"It Makes Zero Sense": After Taxing Soda, Philadelphia Passes "Construction Tax"

What better way to encourage the creation of so-called "affordable" housing than to impose an onerous tax on new construction? While that approach might appear counterproductive, it's exactly how the Philadelphia City Council has chosen to try to alleviate the city's affordable housing crisis. Instead of easing restrictive zoning laws, the city council has proposed a 1% tax on new construction that council members say will finance affordable housing elsewhere. It brings to mind an employment tax recently passed by the Seattle City Council with a similar goal of providing more services to the city's homeless (whose numbers will no doubt expand as more jobs are eliminated).

Opponents of the tax have criticized it as "ill conceived", arguing that it could make life more difficult for developers and end the "impressive run" of new construction that is helping transform some of the city's grittier neighborhoods. John Dougherty, a union leader who heads the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 98, said the tax "makes zero sense," according to Plan Philly.

Construction

But the finance subcommittee of the Philadelphia City Council, in a burst of short-sightedness, decided to go ahead with it. In a 6-3 vote, the council decided to pass the tax, which will purportedly raise revenue for the city to build subsidized housing for residents with incomes up to 120% of the median income for the area - or more than $100,000 for a family of four.

They probably should've checked to see how that worked out with the soda tax, which has consistently missed its revenue projections:

Tax

Philadelphia Mayor Jim Kenney hasn't said whether he will support the proposal should it pass the full council. But both Commissioner of Licenses and Inspections David Perri and Commerce Commissioner Harold Epps have blasted the tax in public testimony, arguing that the tax is directly at odds with its stated goal, and that it also would pose a collection challenge from a logistical standpoint.

"While we agree that we must ensure the continued availability of affordable housing, we are very concerned there will be unintended consequences to this legislation," said Epps. "This type of legislation hampers the business environment, works at odds with our business-attraction efforts, and makes it more difficult to grow jobs in Philadelphia."

Perri’s line of criticism was more technical, questioning the means by which the tax would be collected. As currently proposed, the amount of tax that must be paid on a project would be determined by the “total value of construction” estimated in the building permit. Perri called that mechanism “highly subjective and impossible to verify.”

"Almost 20 years ago, the Department of Licenses and Inspections moved away from calculating building-alteration permit fees based upon estimated values of construction due to reporting inconsistencies and disputes," he wrote.

Perri also argued that the Revenue Department does not have the resources "to review the more than 22,000 building permits that are processed each year."

After Amazon threatened to cease construction on a new building in Seattle after that city adopted a controversial employment tax, Dougherty pointed out that Philly would risk driving away Amazon - which named Philly as a finalist for its HQ2. Local unions have said they wouldn't oppose a reexamination of Philly's 10-year property tax abatement for developers, and they even hired a lobbying firm to examine every abated property in the city over the past five years to see if they're keeping up with their permits.

Several amendments to the measure have been proposed, including one that would award a 25% construction-tax rebate to firms that meet certain requirements to hire minority workers. Another would have exempted projects under $100,000 - though some experts said this would be illegal under federal law. Affordable-housing advocates have demanded that the plan set aside funding for helping Philadelphia residents living in poverty. After meeting resistance from councilmembers from the city's outskirts, the bill was eventually modified to allow some of the funds raised by the tax to be spent repairing "affordable" homes in some of the city's outer neighborhoods that have been declining but are not considered impoverished.

Comments

Cryptopithicus Homme gwar5 Thu, 06/07/2018 - 19:18 Permalink

I've consulted some "socialized" friends for information on how it works.  Multi-millionaire and billionaire business people are too dumb to do the high-level organization provided generously by your taxes.  They need to consult "mature college grad" government paper-pushers to see how it's done.  They provide the super-structure and us proles fill in the holes.  The cart is merely there to push the horse forward in their view.

In reply to by gwar5

ravolla hoos bin pharteen Fri, 06/08/2018 - 00:29 Permalink

Hello SPAM-LOVERS!!!  I m BACK from being BANNED!!!  

Let's get right to it  -> I'm here SPAM TAG-TEAMING with Wadalt and Anunnaki, my best buds (up above)   AND  alternate log-on====Even though all of us "people" here are really  just one crazy obsessed SPAMMER with a bazillion log-on's, Wadalt and Anunnaki and I are like bro's -- SPAMMIN' BROs.   I am out of the Penalty Box and ready to SPAM every thread on ZH like a grease fire in a dumpster.

****

Did your train run late?  IT's the JOOS!!

Did your wife get the child support doubled?  IT's the JOOS!!

Did your Johnson let you down?  IT's the JOOS!!

IT's the JOOS!!  

The JOOS did it and they DO EVERYTHING!!!  It's ALL the JOOZ!!!!

****

SAD BUT TRUE!!  I have wasted my youth (or at least the last five years) with at least one hand in my pants and the other hand SPAMMING ZH.  Yes, indeed.  DOZENS and DOZENS (maybe hundreds) of log-on's banned --  All the porn at Celebrity-leaks: that's meBiblicism: that's me.  Daily Westerner: that's me.  That's my life: mopping the floor at the Porn Cinema, working the drive-thru window at SONIC, and spamming ZH.

Just check out my other log-on's { "bobcatz"  AND  "Leakanthrophy"  AND  "Jumanji1959"  AND  "Mr Hankey"  AND  "PrivetHedge"  AND  dozens of others, and dozens and dozens banned)!!!   We all say the same thing!!   It just PROVEs we are all right and that it's all truetrue and that I am WHACKED!!!

Swing by my double top-secret awesome BLOG about how the JOOS do everything AND pick up a CHRISTIAN VIRUS and a whole load of CRUSADER TROJANS inside your DEVIL COMPUTER:

wwwww.BiblicismInstituteForTheRaciallyObsessedAndTheFeebleMinded.orgasm

In reply to by hoos bin pharteen

Money_for_Nothing iampreparedru Fri, 06/08/2018 - 07:37 Permalink

The (nominal) poor are paid not to work. In both cases (poor and imported) persons are doing what is best for themselves. Without Social Programs the (nominal) poor would riot and kill imported laborers. Or even worse join Unions (sarcasm). The cost of both Social Programs and imported laborers are bore by a Society via taxes and deficit spending. The nominal benefits of these policies go to politicians and businesses. See Senator Feinstein and Koch Industries.

In reply to by iampreparedru

Smack gwar5 Thu, 06/07/2018 - 20:20 Permalink

Funny thing is some of them buy homes around me here in the South, the first things they say are, we moved here because of the cost of living and taxes up in Philly, and how bad it is.

Then they say stuff like we noticed there's no zoo, or museum here, and there are very few street lights it's dark at night, then they talk about no sidewalks, and we noticed there are very few bus routes.

So you see it's just a matter of time, it's like a virus, eventually they will multiply here, some will get in office, they will want those same things here, we will need a stadium, zoo, museum, busses, more schools, sidewalks, street lights, a park every 1/2 mile, a community center, larger police force........ect

In reply to by gwar5

lakecity55 Thu, 06/07/2018 - 19:17 Permalink

Tax legislation passed by those who feed off the taxpayer and who have never held an actual job or had to balance a budget.

This will end well, I'm sure.

Catullus Thu, 06/07/2018 - 19:21 Permalink

I mean why not? In the mental checkers of a local politician they can only think “what can I do to get more money and resources where people won’t notice and I can use the money for influence or a higher office?” Consequences? Who cares? They should be lobbying me not to do this if they care so much