100s Of White South African Farmers Apply To Australia For Humanitarian Rescue

Back in February, after literally years of scandal, abuse, and incompetence, South Africa’s president Jacob Zuma was finally forced to resign last week, and new President, Cyril Ramaphosa, was supposed to represent a positive, new chapter for South Africa.

However, as Simon Black wrote at the time, Ramaphosa addressed the nation’s parliament in Cape Town and made clear that his priority is to heal the divisions and injustice of the past, going all the way back to the original European colonists in the 1600s taking land from the indigenous tribes.

Ramaphosa called this “original sin”, and stated that he wants to see “the return of the land to the people from whom it was taken… to heal the divisions of the past.”

How does he plan on doing that?

Confiscation. Specifically– confiscation without compensation.

The expropriation of land without compensation is envisaged as one of the measures that we will use to accelerate redistribution of land to black South Africans.

Ramaphosa minced no words: he’s talking about taking land from white farmers and giving it to black South Africans.

And as we noted at the time, the problem is - a 2017 government audit found white people owned 72 per cent of farmland in South Africa. According to the 2011 census, there are about 4.6 million white people in South Africa, accounting for 8.9 per cent of the population.

And as Australia's News.com reported, the racially charged issue of land rights and farm murders has been the subject of fierce debate in the country and internationally.

According to civil rights group Afriforum, which represents around 200,000 white farmers largely from the Afrikaner minority, 82 people were killed in a record 423 attacks on farms last year. In 2018 so far, there have already been 109 attacks and more than 15 murders.

Afriforum says it is forced to compile its own numbers because the South African government — which denies the attacks are racially motivated or that white farmers are killed in disproportionate numbers — stopped releasing farm murder statistics in 2008.

“Our rural areas are trapped in a crime war,” Afriforum head of safety Ian Cameron said in a statement, adding that torture with irons, blowtorches, melted plastic and boiling water often continued for hours during the attacks.

“Although the South African government denies that a violence crisis is staring rural areas in the face, the numbers prove that excessive violence plague these areas. Government cannot deny the facts — our people are being mowed down.”

Which is why, earlier this month, Australian Home Affairs Minister Peter Dutton floated the idea of fast-tracked humanitarian visas for white South African farmers, saying they faced "horrific circumstances" and needed help from a "civilised country."

“We’re looking at ways we can help people to migrate to Australia if they’re finding themselves in that situation.”

And despite the facts of savage attacks on white farmers, this statement outraged South Africa's government who claimed "the threat did not exist" and accused Mr Dutton of being an "out and out racist."

This was followed just a few weeks later by perhaps the most Orwellian statement yet, as the head of South Africa’s radical Marxist opposition party - who declared his party was "cutting the throat of whiteness" - called Australia a "racist country" for offering fleeing white farmers a refuge.

Malema, who was convicted of hate speech in 2011 for singing the apartheid-era revolutionary song Shoot the Boer, Kill the Farmer and in 2016 told supporters he was “not calling for the slaughter of white people‚ at least for now”, said farmers should “leave quietly”.

“We’re too busy,” he said. “Don’t make noise, because you will irritate us. Go to Australia. It is only racists who went to Australia when Mandela got out of prison. It is only racists who went to Australia when 1994 came. It is the racists again who are going back to Australia.”

But he said they would be “poor in Australia”. “They are rich here because they are exploiting black people. There is no black person to be exploited in Australia, they are going to be poor.

“They will come back here with their tail between their legs. We will hire them because we will be the owners of their farms when they come back to South Africa. As to what we are going to do with the land, it’s our business, it’s none of your business.

“We want Africa back. Africa belongs to our people.

Last year, some 82 people were killed in a record 423 farm attacks, and there have been 109 attacks and more than 15 murders in 2018, Afriforum, a South African civil rights group reported in March.

