"Time For Reconciliation Is Over" - South Africa Votes To Confiscate White-Owned Land

Is South Africa on the verge of a race-based civil war?

Just as we warned was likely a week ago, the Parliament of South Africa voted this week in favor of a motion allowing lawmakers to amend the constitution to allow for the confiscation of white-owned farmland without any form of monetary compensation.

The motion, brought by the Economic Freedom Fighter (EFF) leader Julius Malema (radical Marxist), was overwhelming adopted in parliament with a vote of 241 in support, and 83 against.

According to News24.com, an English-language South African online news publication, there were only a few parties that were against the motion including the Democratic Alliance, Freedom Front Plus, Cope and the ACDP. The proposal will be sent to the Constitutional Review Committee which must report back to Parliament by late August.

Confiscation of white-owned farmland was a major topic in the new president Cyril Ramaphosa’s platform, after he became the fifth President of South Africa since the 1994 democratic transition, in mid-February.

“The time for reconciliation is over. Now is the time for justice,” Malema told the parliament.

“We must ensure that we restore the dignity of our people without compensating the criminals who stole our land.”

With over 50 million citizens in South Africa, Bloomberg indicates that a 2017 government report shows white people own 73 percent of farmland.

White farmers own almost three-quarters of South Africa’s agricultural land, even after 23 years of government efforts to redistribute land to the black majority, City Press reported, citing a land audit by farm lobbying group Agri SA.

Some 73.3 percent of agricultural land is owned by whites, down from 85.1 percent in 1994, the year South Africa first held democratic elections, the newspaper reported.

Black ownership has increased markedly in some of the country’s most fertile provinces. Black farmers own 74 percent of the land in KwaZulu-Natal and 52 percent in Limpopo, City Press reported, citing the report to be released this week.

Total acreage available for farming fell 4 percent over the 23 years reviewed, as mining and expanding municipalities took over agricultural land, according to economist Johann Bornman, who conducted the audit for the lobbying group.

Last week, South Africa’s new president, Cyril Ramaphosa, said that he would return the lands owned by the white farmers since the mid-1600s to the black citizens of the country. He added the country’s agriculture (see below) must be preserved.

Gugile Nkwinti, the former minister of rural affairs and land reform until Monday (reassigned to the minister of water affairs) said, “The ANC unequivocally supports the principle of land expropriation without compensation.”

“There is no doubt about it, land shall be expropriated without compensation,” he added.

On the other hand, the official opposition Democratic Alliance party (DA) has criticized the motion, saying white confiscation of farmland by the government will undermine property rights and possibly collapse the economy.

The DA’s Thandeka Mbabama told the parliament that the wrongs of the past must be addressed, but white confiscation of farmland without compensation “cannot be part of the solution.”

The Transvaal Agricultural Union of South Africa (TAU SA), a commercial farmers union in the region, warned the country is in danger of traveling the same path as Zimbabwe, which “plunged into famine after a government-sanctioned purge of white farmers in the 2000s,” said the Russian Times.

“Where in the world has expropriation without compensation coupled to the waste of agricultural land, resulted in foreign confidence, economic growth and increased food production?” Meintjes said, via Australia’s news.com.au.

“If Mr Ramaphosa is set on creating an untenable situation, he should actively create circumstances which will promote famine. His promise to expropriate land without compensation sows the seed for revolution. Expropriation without compensation is theft.”

Freedom Front Plus leader Pieter Groenewald warned, 

“If you continue on this course, I can assure you there is going to be unforeseen consequences that is not in the interest of South Africa.”

The Coming Civil War in South Africa explained: 


COSMOS auricle Thu, 03/01/2018 - 04:28 Permalink

Lauren Southern's channel on youtube is a must watch that is where the video above is from.


The Afrikaaners now have only two choices, be exterminated or organize and break apart from South Africa with a portion of the country.  They cant leave since no country in this world would let 3 million people in.  Unfortunately they wont have any support from all these liberal run NATO POS 'cunt'ries that got the Afrikaaners into this mess. FUCK YOU MANDELA! And especially FUCK HOLLYWOOD and the rest of the entertainment industry.

What you see in SA is what will happen in the USA when whites become a minority. History repeats itself.

In reply to by auricle

CuttingEdge HenryKissinger… Thu, 03/01/2018 - 05:39 Permalink

Someone doesn't understand sarcasm Haus.


