Four CBS Producers "Terrified" Over Upcoming Charlie Rose Sex Scandal Exposé

CBS has been scrambling to have employees sign NDAs in order to silence potential sources ahead of an upcoming Exposé on Charlie Rose in the Washington Post, reports Page Six.

We’re told that CBS News president David Rhodes, “CBS This Morning” executive producer Ryan Kadro, “60 Minutes” executive producer Jeff Fager and former “CBS This Morning” executive producer Chris Licht are all terrified about a looming Washington Post investigation that’s now been in the works for months.

There are a lot of executives looking around corners, hoping they’re not named in the story,” an industry insider told us. “[CBS is] trying to suppress [the story] by using the NDAs.” Meanwhile, said the source, “Jeff, Ryan and David are all waiting for the other shoe to drop.”  -Page Six

Page Six notes the hypocrisy of CBS News framing alleged Donald Trump mistress Stormy Daniels as "brave" for breaking her NDA, while forcing their own employees to sign them. 

Rose, a veteran journalist and paragon of the MSM saw his nearly half-century career end within hours of eight women coming forward in a November 2017 Washington Post Exposé - accusing him of predatory "casting couch" behavior similar to Harvey Weinstein. 

Eight women have told The Washington Post that longtime television host Charlie Rose made unwanted sexual advances toward them, including lewd phone calls, walking around naked in their presence, or groping their breasts, buttocks or genital areas.

The women were employees or aspired to work for Rose at the “Charlie Rose” show from the late 1990s to as recently as 2011. They ranged in age from 21 to 37 at the time of the alleged encounters. Rose, 75, whose show airs on PBS and Bloomberg TV, also co-hosts “CBS This Morning” and is a contributing correspondent for “60 Minutes.” -WaPo

*POOF* ...end of the road Charlie. 

Rose issued an "I'm sorry and ashamed for walking around with my dick out and groping women" statement before his dishonorable discharge into a shame-filled retirement full of country-club whisperings and fewer holiday parties, we imagine. 

It looks, however, like the Washington Post isn't done with Rose - as those previously in his orbit who may have enabled his behavior appear to be firmly in the crosshairs of JEFF BEZOS (and his robot dog).

Comments

MasterPo Wed, 04/11/2018 - 23:15 Permalink

I lost all respect for him long ago when I watched him give Henry Kissinger an hour long blow job on TV and call it an interview.

Complete and total scumbag... 

izzee Wed, 04/11/2018 - 23:42 Permalink

Jeff needs to do something to deflect The Donald's constant attacking the Bezos Post.  What better than to put out a Major Expose on CBS, MainStreamMedia.

 

BGO Thu, 04/12/2018 - 00:02 Permalink

A Charlie Rose Expose = low hanging fruit.

Charlie must have pissed someone off. It was fun years ago watching his PBS interviews, Charlie barely able to keep himself upright in his chair, forever slouching and slurring drunk, the interview with GS's Lloyd Lizardstein was the last interview of his I watched. 

ZIRPdiggler Thu, 04/12/2018 - 00:04 Permalink

poor CBS pedo's. fuck CBS. ALL these media orgs should be terrified of going to Gitmo for treason. that's where they belong, if they don't get the death penalty. Trump out to sue every single one of these screeching histrionic lying "media" organizations for Libel and slander for pushing this bullshit porn star distraction.

ZIRPdiggler Thu, 04/12/2018 - 00:09 Permalink

speaking of robots, did you catch fuckerberg's testimony in front of senate today>? what a fucking weirdo that guy is. he is a bot. If there ever was a real suckerberg, he's been replaced at this point, by that awkward little boy I saw on FOX news today. He's a Rockefeller, through and through. Another Zionist corporate clown puppet little boy. Buh Bye and good riddance, Fascistbook.

BetterRalph ZIRPdiggler Thu, 04/12/2018 - 04:58 Permalink

Not sworn in.  Convienient. Everyone important is never sworn in. 
also being questioned by INVESTORS/SENATORS who have an monetary interest in FACEBOOK not being blacklisted like so.
127.0.0.1  facebook.com

Then he made it sound like he's special, "I can't talk about that, maybe in a secure setting"  yeah meet me at the SCIF

You time better spent telling BUSINESS that has the little "F" if it isn't GONE when you come back, your won't COME BACK.

The answer to FACEBOOK is to nullify it.  The data is stolen. You might as well change your name while you SUE. At least the punk will have to be under oath for that transaction.

In reply to by ZIRPdiggler