Is Wikipedia An Establishment Psyop?

Authored by Caitlin Johnstone via Medium.com,

If you haven’t been living in a hole in a cave with both fingers plugged into your ears, you may have noticed that an awful lot of fuss gets made about Russian propaganda and disinformation these days.

Mainstream media outlets are now speaking openly about the need for governments to fight an “information war” against Russia, with headlines containing that peculiar phrase now turning up on an almost daily basis.

Here’s one published today titledBorder guards detain Russian over ‘information war’ on Poland“, about a woman who is to be expelled from that country on the grounds that she “worked to consolidate pro-Russian groups in Poland in order to challenge Polish government policy on historical issues and replace it with a Russian narrative” in order to “destabilize Polish society and politics.”

Here’s one published yesterday titled Marines get new information warfare leader“, about a US Major General’s appointment to a new leadership position created “to better compete in a 21st century world.”

Here’s one from the day before titled “Here’s how Sweden is preparing for an information war ahead of its general election“, about how the Swedish Security Service and Civil Contingencies Agency are “gearing up their efforts to prevent disinformation during the election campaigns.”

This notion that the US and its allies are fighting against Russian “hybrid warfare” (by which they typically mean hackers and disinformation campaigns) has taken such deep root among think tanks, DC elites and intelligence/defense circles that it often gets unquestioningly passed on as fact by mass media establishment stenographers who are immersed in and chummy with those groups. The notion that these things present a real threat to the public is taken for granted to such an extent that they seldom bother to even attempt to explain to their audiences why we’re meant to be so worried about this new threat and what makes it a threat in the first place.

Which is, to put it mildly, really weird. Normally when the establishment cooks up a new Official Bad Guy they spell out exactly why we’re meant to be afraid of them. Marijuana will give us reefer madness and ruin our communities. Terrorists will come to where we live and kill us because they hate our freedom. Saddam Hussein has Weapons of Mass Destruction which can be used to perpetrate another 9/11. Kim Jong Un might nuke Hawaii any second now.

With this new “Russian hybrid warfare” scare, we’re not getting any of that. This notion that Russians are scheming to give westerners the wrong kinds of political opinions is presented as though having those political opinions is an inherent, intrinsic threat all on its own. The closest they typically ever get to explaining to us what makes “Russian disinformation” so threatening is that it makes us “lose trust in our institutions,” as though distrusting the CIA or the US State Department is somehow harmful and not the most logical position anyone could possibly have toward historically untrustworthy institutions. Beyond that we’re never given a specific explanation as to why this “Russian disinformation” thing is so dangerous that we need our governments to rescue us from it.

The reason we are not given a straight answer as to why we’re meant to want our institutions fighting an information war on our behalf (instead of allowing us to sort out fact from fiction on our own like adults) is because the answer is ugly.

As we discussed last time, the only real power in this world is the ability to control the dominant narrative about what’s going on. The only reason government works the way it works, money operates the way it operates, and authority rests where it rests is because everyone has agreed to pretend that that’s how things are. In actuality, government, money and authority are all man-made conceptual constructs and the collective can choose to change them whenever it wants. The only reason this hasn’t happened in our deeply dysfunctional society yet is because the plutocrats who rule us have been successful in controlling the narrative.

Whoever controls the narrative controls the world. This has always been the case. In many societies throughout history a guy who made alliances with the biggest, baddest group of armed thugs could take control of the narrative by killing people until the dominant narrative was switched to “That guy is our leader now; whatever he says goes.” In modern western society, the real leaders are less obvious, and the narrative is controlled by propaganda.

Propaganda is what keeps Americans accepting things like the fake two-party system, growing wealth inequality, medicine money being spent on bombs to be dropped on strangers in stupid immoral wars, and a government which simultaneously creates steadily increasing secrecy privileges for itself and steadily decreasing privacy rights for its citizenry. It’s also what keeps people accepting that a dollar is worth what it’s worth, that personal property works the way it works, that the people on Capitol Hill write the rules, and that you need to behave a certain way around a police officer or he can legally kill you.

