Peak S&P 500 P/E Multiple?

Authored by Kevin Muir via The Macro Tourist blog,

Let’s talk earnings for a bit. Specifically, how the 2017 tax cut affected S&P 500 earnings.

We all know the story.

America’s corporate tax rate was uncompetitive and created distortions in the economy that prevented companies from investing in the U.S. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 was designed to level the playing field and in the process, create all sorts of high-paying jobs. The Federal corporate tax rate was slashed from 35% to 21%.

There can be no doubt the effects were immediately felt in the corporate sector.

One-year forward earnings-per-share estimates for the S&P 500 jumped from 145 to 160 almost overnight. Investors applauded Trump’s policies with gusto.

Stock market traders especially fell all over themselves with jubilation about the tax cuts. No one wanted to write any pink tickets before year-end. And even when the calendar year turned over, the wall of buying just kept coming. January turned into an absurd food fight as investors chased stocks higher and higher. Earnings had just been given a huge adrenaline shot in the arm and the rush to buy stocks overwhelmed any sense of caution.

Yet, like all good things, it eventually ended.

Over the past couple of months, stocks have been slipping. But what caused the euphoria to break?

Even though earnings estimates are still ratcheting higher, the price-to-earnings multiple has been sinking. The 1-yr forward P/E multiple was almost 19 in the days before the tax cut announcement. That same measure is now sitting below 17.

Investors are now taking sober second-looks and re-examining the appropriate multiple to pay for post tax-cut earnings. We are now almost 9 years into this economic expansion. This cycle is getting long in the tooth. It’s probably not the time to forecast aggressive future growth and pay peak multiples for stocks.

The economic bulls will claim the tax cuts will keep this economic upswing fueled for a while yet. And maybe they are right. Who knows? Yet, I think they might be making a mistake about the tax cut effects.

There can be no denying that the tax cuts will unleash a lot of extra capital. Yet we need to ask ourselves what will happen to that money. There are three main possibilities.

The first, and most beneficial for the economy - companies invest that capital back into their business through CAPEX spending. This would be the best case scenario. The result would be more productive companies, increased jobs, and a stronger economy. Yet ever since the Great Financial Crisis, interest rates have been hovering near zero. For many businesses capital has been almost free. Why would the tax cuts suddenly cause them to invest in the CAPEX they have delayed for so long? Now don’t mistake this as a forecast that there will be zero pickup in CAPEX spending. Of course some of the tax cut will go into CAPEX spending, but not nearly as much as the economic bulls would have you believe.

The second option is that companies share the tax windfall with their employees. Although there were some announcements from companies announcing bonuses or wage increases, a lot of these were PR promotions. According to Paul Tudor Jones’ organization Just Capital, most of these announcements were one-time bonuses.

“Just Capital has analyzed 120 of these companies, whose savings account for about one-third of the total, and found that only about 6% of the windfall was going toward wages that weren’t one-time bonuses.”

So if the majority of the tax-cut savings is not going into CAPEX or wage increases, what will happen to it? Well, again according to Just Capital:

Many companies have already made clear their intentions to prioritize shareholders. CEOs from Coca-Cola, Cisco, Amgen, and others have stated that the extra money will largely flow to the investment community through increasing dividends and stock buybacks. According to an S&P Dow Jones survey conducted in July of 302 companies surveyed, 65 percent said they planned to boost dividend payments, and 46 percent forecast share buybacks.

Yup. The tax-savings will flow back into the stock market in the form of buybacks and dividends. There is no sense arguing about whether this is right or wrong, good or bad. It is what it is. Arguing about it is like arguing with the wind.

But it has dramatic ramifications about financial market prices going forward.

What a “more-buybacks-less-CAPEX spending” world looks like

Assuming there will be increased buybacks with less CAPEX spending than expected, it is safe to conclude that the real economy will underperform. After all, we have decades of data showing that trickle-down is not nearly as effective as advocates believe. Not only that, its marginal effect is also decreasing.

Yet even though buy-backs will not kick-start the real economy, it will have an effect on the financial economy. We can expect stocks to be goosed higher in the coming quarters as the buy-backs kick in. Many projections have buy-backs increasing by over 75% this year. This is from an already elevated level. The relentless bid from corporates purchasing their own shares will not be going away anytime soon and, in fact, will increase in intensity in the coming months.

And this is a problem. Think about the dilemma the Federal Reserve is facing. They are raising rates, but can’t tighten financial conditions.

This buy-back development only mutes the Federal Reserve’s effectiveness at influencing financial conditions as stocks and other credit spreads will be bid. Therefore, at the margin, this means the Federal Reserve will mistakenly believe they need to raise rates even more. So even though there is little real economic growth from the tax-cut, the Federal Reserve will tighten so that they can create a slowdown in financial market appreciation.

It’s the worst of both worlds - little actual real growth which is squashed by a central bank worried about overly easy financial market conditions. This combination will only hasten the economic slowdown.

No wonder stock market investors are reluctant to pay peak P/E multiples.

In the coming quarters, there will be a struggle between corporate buy-backs and investors who correctly realize the economic cycle is approaching completion which will be made all the worse by a central bank who cannot tighten financial conditions without dramatic action.

