Pepe Escobar: Putin & Xi Top The G6+1

Authored by Pepe Escobar via The Asia Times,

All hell broke loose at the G6+1, aka G7, while the China-led Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) aimed at global integration and a peaceful multipolar order...

East vs. West: the contrast between the “dueling summits” this weekend was something for the history books.

All hell broke loose at the G6+1, otherwise known as G7, in La Malbaie, Canada, while all focused on divine Eurasian integration at the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) in China’s Qingdao in Shandong, the home province of Confucius.

US President Donald Trump was the predictable star of the show in Canada. He came late. He left early. He skipped a working breakfast. He disagreed with everybody. He issued a “free trade proclamation”, as in no barriers and tariffs whatsoever, everywhere, after imposing steel and aluminum tariffs on Europe and Canada. He proposed that Russia should be back at the G8 (Putin said he has other priorities). He signed the final communiqué and then he didn’t.

Trump’s “I don’t give a damn” attitude drove the European leaders assembled in Canada crazy. After the official photo shoot, the US president grabbed the arm of new Italian Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte and said, in ecstasy, “You’ve had a great electoral victory!”

The Euros were not pleased and forced Conte to abide by the official EU, as in German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s, policy: no G8 readmission to Russia as long as Moscow does not respect the Minsk agreements. In fact it is Ukraine that is not respecting the Minsk agreements; Trump and Conte are fully aligned on Russia.

Merkel, in extremis, proposed a “shared evaluation mechanism”, lasting roughly two weeks, to try to defuse rising trade tensions.

Yet the Trump administration does not seem to be interested.

“Strategic” game-changer

Meanwhile, over in Qingdao, the stunning takeaway was offered predictably by Chinese President Xi Jinping; “President Putin and I both think that the China-Russia comprehensive strategic partnership is mature, firm and stable.”

This is a massive game-changer because officially, so far, this was a “comprehensive partnership.” It’s the first time on record that Xi has put the stress on “strategic”. Again, in his own words: “It is the highest-level, most profound and strategically most significant relationship between major countries in the world.”

And if that was not far-reaching enough, it’s also personal. Xi, referring to Putin and perhaps channeling Trump’s bonhomie with leaders he likes, said, “He is my best, most intimate friend.”

Heavy business, as usual, was in order. The Chinese partnered with Russian nuclear energy giant Rosatom to get advanced nuclear technologies and diversify nuclear power contracts beyond its current Western suppliers. That’s the “strategic” energy alliance component of the partnership.

In a trilateral Russia-China-Mongolia meeting, they all vowed to go full steam ahead with the China-Mongolia-Russia Economic Corridor – one of the key planks of the New Silk Roads, known as the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).

Mongolia once again volunteered to become a transit hub for Russian gas to China, diversifying from Gazprom’s current direct pipelines from Blagoveshchensk, Vladivostok and Altai. According to Putin, the Eastern Route pipeline remains on schedule, as does the US$27 billion liquefied natural gas (LNG) plant in Yamal being financed by Russian and Chinese companies.

On the Arctic, Putin and Xi went all the way for developing the Northern Sea Route, including crucial modernization of deep-water ports such as Murmansk and Arkhangelsk, and investment in infrastructure. The added geopolitical cachet is self-evident.

Putin had said last week that annual trade between Moscow and Beijing will soon reach US$100 billion. Currently, it stands at US$86 billion. Now Russian businesses venture the possibility of reaching US$200 billion by 2020 as feasible.

All this frenzy of activity is now openly described by Putin as the interconnectivity of BRI and the Russia-led Eurasia Economic Union (EAEU). Not to mention that the SCO itself interconnects with both BRI and the EAEU.

Putin told Chinese TV channel CGTN that though the SCO began as a “low-profile organization” [back in 2001] that sought merely to “solve border issues” between China, Russia and former Soviet countries, it is now evolving into a much bigger global force.

In parallel, according to Yu Jianlong, secretary general of the China Chamber of International Commerce, the SCO has now gathered extra collective strength to harness BRI expansion to increase business across Europe, the Middle East and Africa.

