Nancy Pelosi Caught Off Guard By Heckler: "How Much Are You Worth Nancy?"

During a Tuesday stop-off in Phoenix to trash talk the "disastrous" GOP tax cuts at the Arizona Center for Economic Progress, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi was startled at a question over her net worth by an audience member who couldn't stomach the top Democrat's ivory-tower oratory over wealth inequality. 

Pelosi has embarked on a 100-city taxpayer funded junket organized by Democrats to frame the Republican tax cuts as an assault on low income Americans.

“It can’t possibly be a statement of values for us to talk about, as Martin Luther King said, … ‘God never intended for one group of people to live in superfluous inordinate wealth while others live in abject deadly poverty,’” Pelosi pontificated, hypocritically.

“So these are kitchen table issues for most of America’s families. Most people are not in deadly poverty, but some are. But most people have to struggle to …”

Pelosi's needle skips as an audience member asked the richest woman in Congress:

How much are you worth, Nancy?” 

A flustered Pelosi shot back:

"No, we're not talking about that ... In any event ... I can out ... I'm a mother of five, I can speak louder than anybody." 


Of note, the 77-year-old Pelosi is estimated to have a net worth of $100,643,521 according to, making her the 6th richest member of the House in 2015.  We wonder if Pelosi's San Francisco pizza parlor is included in the calculation?

Pelosi, of course, wants to pay as little tax as possible

And here we arrive at the heart of why wealthy ivory-tower Democrats are the penultimate hypocrites. While spending her career espousing higher taxes for the rest of us and denouncing income inequality, Pelosi has engaged in a series of complex tax schemes to avoid paying as much tax as possible

As the Washington Free Beacon reports: 

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D., Calif.), who often rails against income inequality and calls on the wealthy to pay its "fair share" in taxes, took pains in late December to try to preserve tax breaks for two of her multi-million-dollar homes one last time before the new tax law kicked in.

Largely thanks to her husband Paul, a real-estate and venture-capital investor, Pelosi is the wealthiest woman in Congress with a net worth of more than $100 million and the seventh wealthiest member overall, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

Just days after President Trump signed the sweeping tax bill into law late last month, Pelosi and her husband tried to preserve $64,000 in property tax breaks, known as the state and local taxes (SALT) deductions, for her two California homes. The new tax law limits the deduction to $10,000 and went into effect Jan. 1.

Seems like Nancy's little propaganda junket is off to a bad start... 


toady RAT005 Tue, 02/20/2018 - 22:24 Permalink

I was surprised to hear she was coming to Phoenix to trash talk the tax cut.... talk about a hostile environment!

She better stick to the coasts and other liberal enclaves with this shit.... nobody with any sense is gonna listen to a multimillionaire talking about helping poor people.


In reply to by RAT005

J S Bach toady Tue, 02/20/2018 - 22:27 Permalink

I find that most liberals and jews are inherently hypocrites.  I'm beginning to believe that it's a pathological condition that they're not even aware of.  Regular people of conscience see it so plainly, but they are oblivious to their countless double standards.  This is a sign of literal insanity... and yet THEY are the ones steering our cultural and national ships of state.

In reply to by toady

esum jcaz Wed, 02/21/2018 - 07:04 Permalink


Nancy is OK with Congressional INSIDER TRADING and special ipos like VISA which she got cut in on... perfectly ok for me... but not for thee..

She is used to pandering to illiterates and illegals in her district which shows 1/4 of a million can uleash this fucking idiot onto the national stage ...

"PASS IT TO FIND OUT WHAT'S IN IT" a classic idiotic Pelosi statement....

where was this rancid twat when Obozo the traitor was doubling the national debt ..

did the limp wristed bendover jihadi bathhouse towelboy ever have a budget ... and where the fuck did the billions in cash and gold he shipped to iran come from... and where did Khadaffy's $60 billion in cash and gold go to..?? 

In reply to by jcaz

Singelguy Miffed Microbi… Wed, 02/21/2018 - 05:40 Permalink

Nancy, being the dutiful wife that she is, steered a lot of government contracts to her husband who profited greatly. Diane Fienstein, who is also worth more than $75 million, did the same. Her husband owns CBR, one of the largest commercial real estate brokers in the country. When the post office was downsizing, CBR got the contract to sell off all the superfluous property. Coincidence?

In reply to by Miffed Microbi…

beyondtheprogramming Machbet Wed, 02/21/2018 - 07:54 Permalink

Happens every single time! Once the public finds they're being duped by a famous bad guy who is sharper and more clever than they are, the famous bad guy always gets appointed to non-human Supervillian Status. Why is it so hard to believe that so many of our adored humans of celebrity status are in reality full-blown psychopaths?

In reply to by Machbet

ssnova J S Bach Tue, 02/20/2018 - 22:49 Permalink

Gonna quote my previous post about Pelosi:


Isn't it so intriguing how so many filthy rich Democrats(Pelosi estimated to be at least $196 Million), say they want to raise taxes to be a hero for the little guy while pointing out fingers to the "rich man" as the bad guy.... if they really believed that nobody should be rich because they are "hogging all the money", then they should give away/donate the majority of their wealth in taxes and let the government decide how to spend their money, as that's what they're pushing for on the Middle Class...they make it sound so good for everyone too.. hypocrites...they want take away your freedom... your potential, your propensity... they want to keep you as some poor wage worker...  when will America wake up?



"Keep them starved
Keep them blind
Keep them stupid"




I also met a flaming angry Liberal couple who taught at a university, allegedly had 7 properties, who used to passionately repeat, "No one in America should be able to make more than $50k a year, otherwise they're greedy!  We need to tax them so everyone is equal!"... I would think to myself, "how hypocritical?", they were allowed the opportunity and freedom to make a lot of money, choose what to do with that money, buy up properties, rent them out, make more money, and live a life of luxury, yet they want that same opportunity to be denied to everyone else and are fighting hand over fist for that "passion".

I got down voted and some guy missed my point... that's the difference between a "freedom" mentality of our forefather's vs. a "socialist"/"liberal"/"communist" view from the "passonate" Left who are supposedly fighting for the Middle class and below... and repeat that mantra(deceptive lie) that they allegedly stand for.

In reply to by J S Bach

44magnum J S Bach Wed, 02/21/2018 - 04:51 Permalink

“If one understands that socialism is not a share-the-wealth program, but is in reality a method to consolidate and control the wealth, then the seeming paradox of super-rich men promoting socialism becomes no paradox at all. Instead, it becomes logical, even the perfect tool of power-seeking megalomaniacs,” explained the late Gary Allen. “Communism or more accurately, socialism, is not a movement of the downtrodden masses, but of the economic elite.”

Seems logical

In reply to by J S Bach

GreatUncle J S Bach Wed, 02/21/2018 - 05:45 Permalink

Eugenics, it is the underlying behaviour where they believe in a two tier system of the population being controlled by a few entitled because "they are supposedly better than anybody else".

Slavery is inherent in this type of person as is their so called belief they are worth far more because they are much better people.

Freedom and eugenics are mutually exclusive whilst eugenics and slavery is inclusive.

Now you know why so many western societies are growing in anger.

What right has anybody to tell you what to do?

When they refuse to represent you leaving you with no voice then that point becomes pronounced.



In reply to by J S Bach