The Fragile Generation

Authored by &  via Jim Quinn's Burning Platform blog,

Bad policy and paranoid parenting are making kids too safe to succeed

One day last year, a citizen on a prairie path in the Chicago suburb of Elmhurst came upon a teen boy chopping wood. Not a body. Just some already-fallen branches. Nonetheless, the onlooker called the cops.

Officers interrogated the boy, who said he was trying to build a fort for himself and his friends. A local news site reports the police then “took the tools for safekeeping to be returned to the boy’s parents.”

Elsewhere in America, preschoolers at the Learning Collaborative in Charlotte, North Carolina, were thrilled to receive a set of gently used playground equipment. But the kids soon found out they would not be allowed to use it, because it was resting on grass, not wood chips. “It’s a safety issue,” explained a day care spokeswoman. Playing on grass is against local regulations.

And then there was the query that ran in Parents magazine a few years back: “Your child’s old enough to stay home briefly, and often does. But is it okay to leave her and her playmate home while you dash to the dry cleaner?” Absolutely not, the magazine averred: “Take the kids with you, or save your errand for another time.” After all, “you want to make sure that no one’s feelings get too hurt if there’s a squabble.”

The principle here is simple: This generation of kids must be protected like none other. They can’t use tools, they can’t play on grass, and they certainly can’t be expected to work through a spat with a friend.

And this, it could be argued, is why we have “safe spaces” on college campuses and millennials missing adult milestones today. We told a generation of kids that they can never be too safe—and they believed us.

Safety First

We’ve had the best of intentions, of course. But efforts to protect our children may be backfiring. When we raise kids unaccustomed to facing anything on their own, including risk, failure, and hurt feelings, our society and even our economy are threatened. Yet modern child-rearing practices and laws seem all but designed to cultivate this lack of preparedness. There’s the fear that everything children see, do, eat, hear, and lick could hurt them. And there’s a newer belief that has been spreading through higher education that words and ideas themselves can be traumatizing.

How did we come to think a generation of kids can’t handle the basic challenges of growing up?

Beginning in the 1980s, American childhood changed. For a variety of reasons—including shifts in parenting norms, new academic expectations, increased regulation, technological advances, and especially a heightened fear of abduction (missing kids on milk cartons made it feel as if this exceedingly rare crime was rampant)—children largely lost the experience of having large swaths of unsupervised time to play, explore, and resolve conflicts on their own. This has left them more fragile, more easily offended, and more reliant on others. They have been taught to seek authority figures to solve their problems and shield them from discomfort, a condition sociologists call “moral dependency.”

This poses a threat to the kind of open-mindedness and flexibility young people need to thrive at college and beyond. If they arrive at school or start careers unaccustomed to frustration and misunderstandings, we can expect them to be hypersensitive. And if they don’t develop the resources to work through obstacles, molehills come to look like mountains.

This magnification of danger and hurt is prevalent on campus today. It no longer matters what a person intended to say, or how a reasonable listener would interpret a statement—what matters is whether any individual feels offended by it. If so, the speaker has committed a “microaggression,” and the offended party’s purely subjective reaction is a sufficient basis for emailing a dean or filing a complaint with the university’s “bias response team.” The net effect is that both professors and students today report that they are walking on eggshells. This interferes with the process of free inquiry and open debate—the active ingredients in a college education.

And if that’s the case already, what of the kids still in grammar school, constantly reminded they might accidentally hurt each other with the wrong words? When today’s 8-year-olds become the 18-year-olds starting college, will they still view free speech as worthy of protecting? As Daniel Shuchman, chairman of the free speech-promoting Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), puts it, “How likely are they to consider the First Amendment essential if they start learning in fifth grade that you’re forbidden to say—or even think—certain things, especially at school?”

Parents, teachers, and professors are talking about the growing fragility they see. It’s hard to avoid the conclusion that the overprotection of children and the hypersensitivity of college students could be two sides of the same coin. By trying so hard to protect our kids, we’re making them too safe to succeed.

Children on a Leash

If you’re over 40, chances are good that you had scads of free time as a child—after school, on weekends, over the summer. And chances are also good that, if you were asked about it now, you’d go on and on about playing in the woods and riding your bike until the streetlights came on.

