Still Raising Questions: How Angela Merkel Started Her Career In German Politics

Submitted by Socrates F. Bach,

Angela Merkel is considered to be the world’s most powerful woman and perhaps Europe’s most powerful person. She’s about to be re-elected as Germany’s Chancellor for the fourth consecutive time. Her policies have provoked a lot of debate, from Germany’s decision to phase out nuclear energy over the Eurozone bailouts onto her refugee policies.

What has received much less attention is how she entered politics. A number of biographies have been written about her, with the most critical one perhaps being “the first life of Angela M”, written in 2013 by a journalist for Die Welt who later joined the rightwing populist AfD party. This centered on how she was a member of the FDJ, the communist youth organization, when she was at school, and how she later served as cultural secretary for the FDJ while working as a physicist at the Academy of Sciences, leading to Merkel denying this role included propaganda.

To be fair to her: in any case, she wasn’t a politically active avid Communist trying to make a career in the German Democratic Republic. That however changed with the “Wende”, the period during which the Berlin wall fell and Eastern Germany was absorbed into the West.

During that period, Merkel made a blitz career in politics, morphing from a stuffy Eastern German researcher in November 1989 to entering the German Bundestag in 1990, in order to be appointed shortly after as Minister for Women and Youth in the government of Chancellor Helmut Kohl in January 1991.

What’s really intriguing here is how she achieved this.

Merkel’s first job in politics

Her first job in politics wasn’t a great success. In February 1990, she had become the spokeswoman of the “Democratic Awakening”, an East German political movement and political party which was founded in October 1989. The party didn’t do well in the first democratic Eastern German elections in 1990, only collecting 0.9% of votes. This was because its chairman, Wolfgang Schnur, had to confess to having been an informer for the feared and ruthless Ministry for State Security (Stasifor more than two decades. A few days before the election, he had to resign, as this wasn’t exactly a great sales pitch for an Eastern German pro-democracy movement. The man was later criminally convicted as well.

How did Merkel end up there? According to her predecessor as party spokeswoman for Democratic Awakening”, Christiane Ziller, who stepped down along with some other more left leaning people over the decision of the party convention to adopt a more conservative program, “there wasn’t any democratic legitimacy [as to how Merkel was appointed], as far as I know. Her appointment was one of these discretionary decisions by Schnur”, the later disgraced party chairman. Ziller, who otherwise speaks positively about Merkel in an interview with die Welt and later joined the German greens, mentions how Merkel “remained a stranger within the opposition network in the German Democratic Republic”.

Merkel had joined the opposition movement Democratic Awakening only after the Berlin wall fell, on 9 November 1989. She has never claimed to have been an active dissident before the wall fell.

The Democratic Awakening was based on existing politically active church groups and that’s where Merkel’s father, Horst Kasner, comes in. He was a pastor, who had moved from Hamburg to East Berlin in 1954, when already a lot of people had fled the Communist regime. Eastern German official documents describe him as “an opponent” of the regime, but later his nickname seems to have evolved into “red Kasner”, as he was then campaigning for the Eastern German Church to be split off from the Western Germany Evangelical Church in a bid to reconcile Christianity and “socialism”, as the Communists called their ideology. This was very much something the Eastern German regime desired, as cutting Church ties with the West would strengthen their grip on the Church, which was a vehicle to oppose the regime.

Some sources describe Merkel’s father as someone who toed the regime line within the Eastern Germany Church community, although it must be said that other sources contradict this. Gerd Langguth, a former European Commission representative in Germany, takes the former line and when writing the obituary of Merkel’s father in Die Welt, he points out that, unlike the children in other pastors’ families, the higher education of Kasner’s children, including Angela Merkel, was not impeded, a sign that he may have been quite friendly towards the regime. He writes that Kasner may well have taken this conciliatory stance for the good of his children. One biography of Merkel even claims that she enjoyed special treatment at school thanks to her father’s connections. It’s hard to know of course, and can we really blame a father to do everything for his children?

