You Can Now Be Arrested for Sexism in Belgium

Via The Daily Bell

A Belgian court fined a man €3,000 ($3,700) for telling a female police officer that she should do a job more “adapted to women.”

It is the first time that anyone has been convicted of sexism under a new Belgian law.

The driver was found guilty of three charges: contempt of a police officer, making threats and sexist remarks in public, and a serious violation of another person’s dignity because of her gender.

He was warned that if he failed to pay the fine, a prison term of a month would be imposed.

“This is the first time we have used this law to prosecute someone,” said Gilles Blondeau, spokesman for the public prosecutor’s office. “It is quite common for people arrested by the police to insult and threaten. But to personally blame a policewoman because of her sex is different.” …

Under the law, any behaviour expressing “contempt towards a person, because of their sexuality” or treating a person as “inferior or as reduced essentially to their sexual dimension“, which entails a serious attack on their dignity is punishable by up to a year in prison and/or a fine.

Some men are rude. Some men say mean things. They shouldn’t do that.

But how weak must people be when they need a law to protect their feelings? It is almost as if some women think they need the state and their guns to protect them because women are unable to protect themselves.

That is an actual sexist attitude. It seems to suggest women are too frail to fend off mere words.

A strong self-assured woman would not need the law to retaliate against men who insult or offend her.

The fact that this criminalizes speech against a public official is even more concerning.

It doesn’t matter how rude, nasty, or offensive someone is, the right to free speech is more important.

You don’t have to play by the rules of the corrupt politicians, manipulative media, and brainwashed peers.

When you subscribe to The Daily Bell, you also get a free guide:

How to Craft a Two Year Plan to Reclaim 3 Specific Freedoms.

This guide will show you exactly how to plan your next two years to build the free life of your dreams. It’s not as hard as you think…

Identify. Plan. Execute.

Yes, deliver THE DAILY BELL to my inbox!


Creative_Destruct thisandthat Thu, 03/08/2018 - 13:48 Permalink

"...which entails a serious attack on their dignity is punishable by up to a year in prison and/or a fine."

So, this trend of writing laws based on offenses to "dignity" can be a multi-edged sword.

It's damned hard to interpret and narrowly construe what constitutes "offenses" to "dignity." Every identity group has their own definition.

The Supreme Court ruling on gay marriage where flaky Anthony Kennedy wrote the majority opinion based on "dignity" is another example of this foolishness. In the future we may very well be insulting every identity group's dignity and throwing each other in jail for it.


In reply to by thisandthat

Bastille Day Lost My Shorts Thu, 03/08/2018 - 15:43 Permalink

Too bad the guy was probably entirely correct in his assessment as proven by the Sheriff's dept response in Lakeland FL.  Everyone has been criticizing the Sheriffs deputies for not going in to the school to confront the shooter, calling them cowards.  I knew from the first second that there was entirely more to it than them being cowards.  Turns out the female captain ordered them to stand down and wait for the Sheriff's swat team to arrive.  Also of note was that her order to stand down was against department protocols.  Think we will hear an uproar over this cowardly woman ordering her men to stand down?  

Also to note, the Miramar SWAT members that did enter the building have been suspended for bravery.

In reply to by Lost My Shorts

Endgame Napoleon silverer Thu, 03/08/2018 - 11:07 Permalink

What about the oh-so-catty words of women, aimed at other women, sometimes by women in positions of authority in the many discriminatory, 98%-to-100% female-dominated, mom-dominated workplaces?

This, I suppose, is protected EU speech.

Here’s how it goes in the USA.

Women often try to bully out the female “non culture fits” in the many workplaces, staffed with 100% or close to 100% women.

Women do this for a variety of reasons, including 1) pushing out the hardworking and high-selling competition in sales-related jobs and 2) shoving out the few childless women who don’t fit in the frequently absentee mom gangs in the many female-dominated back-office jobs “voted best for moms” to keep the lid on their crony absenteeism collusion.

Women with unearned income for womb productivity often use “mean words” to bully out the women with no unearned income from spouses / ex spouses / monthly welfare and child-tax-credit welfare, hoisting up their low wages.

Women use “mean words” like weapons, bullying non-culture-fit women into quitting the crony-mom-absenteeism-gang jobs before they are eligible for Unemployment Compensation, which covers rent between low-wage jobs.

Many “non-culture-fit” females, working in catty, female-dominated industries, never get a dime of the UC that they pay into, while many of these culture-fit absentee bully moms, working part time to stay below the earned-income limit for welfare, are showered with 100%-free, non-contributory monthly welfare that covers their rent and groceries and child tax credits up to $6,444.

Thanks to witholding and their now-doubled refundable $6,444 (max) child tax credits, the paychecks of welfare moms are higher, even though they — and many of the married moms, too — often bound out the workplace door every afternoon, leaving behind phones ringing off the hook with paying customers, leading to unmet quotas, month after month, especially since they likewise take off whole days and whole weeks beyond their PTO and pregnancy leave.

Well-vacationed moms-in-charge often fire the female “non culture fits” who come to work every day, stay the whole day and meet the account-generation and account-retention numbers every month, while keeping the back-watching, frequently absentee culture-fit moms whose sales and account-retention numbers are low, but who squeal with delight at the Halloween Dress-Up Day festivities and during the parking lot Family Day Picnic. Momma managers often churn the high-selling, female “non culture fits” after they get their bonus numbers up.

Do the counts in Belgium punish female managers who, in the middle of a meeting in a corporate back office, say “The prize for the baby-mommy-look-alike-bulletin-board decorating contest is getting X childless, female employee down in the floor and smearing Vaseline all over her shiny, exfoliated face?”