Today many kids are raised like veal. Only 13 percent of them even walk to school. Many who take the bus wait at the stop with parents beside them like bodyguards. For a while, Rhode Island was considering a bill that would prohibit children from getting off the bus in the afternoon if there wasn’t an adult waiting to walk them home. This would have applied until seventh grade.

As for summer frolicking, campers don’t just have to take a buddy with them wherever they go, including the bathroom. Some are now required to take two—one to stay with whoever gets hurt, the other to run and get a grown-up. Walking to the john is treated like climbing Mt. Kilimanjaro.

After school, kids no longer come home with a latchkey and roam the neighborhood. Instead, they’re locked into organized, supervised activities. Youth sports are a $15 billion business that has grown by 55 percent since just 2010. Children as young as third grade are joining traveling teams—which means their parents spend a lot of time in the car, too. Or they’re at tutoring. Or they’re at music lessons. And if all else fails, they are in their rooms, online.

Even if parents want to shoo their kids outside—and don’t come home till dinner!—it’s not as easy as it once was. Often, there are no other children around to play with. Even more dishearteningly, adults who believe it’s good for young people to run some errands or play kickball down the street have to think twice about letting them, because busybodies, cops, and social workers are primed to equate “unsupervised” with “neglected and in danger.”

You may remember the story of the Meitivs in Maryland, investigated twice for letting their kids, 10 and 6, walk home together from the park. Or the Debra Harrell case in South Carolina, where a mom was thrown in jail for allowing her 9-year-old to play at the sprinkler playground while she worked at McDonald’s. Or the 8-year-old Ohio boy who was supposed to get on the bus to Sunday school, but snuck off to the Family Dollar store instead. His dad was arrested for child endangerment.

These examples represent a new outlook: the belief that anytime kids are doing anything on their own, they are automatically under threat. But that outlook is wrong. The crime rate in America is back down to what it was in 1963, which means that most of today’s parents grew up playing outside when it was more dangerous than it is today. And it hasn’t gotten safer because we’re hovering over our kids. All violent crime is down, including against adults.

Danger Things

And yet it doesn’t feel safer. A 2010 study found “kidnapping” to be the top parental fear, despite the fact that merely being a passenger in a car is far more dangerous. Nine kids were kidnapped and murdered by strangers in 2011, while 1,140 died in vehicles that same year. While Harvard psychologist Steven Pinker writes in 2011’s The Better Angels of Our Nature that life in most countries is safer today than at any time in human history, the press keeps pushing paranoia. This makes stepping back feel doubly risky: There’s the fear of child kidnappers and the fear of Child Protective Services.

At times, it seems like our culture is conjuring dangers out of thin air, just to have something new to worry about. Thus, the Boulder Public Library in Colorado recently forbade anyone under 12 to enter without an adult, because “children may encounter hazards such as stairs, elevators, doors, furniture, electrical equipment, or other library patrons.” Ah, yes, kids and library furniture. Always a lethal combo.

Happily, the library backed off that rule, perhaps thanks to merciless mocking in the media. But saner minds don’t always prevail. At Mesa Elementary School, which also happens to be in Boulder, students got a list of the items they could not bring to the science fair. These included “chemicals,” “plants in soil,” and “organisms (living or dead).” And we wonder why American children score so low on international tests.

But perhaps the single best example of how fantastically fearful we’ve become occurred when the city of Richland, Washington, got rid of all the swings on its school playgrounds. The love of swinging is probably older than humanity itself, given our arboreal origins. But as a school district spokesman explained, “Swings have been determined to be the most unsafe of all the playground equipment on a playground.”

You may think your town has avoided such overkill, but is there a merry-go-round at your local park, or a see-saw? Most likely they, too, have gone the way of lawn darts. The Consumer Product Safety Commission even warns parks of “tripping hazards, like…tree stumps and rocks,” a fact unearthed (so to speak) by Philip Howard, author of 2010’s Life Without Lawyers.

The problem is that kids learn by doing. Trip over a tree stump and you learn to look down. There’s an old saying: Prepare your child for the path, not the path for your child. We’re doing the opposite.

Ironically, there are real health dangers in not walking, or biking, or hopping over that stump. A Johns Hopkins study this summer found that the typical 19-year-old is as sedentary as a 65-year-old. The Army is worried that its recruits don’t know how to skip or do somersaults.

But the cost of shielding kids from risks goes well beyond the physical, as a robust body of research has shown.

