Dear White Men

By Chris at

EVERYTHING is related.

Which means that economics and social trends don't function independently; they feed one another in a push and pull... or yin and yang. Keep that in mind as I'll come back to it.

This week brought us something so absurd that I quite honestly would never have thought I'd see it actually take place. At first glance I thought, no, it must be from the Onion. But it wasn't.

The social justice warriors have come a long way.

They've moved on from stopping us all from clubbing baby seal pups to death and killing pandas to scolding us for looking at woman's breasts. This is saddening news for me as I like breasts very much.

Yup, political correctness and identity politics have now infiltrated the next best thing to Sunday sports: beautiful girls in bikinis.

It so turns out that it's "discriminating" against those lasses who would love to enter beauty contests but... well, frankly they're not that pretty and probably carrying a bit too much "wobble".

And so instead of just being OK with the fact that we're all different, the social justice warriors have now cemented the fact that Miss America 2018's viewership and ratings will absolutely plummet. If I could short it, I would.

A woman called Gretchen, who is the chair of the Board of Trustees of the Miss America Organisation, tells me we're now to have Miss America judged on "what comes out of their mouths". No, seriously. I'm not making this isht up.

Perhaps it hasn't occurred to these dolts that we've already competitions for that? They're called intellectual debates and you can find them in any field you care for. And guess what? They're pretty darn good. Though now that I think about it, they discriminate wholeheartedly against those who aren't so intellectually gifted.

How the hell do you reconcile that?

Should we now hold a mathematical debate focussed on the parabolic wave curve theory, reflector equations, and wavefunctions of the electron in a hydrogen atom at different energy levels, and invite anyone to participate regardless of their understanding... just you know... to ensure it's "inclusive"?

To understand how absurd this is, consider that our DNA quite literally dictates that we look for sexual partners that are healthy and virile.

The reason that a man will look at Scarlett Johansson and think all sorts of dirty thoughts is because she has the attributes that we, men, deem attractive.   And the same goes for women, who like the look of this waaay more than overweight guys missing their front teeth. Why?

Subconsciously, our DNA runs the controls.

Studies have shown, for example, that women will overwhelmingly seek out sexual partners who have, amongst other things, high status, wealth, and who are physically and mentally fit and powerful. Richard Dawkins talks about this gene selection in The Selfish Gene — a book I highly recommend, by the way.

You may think this harsh, but it IS reality. Ignoring this is dangerous when practiced as an individual, and when practised as a society, potentially catastrophic.

But what these intellectual lightweights are actually referring to is a system where you and I are FORCED to include people. THAT is quite literally insane. Furthermore, who the hell wants to be included in anything by force when you know you're not wanted?

Let me ask you a few questions:

  • Would you really want that job if you knew it was given to you by force and came undeserved?
  • Would you really want to live your life with a partner who despises you but is forced into the relationship?
  • Would you really want to go through life pitied by all around you?

If you answered yes to any of these questions, you're a despicable moron with no sense of self worth.

At the heart of identity politics is this concept of the oppression narrative of victimisation.

If you shout loudly enough about your being a victim and blame this real (or imagined) victimisation on someone else (preferably someone with money), you gain power.

It is power by pity. And pity is the most disgusting of human traits and no person should ever want to be pitied.

This doesn't mean that pity shouldn't exist. Not at all.

If, for instance, a loved one dies, or you lose your job, or your car is stolen, your home damaged by fire or floods, or any damn thing untoward and nasty happens to you, it's perfectly normal for others to feel pity for you.

But — and this is important — should this happen to you or me, the last thing we'd ever want is pity. Comfort, reassurance, friendship — all those things, absolutely. But not pity. It's a bloody weak, horrible, subservient state and we should and do rightly despise it.

Pity, however, is the watchword of the victim. And being a victim has never been so powerful as it is today in Western society.

And you'd be forgiven for thinking the Miss America fustercluk is random or unusual.

It's not, as pointed out by this article I came across. It explains how two employees in Portland were fired for closing a bakery on time and refusing service to a customer who tried to get served after closing time.

The customer, when told the shop was closed, accused them of racism. Other customers had been told the same story but this customer was a victim. And in order to try to appease the mob of social justice warriors who flash mobbed the owners then fired the employees.