How’s that for degrading? 

Does the goverment fine female (mom) managers who interview childless, non-culture-fit females by letting them know, as the female non culture fit sits down to interview and before a word is uttered, that “we have 17 women in here (MOMS), and we HAVE to have someone who fits in!” 

Without batting an eyelash, momma managers in a company with a big government contract (due to being a “woman-owned” business) did that to me in an interview. 

It is typical. It is the norm in female-dominated industries.

In the USA, it is okay to discriminate if you do it in reverse, discriminating against men, or if you narrow your discrimination categories within the blanket of gender.

How about being told—after getting ready for an hour, driving for an hour, waiting for an hour, filing out a bunch of forms with every type of information in the world for an hour and answering an hour’s worth of canned hoop-jumping interview questions—that, for this low-wage office job, we hire “women with somethin’ comin in’ from spouses, ex spouses or goverment due to womb productivity, which hoists up the low wages for the 100% female employees.

You need a spousal income that pays your rent, child support that covers rent or free food, free rent, free electricity, monthly cash assistance and a child tax credit up to $6,444 for womb productivity out of wedlock to get this female-dominated, low-paying office job, woman.

How about being told by a female hiring manager in an interview that “I can see what you are, and YOU just don’t know what it is like to raise two boys.”

Translation: Despite your college degree, four relevant licenses and 3 years of experience, including experience doing the very thing we do here, and with high numbers when dealing with one of our biggest clients in another business, YOU definitely won’t fit in our back-watching mom-protection gang of frequently absentee, womb-productive female discriminators. 









In reply to by silverer

George Bush League Socratic Dog Thu, 03/08/2018 - 05:22 Permalink

"Women simply shouldn't vote, they need to rollback women's rights to circa 1905"  Women in general have no sense of logic, reason or fair play, it's all about emotions, feelings and equal outcomes. The 100 year experiment of Feminism has done wonders for Sweden and the West, the silver lining, in the future women in the West are going to lose their rights either from western men (preferably) or from Islam.  We are going back to a soft or hard patriarchy.

"You would think that roving Muslim rap gangs would get the attention of women voters in the EU but apparently not."  History shows, once a civilization is conquered the women immediately lie on their backs and spread their legs for their new rulers, it's matter of instinctual survival. Sweden is a perfect example of the feminist double standard, the Muslim invaders (new rulers) can rape with impunity and the likes of Julian Assange and Swedish men get charged with

All you triggered Feminists and SJW Cuck down voters, refute the facts and "observable reality".

In reply to by Socratic Dog

Jon_Locke Socratic Dog Thu, 03/08/2018 - 12:19 Permalink

Its sounds funny, but that is where this ultimately ends up. Baby steps toward it. They go after easy targets first, then they slowly inch toward others. Europe will end up like Nazi Germany. People walking around terrorized of saying anything for fear of retaliatory action worse. This is exactly what the muslims want. History doesn't repeat it self but it often rhymes.

In reply to by Socratic Dog

VWAndy Wed, 03/07/2018 - 18:29 Permalink

 As if the women dont say nasty shit? I wonder how long before the first female is charged for doing it?

  look up how the duluth model is being used.

nmewn Wed, 03/07/2018 - 19:24 Permalink

Lived next door to an elderly couple (great friggin people) down in the Burg and I'll never forget what the lady (Mary) always said about cops if she had to call them...she said...

"Who calls the cops and say's, send the shortest, skinniest little pissant social worker-type female you have over here immediately?! No, if I call the cops I want the biggest, meanest son-a-bitch male they have coming over here with a gun and a bad attitude to get the bastard I called them on!" swear, great people, salt of the earth ;-)

Miffed Microbi… nmewn Wed, 03/07/2018 - 20:49 Permalink

30 years ago I was working graveyards and because I was low man on the totem pole, I had to do all the legal blood alcohols for the hospital. I got a call from the ER physician he needed one and warned me the guy was quite combative. When I walked into the room there was a 300+ lb fully tatted up man in the bed who looked like he was in Hells Angels. Next to him was a cop who looked like grandma Broomhilda . Needless to say this was not comforting to me and I figured I may be hurt. I explained what I was going to do and he said " Listen you fucking cunt, if you come anywhere near me with any fucking needle, I'm gonna rip it out of your hands and stab you in the neck with it Bitch. " I looked at the cop and she looked at me. Suddenly she launched on top of him brandishing her baton. " So you don't want this nice lady to draw your blood? Fine that leaves me to do it and I don't know how to draw blood. So we'll just tie you down and I'll get a chance to learn. Frankly I don't care if I rip your damn arm off." I was quite taken aback when he quietly extended arm.

I found out later there were two dead bodies in the morgue due to him. Grandma was actually the best cop I had under such circumstances believe it or not. 



In reply to by nmewn

Rhetorical Wed, 03/07/2018 - 19:26 Permalink

Most of europe has no free soeech laws if Im correct?


Ah well they're about to be outbred. By truely masculane individuals anyway. The women will soon have this foolishnees fucked out of them one way or the other.

Rex Andrus Wed, 03/07/2018 - 19:28 Permalink

Appeal on the grounds that the policy or decree is sexist and he's being discriminated against by the judge / jury and the sexist feminazis who codified it. There must be some laws in Belgium against Nazis too...

Automatic Choke Wed, 03/07/2018 - 19:59 Permalink


this is not the US, this is Belgium.   we have a hard enough time trying to keep our rights - such as free speech - from being infringed here in the US.   expecting the rest of the world to behave according to U.S. idealism is beyond stupid.   if you don't like the laws in Belgium, don't go there.