Instead of speculating, let’s stay to the facts. One of these facts is that Wolfgang Schnur, the leader of the first Eastern German opposition party who was later unvealed as a Stasi, has been pretty clear that he employed Angela Merkel because her father was a lifelong friend.

Schnur was active in the Synod of the Federation of the Protestant Churches in the GDR and as an attorney he defended many Eastern German political dissidents in the 1980s. This may have helped this Stasi man to infiltrate so deeply into the Eastern German opposition movement that he emerged as one of its leaders when the wall came down. For what it’s worth: he has claimed to be acting against Stasi advice in joining the opposition movement.

In any case, perhaps unknowingly, Merkel has her first job in politics to thank due to the regime connections of her father.

Merkel’s second job in politics

After that, also for Merkel’s second jobs in politics she ends up working for a politician who didn’t only have to step down over suspected Stasi links but who also comes out of the world of Eastern-German Church politics. That is Lothar de Maiziere, the first democratically elected Prime Minister of Eastern Germany.

When Merkel had to find a new way in politics after the Democratic Awakening had been crushed in March 1990 due to the Stasi – connections of its leader, she was appointed as deputy spokesman for Lothar de Maiziere, in April 1990, who was the leader of the Eastern German Christian Democration Union, a so-called “bloc party”, whose function it was to serve as a pretense of real democracy. He had just won the first democratic elections in Eastern Germany and was about to become Prime Minister. In a later interview, Lothar de Maiziere recalls how German Chancellor Kohl was easy to be convinced to merge the Eastern German CDU into the Western German one, despite some protest in his party, because, according to de Maiziere, “in all areas of the GDR we had an office (…) and we were able to conduct a comprehensive electoral campaign. The Chancellor was always open to such considerations”. Also the liberal party decided so, given the high number of members and despite some resistance.

Lothar’s cousin and Germany’s current Interior Minister Thomas de Mazière was also appointed to his cabinet in April 1990, closely working together there with Merkel. Thomas comes from the West-German wing of the family that had been estranged from the Eastern-German wing. Merkel and him both go back a long way, especially as Merkel appointed Thomas de Mazière to serve as her chief of staff when she became Chancellor in 2005.  

According to Thomas, in 1990, he would have recommended his uncle to hire Merkel. Thomas had been impressed by her qualities at the press conference where Schnur’s resignation as the leader of “Democratic Awakening” was declared. That party was in an electoral association called “Alliance for Germany with Lothar de Mazière’s CDU. In a joint interview with his cousin, Lothar de Mazière makes clear that even before his cousin’s recommendation, Merkel had already impressed him, as she “was very good at moderating” between the “squabbling” different parties of the association.

Oddly, in this particular interview, Lothar de Mazière doesn’t mention that his father, Clemens de Mazière, and Merkel’s father knew each other. It’s also very likely that Lother himself knew Merkel’s father personally, as both had been prominent in Eastern German Church politics for years.

Lothar de Maizière’s father Clemens was the Eastern German Church’s lawyer, where he worked closely together with Merkel’s father to split the Eastern German Church off from its Western German counterpart. As said, this was a policy desired by the Eastern German regime. Clemens de Maizière was a shrewd Stasi-operator who apparently even betrayed his own family. After the war, Clemens had swiftly converted from Nazism to Communism as he had once belonged to Adolf Hitler’s “Sturmabteilung”, with membership number 3952867. Just to give a bit of background on politics in Communist Eastern Germany.   

As mentioned, Merkel’s father may well only have cooperated with the regime to prevent worse and for the good of his family. He may not even have been aware that Clemens de Maizière was a Stasi man. If that would be the case, how tragic it must have been when his daughter’s boss and Clemens’ son, Lothar de Maizière, was accused of having been a Stasi operator in December 1990, resulting in his resignation as Eastern German Prime Minister. Lothar de Maizière would have worked for the Stasi since 1981, the year after his father Clemens, a long-time Stasi asset, had passed away, as he also took over his father’s role of the Eastern German Church’s lawyer. Before he went into active politics, Lothar de Maizière, was the vice president of the synod of the Association of Protestant Churches in the GDR. How likely is it that he would not have known Merkel’s father?