So it’s no wonder companies from SCO nations are now being “encouraged” to use their own currencies to seal deals, bypassing the US dollar, as well as building e-commerce platforms, Alibaba-style. So far, Beijing has invested US$84 billion in other SCO members, mostly in energy, minerals, transportation (including, for instance, the China-Kyrgyzstan-Uzbekistan highway), construction and manufacturing.

Putin also met with Iranian President Hassan Rouhani on the sidelines of the SCO and vowed in no uncertain terms to preserve the Iranian nuclear deal, known as the JCPOA.

Iran is a current SCO observer nation. Putin once again reaffirmed he wants Tehran as a full member. The SCO charter determines that “a dialogue partner status can be granted to a country that shares the goals and principles of the SCO and wants to establish relations based on equal and mutually profitable relationship.”

Iran, as an observer, fulfills the commitment. The spanner in the works happens to be tiny Tajikistan.

Enter the trademark convoluted internal politics of the Central Asian stans, in this case revolving around Tajik president Emomali Rahmon accepting Saudi Arabia’s acquisition of a 51% stake in Tajikistan’s largest bank. Nobody else wanted it; Riyadh was just buying influence.

All SCO full members must be approved unanimously. Still, that won’t prevent larger economic integration between Iran, Russia and China. The talk in the SCO corridors was that Chinese companies expect an extra bonanza in the Iranian market after the unilateral Trump pullout of the JCPOA.

Behind closed doors, as diplomats told Asia Times, the SCO also discussed the crucial plan devised by the SCO-Afghanistan Contact Group, an Asia-wide peace process with Russia, China, India, Pakistan, Iran and Afghanistan trying to finally solve the decades-long tragedy without Western interference.

So what about a G3?

The “dueling summits” clearly set the scene. The G7 meeting at La Malbaie represented the dysfunctional old order, dilacerated by largely self-inflicted chaos and its apoplexy at the Rise of the East – from the integration of BRI, EAEU, SCO and BRICS, to the yuan-based gold-backed oil futures market.

In contrast to the G7’s full spectrum dominance doctrine of total military superiority, Qingdao represented the new groove. Implacably derided by the old order as autocratic and filled with “democraships” bent on “aggression”, in fact it was a graphic illustration of multi-polarity at work, the intersection of four great civilizations, an Eurasian Café debating that another, non-War Party conducted future is possible.

In parallel, diplomats in Brussels confirmed to Asia Times there are insistent rumbles about Trump possibly dreaming of a G3 composed of just US, Russia and China. Trump, after all, personally admires the leadership qualities of both Putin and Xi, while deriding the Kafkaesque EU bureaucratic maze and its weaklings, currently represented by the M3 (Merkel, Macron, May).

In Europe, no one seems to be listening to informed advice, such as provided by Belgian economist Paul de Grauwe, who’s pleading for Frankfurt and Berlin to manage a common debt, without which the EU won’t survive the sovereign crises of individual members.

Trump, for all his dizzying inconsistencies, seems to have understood that the G7 is a Walking Dead, and the heart of the action revolves around China, Russia and India, which not by accident form the hard node of BRICS.

The problem is the US national security strategy, as well as the national defense strategy, advocate no less than Cold War 2.0 against both China and Russia all across Eurasia. All bets are off, however, on who blinks first.


FBaggins I Am Jack's Ma… Tue, 06/12/2018 - 01:50 Permalink

There is a lot of posturing going on. The article points out that Russia's annual trade with China totals around $80 billion with exports and imports. However, that is nothing compared to China's dependence on trade with the US.

China's annual trade with the US is over $600 billion and the US trade deficit with China, its main trading partner, is about $350 billion, give or take about $25 billion. The US trade deficit with the EU is around $147 billion, which is another significant amount. The US trade deficit with Canada, its second largest trading partner, depending on the source of the information, is no more than about $20 billion and is likely much lower. China is counting on a more independent economic future but is not likely to rock the boat too much with the US at this time, even for Russia, despite the fact that Russia is a key nation for resources and a reliable land link to Europe. 

With his tariffs, sanctions and his warmongering cabinet, Trump has lost the US business cool. He has succeeded in making his nation look desperate to end foreign trade deficits and to end other nations abandoning the use of US petrodollars.