And therein lies the answer to the question. You are not being protected from “disinformation” by a compassionate government who is deeply troubled to see you believing erroneous beliefs, you are being herded back toward the official narrative by a power establishment which understands that losing control of the narrative means losing power. It has nothing to do with Russia, and it has nothing to do with truth. It’s about power, and the unexpected trouble that existing power structures are having dealing with the public’s newfound ability to network and share information about what is going on in the world.

Until recently I haven’t been closely following the controversy between Wikipedia and popular anti-imperialist activists like John Pilger, George Galloway, Craig Murray, Neil Clark, Media Lens, Tim Hayward and Piers Robinson. Wikipedia has always been biased in favor of mainstream CNN/CIA narratives, but until recently I hadn’t seen much evidence that this was due to anything other than the fact that Wikipedia is a crowdsourced project and most people believe establishment-friendly narratives. That all changed when I read this article by Craig Murray, which is primarily what I’m interested in directing people’s attention to here.

The article, and this one which prompted it by Five Filters, are definitely worth reading in their entirety, because their contents are jaw-dropping. In short there is an account which has been making edits to Wikipedia entries for many nears called Philip Cross. In the last five years this account’s operator has not taken a single day off–no weekends, holidays, nothing–and according to their time log they work extremely long hours adhering to a very strict, clockwork schedule of edits throughout the day as an ostensibly unpaid volunteer.

This is bizarre enough, but the fact that this account is undeniably focusing with malicious intent on anti-imperialist activists who question establishment narratives and the fact that its behavior is being aggressively defended by Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales means that there’s some serious fuckery afoot.

“Philip Cross”, whoever or whatever that is, is absolutely head-over-heels for depraved Blairite war whore Oliver Kamm, whom Cross mentioned as a voice of authority no fewer than twelve times in an entry about the media analysis duo known collectively as Media Lens. Cross harbors a special hatred for British politician and broadcaster George Galloway, who opposed the Iraq invasion as aggressively as Oliver Kamm cheered for it, and on whose Wikipedia entry Cross has made an astonishing 1,800 edits.

Despite the overwhelming evidence of constant malicious editing, as well as outright admissions of bias by the Twitter account linked to Philip Cross, Jimmy Wales has been extremely and conspicuously defensive of the account’s legitimacy while ignoring evidence provided to him.

“Or, just maybe, you’re wrong,” Wales said to a Twitter user inquiring about the controversy the other day. “Show me the diffs or any evidence of any kind. The whole claim appears so far to be completely ludicrous.”

“Riiiiight,” said the totally not-triggered Wales in another response. “You are really very very far from the facts of reality here. You might start with even one tiny shred of some kind of evidence, rather than just making up allegations out of thin air. But you won’t because… trolling.”

“You clearly have very very little idea how it works,” Wales tweeted in another response. “If your worldview is shaped by idiotic conspiracy sites, you will have a hard time grasping reality.”

As outlined in the articles by Murray and Five Filters, the evidence is there in abundance. Five Filterslays out “diffs” (editing changes) in black and white showing clear bias by the Philip Cross account, a very slanted perspective is clearly and undeniably documented, and yet Wales denies and aggressively ridicules any suggestion that something shady could be afoot. This likely means that Wales is in on whatever game the Philip Cross account is playing. Which means the entire site is likely involved in some sort of psyop by a party which stands to benefit from keeping the dominant narrative slanted in a pro-establishment direction.

A 2016 Pew Research Center report found that Wikipedia was getting some 18 billion page views per month. Billion with a ‘b’. Youtube recently announced that it’s going to be showing text from Wikipedia articles on videos about conspiracy theories to help “curb fake news”. Plainly the site is extremely important in the battle for control of the narrative about what’s going on in the world. Plainly its leadership fights on one side of that battle, which happens to be the side that favors western oligarchs and intelligence agencies.

How many other “Philip Cross”-like accounts are there on Wikipedia? Has the site always functioned an establishment psyop designed to manipulate public perception of existing power structures, or did that start later? I don’t know. Right now all I know is that an agenda very beneficial to the intelligence agencies, war profiteers and plutocrats of the western empire is clearly and undeniably being advanced on the site, and its founder is telling us it’s nothing. He is lying. Watch him closely.