Of Trophies and Traumas

A few years ago, Boston College psychology professor emeritus Peter Gray was invited by the head of counseling services at a major university to a conference on “the decline in resilience among students.” The organizer said that emergency counseling calls had doubled in the last five years. What’s more, callers were seeking help coping with everyday problems, such as arguments with a roommate. Two students had dialed in because they’d found a mouse in their apartment. They also called the police, who came and set a mousetrap. And that’s not to mention the sensitivity around grades. To some students, a B is the end of the world. (To some parents, too.)

Free play has little in common with the “play” we give children today. In organized activities, adults run the show. It’s only when the grown-ups aren’t around that the kids get to take over. Play is training for adulthood.

Part of the rise in calls could be attributed to the fact that admitting mental health issues no longer carries the stigma it once did, an undeniably positive development. But it could also be a sign, Gray realized, that failing at basic “adulting” no longer carries the stigma it once did. And that is far more troubling.

Is this outcome the apotheosis of participation-trophy culture? It’s easy to scoff at a society that teaches kids that everything they do deserves applause. But more disturbing is the possibility that those trophies taught kids the opposite lesson: that they’re so easily hurt, they can’t handle the sad truth that they’re not the best at something.

Not letting your kid climb a tree because he might fall robs him of a classic childhood experience. But being emotionally overprotective takes away something else. “We have raised a generation of young people who have not been given the opportunity to…experience failure and realize they can survive it,” Gray has said. When Lenore’s son came in eighth out of nine teams in a summer camp bowling league, he got an eighth-place trophy. The moral was clear: We don’t think you can cope with the negative emotions of finishing second-to-last.

Of course, it’s natural to want to see kids happy. But the real secret to happiness isn’t more high fives; it’s developing emotional resilience. In our mania for physical safety, coupled with our recent tendency to talk about “emotional safety,” we have systematically deprived our children of the thousands of challenging—and sometimes upsetting—experiences that they need in order to learn that resiliency. And in our quest to protect them, we have stolen from children the best resilience training known to man: free play.

Play’s the Thing

All mammals play. It is a drive installed by Mother Nature. Hippos do backflips in the water. Dogs fetch sticks. And gazelles run around, engaging in a game that looks an awful lot like tag.

Why would they do that? They’re wasting valuable calories and exposing themselves to predators. Shouldn’t they just sit quietly next to their mama gazelles, exploring the world through the magic of PBS Kids?

It must be because play is even more important to their long-term survival than simply being “safe.” Gray’s main body of research is on the importance of free play, and he stresses that it has little in common with the “play” we give kids today. In organized activities—Little League, for example—adults run the show. It’s only when the grown-ups aren’t around that the kids get to take over. Play is training for adulthood.

In free play, ideally with kids of mixed ages, the children decide what to do and how to do it. That’s teamwork, literally. The little kids desperately want to be like the bigger kids, so instead of bawling when they strike out during a sandlot baseball game, they work hard to hold themselves together. This is the foundation of maturity.

The older kids, meanwhile, throw the ball more softly to the younger ones. They’re learning empathy. And if someone yells, “Let’s play on just one leg!”—something they couldn’t do at Little League, with championships (and trophies!) on the line—the kids discover what it means to come up with and try out a different way of doing things. In Silicon Valley terms, they “pivot” and adopt a “new business model.” They also learn that they, not just grown-ups, can collectively remake the rules to suit their needs. That’s called participatory democracy.

Best of all, without adults intervening, the kids have to do all the problem solving for themselves, from deciding what game to play to making sure the teams are roughly equal. Then, when there’s an argument, they have to resolve it themselves. That’s a tough skill to learn, but the drive to continue playing motivates them to work things out. To get back to having fun, they first have to come up with a solution, so they do. This teaches them that they can disagree, hash it out, and—perhaps with some grumbling—move on.

These are the very skills that are suddenly in short supply on college campuses.

“Free play is the means by which children learn to make friends, overcome their fears, solve their own problems and generally take control of their own lives,” Gray writes in 2013’s Free to Learn (Basic Books). “Nothing we do, no amount of toys we buy or ‘quality time’ or special training we give our children, can compensate for the freedom we take away. The things that children learn through their own initiatives, in free play, cannot be taught in other ways.”

Unstructured, unsupervised time for play is one of the most important things we have to give back to kids if we want them to be strong and happy and resilient.