In a nutshell: Merkel may well have gotten her second job because the Democratic Awakening had been in a pre-election alliance with the Eastern German CDU and because she did such an impressive job dealing with journalists when the Democratic Awakening was in crisis. But apart from that, there is something very intriguing about the direct and indirect connections between her father and her first two political bosses.

Did Merkel use her father’s Church policy connections to get her first two jobs in politics, twice working for people who had to resign over Stasi allegations? Did her father know or suspect they were? Did Merkel herself know or suspect? Questions abound. According to one critical biography of Merkel, right after the wall had fallen, she actually started to emancipate herself from her father who was “deeply enmeshed into the system of German Democratic Republic”. One example is how she did not join the social democrats, like her mother, but the Democratic Awakening, which had an alliance with Helmut Kohl’s conservatives.

Shouldn’t this have been investigated more deeply? Lothar de Mazière is still alive. Despite all the indications, he maintains he wasn’t secret Stasi agent “Czernie”. Then, it was De Maiziere's government which ordered the destruction of Stasi computer tapes. The West-German government hadbeen warned even before the elections in March 1990 about possible Stasi connections of the CDU lead candidate in Eastern Germany but because of his membership of the CDU, this may not have been thoroughly researched, according to Stasi-expert and Die Welt-journalist Uwe Müller.

Both Schnur and Lothar de Mazière emerged as leaders of the Eastern German opposition movement before having to step down because of Stasi accusations. Both brought Angela Merkel to the fore. There are the Stasi archives, the many people who were involved in the Democratic Awakening and Eastern Germany’s CDU, people within Eastern Germany’s Church community. Doesn’t this deserve more investigation?

Maybe the only thing that can be concluded here will be that Merkel was lucky enough to be able to use her father’s dodgy political connections to launch her career. To be fair, without wanting to claim that no proper evidence can be presented to counter that claim: everything points in that direction. Isn’t that something interesting?

This is almost 30 years later. But has there been a proper debate in Germany over the role of the Stasi and its network during and after the unification of Germany? Even if the regime’s network would have only played a very minimal, almost accidental role in kickstarting Angela Merkel’s career: shouldn’t this be out in the open?

It’s commonly accepted that in the “East Block” countries that abandoned Communism, there was a lot of continuity also after 1990. Not only are there Putin and his KGB buddies who are ruling Russia. The frustration that many who were high up in Communist Poland haven’t seen their careers squashed is at the heart of Poland’s rule of law reforms – or at least the Polish government uses this public concern as the excuse to crack down on a justice system. One in four Eastern Germans was a member of the Stasi, which has been described as “worse than the Gestapo" by Nazi hunter Simon Wiesenthal, The Christian democratic, liberal and social democratic “bloc parties” of Eastern Germany– which must have been infested with Stasi influences – were absorbed into Western Germany’s political system. Is it really surprising that the old elites managed to help each other in the politically turbulent period when Germany was unified?  



Bokkenrijder purplewarrior Mon, 03/05/2018 - 04:49 Permalink

"This is almost 30 years later. But has there been a proper debate in Germany over the role of the Stasi and its network during and after the unification of Germany? "

Germans don't debate. Germans follow orders; orders from the Kaiser, orders from the Führer, orders from the Communist Party and now orders from Mutti Merkel.

Every time these socio- military- and economic engineering projects end in tears, but Germans don't debate their mistakes. Instead they always gravitate towards collectivism and totalitarianism, as for example now with Germany's (NetzDG) 'hate speech' laws from Heiko Maas.

Every few generations, a new German Übermensch emerges. We've already seen the 'military Übermensch' (the Kaiser), the 'genetic Übermensch' (Hitler), the 'economic Übermensch' (Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels and East Germany) and now it's the 'moral and economic Übermensch' under Angela Merkel.

"This time it's different," the Germans tell each other, and every time it ends up in tears...

Where Hitler failed with his Third Reich, Merkel continues, and The European Union is to become the Fourth Reich under German leadership. The EUSSR: a multicultural Utopia financed by debt and the printing press of Mario Draghi.