*  *  *

Internet censorship is getting pretty bad, so best way to keep seeing my daily articles is to get on the mailing list for my website, so you’ll get an email notification for everything I publish. My articles and podcasts are entirely reader and listener-funded, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me on Facebook, following my antics on Twitter, checking out my podcast, throwing some money into my hat on Patreon or Paypalor buying my new bookWoke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers.

Comments

Leakanthrophy cheka Sun, 05/20/2018 - 22:15 Permalink

Does the pope shit in the woods after playing with little boys?

95% of things placed in top 3 of Google search are PSYOP. The remaining 5% are those pesky old school blackhat SEO guys that know how to game the search engine.

 

Wikipedia is as fake as WWE is. But at least WWE has some juicy stuff:

WWE Diva Zelina Vega Nude Photos Leaked

https://celebrity-leaks.net/wwe-diva-zelina-vega-nude-photos-leaked/

 

In reply to by cheka

DownWithYogaPants robertsgt40 Sun, 05/20/2018 - 22:39 Permalink

The Zionist side is ALWAYS the side that is presented.

Eustace Mullins was a truly kind individual. His only crime was to not swallow the hogwash Koolaid of the ZioNAZI.  For that he was followed by the FBI for 30 years.  

But of course all the standard tropes are trotted out on Wikipedia.  I suspect that Wiki / Wales gets a lot of funding from YOU KNOW WHO.  Same people who has the Germans put people in jail for thought crimes.  

You are only safe when you are looking at a page regarding theoretical mathematics.  But not mathematics about global warming.

In reply to by robertsgt40

MoreSun TruxtonSpangler Mon, 05/21/2018 - 01:19 Permalink

Wikipedia is jew supremacist ran/controlled and always has been. jew owned Google pushes it to the top of almost any search. The israeli government uses U.S. taxpayer $'s to pay pro-zionist & jew supremacist activists throughout the world to add to and lobby to remove content all in favor of israel and the jew supremacist murderous agenda. They add and scrub ad nauseum.

It's all well documented. (((They))) do not fear you, just like the illegal aliens stand in your cities and say "undocumented & unafraid". The jew supremacists gave you the 1965 immigration act that they designed to destroy your country. Jew zio-hog senator jacob javits screamed out when it passed " OPEN THE FLOOD GATES" and all the jew supremacists said "we had a good day"

We are at war folks, but its not with Russia, Iran, Syria, or any other peoples or nations. We have been in a protracted war with the jew supremacists since at least since 1776. They started the war and have waged it against us incessantly, and it is up to the citizens of the world to put an end to it. 

End the jew supremacists fed reserve free fountain of funds and we can end their destructive and murderous activities across the globe!

HOW 10 U.S. PRESIDENTS REALLY FELT ABOUT ZIONIST JEWS:

http://www.tomatobubble.com/id618.html

In reply to by TruxtonSpangler

Tarzan MoreSun Mon, 05/21/2018 - 05:46 Permalink

John Michael "Jack" Posobiec III (/pəˈsoʊbɪk/ pə-SOW-bik; born 1985) is an American alt-right[1][2][3]internet troll[4] and conspiracy theorist[5] known primarily for his controversial and pro-Donald Trump comments on Twitter. He has promoted fake news, including the debunked Pizzagate conspiracy theory that high-ranking Democratic Party officials were involved in a child sex ring.[6] He has been retweeted by Donald Trump.[7]

That's how Wikipedia describes an American Patriot.... Yes they are controlled by the Deep State swamp.

In reply to by MoreSun

wafm PhilofOz Mon, 05/21/2018 - 00:57 Permalink

agree, take for example anything to do with the official narrative on health/big pharma challenged... Wiki describes acupuncture as pseudo science clearly to try to deligitimize it... try and change it, it’s impossible.

Forget about editing anything to things like 911 obviously, I did try - within seconds I was threatened.

In reply to by PhilofOz

The First Rule Leakanthrophy Sun, 05/20/2018 - 22:34 Permalink

Wikipedia is completely unreliable.  Especially when it comes to politics.

 

You can find LIES GALORE. You can edit the Lies out, document them and backup with sourced justification; but within an hour they will have reset the Lie.

They simply don't care about the Truth.