One last chance to sell? All I can say is don’t hold out for peak P/E multiples. They probably hit their high right before the tax cut. The market will be a lot less optimistic about future growth.

It’s a delicate dance between how much EPS can grow in the meantime before the economy finally rolls over. Colour me skeptical that growth will exceed expectations. This last round of corporate tax-cut fueled buy-backs might be the best chance to write some sweet pink tickets.

Comments

Gold Pedant BandGap Thu, 04/19/2018 - 17:09 Permalink

Yes, and he's not as old as he looks. Hanoi Jane is unfortunately still alive, and I can't say the same for her. With all these remakes being done in Hollowood, I would *love* to see another China "Syndrome" movie. You know, they come back 40 years later and have mutated like the people in that Planet of the Apes sequel.

In reply to by BandGap

Gold Pedant takeaction Thu, 04/19/2018 - 19:09 Permalink

Also found this on the Internet. I'm not sure how true it is, but I'm not dismissing it either.

While Brimley was visiting an American Antarctic research station in 1973, he gained the ability to perfectly imitate any animal or human he came into contact with. The crew of the station quickly began to distrust each other as they couldn't tell who was Brimley and who was not. One by one they were killed, either by Brimley or by each other.

Brimley was capable of quickly assuming the form of any creature he had ever devoured or absorbed within the limits of his mass. In addition, he may have been able to quickly recover from grave injuries and adapt his physiology to survive in a wide variety of atmospheric conditions.

In addition to those physical attributes, Brimley was also telepathic. He could read minds and also broadcast thoughts which manifested as nightmares to humans. He hypnotically lulled his prey into a helpless state so as to easily absorb it. However, this hypnotic ability apparently could not have been used on more than one person or animal at a time.

Officials secretly warned citizens to be prepared for a Devastating Brimley Outbreak if they failed to contain him to the Antarctic Continent through additives in oatmeal. Latest sightings from the region indicated that Brimley now has three red eyes, blue skin, a fanged mouth, four tentacle-like arms, and seven-tentacled hands. He may or may not be four feet tall, and covered in worm-like follicles in place of hair.

In reply to by takeaction

pitz Thu, 04/19/2018 - 17:10 Permalink

The US economy is highly correlated to low interest rates, and basically progressively lower rates have provided rocket fuel for the FIRE sector.  Rising rates, accordingly, will kill these sectors, while plumping sectors, such as precious metals, and other capex-intensive investments that are not particularly well represented inside the USA (but may be more highly represented offshore).

In other words, the S&P500 P/E should be closer to the single digits going forward because there will very likely be no earnings growth going forward.  The "tax cuts" (which really weren't cuts at all, since corporations already were paying very low effective rates) are now in the rear-view mirror.  

"repatriation" is also a complete scam as most so-called 'offshore' funds were actually being held in the US, or invested in the US, but merely titled "offshore".  The preferential rate for 'repatriation' was basically a reward for transferring profits offshore, and ensured that the practice will continue indefinitely instead of re-investment in the US economy.

MrSteve Thu, 04/19/2018 - 17:22 Permalink

Marty Zweig used to track the Fleet/Seat Ratio, the price of a NYC taxi medallion compared to the price of a seat on the NYSE. This was a measure of mania on Wall Street. Today the hog/corn ratio may be more relevant than P/E on the NYSE. The tax cut impulse is already priced in so the effects of rising energy and trade war costs are more key than adjusted earnings being applied to “Price”.

Any popular fraction used to dupe the stupes into buying at ATHs should not be given a second thought. 

abgary1 Thu, 04/19/2018 - 17:46 Permalink

The central banks need to be asking themselves what do falling or rising assets valuations have to do with economic activity?

Central bank fiat money driven asset bubbles sure haven't helped main-street.

 

End the Fed and neo-classical economic theory.

Glassport Thu, 04/19/2018 - 18:25 Permalink

What a “more-buybacks-less-CAPEX spending” world looks like

Assuming there will be increased buybacks with less CAPEX spending than expected.....

That's a hot one.  Only way to get less CAPEX is to start selling assets and using the proceeds for buybacks.  It's tough to go less than nothing.

Let it Go Thu, 04/19/2018 - 18:42 Permalink

A recent report from JP Morgan revealed that S&P 500 companies will buy back a record $800 billion of their own shares in 2018, far exceeding the current high of $530 billion that was recorded in 2017. If indeed we are seeing the later stages of a bull market built on valuation illusions based on share "buyback alchemy" then we can only speculate as to the downside potential of this market.

Below is the link to the second part of a two-part series. The first explored how stock buybacks have been instrumental in driving this market higher since QE fueled easy money starting in 2009. This part focuses on what is ahead and how the recently passed Trump tax plan has supercharged this trend just as it may have been reaching its natural conclusion.

 http://Stock Buybacks Driving Market-Where It Might Take Us!html

The Real Tony Thu, 04/19/2018 - 20:12 Permalink

What better way to go chapter 11 than buyback your shares at 600 percent of fair market value. Best reason in the world for going bankrupt... we paid far too much for those shares in retrospect after the delisting.

globalintelhub Thu, 04/19/2018 - 21:48 Permalink

p/e ratio is an old joke on wall st. it is how much p/ee you can get in the shot glass / on the table after you've had 10 too many (usually a really strong trader gets a p/ee of about 50%)