“They said they knew we didn’t mean anything by what we did, and that it was something we did almost nightly,” Lisa recalls, “but with everything that was happening, [they said] the only way to make things right was to let both of us go.” She says the management offered to give her a “glowing recommendation” to cheer her up.

The article goes on to describe multiple other insanities, including this.

"The following spring, Kali Wilgus and Liz Connelly were accused of culturally appropriating—that is, stealing—Mexican culture by selling burritos from their new food cart. After receiving death threats and sustained protest, they shut down their business, deleted their social media accounts, and went into hiding."

You want to destroy society? Well, this is one surefire way of doing so.

The social justice warriors behind this are nothing more than pimps — pushing dangerous and myopic initiatives such as:

Affirmative action, which, if we're being honest, really amounts to hiring people who couldn't otherwise be hired for the given job.

Inclusivity, which amounts to much of the same thing. Actually, it's the very worst thing possible because, if you think about it, the only reason you'd include someone in something... anything is because you want them there. Typically, this is the result of their skills, demeanour, and other attributes they bring to the relationship. Being forced to do so is quite different.

Equality. When you hear someone talking like this, run away. Or better yet, slap them very hard to wake them up. What they're talking about is equality of outcome, which is NOT the same thing as equality of opportunity. They are dangerous beyond measure. The latter is what the Western world has largely built over the past 100 years, and sure it's not perfect, but it's a helluva lot better than the former, which is what Mao's China and Stalin's Russia tried.

White privilege, which attempts to categorise a specific group (which conveniently holds the wealth) and chastise that group for its contributions to the economy, and humanity and then goes on to demand that group pays for any other group that for some reason (and there are many) has or even thinks it has less.

It is Atlas Shrugged with a twist.

What these people want is to have their incompetence rewarded by those with competence. I'll remind you of the Marxist dogma. And it got me thinking, why is it only in the West that we see this phenomenon?

It's certainly not taking place in Asia. You bring it up in conversation and people look at you like you're an alien. They can't make head or tail of it.

As a friend who's a native to Hong Kong recently said to me:

"We don't understand any of it. None of it. We just think people are very stupid to put up with this. We don't talk about this sort of thing here in Asia because it's not worth talking about"

And the answer to that question is the same answer to why we're seeing this.

How Did This Happen?

The answer, I believe, lies in economics. The great bond bull market began waaay back in 1982 — 36 years ago. And as governments were able to keep financing at lower and lower rates, they kept promising more and more.

It's become the tried and tested way to get elected.

This is how we find ourselves in the Western world with a populace who think it completely reasonable that the government educate their children, provide for their healthcare, and provide for them in their old age. From cradle to grave. The nanny state.

For those of us living in Western countries, fewer and fewer things in life are genuinely considered our responsibility.

These sorts of responsibilities that countries in Asia, for example, aren't expected by the populace or necessarily provided "free" have in the West, become understandably "rights". I wrote about rights in a few months ago, so won't rehash that argument here.

What is fascinating is that what we're looking at is an increase over 36 years in socialism.

We're now at a peak where we find Marxist ideology championed by social justice warriors and the left, calling for more and more. I find it both disturbing and ironic that protestors in Venezuela are marching in the streets resisting socialism, while protestors in the streets of America and Europe are marching in the streets demanding it.

And this at a time that Western governments' balance sheets have reached breaking point. In other words, their ability to pay for all that has been promised is butt-clenchingly hopeless.

Socialism has an unintended consequence: someone has to pay the bill. And the bill is coming due.

And so, while many people (white males in particular because they've been singled out as "oppressors") are, for some reason I still can't fathom, cowering in the corner and feeling guilty instead of standing up to this radical ideology and telling social justice warriors in no uncertain terms to f*ck off, the risk is we'll see the other side emerge. The radical right.

Now, realise that both are equally dangerous, though right now the greater threat by order of magnitude is the former.

When sufficient pressure, which will likely be both economic as well as this radical leftist ideology, is placed on any group (including white males), they'll react as all humans do.

They'll revert to protecting what they see as their own. They'll revert to tribalism. Never forget that human beings are basically tribal by nature.