And so, after those threats from Malema and Ramaphosa - and on the back of Australia's offer, RT reports this week that more than 200 farmers from South Africa have applied for humanitarian visas in Australia after allegedly suffering attacks for being white, according to the Australian Home Affairs Ministry.

“The type of criteria they of course have to meet – or the key one – is evidence of persecution, so that's exactly what we will be looking at,” Home Affairs Deputy Secretary Malisa Golightly said.

Home Affairs said 89 refugee visa applications relating to 213 people had been received, although they did not specify their ethnicity or any other details.

Finally, as a reminder, the actions that Malema and Ramaphosa are taking are exactly what Zimbabwe did.

Seeking to correct similar colonial and Apartheid-era injustices in his country, Zimbabwe’s president Robert Mugabe initiated a land redistribution program in 1999-2000.

Thousands of white-owned farms were confiscated by the government, and the farmers were forced out.

Bear in mind that Zimbabwe used to be known as the breadbasket of southern Africa. Zimbabwe’s world-class farmers were major food exporters to the rest of the region.

But within a few years of Mugabe’s land distribution, food production plummeted.

Without its professional, experienced farmers, the nation went from being an agricultural export powerhouse to having to rely on handouts from the United Nations’ World Food Programme.

Hyperinflation and a multi-decade depression followed.

If there’s an economic model in the world that you DON’T want to follow, it’s Zimbabwe.

And judging by the action in the Rand since this confiscation was announced, Zimbabwe is what they will get...


Dr. Bonzo Wed, 05/23/2018 - 02:50 Permalink

As soon as Oz confirms their acceptance of the applications the trickle will turn to a flood. Prolly upward of half-a-million. Watch. Canada should get in on it. They had a program in the 60s enticing European farmers. Thousands applied. Better than the Asian trash luck-seekers wishing to cash in their shit passports for whitey passports and string along 5 generations of mud people.

ACP NemesisteM Wed, 05/23/2018 - 03:25 Permalink

I'd like to see some in the US too, where they can thrive.

The blacks in SA are so incredibly stupid, when they take over a building (before white SA contractors kick them out with force), they literally throw all their shit into elevator shafts until they are completely filled, then have to find somewhere else to dump it.

All the whites should leave. Everything will collapse (literally) and the blacks will be able to "re-appropriate" their hunter/gatherer culture again.

In reply to by NemesisteM

mtl4 Richard Chesler Wed, 05/23/2018 - 10:27 Permalink

These folks actually want to work and assimilate into a country, I'd welcome them anytime.  Folks that come to steal, lie, cheat and become financial leeches of society (no matter what color), don't let the door hit you on the way out.  The level of hypocrisy gets deeper by the day to the point that nations which allow such nonsense to become the norm will simply implode from within.

In reply to by Richard Chesler

keep the basta… techengineer Wed, 05/23/2018 - 07:26 Permalink

Clearly you are grouping me with the maggots. 

the left has the great betrayers and fleecing artists, the greens and the labour just as foul as Turnbull and bishop and the scomo scourge.

objection is based on land environment population and real matters as other objectors point out.

I suspect the left maggots like South Africans, and get them on Tele.

In reply to by techengineer

chubbar ACP Wed, 05/23/2018 - 07:03 Permalink

WTF does everyone think is slowly happening here in the US? Does anyone think that awarding jobs and advancement to someone because of their skin color or sex is going to result in optimum performance in whatever job it happens in? It doesn't happen overnight, it may take decades before it's realized that the competent performers are covering up the incompetence these policies lead to. But, give it time and you will see sub-optimum performance. That matters when it's in a critical field, like growing food or engineering bridges. Just wait and see.

As an addendum, I don't want to see any fucktards from the US or S. Africa screaming about needing food donations or other assistance in the future to that group of racists. Fuck them. Does anyone remember EVER seeing a picture of thousands of whites at a convention/speech calling for the murder of blacks BECAUSE they were black? They are calling for war against their own countrymen, not some invading nation.