 

 

 

In reply to by Leakanthrophy

uhland62 Leakanthrophy Mon, 05/21/2018 - 02:20 Permalink

Wikipedia is definitely bent now. The US government is probably funding it now; well that's how it feels. The Manafort entry is only dealing with his latest endeavours, Ukraine etc, not with his 'work' for Mobutu and Marcos.

He must have been the same unregistered foreign agent then or it would have said when he let his registration lapse. Tax evasion? Can't ask that on wikipedia. Manafort had 'protection' - we wonder who that was. The same people who now fund wikipedia? 

In reply to by Leakanthrophy

NidStyles cheka Sun, 05/20/2018 - 22:15 Permalink

Wikipedia is ran by Hasbara trolls. They took it over after the first meme war in the early 2000’s to use as a hammer to validate their power.

 

It failed on first contact with Kek. Yes, he was fighting even back then.

 

If you want more evidence I can give the actual sites these battles took place on. One of them is actually still around.

In reply to by cheka

Count Cherep Bitchface-KILLAH Mon, 05/21/2018 - 02:10 Permalink

Left unsaid by the author of the article (or is it authoress — Yahweh, or the Elohim, or the Bolshevik council of ministers, or other ministers, preachers, priests, rabbis, mullahs, shamans, witch doctors, members of the modern inquisition, Democrats, Republicans, psychopaths, sociopaths or whoever, forbid that I be politically incorrect) is:

(((___________)))  (((_____________))) (((______________))) etc. {Fill in the blanks}.

Cue the wailing and gnashing of teeth... 

 

In reply to by Bitchface-KILLAH

AllBentOutOfShape Bitchface-KILLAH Mon, 05/21/2018 - 03:09 Permalink

Israeli Hasbara Wikipedia troll team:

While it is common and appropriate for individuals to edit Wikipedia entries to add factual information and remove inaccurate statements, this project was the antithesis of such editing. As EI, reported, its purpose was “to rewrite Palestinian history, pass off crude propaganda as fact, and take over Wikipedia administrative structures to ensure these changes go either undetected or unchallenged.”

https://israelpalestinenews.org/israel-partisans-work-censor-internet/

Edit: Just adding the corresponding video about this Israeli Hasbara troll campaign

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vqhi16iikxk&feature=youtu.be

In reply to by Bitchface-KILLAH

techpriest Radical Marijuana Sun, 05/20/2018 - 23:45 Permalink

It isn't a psyop. What it is, is a self-selected community that runs an encyclopedia website.

Now tell me, who has the time to sit around editing posts and running edit wars all day? Do you think the kind of people who will post carefully researched content have that kind of free time? Of course not, it is going to be low-information trolls who have a chip on their shoulder, the same kind who think that Snopes and NPR are accurate sources of information.

With that in mind, one great thing about Wikipedia is that the underlying Wikimedia software is open source. I've made a couple of hobby wikis with it - if you are willing to put up 1-2 hours of study time to get it working, you could make a wiki that is amenable to your politics. However, like Wikipedia you will run into the same problem of trolls with too much free time.

In reply to by Radical Marijuana

r0mulus techpriest Mon, 05/21/2018 - 00:32 Permalink

Cmon now- are you seriously discounting the very likely possibility that some of these "volunteers" are on the payroll of nation-state level intelligence organizations, or are even piloted by a 24/7 team of editors/propagandists, just like the Philip Cross account mentioned in this article? Did you actually read this article? Your comment reads like a giant apology or distraction from the issue at hand.

In reply to by techpriest

RationalLuddite techpriest Mon, 05/21/2018 - 05:54 Permalink

Now two Israeli groups seeking to gain the upper hand in the online debate have launched a course in "Zionist editing" for Wikipedia, the online reference site.

Yesha Council, representing the Jewish settler movement, and the rightwing Israel Sheli (My I srael) movement, ran their first workshop this week in Jerusalem, teaching participants how to rewrite and revise some of the most hotly disputed pages of the online reference site.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/aug/18/wikipedia-editing-zionist…

 

Took 5 minutes to find this. Left wing AgitProp and grey propaganda scum and the Permanent State intelligence services would be doing much much more than your trolls i think. Need more evidence to back up your "don't worry it’s just trolls" assertion Techpriest.

In reply to by techpriest