Sweden's 'Cash Rebellion' Warns "We Have No Weapon To Fight Back...If Putin Invades"

For the last two years we have documented the rapid ascent of Sweden's cashless society as government's demands for ever greater control over "you, the people's" money combined with the 'ease-of-use' narrative has left many stores no longer accepting cash at all  and even sparked anxiety among Swedish authorities  that:

"If this development with cash disappearing happens too fast, it can be difficult to maintain the infrastructure” for handling cash."

Last year, the amount of cash in circulation in Sweden dropped to the lowest level since 1990 and is more than 40 percent below its 2007 peak. The declines in 2016 and 2017 were the biggest on record.

But the pace at which cash is vanishing has authorities worried.

“One may get into a negative spiral which can threaten the cash infrastructure,” Mats Dillen, the head of the parliamentary review, said.

“It’s those types of issues we are looking more closely at.”

Riksbank Governor Stefan Ingves has said Sweden should consider forcing banks to provide cash to customers.

And now, as The Guardian reports, a small but growing number of Swedes anxious about their country’s rush to embrace a cash-free society.

While many large western nations have that nagging doubt in the back of their mind that government may not be all-virtuous, Swedes - until now - have not...

The Swedish government is a rather nice one, we have been lucky enough to have mostly nice ones for the past 100 years,” says Christian Engström, a former MEP for the Pirate Party and an early opponent of the cashless economy.

In other countries there is much more awareness that you cannot trust the government all the time. In Sweden it is hard to get people mobilised.

...but there are signs this might be changing. Following discussions by the country's central bank, concerns about a cash-free society have emerged into the mainstream, says Björn Eriksson, 72, a former national police commissioner and the leader of a group called the Cash Rebellion, or Kontantupproret.

As The Guardian reports, until now, Kontantupproret has been dismissed as the voice of the elderly and the technologically backward, Eriksson says.

“When you have a fully digital system you have no weapon to defend yourself if someone turns it off,” he says.

“If Putin invades Gotland [Sweden’s largest island] it will be enough for him to turn off the payments system. No other country would even think about taking these sorts of risks, they would demand some sort of analogue system.”

In this sense, Sweden is far from its famous concept of lagom – “just the right amount” – but instead is “100% extreme”, Eriksson says, by investing so much faith in the banks.

“This is a political question. We are leaving these decisions to four major banks who form a monopoly in Sweden.”

The best case scenario is that we are not as secure as we think, Mattias Skarec, 29, a digital security consultant, says – the worst is that IT infrastructure is systemically vulnerable.

“We are lucky that the people who know how to hack into them are on the good side, for now,” he says. “But we don’t know how things will progress. It’s not that easy to attack devices today, but maybe it will become easier to do so in the future.”

The Pirate Party – which made its name in Sweden for its opposition to state and private sector surveillance – welcomes a higher political profile for these issues, according to The Guardian. Look at Ireland, Christian Engström says, where abortion is illegal. It is much easier for authorities to identify Irish women who have had an abortion if the state can track all digital financial transactions, he says. And while Sweden’s government might be relatively benign, a quick look at Europe suggests there is no guarantee how things might develop in the future.

“If you have control of the servers belonging to Visa or MasterCard, you have control of Sweden,” Engström says.

“In the meantime, we will have to keep giving our money to the banks, and hope they don’t go bankrupt – or bananas.”

Bananas indeed.

Finally, by way of ironic reminder, here is the 360 year history of Sweden's experiment with paper currency:

In 1660, Sweden’s Riksbank was the first central bank in the world to issue paper currency.

In 2016, Sweden began to accelerate its transition from cash to digital currency.

At the time, Deputy Riksbank Governor Cecilia Skingsley warned:

“We need to do the homework because it’s not an option for the public sector to stay on the sidelines and see the private sector cut off access to central bank money for individuals."

A year later, in 2017, cash in circulation was plummeting and establishment economists celebrated the battle in the war on cash.

Additionally, Riksbank was actively looking toward cryptocurrencies as potential government-backed money.

At the start 2018, Swedish officials are worried that too much (or too little in this case) is a bad thing warning:

"If this development with cash disappearing happens too fast, it can be difficult to maintain the infrastructure” for handling cash.