The US is in fact still the richest and most powerful nation on earth. It has the military high ground and is dominant, but it is economically wounded and some time ago it lost the moral high ground and a great deal of international trust. Unless it starts another war at this time, which it cannot afford, it is most likely that the EU, Russia, China and most other nations will just wait around enduring the tariffs and sanctions and let the US just bleed itself out. This is a pretty bleak forecast and I sincerely hope I am wrong and that there are more positive options for everyone.  

In reply to by I Am Jack's Ma…

algol_dog Tue, 06/12/2018 - 00:13 Permalink

This article is spot on, and unfortunately so is this part -

"The problem is the US national security strategy, as well as the national defense strategy, advocate no less than Cold War 2.0 against both China and Russia all across Eurasia"

and Trumps biggest challenge ...

lizzoilz Tue, 06/12/2018 - 00:25 Permalink

Does anyone see a connection here with the turn date predicted by





Posted: 6/11/2018 23:03 EST


Be careful traders.  The indexes have seen a nice run-up from the anticipated recent low of May 3rd (most recently)--and the aggressive call by ShepWave to GO LONG EQUITIES on that morning. 

Remember as well the wedge patterns given in the Daily Time frame chart--mainly the SPX.

Tuesday's update gives some new trading notes and analysis for short-to-mid term (swing) traders.

Please trade carefully and within your own limits and abilities. Also take into account your own risk tolerance level.

During holiday weeks--especially of the Summer--it is normal to see some range bound Island patterns that are volatile on a short term basis.  Do not let this throw you off. 

Also please take notice of the recent gap patterns and that we may see a short term rotation of sorts between the indexes.

POTENTIAL CRITICAL TIME-CYCLE TURN DATE coming for major U.S. equity indexes coming.

Log In at www.shepwave.comfor Tuesday's Pre-market / Intra Day 



lasvegaspersona Tue, 06/12/2018 - 01:00 Permalink

If the reserve currency status is lost, the US will not be able to afford to be world cop. Everyone knows this especially China, the lender who keeps us afloat today.

Manipuflation Tue, 06/12/2018 - 01:05 Permalink

I did a Ancestry DNA test.  My fore bearers are from pretty much where I thought except for the large chunk of Scandinavian.  Fuck Euro, there is a reason that my forebears left and abandoned the language.

Mrs. M did the same.  She's not as Russian as she thought and is 2% Native American which is interesting.  I tell her "YOU ARE THE MERICAN".  2% woman!

We know and we won't do our children because someone will steal that data on them, again, the hospital they were born did already in case you didn't know.

Russian is spoken here with Mr.s M and the children understand it.  They need to know that language.  My children will be the next leaders and speaking the language helps a great deal. 

Joe A Tue, 06/12/2018 - 01:05 Permalink

Trump can dream of a G3 but it is not gonna happen. China and Russia won't want the us be part of that. Trump is causing a rift in the transatlantic relationship so eventually Europe will move East.

louie1 Tue, 06/12/2018 - 01:07 Permalink

"no G8 readmission to Russia as long as Moscow does not respect the Minsk agreements."

Hahahahaha. Russia is not a signatory to the agreement.

Implied Violins Tue, 06/12/2018 - 01:10 Permalink

Here we go again with the stealth globalist shit...for the uninitiated:  "Unipolar" = evil western hegemony that is taking the world into the abyss;  "Multipolar" = fuzzy wuzzy loveable system that is SO MUCH BETTER oh my gawrd we NEED IT let's accept it willingly life will be SO MUCH BETTER...except it's actually stealth globalism presented us via the Hegelian Dialectic and the (((SAME PEOPLE))) run this fucking scam.

snblitz Tue, 06/12/2018 - 01:34 Permalink

He issued a “free trade proclamation”, as in no barriers and tariffs whatsoever, everywhere, after imposing steel and aluminum tariffs on Europe and Canada

Does Pepe get his news from CNN?  Would Pepe perhaps consider actually listening to what Trump said, rather than what CNN said Trump said?

Who is paying Pepe to spin his lies?

What Trump said was very clear, easy to understand, and cogent.  Please just view it for yourself on youtube.

I did not read the remainder of the article.  If Pepe was worth reading he would not start out his articles with rubbish.