In reply to by ACP

zaphire999 ACP Wed, 05/23/2018 - 07:04 Permalink

Already left - sadly, and didn't want to.  But the world don't give a shit about whites - especially white elites who only give a shit about themselves.


We live in an elitist, power dominance hierarchy.  Niggers are at the floor and the rest of us are in between the ultra rich and the scum.  All we can hope for is we don't fall through the cracks and into the scum floor.



In reply to by ACP

zaphire999 ACP Wed, 05/23/2018 - 07:04 Permalink

Already left - sadly, and didn't want to.  But the world don't give a shit about whites - especially white elites who only give a shit about themselves.


We live in an elitist, power dominance hierarchy.  Niggers are at the floor and the rest of us are in between the ultra rich and the scum.  All we can hope for is we don't fall through the cracks and into the scum floor.



In reply to by ACP

house biscuit Bigly Thu, 05/24/2018 - 07:48 Permalink

I suspect the average black in South Africa will ultimately end up being the biggest victim in all of this

Meaning that the upper 2% of gov't-connected blacks will benefit from the appropriated land while the majority suffer from the lack of food

Similar to the African slave trade centuries back; would not have happened if Africans had not sold out other Africans

In reply to by Bigly

not dead yet tenpanhandle Wed, 05/23/2018 - 03:28 Permalink

In Zimbabwe many of the blacks who were given stolen farms have realized that they aren't very good at farming. Their solution, and a smart one, is to hire former white farmers to run their operations. In some cases it's the former owner. Last I heard the government was going to outlaw the hiring of white managers for black farms. When you think people can't get any dumber they prove they can.

In reply to by tenpanhandle

fleur de lis not dead yet Wed, 05/23/2018 - 03:45 Permalink

It's the multicultural lie -- people just don't learn.

Multiculturalism warps thinking and keeps a prison of mental denial.

The victim of multiculturalism is rendered incapable of thinking clearly and even the most educated can be controlled like a zombie.

Once the whites leave SA or Zimbabwe they simply cannot return.

Case closed.

They must put down roots someplace else and forget the past.

It's gone and it will never come back.

In reply to by not dead yet

rejected not dead yet Wed, 05/23/2018 - 09:41 Permalink

"Last I heard the government was going to outlaw the hiring of white managers for black farms. When you think people can't get any dumber they prove they can."

It's called affirmative action in the US.  Shit canning the brightest and best for the dumbest and worse.

If one can see,,, it is already having negative effects. It will be the nail in the coffin for the human race.

Whites appear to lack a major characteristic that will prove fatal. Pride in their race. Looking around the globe the difference is readily apparent between mostly White civilizations and others. It is why many want to immigrate to White countries. How many are jumping fences to get in Zimbabwe?

In reply to by not dead yet

fleur de lis tenpanhandle Wed, 05/23/2018 - 03:31 Permalink

Everybody is petrified by the word "rayciss."




It is abundantly obvious to the most hardened leftist that the South African blacks are threatening the white farmers.

This will not get better and indeed the farmers will be gone one way or another, sooner or later.

Either they die at the hands of the wild marauders or they emigrate to a civilized nation.

It is a mystery why they did not leave sooner, right after Mandela took charge.

They should have seen the writing on the wall since the deterioration started at that point and picked up speed.

They all should have been gone years ago.

Alas, they believed the lie that a complete change in governance did not include revenge, theft, and murder.

That whole place will go up in smoke in the near future, it will turn into a massive killing field, and any whites should be long since gone or face murder.

Multiculturalism requires deep denial of the obvious in order for the lie to work.

Since the word "rayciss" also plunges most believers into a state of deep denial, they cannot accept the obvious solution -- fast track the productive farmers to places that have farms.

The farmers should not wait around for other governments to shake off the multiculti inebriation while fumbling for a decision.

They should apply to as many nations as they can, even those that don't need farmers.

They can always move afterwards to other stable places. 

They might even like unexpected surroundings and stay farming or find another line of work.