Where Have All the Paperboys Gone?

It’s not just that kids aren’t playing much on their own. These days, they’re not doing much of anything on their own. In an article in The Atlantic, Hanna Rosin admits that “when my daughter was 10, my husband and I suddenly realized that in her whole life, she had probably not spent more than 10 minutes unsupervised by an adult.”

In earlier generations, this would have seemed a bizarre and wildly overprotective upbringing. Society had certain age-related milestones that most people agreed on. Kids might be trusted to walk to school by first grade. They might get a latchkey at 8, take on a newspaper route around 10, start babysitting at 12. But over the past generation or so, those milestones disappeared—buried by fears of kidnapping, the rise of supervised activities, and the pre-eminence of homework. Parents today know all about the academic milestones their kids are supposed to reach, but not about the moments when kids used to start joining the world.

It’s not necessarily their fault. Calls to eight newspapers in North Carolina found none that would take anyone under the age of 18 to deliver papers. A police chief in New Albany, Ohio, went on record saying kids shouldn’t be outside on their own till age 16, “the threshold where you see children getting a little bit more freedom.” A study in Britain found that while just under half of all 16- to 17-year-olds had jobs as recently as 1992, today that number is 20 percent.

The responsibility expected of kids not so long ago has become almost inconceivable. Published in 1979, the book Your 6-Year-old: Loving and Defiant includes a simple checklist for what a child entering first grade should be able to do: Can he draw and color and stay within the lines of the design being colored? Can he ride a small two-wheeled bicycle without helper wheels? Can he travel alone in the neighborhood (four to eight blocks) to a store, school, playground, or friend’s home?

Hang on. Walk to the store at 6—alone?

It’s tempting to blame “helicopter parents” for today’s less resilient kids. But when all the first-graders are walking themselves to school, it’s easy to add yours to the mix. When your child is the only one, it’s harder. And that’s where we are today. Norms have dramatically changed. The kind of freedom that seemed unremarkable a generation ago has become taboo, and in some cases even illegal.

A Very Hampered Halloween

In Waynesboro, Georgia, “trick or treaters” must be 12 or younger; they must be in a costume; and they must be accompanied by an adult at least 21 years of age. So if you have kids who are 15, 10, and 8, you can’t send them out together. The 15-year-old is not allowed to dress up, yet she won’t be considered old enough to supervise her siblings for another six years. And this is on the one night of the entire year we traditionally let children pretend to be adults.

Other schools and community centers now send letters home asking parents not to let their children wear scary costumes. Some even organize “trunk or treats”—cars parked in a circle, trunks open and filled with candy, thus saving the kids from having to walk around the neighborhood or knock on doors. (That would be tiring and terrifying.) If this is childhood, is it any wonder college kids also expect to be micromanaged on Halloween?

At Yale in 2015, after 13 college administrators signed a letter outlining appropriate vs. inappropriate costume choices for students, the childhood development expert and campus lecturer Erika Christakis suggested that it would be better to allow kids to think for themselves. After all, Halloween is supposed to be about pushing boundaries. “Is there no room anymore for a child or young person to be a little obnoxious…or, yes, offensive?” she wrote. “Have we lost faith in young people’s capacity—your capacity—to ignore or reject things that trouble you?”

Apparently, yes. Angry students mobbed her husband, the professor Nicholas Christakis, surrounding him in the courtyard of the residential college where he served as master. They screamed obscenities and demanded he apologize for believing, along with his wife, that college students are in fact capable of handling offensive costumes on Halloween. “Be quiet!” a student shouted at him at one point. “As master, it is your job to create a place of comfort and home for the students!” She did not take kindly to his response that, to the contrary, he sees it as his job to create a space where students can grow intellectually.

As it turns out, Halloween is the perfect Petri dish for observing what we have done to childhood. We didn’t think anything was safe enough for young people. And now we are witnessing the results.

No Fun and No Joy

When parents curtail their kids’ independence, they’re not just depriving the younglings of childhood fun. They are denying themselves the grown-up joy of seeing their kids do something smart, brave, or kind without parental guidance.