I lived under Afrikaner rule - it's the reason I got the hell out 6 years before Mandela was released. As a tribe (probably the most accurate collective, given their mentality as it was back in the day), let me assure you, they are nothing to write home about. To be fair, with personal experiences of Rhodesia's transition to a shithole, I wouldn't have stuck round had I knew what was coming. A black majority tribe was always going to be Xhosa, and them running the show was a big no-no.

Now, it probably doesn't help my personal leanings with respect the the Afrikaner nation (the merits and greatness and goodness of which I had rammed down my throat every fucking day at school), that my English teacher (a very good one, and drop dead gorgeous to boot) was sacked for daring to broach the subject of apartheid in her final year classroom of 18 year old young men (those not looking up her skirts, that is). All of which was carefully monitored by the Principal and his merry band of named Broederbond affilliates via the intercom system. It's all those four cunts did most of the day.  Or the (black) groundsman who was sacked for responding to a question from a pupil about the state of the cricket pitch. Communication was verboten - they just didn't tell the kids. And if you want to find where in the Bible it tells us that all are created equal, as long as they are white, look no further than the preachings of the Dutch Reformed Church (another daily school torture).


So, no, I will not shed a single tear for the fall of the Afrikaner dream. Fucking nazis for the most part.


But I will the people of the country as a whole, as it accelerates towards inevitable collapse.

In reply to by HenryKissinger…

FireBrander dasein211 Thu, 03/01/2018 - 10:23 Permalink

I get the sarc.

There is nothing wrong with "immigrants"...that means a country specifically allowed them to enter (hopefully using good standards)...it's "free-for-all" ILLEGAL immigration that is a huge No-No.

If the majority in SA want it, then give it to them...if you are white/Dutch in SA, it is PAST time to take a "vacation" to the Netherlands/USA and never return...I'm sure you can successfully claim you'll be killed if you go back.

Opportunity here for Trump...open the door for LEGAL immigration of any farmer stripped of his land in SA....maybe even take some action to help them get wealth out of the country.

In reply to by dasein211

FireBrander FireBrander Thu, 03/01/2018 - 11:02 Permalink

When they write the law confiscating the land, I sure hope they include a rule that the land can't be sold for 99 years...if not, I'll bet a lot of new black land owners are going to sell that land right back to new white (Chinese) owners...lol...betcha a $1000~

Then they'll use that newly found black wealth to buy Lamborghini's and build rapper mansions'...

In reply to by FireBrander

waspwench FireBrander Thu, 03/01/2018 - 16:31 Permalink

The "white/Dutch" would probably love to go  to the Netherlands or the USA and Trump should open the door to them, as should all of Europe.   It is my understanding, however, that no-one is willing to let them in.   They are white and Christian.   Only non-caucasians and muzzies are welcome asylum seekers.

This is where the UNHCR ought to be active, but we all know that they will do nothing to assist white, Christians refugees

In reply to by FireBrander

DownWithYogaPants Scar Bro Thu, 03/01/2018 - 09:53 Permalink

Dude you need to get over your Jew fetish.  Some Jews are good some are bad.  Just like the rest of us.  You come across as someone who is not quite right in the head when you fixate so singularly.

Got a friend named Roy.  He's pretty right wing. He accepts that 911 was probably Mossad event.  There is adequate reason to be upset with the Jewish cabal that suppresses David Irving.  However what ever Lauren Southern is she is good and on the side of right.

In reply to by Scar Bro

poeg HockeyFool Thu, 03/01/2018 - 08:28 Permalink

It's already failed in epic fashion. There have been bills floored to coerce the currently evicted white farmers back onto those same farms as non-titled management workers. The new black owners can't seem to grow, harvest or manage the farm's logistics/maintenance in any sustainable fashion. Seems being a farmer is a skilled profession... they should have asked the farm hands themselves rather than politician Nelson's pals and relatives as to just how turn-key a farm is/was/will-always-be.

In reply to by HockeyFool

JustPastPeacefield tonyw Thu, 03/01/2018 - 10:52 Permalink

The idiot blacks will try to flee, but the Whites are smart and industrious people. They started off in Europe 400 years ago, but I doubt if any are stupid enough to go back now. 

America, Canada, Australia, NZ ... if we're smart enough to let them in. Of course, we can always substitute 8 million more Haitians with an IQ of 60 and palms upturned.