The Russians, Poles, Hungarians, and Caucuses regions would take them quickly since they are skilled farmers.

The dunces running South Africa will revert to sustenance living which will be a violent stage indeed.

At that point any remaining whites will be rounded up as hostages by the incompetent rulers and will be sold for quick cash to other nations or get killed.

Or being natural born grifters it might be some kind of package deal -- you can have the whites but only if you take us too. 

And all our family and friends.

And you have to provide permanent residence and welfare and new passports for all of us.

The whites have to leave and go anywhere.

They are on borrowed time every day.





In reply to by tenpanhandle

The Grim Teacher fleur de lis Wed, 05/23/2018 - 04:37 Permalink

White Europeans of Dutch, English, Irish, Portuguese and German descent have been in South Africa for as many generations as white Europeans have been in the USSA. There are people who are farming land whose great great grandparents farmed the same land. This absurd lie that the land was "taken" from the "natives" is the biggest lie that is propagated around this new drive for land theft. The Koi Koi have more original claim to the land than the Bantu's. The fact that the British imported slave labour from Malaysia to the Cape Colony (the descendants of which are referred to as coloureds today, no relation to Bantu's) is evidence to show that there was no local labor for to be exploited. The Koi Koi died mainly of disease which the Europeans brought with them, the same as happened in many other pats of the planet.


White Europeans are just as native to South Africa as the Bantu's are, as they, the Bantu's, moved down from more Northern parts of the continent to South Africa. They clashed with the Europeans and LOST, therefore they lost their land, too fucking bad. If the continent of Africa is for African's only, then Western governments need to kick all blacks out of their countries and they can fuck off back to Africa, and we'll keep Europe and North America for whites only.

In reply to by fleur de lis

Khan Bodin The Grim Teacher Wed, 05/23/2018 - 07:06 Permalink

Looketh this lying piece of white European shit! White trash of Europa is indigenous only to Europa, you lying sack of shit.




Kingdom of Mapungubwe of 11th century, that's half a millenium before white European invaders started to arrive. Who arrived from the north then, indigenous afros or invading euros? You lying white sack of shit!




A subspecie of African race which is indigenous to that part of africa. Who arrived from the north again? You lying piece of white european shit!


White filth has no business in Africa. Africa belongs to its indigenous african people, not to invaders who managed to take 70% of land to themselves being only a small minority of population. Australia must be cleansed from white trash too! Australia does not belong to white trash. White trash are invaders there too.

In reply to by The Grim Teacher

fleur de lis Khan Bodin Wed, 05/23/2018 - 10:14 Permalink

Perfect example of what multiculturalism produces.

An angry non white spitting and spewing anger about something centuries ago like he can do something about it. 

Multiculturalism and its sibling word "rayciss" has infected his mind and all he can do is thrash about the past.

But the danger is that this very anger can stir morons like himself, can breed resentment within society, and start fights that spiral out of control.

Since his mind has been effectively warped, his assignment going forward is to spread resentment.

Notice how this moron has no intentions of leaving a cushy white society and move to a non white one so as to improve the condition of non white inhabitants.

His mind has been poisoned and he has devolved into an angry moron.

This is all he can do.

In reply to by Khan Bodin

Khan Bodin fleur de lis Wed, 05/23/2018 - 13:21 Permalink

Fleur de lis. Lilium. I take you are French. Amero of French lineage. Despicable kind. What do you find confusing French-amero? When someone lies so audaciously to insult readers' minds (like that claim that euros are as indigenous to Africa as native afros), nobody should be angry or antagonistic about it, hmm, Frenchie? It might "breed resentment" if you dispute lies, right, Frenchie? No wonder everyone that comes into contact with your kind hates the guts out of you. You are extremely duplicitous creatures. Very... despicable. Vile whites who wants to feed on everything on their path. Destroy nature, and its own future for that matter, just to have more goods... more pleasure... moar things for whites to consume and please themselves with. Say it isn't so, despicable French-amero! ehehehehe 

In reply to by fleur de lis

Khan Bodin fleur de lis Wed, 05/23/2018 - 15:27 Permalink

I should have pointed out that I have no interests in white european thing with afros (I am no afro or fan of afros, and no sane or even somewhat intelligent person is for that matter), but seeing how greedy and unscrupulous with your claims you are, how you want everything worthy for yourselves in order to feed your liberal lifestyles, I guess it just makes me angry. Your duplicitous nature. And later on you complain how your nature has produced such "angry response." Shocking I tell you!