In reply to by purplewarrior

fx house biscuit Mon, 03/05/2018 - 09:26 Permalink

Merkel is suspected to have worked for the Stasi herself under the codename "IM Erika" (IM standing for informal agent, many thousands of people were working as IMs, collecting and delivering all sorts of more or less useful information to the Stasi. Remember, there was no goog, fb, twtr, amazn around back then for people to deliver lots of that stuff on their own).

No proof has surfaced so far. However, since the (western) CDU was quickly in charge of everything, including the vast Stasi archives, that doesn't mean there is none.


More importantly, well before German unification the US intelligence took possession of a special, big Stasi database, called the "Rosenholz data files". They were quickly shipped to the US (so much for German being an independent, self determined country). These files are supposed to be a treasure of very useful intelligence information from the cold war era that contain information well beyond German interior stuff. People supsect that the C!A actually may be in possession of compromising evidence against Merkel. That would explain why Merkel has always behaved as Obozo's lapdog, would explain why she didn't even try to do anything against the N$A spying on her from within German territory, would explain why the anlgo-american controlled German mass media have done everything tp portray merkel always in the most positive possible light and to keep her in power for as long as possible.

Nice, if you can simply order the German chancellor to do whatever you wish by threatening to publish her Stasi files, isn't it?

In reply to by house biscuit

kellys_eye Easyp Mon, 03/05/2018 - 04:34 Permalink

Irrelevant really.

Her policies are being questioned by the public - recent election results and (slight) change in her stance are evident for this - and the coalition she's now had to form is shaky at best.  Who knows what other former-NWO policies she'll be forced to water down in the coming months?

Just as with everything 'leftist' the truth eventually steps forward to expose the left for the manipulating scum they really are.  The signs of her imminent political demise are already there - all it takes from here on in is time.  Same for all the leftist political operators across Europe.

Look at Italy......

In reply to by Easyp

An Shrubbery Mon, 03/05/2018 - 03:30 Permalink

This is almost 30 years later. But has there been a proper debate in Germany over the role of the Stasi and its network during and after the unification of Germany? 


ted41776 Mon, 03/05/2018 - 03:32 Permalink

by promising a never ending supply of free shit, just like any other politician. everyone loves free shit except for the guy paying for it

fx quasi_verbatim Mon, 03/05/2018 - 09:35 Permalink

There have since lonng been rumours that Merkel once worked for the Stasi herself under codename "IM Erika".

It is believed by some that the US intelligence services do possess proof of that since they quickly took over vast parts of the Stasi archives and datafiles (which were simply handed to them no questions asked and not even copied before or otherwise touched by their west German lapdogs, i.e. the BND). So Merkel could perhaps very easily be controlled by the US through blackmail.

It would explain a lot of her really lapdog-style behaviour versus Obongo, which often ran contrary to core German interests.

In reply to by quasi_verbatim

Joe A Mon, 03/05/2018 - 03:42 Permalink

Families like de Maizière have no problems switching ideologies. Ideologies are just a means to an end for them: to assume power. Same as it ever was. That happened after WII and when the wall came down. When communism fell, many in Eastern Europe just took off their communist hat and replaced it with a socialist, social democrat or even liberal democrat hat and continued in national politics or even went to the EU (EC, EP). The reason for that is continuity. It takes a long time to start anew and build everything up. No, it is easier to make use of existing structure with the added advantage that all these people are blackmailable. It that also the case with Merkel? Is she on file somewhere?

An Shrubbery Mon, 03/05/2018 - 03:47 Permalink

"Families like de Maizière have no problems switching ideologies."

That rings true. When the allies invaded Germany at the end of WWII, they couldn't find ANY Nazis!

Cloud9.5 An Shrubbery Mon, 03/05/2018 - 08:01 Permalink

We found a few, but we looked across the fence and saw the Russians.  The documentary on the holocaust was never produced, their scientists were brought into our defense complex, and life went on.  A Nazi 88 gunner was a watch repairman in my little town here in south Florida for forty years.  Nobody bothered him and everybody went to him to get their clocks repaired back in the day when we repaired things. His name was Kirchhoff.