In reply to by tonyw

Nolde Huruska tonyw Thu, 03/01/2018 - 13:43 Permalink

They'll all bug out to the old Orange Free State, declare independence and when the kaffirs come it will be the Battle of Rorke's Drift redux. Their forefathers fought the British Empire to a standstill and most of them have R1s (FN FAL - not an "assault rifle" but a real main battle rifle) and tins of 7.62x51  buried on their property. They can feed themselves, SA without them cannot. It will come down to a Mexican standoff and SA grants them autonomy for food.

In reply to by tonyw

fleur de lis Indelible Scars Thu, 03/01/2018 - 10:27 Permalink

Most of the whites should have been long since gone.

Those who are there now need to think fast -- Poland, Russia, Hungary would be good start but they have to start thinking like war refugees.

If they stay for any reason they will be killed -- simple as that.

Westernized nations will not take them since whites are considered a criminal element by definition.

But they need to leave post haste.

As for the blacks, they will descend into violent anarchy, and will eventually start starving like the Venezuelans, although the Venezuelans have a foundation of civil society so they will eventually recover.

The tribal South Africans have no such tradition, they will eat each other alive.

There is no way they can take the reins of a complex modern society.

Unable to feed themselves, the blacks will turn the whole region into a violent, primitive wasteland and mass starvation will ensue.

Then they will be welcomed into Westernized nations as poor refugees who were victims of evil whites, whereupon they will become wards of the state on welfare, being fed and cared for by whites.

This is actually a culture clash in real time.

Not the culture clash described by academic parasites, nor political race baiters, nor empty headed MSM idiots.

This is the real McCoy.


In reply to by Indelible Scars

waspwench The Ram Thu, 03/01/2018 - 16:40 Permalink

Africa's black population is what it is because of Western food aid and Western medical intervention.   It will continue to expand because of our food and our medicine.

It is a dreadful prospect to watch millions of people starve to death, but if we keep feeding them the problem will only continue to get worse and eventually it will be impossible to look after them.   Their sheer numbers will overwhelm us.

Western aid must be tied to sterilization.   If we look after you you must agree to be sterilized.


In reply to by The Ram

aardvarkk COSMOS Thu, 03/01/2018 - 10:56 Permalink

Meh.  I have some experience working with Afrikaners as well here in the States...I worked a couple of years at an Afrikaner-owned business in MN as a software developer.  If those guys were representative of their buddies in SA, then as a group they truly are NOT anything I'd want in power either.  There was ONE guy there who I really got along with well.  I mentioned to him once that I kind of liked Prince's older stuff, and his response was "no way, mate, I'm not with that faggoty mission."  Heh.

That said...no government should ever "expropriate" anything from any of its citizens outside of a complete state of war.  Ever.  Especially in a race-based way.  That is how you get never-ending hatreds between groups that will dog your country much longer than will its current (apparently stupid) government.

In reply to by COSMOS

curbjob Unreconstructe… Thu, 03/01/2018 - 08:20 Permalink

What most Americans don't realize is that apartheid would have ended 14 years earlier if it wasn't for the USA propping up the Pretoria regime as an extension of the cold war.

The wars in Namibia, Angola and Mozambique were another case of the US supporting evil in the name of defeating communism.

Apartheid ended when the iron curtain fell because the US said "fuck off you're on your own now." ... and not because of sanctions.

Ask any white South African who grew up during apartheid and asked them to list their favorite television shows of the time ... they were watching what Americans were watching while drinking Coke, Pepsi and eating KFC.

In reply to by Unreconstructe…

rex-lacrymarum curbjob Thu, 03/01/2018 - 09:08 Permalink

It was actually the demise of Soviet Communism that opened the window for ending apartheid. I still remember the meeting between USSR foreign minister Shevardnadse and de Klerk in Namibia on the eve of Mandela's release. It was never made public what they discussed, but one can certainly make an educated guess. It is noteworthy in this context that the very first political demand Mandela decided to thoroughly abandon after his release was the one calling for the "nationalization of the commanding heights of the economy". He did that shortly after getting around to reading the memo from Moscow. 

In reply to by curbjob

curbjob rex-lacrymarum Thu, 03/01/2018 - 09:31 Permalink

"It was actually the demise of Soviet Communism that opened the window for ending apartheid"

The stalemate in 88 at Cuito Cuanavale was undoubtedly a turning point.

I was in Southern Angola a year earlier and remember thinking that the Pretoria regime would be a stain in the history books within a decade .. as it turned out, a conservative estimate. 

In reply to by rex-lacrymarum