In reply to by fleur de lis

inhibi Khan Bodin Wed, 05/23/2018 - 14:40 Permalink


Everyone, or rather, every race is an invader. The flow of people, the migrations, the wars, etc. has displaced every race from their homeland multiple times, mixed with other races, ad inifinitum.

If Africa belongs to the indigenous Africans, then what would you do with those that are, say, half African half Boer? Kill them? What about the Egyptians? Are they not a part of Africa too? They mixed with the Greeks, Romans, Hyksos, Ethiopians, etc. 

You think that there is a rightful ruler, like perhaps the San people that you mention. The San people lived in the deserts, and the Tswana people (more modern) displaced them along with the Whites that brought large scale farming.

I dont think anyone here denies that the European invasion of Africa wasnt frought with genocide and bloodshed, only that living in the past is useless. All land was and has been taken from someone else at some point in time. Trying to undo that is simply nonsense: for if you would give Africa back to its true rightful ancestors (an impossible task in the first place), you would  find that they no longer exist.

Taking land away based on race is, I thought, exactly what African's like you would never want to see again. But I guess it should show you, above all else, how SIMILAR you are to the ones you so clearly hate.

In reply to by Khan Bodin

Khan Bodin inhibi Wed, 05/23/2018 - 15:49 Permalink

It's not. The "flow of people" were called the great migrations and they were pretty rare. That's how btw all that diverse groups, races and etnicities were created. If there was regular "flow of people" everywhere, there would be no diversity of humanoids today. Wars and conquests were how someone got the right to settle somewhere. You are ignorant of basics. As for the race of half-breeds, they are only newly crated race formed by interbreeding between races, and they should either make their own land since their chilrun can only spread their seed which does not belong to either races of which they became, thus they would polluted, corrupt and deform original creation, i.e. races of which they were formed, or they could be in lands of races of their creation but exist as eunuchs. That is possibility too. So either they seek their own land or agree not to reproduce in order not to pollute the seed of which they were created. European conquest of you afros wasn't a genocide else you wouldn't exist now. Native americans, now that was a genocide. Do you see them now? Only in traces since they were cleansed. You afros were not. Fate was way more generous to you than you worms deserve. Do you know why native americans were genocided and you not? Because they resisted and waged wars against their invaders, wheres you like whores submitted. Comparing you slithering worms to those who truly stood against their invaders is... low. Undeserving. That's why I despise you afros as much as I don't like whiteys even though I am white myself. You whores would make yourselves victims whereas those who really are never say a word. Always bitching about your defeat when you submitted, and you do so because you want to extract benefits and favors from the whiteys... want to profit in other words.

And you have the right to take the land from whiteys if you want so. They made it by conquest when they were strong, if they lose it now when they are weak -- it's the way of nature. They have no place there. They are foreign invaders. Neither do you afros have place in their native lands. I suspect they are not actually thrilled to have millions of afros settled in their lands to pollute and destroy their genes... making their future to be of Mulat half-breed race, to destroy their biological distinctiveness, that what makes them what they are. Certainly not. The question is only when and how it ends. Better to end it sooner since the damage will be smaller. The longer it goes, the more damage to biology it does. They are still some 80% their own in Europa I think. You are +90% or completely pure in Africa. The damage is not great... yet. As for Murica, afros should have their land in North America. That's what ameros wouldn't want to give though.

