the same that would help, which leads me back to... the familyto come back to your assertion: no. perhaps there is a racial/ethnic/religious background to all that... in the US. but elsewhere... no. feminism is not a local phenomenon, but it has local... adaptationsnow, those spearheading feminism of the 4th/5th gen... now there you could be onto something

In reply to by Socratic Dog

Infnordz Ghordius Mon, 12/18/2017 - 14:34 Permalink

Nope, feminism is mostly cancer, because it fails to recognise the ruthlessly brief window for the most healthy mother and babies, and women's bias for emotional thinking, for raising children and "shit-testing" males, can make they harmfully childish and dishonest if not moderated by discipline, now with even institutionalised mysandry/male-oppression for imagined/inflated faults of males.1st-wave feminism is bad because decades of women voting and being in politics has driven destructing sabotage like Cultural Marxism faster, because women are less rational, more emotional, so can be less loyal, and more childish in their decision making, and often significantly worse at technical thinking.  Property rights is OK in moderation, however too much, and it will be used to cause drama e.g. the earlier Suffragete terrorists were paid to cause escalating exciting drama by wealth rich women, including wives!2nd-wave feminism may look partly OK, but is even worse, because it removed the remaining discipline on women, so allowed women to enslave/corrupt/waste themselves (meaningless jobs/education, THOTS, Hypergamy, permanent genetic tainting risks from earlier unprotected sex, genetically harmfully late marriage, miserable childless/spinster cat-women), made many significantly worse potential mothers and mothers.3rd, 4th, and 5th wave feminism, are complete delusion, depravity, and mysandry, with oppression of males by child-like females.Traditional controls on women existed to protect women from predatory males and mental/genetic corruption, to protect men from childish drama, and to ensure that children were seeded by the husband not another man, and were brought up well, with monogamy to ensure better distribution of women, and better marriage.

In reply to by Ghordius

fleur de lis greenskeeper carl Mon, 12/18/2017 - 09:11 Permalink

Yep -- the leftie bigmouths are so abnormal and unnatural that they are hostile toward childbearing and its responsibilites.If they have one or two children that's a lot, and they have nannies and others to raise them.Mostly they simply do not want to reproduce.They would rather spend that time controlling other people's reproduction and families.They are so warped.The problem is that with all their free time being devoid of family responsibilities, seemingly endless resources, and complete infestation of academia, media, and .gov, they wield disproportionate influence over ordinary people who just want to work and raise families.Academia will have to be flushed and that means cutting off the academic tax welfare checks to hippie departments if they do not produce a 75% post graduate employment rate.By that standard half the colleges will close -- and they should since they are nothing but snowflake factories.All of us are trying to make ends meet and sending snowflake factory managers into the workforce would actually do them a favor.   

In reply to by greenskeeper carl

SilverDOG Latina Lover Mon, 12/18/2017 - 08:54 Permalink

Abuse often "cuts off" women from their genitals.The US has plenty of sexually abused women... and men.When these are abused, predominantly as children, a disconnection or misallocated attention process begins. Consider our(humans) genetic lineage, and not far from the primate we are.Pecking order is 9/10ths of the social structure.High probability you were abused, as more than 25% sexually are, the abuse list goes. onJust do not pass abuse on, and quietly or otherwise stand against it.Yes, Feminazis are looped, but the pendulum swings and has further to go. 

In reply to by Latina Lover

Socratic Dog Ajax-1 Mon, 12/18/2017 - 11:02 Permalink

I spent a year working in Saudi Arabia.  It was standard procedure for the women I worked with to get stiff dicks rubbed against their asses as they leaned over the counters in the gold souk.  Some got pretty good with their reactions, a solid bitch slap knocking the guy down would elicit peals of laughter, and congratulations, from the bystanders.  Some claimed they enjoyed it (the rubbing, not the slapping).  But so far as I could see, it had nothing whatsoever to do with the woman's looks.  Fat slugs got it just as often as lithe beauties.

In reply to by Ajax-1

DavidFL Mon, 12/18/2017 - 08:24 Permalink

In the end we will all come to the conclusion that humans are sexual sentient beings, and as a result, males and females have (for many thousands of years) interacted as such - and will once again settle into the norm once this current phase of hysteria ends.