A reversion to tribalism in the West seems somewhat inevitable at this point and it promises some serious civil strife if left unchecked.

I wish that wasn't the case, but that's how I see it.

Tell me what you think in the comments here and share this with those friends who have yet to wake up to the threat in front of us.

- Chris

“Unfortunately, however much we may deplore something, it does not stop being true.” ― Richard Dawkins, The Selfish Gene


Liked this article? Then you'll probably like my other missives on

this topic as well. Go here to access them (free, of course).



MoreSun Stuck on Zero Tue, 06/12/2018 - 15:09 Permalink

And the real news is: 

Disabled for life” by Israel’s shoot-to-cripple policy

And the response by Western leaders to the wanton slaughter in Gaza and Israeli snipers' use of high velocity dum-dum rounds on civilians? Some are happy to leave the rogue state to investigate itself.…

In reply to by Stuck on Zero

Keyser Sweet Cheeks Wed, 06/13/2018 - 05:09 Permalink

I want a trophy for being the best baseball player, but I suck...

I want a college degree, not based on my intellect, but based on equality...

I want to be a millionaire by they time I'm 24, but I have no idea how...

I want justice for slavery which occurred over 200 years ago when there is an estimated 27,000,000 slaves worldwide TODAY... 

I think Bill Clinton was a great POTUS and I think Trump is Hitler...

I believe I'm see a pattern here, it's called insanity... 

In reply to by Sweet Cheeks

PrivetHedge Sweet Cheeks Wed, 06/13/2018 - 08:12 Permalink

I think we all started off that way, but all the wars we are forced to pay for end up being for and started by Israel.

If Israel had minded their own business and not been behind 9/11, the death of millions in countries that surround them and even changing our laws so we are forbidden to criticise them - no one would care now either.

The parasite who keeps biting is hard to ignore, and it all comes back to the babylonian satanism they follow that causes them to do it.…


In reply to by Sweet Cheeks

inosent PrivetHedge Wed, 06/13/2018 - 13:38 Permalink

The problem with your postings, while generally substantively true, is the link to the same tired and worn out website. If you were interested in being persuasive, instead of camping out on ZH spamming the threads with your links, and used greater care in parsing out the facts and using better resources, that would be much better. The effect of your posts is the opposite of what is presumably intended - unless you are a 'jew' troll working a new 'strategy' to combat the truth you ironically refer to.

The facts work well all by themselves. That is my view. We have had just about enough of mythology. A myth is a story that is believed to be true, and propounded as fact, when there is no possible way to third party verify it, or, on its face, defies the known laws of physics, or in some other respect is irredeemably illogical. So much of these so-called 'holy books' are loaded with these elements, and are presented and digested as hard cold fact that must be believed in, or ELSE!

I have been to the bibilicsm web site, and it is my view, given the very not religious sort at ZH, associating a critical factual detail with the overhang of religious mythology defeats the purpose of raising the issue in the first place.

You note "all the wars we are forced to pay for end up being for and started by Israel". That is sort of true, but not exactly true, because although the big wars during the first half of the 20th century were the product of zionist in tandem with 'jew' banker capital for the purpose of forcing a jewish state in Palestine for the former and re-taking control of our money system for the latter, they could not have been started by the 'jew' state misnamed israhell, because it came into existence after both of those wars were concluded.

There is a plethora of facts to establish that the spark for all the later on converging interests (all bad) who benefited from these ghastly wars began with the zionist initiative in the latter part of the 19th century, capitalizing on the gullibility of Christians for the sake of the unfortunate linkage to what I call abrahamic mythology, from which eventually metastasized into levitical propaganda, which was then wrapped around Jesus, all eclipsed by the extinction of all those ppl and their BS circa 70 AD, only to be resurrected by nomads from Khazaria with no relationship whatsoever to the extinct ppl, they merely adopting the levitical text to justify usury. 

It is an impressive scam, that is for sure, to adopt a set of myths, and based on that alone, eventually leverage it into total control of government, banking, media, education and the judicial system. In fact, this 'jew' cancer is so deep, and so pervasive, to an ordinary person they simply cannot grasp the full extent of it, and the facts being so overwhelmingly supportive of a total takeover of the west, few can actually get themselves to believe it.

