Former CIA Officer Exposes Clinton Charity Fraud As Biggest Scandal In US History

Via Greg Hunter's,

Former CIA Officer and whistleblower Kevin Shipp says the reason for all the crime and treason at the FBI and DOJ all boils down to one thing – the Clinton's so-called “charity.”

Shipp explains, “Hillary Clinton was running and is running a global financial criminal syndicate.  She was using these secret servers to conduct Clinton financial money laundering business."

"The shocking thing about that is all the former directors of the CIA that have come out to support her, from Clapper to Brennan to Morell to Robert Gates supporting her being elected, knew about this criminal syndicate.  Comey was protecting it.  Lynch was protecting it.  Weissmann was protecting it.  And that is the big why.  What’s she got on these people?  Are they financial ties?  They had to be aware of this, especially the counter-intelligence units.  We know it was hacked into by foreign intelligence services because it was just hanging out there.  Hillary Clinton was running a secret server outside the Department of State for the purposes of laundering money through the criminal Clinton Foundation.

Are the crimes and treason of the Clinton Foundation the anvil that is about to drop? Shipp says,

It’s not just an anvil, I think it is a mountain and the nexus of everything.  This “Clinton Global Initiative” (CGI) is worldwide, and it’s been out there for a couple of decades.  It has now intertwined former Directors of the CIA and FBI.   George Soros is a part of it.  It’s connected to all kinds of global financial institutions...

It is at least a $100 billion...

All these people protecting and defending Hillary Clinton and knowing about her criminal syndicate, this goes into the so-called 'Deep State' of our government, and it is connected, involved and intertwined in the global criminal crime syndicate called the Clinton Foundation.  This is probably going to be the biggest scandal in U.S. history–once it’s busted.  I think they are quietly working on it now, and I think they have been for the last year.  It is so huge the arrests and indictments could cause a Constitutional crisis with some people being removed.  Maybe that’s why they are moving slowly.  It all comes back down to the Clinton Foundation and the criminal syndicate.”

Is former President Obama involved with the Clinton crime syndicate? Shipp says,

Yes, I am absolutely convinced of it.  George Soros gave $30 million to Obama’s campaign.  Then he gave $27.1 million to Hillary Clinton’s campaign.  Both Obama and Clinton are tied directly into George Soros.  Obama was put into office with millions of dollars that came out of nowhere. 

Yes, he’s part of this cabal.  Yes, he’s part of this global syndicate, and in my opinion, the subversion of our government.”

In closing, Shipp contends,“There could be a Constitutional crisis in that we could see Congressmen, Senators, former Directors of the FBI and the CIA perp walked after they receive charges."

"Could you imagine if senior DOJ officials were arrested, some Congressmen and Senators were arrested and other government officials were arrested on charges and walked out of office?  That’s the Constitutional crisis I am talking about.  Those kind of high level arrests would shake up this nation.  It would be huge, and that’s why it has taken so long and methodical in doing this.”

Join Greg Hunter as he goes One-on-One with CIA whistleblower Kevin Shipp...



Automatic Choke beemasters Mon, 03/12/2018 - 00:54 Permalink

I am deeply afraid that our "swamp drainers" have politics ahead of doing the right thing.   They are sitting on ample evidence, but are waiting till closer to the mid-term elections for maximum political benefit.   Shame on them.   If they are criminals, get them out NOW and start cleaning up the aftermath ASAP.  Screw the politics, this is bigger.   We need to reclaim our country.


In reply to by beemasters

fleur de lis Janet smeller Mon, 03/12/2018 - 07:52 Permalink

Somehow someway Stormy Daniels is mixed up in this, too.

All of a sudden she appears out of nowhere and targets a sitting President.

Very sleazy distraction away from the criminal Swamp dwellers, but that is all it is.

Lucky for the Swamp that the MSM laps it up like pigs at a trough, never stopping to think of motives and manipulation at a much deeper level.

The Swampites would never survive without the fierce loyalty of the MSM.

Someone with a lot of money and power is behind Daniels.

The Deep State, CIA, FBI, DoJ, NSA, CF, etc., must have gone digging down the deepest depths of the toilet to pull her up.

For her part she must be really stupid not to realize the danger of what she is doing.

No matter how successful in her attempts she is now a loose end who knows too much no matter how little that may be.



In reply to by Janet smeller

Old Skool HopefulCynical Tue, 03/13/2018 - 07:37 Permalink

It's all good and well talking about arrests, but who is going to do the arresting?

Will it be someone we can trust not to screw it up therefore leaving it open to be thrown out of court?

Take your pick of on which beacon of integrity will do the dirty deed and level the charges outlined in the article and issue arrest warrants...

  • FBI
  • Police
  • Secret Service
  • IRS
  • CIA
  • TSA
  • NSA
  • Libtard

In reply to by HopefulCynical

a Smudge by an… Janet smeller Mon, 03/12/2018 - 09:34 Permalink

"I did not read the article because this isn’t news but I’m pretty sure this guy can eat shit."

I read the article but I'm with you from the get-go. I pretty much reject any information that purports to BLOW IT WIDE OPEN or CHANGE EVERYTHING cause those are bullshit 100% of the time.

The whole premise that some information point is suddenly gonna make evil disappear is counting on somebody else (gubment?) to follow through make life better for you and that ain't their job.

Read again nobody is getting paid to help you. No matter how much they are getting paid.