It’s the kind of joy described by a Washington Post columnist who answered the phone one day and was shocked to find her 8-year-old son on the other end. He’d accidentally gone home when he was supposed to stay after school. Realizing she wasn’t there, he decided to walk to the store a few blocks away—his first time. The mom raced over, fearing God knows what, and rushed in only to find her son happily helping the shopkeeper stock the shelves with meat. He’d had a snack and done his homework, too. It was an afternoon he’d never forget, and neither would his very proud mother.

When we don’t let our kids do anything on their own, we don’t get to see just how competent they can be—and isn’t that, ultimately, the greatest reward of parenting? We need to make it easier for grown-ups to let go while living in a society that keeps warning them not to. And we need to make sure they won’t get arrested for it.

What Is To Be Done?

By trying to keep children safe from all risks, obstacles, hurt feelings, and fears, our culture has taken away the opportunities they need to become successful adults. In treating them as fragile—emotionally, socially, and physically—society actually makes them so.

To combat this problem, we have established a new nonpartisan nonprofit, the Let Grow Foundation. Our goal is to restore resilience by overthrowing the culture of overprotection. We teamed up with Gray, the professor whose research we highlighted above, and FIRE’s Shuchman, a New York investment fund manager who is now our chairman.

We are building an organization that seeks to change the social norms, policies, and laws that pressure and intimidate parents, schools, and towns into coddling their kids. We will research the effects of excessive caution, study the link between independence and success, and launch projects to give kids back some free time and free play. Most of all, the Let Grow Foundation will reject the assumption of fragility and promote intellectual, physical, and emotional resilience.

Children know that their parents had more freedom to roam than they do, and more unscheduled time to read or tinker or explore. They also realize that older generations were trusted to roll with some punches, at school and beyond. We hope kids today will start demanding that same independence and respect for themselves. It’s their freedom that has been chiseled away, after all.

We want them to insist on their right to engage not just with the physical world, but also with the world of ideas. We want them to hear, read, and voice opinions that go against the grain. We want them to be insulted by the assumption that they and their classmates are so easily hurt that arguments must stop before they start. To this end, we hope to encourage their skepticism about the programs and policies that are ostensibly there to “protect” them from discomfort.

If this effort is successful, we’ll soon see kids outside again. Common setbacks will be considered “resilience moments” rather than traumas. Children will read widely, express themselves freely, and work through disagreements without automatically calling on authority figures to solve their problems for them. The more adults step back, the more we believe kids will step up, growing brave in the face of risk and just plain happy in their independence.

Children today are safer and smarter than this culture gives them credit for. They deserve the freedom we had. The country’s future prosperity and freedom depend on it.


NidStyles The Alarmist Sat, 02/03/2018 - 08:48 Permalink

Pretty sure the Boomers are the worst.


They had everything handed to them during the wealthiest period in US history and they squandered and like to point fingers at the younger generations while robbing those kids of their future. Not only did they do that, but they even established a system to continue robbing those kids after they are dead.

In reply to by The Alarmist

Lea NidStyles Sat, 02/03/2018 - 09:52 Permalink

You are right. The piece above is wrong on almost every point. I am European. I have a nephew who was never left alone until he was 16, and he is certainly no snowflake nowadays. He is currently is in his twenties, on his own, all by himself in Cambodia for a year for an investment venture. He finds it easy to be in a totally unknown country where he knew no one upon his arrival. I yet have to see something that scares him.

Plus, when I was a kid in the seventies in Europe, we school kids were never left alone. There was always an adult monitoring us, because 1) you don't want a bad accident and a dead kid 2) school bullying was against the law, so you needed someone to make sure no bully could harass weaker kids. We definitely did NOT become snowflakes, though. That's a new American trend.

These US kids are snowflakes for no other reason than their parents being self-centered paranoids who jump at their own shadows, because they have been fed fear porn by advertising companies all their lives. Fear sells, you see. It is a major driver of consumption.

As a result, the country lives in fear (count the scares in the US. National Security threats, food scares, weather scares, obesity scares, drugs scares, Russian aggression scares, you name it, chances are you'll meet more than one per day). So the kids are paralyzed, of course.


In reply to by NidStyles

ThinkerNotEmoter Lea Sat, 02/03/2018 - 10:15 Permalink

The special snowflakes like Dear Leader Obama will be the downfall of the country. FREE $HIT FOR EVERYBODY(!!!) is demanded by the incompetent, incapable,  ones. They'll always put their immediate "safety"  (safe spaces, no microaggressions, no hurt feelings) over the good of the country. 