The trojan horse that let the 'jew' in was the Christian religion, and the book the Christian is instructed to take as 'Gods word', which, based on the text, is saturated with its central protagonist, Jesus, being intimately linked to the levitical myths, with many references linking Jesus to them, either by contrived and impossible to verify genealogies, or some unverified fact in the tale about Jesus as having been 'foretold' by some unverifiable text penned by the levites ~500 years earlier - even though, as a matter of fact, NOBODY knows where Jesus came from, or who he was. Still, with the neatly packaged narrative, and now, modernly, 'judaizing' Jesus, the Christians were an easy mark to play on for 'sympathy' from a Christian world, because without the support of the Christian world in the west (which no longer exists - thanks to the 'jew'), the wicked 'leaders' the 'jew' relied on never could have pulled off what they did. Given that these 'leaders' were also easy prey for the very aggressive initial zionist/juden bankster cancer cells, either by blackmail, threats, extortions or bribes, or what have you, 'leaders' with ZERO morality, themselves being far afield from anything principally Christian, these 'leaders', who peddled the myth to their gullible and ignorant Christian 'citizens', found the promotion of their new zionist overlords' agenda (circa 1903, et seq) to the Christian world in the west at large a very easy sale.

The downfall of the west began at its peak in and around 1790, because that was right about the time these nasty 'jews' began their ascent. The 'jew', as you infer, only brought to the world wars, chaos, mayhem, disease, calamity and confusion. It is part of their code, found in their talmud and kabbalah, the purpose of which is to destroy the world around them, to subjugate everything underneath them, because they have decided they are the masters of the world and everyone else is just a low animal, meant only to service them, but for no other purpose, and surely not deserving of any particular civil rights.

The 'jew' conspiracy has been carefully documented by countless sources. I have posted many myself, as have others here at ZH. The trick is to focus on the facts, and de-link from the religious sphere, because the way you go about it the apparent solution is to move from one evil to another, assuming that being led and directed by myths, socially, economically and politically is an evil thing. It's not Jesus' fault a fraud religion was spun up around his legacy. Even in the narrative itself we find kernals of truth that indicate Jesus as a person, wherever he came from, had nothing at all to do with the levitical sham. Given the manifest evil of what by now can be seen by all with eyes to see what the 'jew' has done to the world, one would be hard pressed to find any way to tie Jesus to the diabolicism to all things 'jew', as expressly delineated in the 'jew' quite un-holy books, the talmud and kabbalah, Jesus, the anti-thesis to the 'jew' by word and deed.

I am sure by the day I die, the world will continue to be in the grip of these old myths, there won't be any Christian leaders to get together and gut their 'bible' of all the myths, impossibilities, and logical fallacies, especially all the ones that tie Jesus to the levitical myth. Even in that 'new' testament of theirs, it does say one cannot get foul water and pure water from the same fountain. Based on my experience, I can attest first hand there is a lot more to this Jesus than meets the eye. There is a powerful, liberating spirit behind it, a spirit strong enough to topple all governments and liberate the individual so endowed to achieve great things on their own. It is my view that very early on, it became not only quite obvious but known that this was a fact, and given the threat to the established gloomy and sinister world order, the snakes with the material power moved in and contrived 'holy' books to attempt to control, diminish and if possible, neutralize the effect of that spiritual force. I just don't know enough to know exactly who was in on delivering to the Christian world this 'holy' book that by its text (with no supporting facts) intimately tied Jesus to the levitical myths, and by now, by extension modernly to the 'jew', but I suspect some 'jew' was there from the start, might have been this 'Paul' character, or some 'jew' at court of the princes and kings when the final edits were being completed and decisions made about what would be known as the 'Christian' bible.

Despite that mystery, to me, at least, the effect of the narrative is as clear as the sun in the sky on a sunny day, and we all know by now who got the upper hand as a result of it - the 'jew'.

In reply to by PrivetHedge

Expendable Container inosent Wed, 06/13/2018 - 14:57 Permalink

I have to disagree as I checked that website and learnt a lot from the articles- just at a time I was reading and researching said topics elsewhere (having eventually outgrown my atheism belief system).