In reply to by Janet smeller

rgraf thinkmoretalkless Mon, 03/12/2018 - 19:53 Permalink

Even sadder when so many think the conjobstitution is some brilliant document, and the 'founding fathers' were responsible for the Bill of Rights, when, in fact the attendees of the convention in Philadelphia unanimously rejected the inclusion of a Bill of Rights, 10-0 during the convention, without discussion. They had the Bill of Rights force fed to them, because the conjobstitution was hopelessly vague. Patrick Henry called it all out, before it was even ratified, but all the imbeciles still think the conjobstitution is some brilliant document.

In reply to by thinkmoretalkless

brianshell D503 Mon, 03/12/2018 - 02:03 Permalink

Interesting but know that the CIA picked Clinton, not the other way around.

Allen Dulles worked paperclip and had an agenda so evil, so unamerican, that he could not tell the congress about it and ran ratlines to fund it.

The question is, who did he serve. Rothschild?

At any rate, the weakness of the human spirit has allowed this.

In reply to by D503

wildbad brianshell Mon, 03/12/2018 - 06:15 Permalink

i remember well when obozo and killary disappeared for a few hours while the bilderberg group was meeting in chantilly va.  obozo got the nod and killary got the sec. statep osition an the promise that "she would be next".  well, that didn't work out for them.  google it.


so who picked?  rockerfeller? queen beatrice?  rothschlid?  them folks

In reply to by brianshell

wildbad D503 Mon, 03/12/2018 - 04:43 Permalink

agreed!  this guys take on Q is wrong.  he says Q is only on the "Dark Web" and then associates that with criminals..trying to discredit by association.  he doesn't realize that Q's posts are for "The Choir": people who are already on board.  This info is not for everyone or better said not everyone is ready to break their ties with the indoctrination paradigm.


I am STILL behind Sessions.  Think of how careful a prosecutor is normally, then think of how careful he has to be when trying to put a noose around the neck of a Soros or Clinton


Not scaring the rabbits beforehand is just as important ais shooting well

In reply to by D503

Kidbuck beemasters Mon, 03/12/2018 - 03:11 Permalink

What's happened to all the current ones?

kidbuck was a whistleblower at 3 different government agencies. Once you sound the alarm you quickly go from current to former staff. At one agency I was told by my union goon that If I came forward I would lose my job, my savings, my retirement, my house, my family, and my sanity. I was shown a long list of prior whistleblowers all of whom did lose their job, house, and family.  Except for my exceptional wife, a former whistleblower herself, so she understood what I was going through, I lost everything else but the vested retirement. 

Once you bring agency wrong doing to the attention of the Inspector General the entire resources, including all your former coworkers and friends, are brought against you. No one is interested in correcting the problem so much as they are in covering their own ass. All your coworkers become concerned for their own careers and rightly so.

In reply to by beemasters

Dorado Pandelis Mon, 03/12/2018 - 10:54 Permalink

"Could you imagine if senior DOJ officials were arrested, some Congressmen and Senators were arrested and other government officials were arrested on charges and walked out of office? 

Mental masturbation.  It will *NEVER* happen.  Politicians & the bureaucracy protect one another.  There's a better chance of

In reply to by Pandelis

greenskeeper carl IH8OBAMA Mon, 03/12/2018 - 00:12 Permalink

This sounds like all the Qanon stuff. While I don't doubt that much of what this guy says is true, I do doubt that anything will come of it. I'd love to be proven wrong here, but I just think the rot goes too deep. People getting all spun up with this Qanon stuff are just setting themselves up to be disappointed. Its been over a year and nothing has been done. All we've seen out of trump is a continuing lack of fulfilling any of his campaign promises.

In reply to by IH8OBAMA

Setarcos One of We Mon, 03/12/2018 - 00:57 Permalink

This "CIA running N Korea" came out of nowhere suddenly and it makes no sense, going back to the all-out war against N Korea in the early 50s right through to hostility and sanctions against N Kore a ever since, Soviet support until collapse of the USSR in 91 (significantly orchestrated by the deep state CIA), a period of great hardship during the 90s and early 2000s, but with assistance from China.  The development of nuclear protection from deep state US aggression.  No hint from Vladimir Putin of CIA support for N Korea.  Nothing, nada, zilch until suddenly this improbable story arose very recently.  Could Kim Jong-Un have been bought whilst in Switzerland?  Anything might be possible - even unicorns - but he has only been the figurehead for seven years.  I just can't see him having lasted if he'd betrayed the old guard.

You have it about face.  Kim's protection hasn't gone anywhere.  He has kept the nukes and delivery systems.  He called Trump's bluff and won, backed by China promising to back N Korea if the US attacked.

In reply to by One of We

Kernighan Setarcos Tue, 03/13/2018 - 13:50 Permalink

The problem is with the description: "CIA Running North Korea".  That's just what the Q Anon group has chirped out as a term of art.  The reality is likely far different.  I personally DO NOT think that CIA runs the place, but the presence of the drug and counterfeiting operations at least DOES support implication of black ops intel people.  By now most of us should be aware that the intel groups use drug operations and similar like arms sales, and counterfeiting, to provide added funding as well as to move funds "in the dark" so that their ops cannot be traced with $$.  

I'd think the most reasonable explanation is that a joint operation existed between NORK and CIA.  The NORK naturally view US as enemy, and want nukes, but use CIA to help get money and use much of that money to keep them armed with mostly Iran originated nuclear weapons (there may well be a side deal that NORK will protect and house Iran's inventory).  Once you pull the intel ops out, you cut off the funding.  NORK can probably not last much over six months without the flow of funds.

At least that's the hypothesis I have right now. 

In reply to by Setarcos