We're fucked.

In reply to by Lea

MoreFreedom The Alarmist Sat, 02/03/2018 - 14:05 Permalink

I don't see it as "screwing with Darwinian selection".  When bad things happen, the seriously unprepared often die because of it.  They don't take risks when it's necessary to survive, nor do they react appropriately from things they find uncomfortable.   Kind of like someone with TDS committing suicide.  Or someone who's too afraid to buy a gun and then gets in a situation where one could save them.

In reply to by The Alarmist

Trader200K Zero Point Sat, 02/03/2018 - 11:16 Permalink

Actually, it still does, but you have to take action to acquire it.

We packed it in from corruptville and moved 100mi into to the exurbs. In exploring the area beforehand, we came across a new family run dairy startup. Glass milk jugs and all. We drove up to the front door on a Saturday, but they were closed. We noticed a nice cooler case out front and peeked in. 

It wasn't locked and the sign said, "Please put your money in the "honor" box at the side." 

Mrs. Trader and I looked at each other saying "We're home!"

True story. And it's the best tasting milk since home delivery in the 50's. This milk actually had seen a cow.

When we visit the kids still back there, it really reinforces just how great the decision really was. Every.Single.Time.

A poster here once said "You can't see the plantation until you leave it."

Amazing wisdom IMHO. 


In reply to by Zero Point

Endgame Napoleon Zero Point Sat, 02/03/2018 - 21:52 Permalink

I am over 40. I was raised a lot like the Millennials, albeit definitely without the verbal hyper-sensitivity stuff. But I was certainly not allowed to roam free — ever, not even as a teenager. We did ride bikes a lot, but not outside of the neighborhood.

The organized sports and “enrichment” activity craze is not a Millennial-specific thing. It was a staple feature of growing up in the Seventies and Eighties. We had every type of “lessons” imaginable, with little of it having much substance. I mostly taught myself to do the hobbies that I continue to pursue, although I did have some college classes. 

Because, the lessons were not  directed at the actual talents of the individual kids. Those organized activities were just what all the mothers put their kids in. All of the girls took ballet, piano lessons, etc. Or, they played soccer, softball, etc. As one atypically honest mother put it: It is really just a night, where you gather with your fiends to watch your kids do this or that activity, and you don’t have to make supper.

I have heard older people — older than 60 — talk about a time when kids had more roaming-free time, the boys anyway, and trust levels were higher. Parents let kids, especially boys, take more risks.

People outside of their family, like merchants, also did not worry so much about kids engaging in normal — but not robotically safe behavior — due to law suits.

Merchants are always concerned when children are allowed to run around in their stores, even though that is natural for children. They have to be.

Fellow merchants have told me they would not have balloon-making machines or certain types of cookies in their store due to fear of lawsuits. Even with something as innocuous as balloons or cookies, they have to think about that, and they did not have to in the big, middle-class era after WWII—the era when most women raised their own children, rather than taking a job.

Maybe, today’s parents are such control freaks because, while they act out all the over-protection theatrics, $9-per-hour babysitters, low-wage daycare attendants, NannyCams and elderly grandparents really raise their children, although they sure do use their children as an excuse for a ton of back-watching absenteeism from work.

And, of course, we are mostly addressing what is left of the middle class here, whereas a lot of evidence suggests that many parents do not watch their children very closely. If you think not, you must not have worked in social services. Ask DCS workers for some stories. When crime rates are down because your country has 5% of the world’s population and 25% of its prisoners, it is not because all neighborhoods are safe for kids or anyone else.


In reply to by Zero Point

Ms No Gaius Frakkin'… Fri, 02/02/2018 - 23:54 Permalink

I was thinking something similar.  If you have 12 you really aren't too worried if one drowns in the river because you have plenty of spares.  Actually at 12 you are lucky if you can even get their names straight.  Now that everybody can only really afford one or two...  we just aren't producing the rough and hardy little beasts that we used to.  They could stand up for themselves by the time they were adult, and maybe sooner. 