In reply to by An Shrubbery

Stef1304 Mon, 03/05/2018 - 03:50 Permalink

I strongly disagree with Merkel policy in most major issues ( like Euro, NATO, Russia, Greece, migrants, etc  ). But still this writer should go fuck himself with this easy and cheap retrovert moral stance.

Some explanation to my opinion

Why are those questions only appearing now that Merkel is weak politically ?

should those questions not have been dealed with when the wall fell, and all this Stasi stuff was clearly available ?

like for example, a German law claiming that anyone who was part of Stasi, at least at a certain level, could no longer access political job ? And has to retire from political life ?

that would have been a simple and a clear political stance that everyone could understand.

and a fair and moral stance too.

with other words, there was NO such political stance in Germany 30 years ago. Same when the Nazi regime fell, by the way.

Sure, the question is still right. 

But why has it not been brought to public attention years ago ?

So why should it appears now ?

And only to target one politician ?

And a failing one ?

Such a great political and moral stance... so GREAT ! 😒

To me, in that regard, it’s just shit digging in someone else life. 🤮

In short, today, it’s should be a question for German historian, no longer a political narrative. 

And by the way, Merkel failed big enough on her policies, attack her on that, if you want to be politically active.

You will contribute to public life in a more healthy way👍🏼






Ranger4564 Stef1304 Mon, 03/05/2018 - 07:48 Permalink

Maybe because before, the truth was controlled by the criminals, so it was all lies, and now, there is a global movement to rectify this situation globally, so the people in control of truth are being contained, and actual truths are being revealed.

Realize there is a power structure that controls what comes out. That power structure is slowly being challenged across the planet. Merkel may have been a neo-Nazi plant by the likes of the neo-Nazi CIA here in the US. The cabal doesn't work with 1 strategy... to take control of the global economic machine, they have governmental control (plants), and central banks, military control, legal control, etc. Anyway, truth, is whether you find it believable (and provable) or not, not whether you find it comfortable to read or not.

In reply to by Stef1304

Nelbev Mon, 03/05/2018 - 04:05 Permalink

Daddy was Stazi, could cross border when others killed trying.  MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE.

EU will eventually break up over Germany's/Merkel's open doors immigration, opps, 2nd destroy Europe.  Russia, or successor of USSR would like EU break-up, no collective EU army, come in as heroes to help like Syria.  Will those €s become like East German aluminum Marks?  EU doomed, next financial crisis last nail, Brexit just beginning, and EU drained of funds, backlash nationalism of countries.  Coalition with opposition with Socialists after massive election losses, AfD win. Short Christian Democrats.…

Fireman Mon, 03/05/2018 - 04:20 Permalink

STASI "Erika" was sold and bought by the USual suspects days before the "Wall" came down. Helmut Kohl, the CIA Chancellor said "she couldn't use a knife and fork before I fished her out of the pond." Little did he know that the German Monika Lewinski pond creature was carefully attached to his hook by the anglozionazi empire to whom Erika is beholden.


When the German keystone fails the entire anglozionazi edifice will crumble. After the SPD sellout and their betrayal of the populace that collapse is already underway.


Like Barry Soetoro...fake everything is fake

Rocco May Mon, 03/05/2018 - 05:32 Permalink

Globalization means socialism for all.

The young “Karl Marx Nazis” in the West are just theoreticians. They have no idea about dictatorship.

The Communist Angela Merkel was ideal. She was successful in East Germany and she has great experience.

Through media propaganda and brainwashing the Stasi was reinstalled, and now all people who criticize Merkel and the system are discriminated; there is no more separation of powers- Germany is no constitutional state. In this way Merkel has reached her goal.


gespiri Mon, 03/05/2018 - 05:33 Permalink

Just like Obangutan, she was planted there by powerful people to help their agenda of destroying national borders and putting 98% of the population under their control.  These people, who pretend to be Jews/Chrisitans/Muslims are Khazarians who have no national identity nor loyalty, openly worship money and evil, and would do anything to put the rest under their control.