Inspector General Report On Clinton Email Probe About To Drop, Now In Final Review

A long-awaited report by the Department of Justice's internal watchdog has moved into its final phase - after the DOJ notified multiple subjects mentioned in the document that they can privately review it by week's end, and will have a "few days" to craft any response to criticism contained within the report, according to the Wall Street Journal.

Those invited to review the report were told they would have to sign nondisclosure agreements in order to read it, people familiar with the matter said. They are expected to have a few days to craft a response to any criticism in the report, which will then be incorporated in the final version to be released in coming weeks. -WSJ

Inspector General Michael Horowitz told lawmakers in April that he expected to issue the report in May, however Tuesday's notification indicates that he has largely completed his inquiry

Congressional investigators will get their hands on the report in coming weeks.

A related report was released in April detailing the DOJ's case against former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, who was found to have lied four times to the DOJ and FBI, including twice while under oath

McCabe, who was fired a day before he was set to collect his full pension, authorized a self-serving leak to the Wall St. Journal claiming that the FBI had not put the brakes on the Clinton Foundation investigation, during a period in which he was coming under fire over a $467,500 campaign donation his wife Jill took from Clinton pal Terry McAuliffe. 

To be clear, this report will have nothing to do with the FBI's alleged FISA abuse, high-level collusion against the Trump campaign, or the genesis of the counterintelligence investigation against then-candidate Donald Trump. The OIG will be covering those issues as part of a separate investigation announced in late March.

The report on the Clinton email investigation will, however, cover the conduct of FBI "lovebirds" Peter Strzok and Lisa Page. Strzok notably spearheaded the Clinton email investigation before also handling the early Trump-Russia investigation. 

Horowitz's report will undoubtedly also cover significant edits made by the FBI's top brass to Hillary Clinton's exoneration statement - effectively decriminalizing her mishandling of classified information so that she wouldn't be prosecuted by the DOJ.

Who is Michael Horowitz?

In January, we profiled Michael Horowitz based on thorough research assembled by independent investigators. For those who think the upcoming OIG report is just going to be "all part of the show" - take pause; there's a good chance this is an actual happening, so you may want to read up on the man whose year-long investigation may lead to criminal charges against those involved. 

In short - Horowitz went to war with the Obama Administration to restore the OIG's powers - and didn't get them back until Trump took office.

Horowitz was appointed head of the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) in April, 2012 - after the Obama administration hobbled the OIG's investigative powers in 2011 during the "Fast and Furious" scandal. The changes forced the various Inspectors General for all government agencies to request information while conducting investigations, as opposed to the authority to demand it. This allowed Holder (and other agency heads) to bog down OIG requests in bureaucratic red tape, and in some cases, deny them outright. 

What did Horowitz do? As one twitter commentators puts it, he went to war...

In March of 2015, Horowitz's office prepared a report for Congress  titled Open and Unimplemented IG Recommendations. It laid the Obama Admin bare before Congress - illustrating among other things how the administration was wasting tens-of-billions of dollars by ignoring the recommendations made by the OIG.

After several attempts by congress to restore the OIG's investigative powers, Rep. Jason Chaffetz successfully introduced H.R.6450 - the Inspector General Empowerment Act of 2016 - signed by a defeated lame duck President Obama into law on December 16th, 2016cementing an alliance between Horrowitz and both houses of Congress. 

1) Due to the Inspector General Empowerment Act of 2016, the OIG has access to all of the information that the target agency possesses. This not only includes their internal documentation and data, but also that which the agency externally collected and documented.

TrumpSoldier (@DaveNYviii) January 3, 2018

See here for a complete overview of the OIG's new and restored powers. And while the public won't get to see classified details of the OIG report, Mr. Horowitz is also big on public disclosure: 

Horowitz's efforts to roll back Eric Holder's restrictions on the OIG sealed the working relationship between Congress and the Inspector General's ofice, and they most certainly appear to be on the same page. Moreover, FBI Director Christopher Wray seems to be on the same page as well. Click here and keep scrolling for that and more insight into what's going on behind the scenes. 

Here's a preview: 

 

Which brings us back to the OIG report expected by Congress a week from Monday.

On January 12 of last year, Inspector Horowitz announced an OIG investigation based on "requests from numerous Chairmen and Ranking Members of Congressional oversight committees, various organizations (such as Judicial Watch?), and members of the public." 

The initial focus ranged from the FBI's handling of the Clinton email investigation, to whether or not Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe should have been recused from the investigation (ostensibly over $700,000 his wife's campaign took from Clinton crony Terry McAuliffe around the time of the email investigation), to potential collusion with the Clinton campaign and the timing of various FOIA releases. 

On July 27, 2017 the House Judiciary Committee called on the DOJ to appoint a Special Counsel, detailing their concerns in 14 questions pertaining to "actions taken by previously public figures like Attorney General Loretta Lynch, FBI Director James Comey, and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton." 

The questions range from Loretta Lynch directing Mr. Comey to mislead the American people on the nature of the Clinton investigation, Secretary Clinton's mishandling of classified information and the (mis)handling of her email investigation by the FBI, the DOJ's failure to empanel a grand jury to investigate Clinton, and questions about the Clinton Foundation, Uranium One, and whether the FBI relied on the "Trump-Russia" dossier created by Fusion GPS. 

On September 26, 2017, The House Judiciary Committee repeated their call to the DOJ for a special counsel, pointing out that former FBI Director James Comey lied to Congress when he said that he decided not to recommend criminal charges against Hillary Clinton until after she was interviewed, when in fact Comey had drafted her exoneration before said interview. 

And now, the OIG report can tie all of this together - as it will solidify requests by Congressional committees, while also satisfying a legal requirement for the Department of Justice to impartially appoint a Special Counsel.