In reply to by Gaius Frakkin'…

Endgame Napoleon Ms No Sat, 02/03/2018 - 22:09 Permalink

You are the funniest poster on here. I really want to upvote this, but on the other hand, I am afraid that it might encourage Marco Pay-Per-Birth Rubio to propose a tripling of the refundable child tax credit for all womb-productive citizens, legal and illegal immigrants, with a $1,000-per-kid bonus for all “hardy” offspring produced over the 5-per-family ideal. That will keep those super-womb-productive fake feminists and often ultra-absentee working mommas voting for those RepubliCON supporters of womb-productivity-based welfare programs for 100 years. If that happens, no childless, single woman, relying on earned-only income, with no spousal income and no womb-productivity-based monthly welfare / [EITC] child-tax-credit welfare will ever get a job again.

In reply to by Ms No

XBroker1 Gaius Frakkin'… Sat, 02/03/2018 - 07:49 Permalink

Trying to figure out how someone guards a .7 child? Or is 1.7 their IQ? What have you millenial cucks (lol) done to stop the dumbing down of your children in the public edJEWcation systems? Has your generation been able to stop water fluoridation, chemtrails, GMO's, EMF radiation in schools and everywhere else?

Can you blame that last one on "boomer cucks"? I'm pretty sure it's you digital idiots who paid for the 7 plus MILLION cell towers worldwide. Welcome to the electronic prison that you funded. That's a bigger threat than anything I can think of. Blaming the prior generation is just a way the next generation excuses themselves from doing anything meaningful themselves. It's almost as old as prostitution.

In reply to by Gaius Frakkin'…

Jumanji1959 Zero Point Fri, 02/02/2018 - 23:05 Permalink

The complete rogues list:
- Lanny Breuer
- Robert Meuller
- Eric Holder
- Loretta Lynch, Rod Rosenstein
- McCabe
- Wray
- Rubenstein
- James Comey

-Hussein Obama

- Hillary Clinton

Lisa Page, Peter Strozok

Debbie Wasserman Schultz

Donna Brazile, Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, Adam Schiff,  Frederica Wilson.


GITMO for all + waterboarding daily!!!

In reply to by Zero Point

swmnguy Zero Point Sat, 02/03/2018 - 08:36 Permalink

You're swimming against the salmon, but you're right.

I grew up in the 70s.  It was far more violent then.  Adults rather commonly got into fistfights.  I haven't been in a fistfight since 10th grade, in about 1980.  Domestic violence was something everyone knew about but didn't discuss because it wasn't our business.  Wives and kids who got beat up were convinced it was their fault.  Kids who got into fistfights were forced to shake hands (me, in second grade, early 70s) and sent right back with the bully we'd fought with.

Today's super-protective parenting and official rules are typical of late-stage finance capitalism.  They've got a bunch of products to sell us, including police forces, social workers, after-school programs with costs, home security systems, etc.  In an age of falling crime and maybe the safest environment for kids in US history, if not world history, parents are being drained of money to fend off non-existent threats.

My goal as a parent has been to raise kids who become effective, autonomous, kind, resourceful adults.  Right now with kids 20 and 18, I'm feeling pretty good about how it's turned out.  We let our kids walk the 5 blocks to elementary school.  My son realized the first week that the bus to middle school was insanely loud and chaotic and dangerous, so he rode his bike every day, 4 miles each way, except on days when it was -15F - -20F (I gave him a ride those days).  And our local high school has given up the yellow buses, giving bused kids a public transit pass.  My kids already knew how to use the bus system, from the time they were 12 or so.

Now my kids have found their way in cities elsewhere in America and in Europe while on school trips; can fill out their own forms; deal with adults as equals in ability if not in status; and they're natural leaders.  My daughter was at her first job ever, in a coffeeshop, and before she was really trained in they had put her in charge of an even newer trainee, because my daughter is effective and autonomous enough to come in and be self-reliant and figure out what needs to be done even if incompetent management doesn't really tell her.

Parents need to see the safety sales pitch for what it is, separate real risks from fear-mongering for profit, and kids will be just fine.

I'm fine with the parents who bubble-wrap their kids and "Helicopter Parent."  Their kids are turning to my kids for help, elevating my kids to leadership.  Thanks, Corporate America!

In reply to by Zero Point

MoreFreedom swmnguy Sat, 02/03/2018 - 14:11 Permalink

My last fistfight was in 8th grade in the early 70s, due to a bully who kept taunting me to fight, so I finally agreed to meet him after school, and was beating him up pretty good until an adult arrived and broke it up.  That was the last time he bullied me.  I had plenty of rough and tumble experience before that.  Ran all over the neighborhood unaccompanied, dug in the garbage, jumped on and fell off the animals in the farmyard, and all sorts of fun for a young boy. 