As Bloomberg reports, Sweden is widely regarded as the most cashless society on the planet. Most of the country’s bank branches have stopped handling cash; many shops, museums and restaurants now only accept plastic or mobile payments.

But there’s a downside, since many people, in particular the elderly, don’t have access to the digital society.

And now, in April 2018, the people are growing concerned at the loss of control and vulnerability to cyber-attack... forcing a return to 'paper'.  An opinion poll this month revealed unease among Swedes, with almost seven out of 10 saying they wanted to keep the option to use cash, while just 25% wanted a completely cashless society. 

But then again, when did the will or the views of the public count for anything?

If you have any misguided notion that a cashless society is not coming, just keep telling yourself that every time you use a debit card, credit card or your phone for your next purchase. With the elimination of cash we effectively hand over our individual human sovereignty to the banks and the government.

*  *  *

Finally we leave you with Harvard's latest study on which nations would 'benefit' the most from going cashless...



fleur de lis beepbop Fri, 04/06/2018 - 21:12 Permalink

It is doubtful that the Ruskies have any inclinations about invading Sweden.

After all, the Swedes invaded them centuries ago and got clobbered for jumping the shark, then the Ruskies built a statue next to St.Basil's in Red Square to commemorate their victory over the invaders.

So why would they invade Sweden now?

What would they get?

They would get a nation of neutered and cowardly males, females and young who are subjected to and accepting of routine sexual attacks by refugees, a government of angry, neurotic, middle aged women, and a massive and growing population of violent and unbridled savages.

So what would be the point of wasting all that military power?


In reply to by beepbop

HenryHall beepbop Sat, 04/07/2018 - 07:56 Permalink

>> Dear Sweden, why would Putin wan't your f'd up muzzy invaded country?

Somewhere in the region of 5% to 10% of Russians are Muslims. And have been for many years.

But the Kremlin knows how to keep the Muslims well behaved. Just like they did when Atheism was the official religion of the USSR.

A lesson relearned the hard way by the Chechnyans. Endless Saudi money provided to stir up religious hatred was not enough for them to defeat the Kremlin. Vlad Putin may be a Christian (not his fault) but he is also a scientist.

In reply to by beepbop

Rutalkingtome TahoeBilly2012 Sat, 04/07/2018 - 04:19 Permalink

Sweden from being an independant, proud contry has rather quickly turned into a pathetic, whinning one. It imported hundreds of thousands of refugees in order to become the rape capital of the world and they are succeeding with that. In the proces their useless Soros controlled media diverts the attention of the swedes to the Russian "threat". Pathetic country!

In reply to by TahoeBilly2012

fleur de lis Joiningupthedots Fri, 04/06/2018 - 21:42 Permalink

Skripal was in on the Christopher Steele dossier.

That means that he knew the who/how/where/when of the hoax.

That makes him a loose end.

And that is a very bad thing to be.

If he had any brains he would have politely declined when they asked him to participate, but the money was too good, it was a sure bet that Hellish would win, and he could go back to his cushy life with that much more money.

But then Trump won and everything went off the rails.

It was abundantly clear that after dodging a KGB bullet and being settled in a nice, quiet English retirement, Skripal reverted to type, fell off the wagon, and went back to his dangerous scheming ways.

Only this time it was with CIANSAMossad,M15,6,7,etc., and he mistakingly fancied himself a valuable asset.

To the extent that toilet paper is a valuable asset.

He figured he could work with these serial killers and earn a nice heap of money.

There is no way he would have done this as a matter of principle.

If Trump had gotten to him first with a bigger payoff he would have worked for him just as fast.

But the traitorous Deep State had a vested interest in a win by Hellish.

So stupid Skripal got roped in. 

If he has any brain cells left he would be safer returning to Russia.

He will not survive in the West, he knows too much, and he is on the DC Swamp/Clinton/Langley short list.


In reply to by Joiningupthedots

nmewn Fri, 04/06/2018 - 20:08 Permalink

“When you have a fully digital system you have no weapon to defend yourself if someone turns it off..."


Another centrally planned socialist paradise who just had that Oh Shit! moment. But they be smart, really, just ask em, they'll tell ya ;-)