In reply to by inhibi

sebmurray The Grim Teacher Wed, 05/23/2018 - 07:09 Permalink

Exactly, my father's ancestry has been traced back to the 1820 settlers, my mother's Dutch heritage goes back even further. Settlers who arrived during Shaka Zulu's Mfecane wars which depopulated much of the coastline and interior of the country. A lot of the land was settled during the early 19th century and that was on land that used to belong to people who were slaughtered by the Zulus. There were never any blacks to start off with in the Cape area either, hence their minority status in the Western Cape.


Then again, facts and logic have never been known to get in the way of some good demagoguery. Cape Town is still a great place to live, water shortage or not. I just make sure my British passport is always up to date though, never know when it may be necessary

In reply to by The Grim Teacher

fleur de lis sebmurray Wed, 05/23/2018 - 10:52 Permalink

Don't tempt fate.

Just because your passport is up to date don't think that you are safe.

You are not.

If you decided today to leave you would have wait a while.

And that does not include packing.

And if you are in the wrong place all bets are off.

You could be injured in a way that would affect your life, or you could be gone for good.

Leave as soon as you can.


In reply to by sebmurray

fleur de lis The Grim Teacher Wed, 05/23/2018 - 10:05 Permalink

The whole multiculturalism racket has been infecting white societies for decades.

And it includes weird white cults within white societies as well.

The word "rayciss" only exists to control white people because it it not equally applied when people of non white ethnic groups meet the same behavioral profile.

It is a word that is good for nothing but starting fights and destroying lives.

It is poison and should be avoided as such.

Do not even engage in a conversation where it is an operative word, or with a person who uses it as a legitimate term.

Poison in the air.

Leave and minimize/sever contact with the person 

As long as people use it with sincerity it will be a problem that goes in circles and poisons anyone who tries to use it, or anyone who is tainted with it.

As for the history of whites in South Africa, it is now a moot point.

There is nothing more to discuss but escape.

It's over, and it would be best for all the whites to be gone before the mass starvation sets in.



In reply to by The Grim Teacher

Cloud9.5 fleur de lis Wed, 05/23/2018 - 08:05 Permalink

If you prefer your culture to the culture of others and you want your children and grandchildren to look like you look, then you are a racist.  Those that are not racist shroud their self-hatred in political correctness and platitudes about multiculturalism.  What they secretly pine for is the extinction of their own people.   Most multiculturalists I have known are charlatans.

In reply to by fleur de lis

fleur de lis Cloud9.5 Wed, 05/23/2018 - 10:44 Permalink

If you prefer your own culture to the culture of others, that is simply something called "ethnocentricity."

It is perfectly normal, and it is how all human societies got started.

A culture is simply a group of people who are held together by similar or agreed upon beliefs.

As time goes on, this evolves into family structure, religion, customs, work, and so on.

The formation of language identified the group's members and outsiders. 

This formed tribes, villages towns, nations, etc.

Then nearby alliances are formed, and other bigger groups invade for the land and absorb the former rulers and subjects.

All societies big and small formed this way since we left caves.

It hath ever been thus.

The genius of the Romans was that they spread the Latin language so that anyone in any part of the Empire could travel to the other end and still communicate, all the while keeping their own native languages.

This is one of the reasons Europe evolved so successfully -- it was multiethnic within a Roman culture.

That structure more or less remained the same until central bankers started infecting the money supply and successfully took down England thanks to their cutout Cromwell.

The problem is that, as usual, academians sitting around with way too much time, nothing to do, no responsibilities, and existing away from the real world, sit around hatching sick ideas about how the world should be.

Then they feed their sick ideas to politicians who always see an opportunity for money and power.

So the "rayciss" buzzword exists to control white populations and thus their potential power,  and the non whites feed into the fake sense of superiority and entitlement owed them, overlooking the destructive behavior within their own ethnic groups.

Sick as it is, certain groups actually profit from this destruction, particularly the academic epicenter of the whole social sickness.

In reply to by Cloud9.5