"they (the world wars) could not have been started by the 'jew' state misnamed israhell, because it came into existence after both of those wars were concluded"

Incorrect because a Jewish state had to be planned long before it actually was achieved, of course! These agendas take time and many steps to achieve.

Moreover the first world war was necessary to get Palestine. How? The British were losing the war and the Jewish Zionists made a deal to 'get America into the war' provided Britain would agree to 'give' the Jews could get a part of Palestine as a homeland (which was not Britain's to give!). This deal was agreed and that is why America entered WWI. (Its on the record - The Balfour Declaration, confirmed in writing and appropriately addressed to Lord Rothschild himself).

WWII was used to progress the first step into total Zionist takeover of Palestine. Its all been exposed by Jewish elite insider Benjamin Freedman, associate of 7 US Presidents, here:


and his speech, here

The semitic Palestinian people have been in Palestine/Canaan for 7,000 years.

In reply to by inosent

Expendable Container PrivetHedge Wed, 06/13/2018 - 13:59 Permalink

Moreover, ignore the author of this article "Dear White Men" recommending Richard Dawkins book, folks! Dawkins obviously doesn't even believe in his book himself.

Richard Dawkins believes in the New Age Movement - a Theosophical (admitted Lucifer worshipers) psy-op war against traditional Christian culture. He refuses to consider the possibility that a Supreme Mind, God (Yahweh) created all but he will gladly consider superior aliens came here and created our human life!

He totally contradicts his book that our genes evolved from primordial slime and actually considers the possibility of Intelligent Design BUT because he himself is an atheist, then for that reason, he is left with no other alternative but the far more absurd fantasy that has absolutely no scientific evidence, 'superior beings from outer space' theory intelligent design as our creators. But who created 'them' then?

By the way, there is no 'gene' for self-conscious awareness of 'aliveness'. Yet we are That!

Listen to him here:

In reply to by PrivetHedge

JohnG MoreSun Tue, 06/12/2018 - 18:51 Permalink

This is the best thing to do in warfare.  Burden your enemy with casualties that must be treated and cared for.  The merely dead you can just leave.  Shoot to wound, taking the enemy combatant out, but leaving the burden on the rest of the enemies resources.

Straight out of The Art of War. 

Now you know why the US Military uses relatively small caliber weapons.  5.56mm tumbles, creating a devastating wound.  Smart.

In reply to by MoreSun

A Sentinel JohnG Tue, 06/12/2018 - 22:55 Permalink

The point of the .223 was exactly to wound rather than to kill. The ak is designed to kill.

What you’re saying is actually documented in the decisions regarding the military’s adoption of the ar style gun.

Here’s a problem I have with the article: the opposite of the far left (sjw’s) is NOT the far right. The far right, at least as commonly understood, is characterized by national socialism. That’s still socialism.

 I say that the opposite of the far left is radical liberty (not radical freedom - there’s a big difference that’s completely lost on people these days as they have become completely ignorant about Christianity.)  Bill of rights stuff — that’s the opposite of sjws. Free speech, religious liberty, property ownership.. the whole kit and kiboodle down to amendment 10 = local first (which they hate as much as they hate us.)

In reply to by JohnG

Burticus A Sentinel Wed, 06/13/2018 - 15:11 Permalink

Actually, the political spectrum goes from 100% (totalitarian) gubbermint (Mao's China, Stalin's Russia, Hitler's Germany) to 0% gubbermint or "anarchy" (which void is always quickly filled by a political oligarchy that promises safety).

These days, virtually NOBODY is on the extreme right, calling for anarchy.  In fact, very few people (except on ZH) are even in the political center, advocating government limited only to protecting its citizens' inalienable rights from others (STOP!).

Watch the professionally-produced JBS video "Overview of America" on YouTube to fit the missing pieces into your puzzle.  It explains the various political & economic systems and how they interact.

Preview:  The Free Enterprise economic system can only function under the rule of law in a Republic.  Fascist, Socialist & Communist ECONOMIC systems always operate under a political oligarchy (rule by the elite few), the most common form of gubbermint throughout history and today.

In reply to by A Sentinel

Trogdor JohnG Wed, 06/13/2018 - 00:04 Permalink

"5.56mm tumbles, creating a devastating wound."