In reply to by swmnguy

Lea Zero Point Sat, 02/03/2018 - 08:59 Permalink

Absolutely. I grew up in the seventies and all I met when I walked alone from school was f... pedos. I don't think I met less than one a month of these creepy morons. They would open their coats to show kids their genitals, sometimes quickly masturbating before some adult passer-by could see them. Or they would try to touch your buttocks, or they would tell you sickening dirty words. I was eight, nine or ten, for Heaven's sake.

Nowadays, in my EU country, there are regulations: parents or other entrusted adults should pick the children at school, period. And that's great. No more children alone in the streets, no more predators.

Children in groups are something else. But alone, no. Or get the police to do its job and clean the streets of pedos for good at last. 

In reply to by Zero Point

el buitre Lea Sat, 02/03/2018 - 17:04 Permalink

Well, Lea, in the USA you won't find the pedos on the street.  The low status ones are working in child welfare service and the Roman Church, and the upper status ones are in medicine, politics and Hollywood.  However, I suspect that to be true in western Europe as well which is even more degenerate than the USSA. 

In reply to by Lea

FORCE Zero Point Sat, 02/03/2018 - 09:33 Permalink

were you alive as a child in the 70's or 80's? or is this millennial ignorance? of course no one advocates irresponsible /neglectful parenting but kids NEED to have a certain amount of autonomy in order to develop.I wouldn't swap my 70's childhood of biking,camp building,stone/fist fights,model making & comic collecting for the techno-teat imprisonment & brain washing that is contemporary childhood.

We ran wild & free;dogshit on our daps,bicycle chain oil stains on our flares & often cuts & bruises from climbing trees & fighting;the rough and tumble of REALITY in the NATURAL world.

In reply to by Zero Point

valjoux7750 Zero Point Sat, 02/03/2018 - 13:11 Permalink

Douchebag response that was. I grew up in the 70s and 80s. Best times of my life. After school we stayed out till dark without supervision. On the weekends we went out and often didn't come home till supper. We climbed trees rode bikes without helmets,  jumped out of swings played cowboys and Indians.

 During school the best part of the day was recess. We played dodgeball and football. Did kids get bruised and scraped up? I'm sure but that was part of the game. 

I'd hate to be your child, hell I'd hate to be a kid today. Fat emasculated whiners most of em are. 


In reply to by Zero Point

new game sheikurbootie Sat, 02/03/2018 - 06:41 Permalink

i allowed my kids to walk to the edge of the cliff(mater of fact), roof or where ever it was dangerous. they never got hurt other than scrapes and bruises.  the fear(as parents)is transferred to our kids.  one became an avid skate boarder(got to learn to fall like a feather) and the other a skilled bmx biker(crash and burn). no fear, til it is real fear, then just avoidance(like driving)...

In reply to by sheikurbootie

LauraB sheikurbootie Sat, 02/03/2018 - 14:59 Permalink

In defense of the kids, the government has made it much more difficult for them to learn to drive, get a job, etc.  Parents can no longer just teach their kids to drive and then take them to the DMV to take the test and get their licenses. There are now expensive classes that the kids are required to take, a certain number of hours of driving under different conditions that they have to log, restrictions on driving themselves and others, etc. In some cases they can't get an unrestricted license until they are closer to 18. Regarding jobs - in our state, kids can't work until they are 14 and need a special permit until they are 18. 

In reply to by sheikurbootie

LetThemEatRand Fri, 02/02/2018 - 21:54 Permalink

"Memo" to bubble wrap kids:  if you work for the deep state, you will indeed have the equivalent of bubble wrap.  You can do whatever you want.  But make sure you're on top of the pyramid, or at least that there's someone lower than you than you can throw under the bus when it becomes necessary.  

BarkingCat LetThemEatRand Sat, 02/03/2018 - 11:49 Permalink

These buble kids have to interact with kids will grow up (physically) and when that happens, they will have to deal with others who did not grow up in such an overprotective environment. 

Many of them will get destroyed.


Frankly their hypersensitivity results in not just some imagined micro-aggression  but actual aggression.  If I were a hiring manager,  I would give them a shit test. See how easily they get triggered and simply avoid hiring them.


In reply to by LetThemEatRand