As illustrated below by TrumpSoldier, the report will go from the Office of the Inspector General to both investigative committees of Congress, along with Attorney General Jeff Sessions, and is expected within weeks.

DOJ Flowchart, Courtesy @DaveNYviii

Once congress has reviewed the OIG report, the House and Senate Judiciary Committees will use it to supplement their investigations, which will result in hearings with the end goal of requesting or demanding a Special Counsel investigation. The DOJ can appoint a Special Counsel at any point, or wait for Congress to demand one. If a request for a Special Counsel is ignored, Congress can pass legislation to force an the appointment. 

And while the DOJ could act on the OIG report and investigate / prosecute themselves without a Special Counsel, it is highly unlikely that Congress would stand for that given the subjects of the investigation. 

After the report's completion, the DOJ will weigh in on it. Their comments are key. As TrumpSoldier points out in his analysis, the DOJ can take various actions regarding "Policy, personnel, procedures, and re-opening of investigations. In short, just about everything (Immunity agreements can also be rescinded).

Meanwhile, recent events appear to correspond with bullet points in both the original OIG investigation letter and the 7/27/2017 letter forwarded to the Inspector General: 

With the wheels set in motion last week seemingly align with Congressional requests and the OIG mandate, and the upcoming OIG report likely to serve as a foundational opinion, the DOJ will finally be empowered to move forward with an impartially appointed Special Counsel.

Comments

FireBrander Thu, 05/17/2018 - 12:31 Permalink

Hillary admitted, to the world, on camera, to:

1. Orchestrating the setup of the email server for her personal "convenience".
2. Using it for State Business.
3. Transferring, at a minimum, "sensitive" information across an unsecured, private server.

Hillary LAUGHED on camera about:

1. Destroying evidence of her crime that was stored on that server.

Slam, dunk, GUILTY!

You and I would have went STRAIGHT TO JAIL!

Gobble D. Goop Chris2 Fri, 05/18/2018 - 00:49 Permalink

It would be a mistake to charge Cankles & crew with crimes before they clean house at the DOJ.  What good would it do indict Cankles, bring her to trial before a dirty judge and corrupt prosecutor only to have charges dropped/dismissed?

A good crime is a terrible thing to waste.  

Team Trump is cleaning house at the DOJ via the IG and Huber so charges will stick when the time comes.

I personally wish it wasn't taking so long, but it's what has to happen step the first, and yes we've known for years 'bout the Clinton Crime Syndicate, the illegal alien and his wookie tgurl wife smelling up the Oval Office, Prescott, Daddy & Baby Bush, the Federal Reserve and it's connection to JFK and all the above, Pizza parlors and spirit cooking, the clean up list is exasperatingly endless.

Trust the plan there, Kek.

In reply to by Chris2

jcaz wildbad Thu, 05/17/2018 - 14:09 Permalink

Yup.  Pretty clear the magnitude has been upped-  the scope of what is at stake can't be subject to pandering by whiny snowflakes who want everything now, this second, when they want it, wah wah...... 

This will undo history.   At least one President may go to prison- for certain, his shrew of a wife.  There hasn't been this much potential internal upheaval since 1846.  Clinton and Crew took 20-30 years to build this, it doesn't all come down in the first 24 months.

In reply to by wildbad

Chris2 InjectTheVenom Thu, 05/17/2018 - 15:05 Permalink

Note to inspector general

Why don't you investigate big public works projects funded by the US government.

Diane Feinsteins husband is in on all of them most recently Subway to Nowhere in San Francisco the Feds gave $1 billion to. The scandalous Boston Big Dig.Today reported that  Tutor Perini  (contractor Feinsteins husband is partners with) put in sub standard steel tracks knowingly and won't answer the phone now that it's been discovered by the incompetent city inspectors. How is this Senator allowed to profit off federal funds, like "goods and services in Iraq"?

btw I met a subcontractor working on this project and I said to him "How does Feinsteins husband become a partner in a construction company. I bet he walked right in and said "Hi, I want to be your partner, my wife is Senator Diane Feinstein."

He said "I talked to him about that and he said that's exactly what happened and said he had no real choice."

She is a gangster with a lil ole lady hairdo wearing pearls.

In reply to by InjectTheVenom

chubbar Sir Edge Thu, 05/17/2018 - 15:58 Permalink

So this is all about being able to move forward with a fucking Special Counsel??? Indict that fucking cunt already and stick that sick bitch in JAIL!!!! This is retarded! All this just so they can appoint yet ANOTHER SC and wait yet another couple of years before we get this asshole in front of a jury??? Fuck this, either do something significant or just admit you are powerless to do any damn thing when it comes to the Clintons.

In reply to by Sir Edge

11b40 OneStinkyDinky Thu, 05/17/2018 - 13:15 Permalink

Well, for sure the MSM has been trying to keep the focus on Trump & Russia, or Trump & porn stars, or Trump and whatever, so long as they can bash Trump 24/7.  It has been going on now since the election, so in effect, they are the ones who had kept all the controversy alive and heated in front of the public.  When this all breaks, the negative information flow reverses and it is all about Hillary & Obummer & rotten Democrats, how will they tamp it down?  

This is going to be so much fun to watch......and plenty of people are going to give a damn.  Especially the people who have been trying to peel this onion for years.  They will not be silenced once the damn bursts.

In reply to by OneStinkyDinky

Billy the Poet chunga Thu, 05/17/2018 - 12:55 Permalink

Just keep paying attention. This thing may very well have legs. Looks likes things are gearing up for maximum impact in November. All politics involve diversion and distraction but here we have factions at war and so fireworks should be expected.

On the other hand, if it is just a dog and pony show it will be worthwhile to observe which dogs and ponies they trot out and so better understand what those behind the curtain are trying to accomplish.

In reply to by chunga