Mmmm - not so much.  The Army experimented with rounds that did, but the modern 5.56 doesn't tumble.  It's main "threat" is it's velocity which creates hydrostatic shock and therefore can damage organs that aren't actually "hit" by the projectile.  Problem is that past about 400 yards, you get a lot of "ice picking" with the  5.56 - where the round just punches through - very little cavitation - it's no longer moving fast enough to do hydrostatic damage. 


In reply to by JohnG

El Vaquero Trogdor Wed, 06/13/2018 - 15:03 Permalink

The 55gr and the 77gr projectiles don't tumble.  They tend to fragment.  The 62gr can fragment, but not nearly as reliably.  Fragmenting means that all, or most of the kenetic energy gets dumped into whatever or whomever you're shooting, and very quickly.  If the bullet frags inside the chest cavity, this is devastating.  I killed an elk several years ago with an '06 that fragged in her chest and she folded faster than the I-35 bridge.  OTOH, if it frags before it gets to the vitals, it may not damage them. 


The ice picking you are talking about is when the bullet is no longer traveling fast enough to fragment. 

In reply to by Trogdor

Count Cherep Trogdor Wed, 06/13/2018 - 19:28 Permalink

There is this round:

Israeli snipers use illegal butterfly bullets on unarmed Palestinians

April 27, 2018

A report last week from Doctors Without Borders/MSF physicians & medics who are treating the injured at the Great Return March in Gaza said, “Half of the more than 500 patients we have admitted in our clinics have injuries where the bullet has literally destroyed tissue after having pulverized the bone.” Doctors say they have seen no bullet injuries comparable since the seven-week Israeli bombing & artillery siege of Gaza in 2014. The reason for the severity of injuries is that Israeli snipers are using internationally banned butterfly bullets. But Israel knows its chances of being censured or prosecuted by the International Criminal Court are almost nil or will be after the fact.

Doctors report that exit wounds can be the size of a fist. The wounds cause massive tissue damage; can cause a range of diseases, including sepsis, gangrene, osteomyelitis; require complex surgical operations; may lead to amputation; & will cause permanent & serious disability. There is one unconfirmed report of 21 cases of limb amputation in Gaza since the Great Return March began on March 30th.


Edit: What else could be expected from the heirs of the Bolsheviks?

Crimes of the Bolsheviks


In reply to by Trogdor

Quantify JohnG Wed, 06/13/2018 - 08:52 Permalink

Maybe in certain circumstances in war. But the best thing to do is demoralize your enemy. If you can kill him from a UAV which he never see's, and just watches as his comrade turned to red goo that is preferable. Take the will to fight or attack away from them. Kill them while they run, while they walk, while they sleep.

In reply to by JohnG

Expendable Container King of Ruperts Land Tue, 06/12/2018 - 19:51 Permalink

I like this article even though the author avoids revealing who is behind this cultural marxist war against the White race.

Let's take note of the elephant in the room. There is a war against Whites in all White majority nations to 'multiculturalise' them to miscegenation - to 'do away with whiteness' - by flooding each nation with only non-White young males, and its being instigated by 'We Jews' according to American/Israeli Barbara Lerner Spectre (herself interfering with ethnic-European Swedes' right to exist).

White males were targeted using the useful idiots, the university indoctrinated cultural marxist feminazis, and all forms of media including 'entertainment', to falsely and maliciously demonize and demoralise our males. Why? The Kalergi Plan requires miscegenation to genocide the White Race who are a threat to the Zionist World Dictatorship. (Crazy, I know, but that's the agenda.)

The most beautiful, diverse women in the world are the White Race (look at the photo above!) so promoting their beauty must be destroyed. Just part of the War Against Whites.

Every race has a right to exist as God's unique creation, including the White race.



and still falling. There is a War Against the White Race.

In reply to by King of Ruperts Land

NidStyles Enoughalready Tue, 06/12/2018 - 23:45 Permalink

The entirety of the Western power structure is behind it.

Even corporate powers are using their ability to deny employment to force this bullshit. Look at where they are forcing the decent white men to? Trucking, what happens to truckers? They spend the majority of their life driving away from any white females, which leaves them vulnerable to other groups that otherwise wouldn’t have a chance with them. 

