Amazon Pulls Child Sex Dolls Following Complaints

Amazon UK has pulled child sex dolls from their online storefront after widespread complaints from a watchdog group and others in Britain over concerns that pedophiles may use them as a "gateway doll" which would lead to the sexual abuse of children.

Over a dozen child sex dolls were removed in all, having been listed by third-party sellers. 

"All Marketplace sellers must follow our selling guidelines and those who don't will be subject to action including potential removal of their account," said an Amazon spokesman in a statement. "The products in question are no longer available."

Amazon does not sell the products itself but instead receives money from the sellers.

Dolls found on the website were typically three or four feet tall with waist sizes around 16 inches (41cm).

In the accompanying pictures they were placed in sexual poses with descriptions such as "Mannequin Sexy" and "100% mimics girl's body".

Several dolls were described as coming with "sexy lingerie".

A couple from Durham were horrified to find that a child sex doll came up in the results for their online search for sex toys.

"We felt disgusted and we straight away reported it to Amazon," they told the BBC.

Twenty four hours later the couple had received no response from the retailer. -BBC

UK authorities want to know how the dolls were allowed on Amazon's platform in the first place.

England's Children's Commissioner, Anne Longfield, said that Amazon needs to explain what happened (Too bad the Children's Commissioner wasn't around during Jimmy Savile's reign of pedophilic terror, or while former PM Sir Edward Heath was abusing children for decades, - which we're isn't going on today of course).

Last year, a judge at Canterbury Crown Court dismissed ex-primary school governor David Turner's argument that a child sex doll he imported was not obscene. Turner, a former churchwarden, pleaded guilty last July to importing the child sex doll.

Responding to a BBC investigation, Anne Longfield, England Children's Commissioner, said: "These dolls are disgusting and are clearly meant to look like children.

"Not only do I, as Children's Commissioner, but the wider public also, have a right to expect a huge company like Amazon, to not only remove these products from their platform, but to explain why they are on there in the first place and ensure they can't just be reloaded having been taken down."

"Such dolls are clearly built for one purpose and that purpose is a clear danger to the safety of real children," she added.

Ms Stewart said the dolls were unlike those people might associate with stag dos and were the precursor to more sophisticated child sex robots, which she warned were “just around the corner”.

“They are the weight of a seven-year-old child, they are not something that is the traditional blow-up doll, she said.

“(They are) very, very different – very, very more accurate anatomically.”

The dolls, with their unnerving glass-eye stare, false eyelashes and crooked fingers and toes, often come packaged with accessories including a choice of wigs, a USB device to warm the spongy silicone skin, and a cleaning device. -independent.co.uk

The UK has seized 179 child-like sex dolls since March of 2016 as part of Operation Shiraz - an operation set up in conjunction with the National Crime Agency. Last July, a judge ruled that child sex dolls were obscene, and therefore covered under the 1979 Customs and Excise Management Act. That said, it is not a criminal offense to manufacture or own a child sex doll - just to import them.

The dolls are designed to be as lifelike as possible - made of silicone type material and weighing as much as a child, and made in such a way as to enable sexual acts to be performed on them. 

NPSCC head Almudena Lara told the BBC "We already know that there is a risk that people using these dolls could become desensitised and their behaviour could become normalised to them, so that they go on to harm children, as is often the case with those who view indecent images of children online.

"There is absolutely no evidence that using the dolls stops potential abusers from abusing children."

Comments

a Smudge by an… dark pools of soros Fri, 04/13/2018 - 00:09 Permalink

Sorry to say, the guy that says this is just the beginning is right. I have half joked over the years that roboticists would first seek to replace females and most men would welcome it. So I'm only half surprised this is turning out to be true.

As to the pedophile aspect, I'm not entirely surprised on this front either. This culture is youth obsessed. Otherwise, tell me why grown women are shaving downstairs these days. Why do grown men shave at all? It's a prepubescent look for both sexes. Now with plastic surgery, guys coloring their hair to look younger, do you see this trend ending any time soon?

I see it accelerating. Call it the quest for eternal life or just some kind of fucked up mental jam we got into...call it whatever but it's all around us.

In reply to by dark pools of soros

Adolph.H. tocointhephrase Fri, 04/13/2018 - 02:03 Permalink

The picture of that girl with her teddy eerily reminds me of Maddie, the little girl who's been abducted and most likely horrifically sacrificed in Spain by the pedosta Bros.:

https://powerglobal.us/2016/11/08/weiner-podesta-maxwell-child-abductio…

Someday these lizards will meet their fate.

In the meantime some stupid American university organizes anal sex workshops:

http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/04/11/university-of-tennessee-at-kno…

It is hard not to believe this country is on the path to self destruction. 

----

It's okay not to be a Jew.

In reply to by tocointhephrase

Automatic Choke tocointhephrase Fri, 04/13/2018 - 03:45 Permalink

sex is a fun and sweaty adventure between two adults who are enjoying the event.   how can ANYBODY think that penetrating a kid too young to comprehend sex is actually anything but a violent and terrible event in that kid's life? 

as for the dolls.....i don't know whether to be disgusted that these exist, or grateful that they give an outlet to sick fucks who want to diddle kids.  i'm not sure i even want to think about this enough to draw the distinction.  

i don't understand such folks.   i certainly have lusts and kinky desires, and am happy to share them with willing partners, but protecting and nurturing children should be built into our genes, and should overrule all else.   how anybody can get off on screwing kids is beyond me.