On campuses they force white men to either turn into degenerates or date outside their race. If you don’t they tell everyone your gay.

In reply to by Enoughalready

Trogdor Expendable Container Wed, 06/13/2018 - 00:08 Permalink

You'll also notice that almost every picture you see of a "couple" any more is a black man and a white woman - I rarely see an all-white couple, and I don't remember seeing a black woman and a white man.

The Kalergi plan calls for the destruction of the White Race - and Jewish Bolshevism/Communism requires the destruction of all objective beauty - hence our "Art Museums" are filled with absolute shit - both figuratively and literally. 

It's cultural destruction 101.

In reply to by Expendable Container

NidStyles Trogdor Wed, 06/13/2018 - 00:48 Permalink

Right foot left foot march of control against chaos. Control is destruction of objective beauty and the spirit of people. 


Entire races and groups of people will be wiped out if this dichotomy is allowed to continue. 


Bad enough that we have corporations like ATT doing work for the cartels and NSA, but now we see them actually conspiring to genocide the very people that pay their wages.

In reply to by Trogdor

Expendable Container Trogdor Wed, 06/13/2018 - 13:17 Permalink

The White males have been a disappointment to the anti-White race genociders such as Jewish Harvard Professor Noel Ignatiev (listen to him below) because they in the main have remained consistent in their preference for women of their own race. So British royalty have used one of their own White males to 'set an example' and make it 'cool' to marry outside your own White race. Expect to see this couple, this 'team', promoted 'everywhere' in the mainstream media.

Fact: Almost NO rapes in the official statistics are White males upon non-White women.

1) Jewish Harvard Professor Noel Ignatiev states here that he wants

White people genocided. I guess if you are Jewish its not 'hate speech'

and okay to push this agenda. (just 40seconds):

2) Jewess Barbara Lerner Spectre says 'we Jews' are behind the Muslim

invasion of Europe as Europe must no longer be White. Listen to her arrogance right here: (1 min)

In reply to by Trogdor

Count Cherep Benjamin123 Wed, 06/13/2018 - 21:05 Permalink

Benjamin, I know you are Jewish, and that you live in Venezuela. I lived there until approximately thirty years ago. I got out while the getting was good. I feel sorry for the good friends I left behind.

Had I known you back then (if you were there at the time), we may have been friends. We may have been enemies.

I hope we are all amenable to reason (which you may be). I do not hate anyone because of their indoctrination. I do not endorse, advocate or promote the genocide of any group of people. If any group of people advocates the enslavement and slaughter of the "others" due to the teachings of their "holy books", they should be held accountable.


In reply to by Benjamin123

Snaffew gmrpeabody Tue, 06/12/2018 - 22:46 Permalink

the result of societal and media pressure claiming that white people are racist will not in the least bit help curb racism....ultimately it will cultivate racism as the whites will feel singled out as being bad and resent the fact that they are viewed as the oppressors.  This is no way to facilitate change.  Tribalism is rampant from affluent white suburbia all the way to every race and ethnicity living in segregated communities in the big cities--Little Italy, Chinatown, all black blocks, middle eastern hoods, etc.  If you want change---move out of your element and assimilate, change will come by naturally mixing the population within close proximity of each other.  And for god's sake, respect your neighbors, maintain your yard and property, don't drink on a couch in your front yard and maybe your affluent neighbors won't move out when you move in. 

In reply to by gmrpeabody

Expendable Container Snaffew Wed, 06/13/2018 - 14:16 Permalink

The psy-op weaponised word "RACIST" is just code for anti-White. "Diversity" and "multiculturalism" are code for White Genocide and 'racist' is used against Whites to self-censor and especially those who dare have the audacity to fight back against the genocide of the race. ONLY all ethnic-European nations are being indoctrinated to 'multiculturalism' (miscegenation). Jewish Harvard Professor Noel Ignatiev calls for the extinction of all Whites: (40secs)

God created diverse unique races and it is natural to prefer to be with your own race, your own people, said world boxing champion Black, Muhammed Ali, to White race traitor Michael Parkinson (who was promoting miscegenation) as he was actually called by Ali, and I agree with him:

"They are all birds, but blue birds live with blue birds, eagles with eagles etc."

In reply to by Snaffew