 

In reply to by tocointhephrase

Eyes Opened MANvsMACHINE Fri, 04/13/2018 - 14:09 Permalink

"Amazon should now publish the names and addresses of everyone who purchased one of these dolls."

 

Why ??

What laws have they broken ??

I am not saying I approve in any way, shape or form,  but seriously, think of what you are saying here...

Just because we find it distasteful / amoral / creepy  (as do I ) etc. etc. doesn't give us the right to judge & "out" these weirdos...

For instance... if I find the idea of vibrators / fleshlights / dildos etc.  abhorrent & dispicable , should I demand that customers for these sex toys be "outted" ... ??

On what grounds ??

My moral compass ??

 

How about nipple rings ??

Or cosplay ??

 

It's a slippery road my friends....

 

All we need now is someone crying out in the background... "for Godssake, someone  think of the children" !!!

 

Some may say "but they are FANTASIZING about having sex with children whilst "using" these dolls so we must ban them....

That is THOUGHT-CRIME... 

And I will have no part in prosecuting someone for THINKING something...

 

If someone commits the crime of pedophilia, they deserve the punishment as seen fit by society... this is NOT pedophilia... 

 

P.S. 

btw MANvsMACHINE .. I didn't downvote you as you are entitled to your opinion as are all here... if anyone feels the need to downvote me for my post, I would appreciate an explanation as to why... I am in no way condoning pedophilia, my post is intended to stimulate (no pun ) a conversation as to the legalities of the sale / purchase of these dolls... not to join in the outrage calls for lynchings...

In reply to by MANvsMACHINE

ThirdWorldDude a Smudge by an… Fri, 04/13/2018 - 08:05 Permalink

I don't see such a significant difference between betrothal and marriage, at least not in this context.

The main point is (((these sick fucks))) think it is enough to live under the same roof with a (jewish) 3+ y/o girl for a couple to be considered engaged. Herein lies also the origin of the muslim practice of marrying underage girls. 

Goyim women are anyway seen as cattle and may be treated as such, regardless of their age.

In reply to by a Smudge by an…

One of these i… a Smudge by an… Fri, 04/13/2018 - 03:53 Permalink

When giving oral pleasure to a full grown woman, it can be a little nicer if she shaves because you aren't spitting out pubes afterwards. They also seem to prefer to receive oral from a shaved face, in my (limited) experience. I also suspect that the whole menstruation thing is a little less messy than if the lady keeps a full bush.

And speaking as a man, rather than as a "mandingo" if I trim my pubes back a bit, the "magic wand" looks a bit more impressive from my perspective, than if I don't!

So now you know, there may well be "healthy" reasons for shaving (or at the very least regularly "trimming") down there.

Having said all that, I feel you are right enough to be concerned about the trend to legitimise and assign equal value to all forms of sexual activity. Sexual activity that produces children surely has more value to society as a whole, than sexual activity undertaken purely for pleasure, such as masturbation or homosexuality? Why would right thinking people want to promote and exalt non-standard sexual practices, rather than frowning in puzzlement at such activities?

 

In reply to by a Smudge by an…

a Smudge by an… Big Whoop Fri, 04/13/2018 - 03:15 Permalink

There's jewish pornography?

Anyways as to realism, none of the pics of these dolls I've seen are even remotely realistic. They are all so exaggerated or just....i don't find them "life like" at all. And I guess I'm not surprised at this. What I am surprised at is we don't see dolls with pointed ears and fur and tails like in anime.

Basically I don't think reality is the objective here. I think we're seeing an emergent art form. I return to my point above is that many men will welcome a replacement for women. Not women themselves or the replacement will be rejected as for the same reasons as the original.

In reply to by Big Whoop

SybilDefense a Smudge by an… Fri, 04/13/2018 - 08:31 Permalink

The mfr of the doll was trying to shave a little off his cost by making a smaller doll.  Imagine if if was 5'7"/120lbs.  Hard to take with you on business trips.

As for the complainant: " my gender spectrum sex partner and I were looking up rhinoceros soddomy sex toys and we were appalled to find that amazon sells small sized sex dolls.  Appalled I tell you!"

If a pedophile fantacizes about kid sex, he will do it with what ever device is at hand.  The fact that people like the Clinton's who need the fantastic just to get arroused means there will always be a market for sexual sickness. 

In reply to by a Smudge by an…

a Smudge by an… dark pools of soros Fri, 04/13/2018 - 00:24 Permalink

dammit persistent double post. Maybe I can use it to run a thought. Seen the new Star Trek series?

They made Klingon women hot in a whole new way. Unbelievable. OK so say somebody has the hots for a Klingon child. Anybody know anything about Klingon longevity or puberty? What if that "child" is 100 years old? Or Vulcan? They live a long time.

Hmmm....how are the courts going to rule on trans-species sexual representations? Oh yeah and what about Sharia law? I think some Mullahs are gonna have some fun tossing that idea around.

To top it off, with new video software they have this method of grafting anybody's face onto anybody's body. So anybody you want to see naked, get some good head shots and go shopping for a body to put them on and shebang!

Of course it's not a realistic representation of that person (naked or otherwise) but...again reality is not exactly what's going on here.

Art is not truth. It never has been. It's always been a subjective lens and more, a MANIPULATIVE INTENT to get you to see things in a way intended by the artist.

In reply to by dark pools of soros