The "Hitler Of South Africa" Tells White People, He Won't Kill Them...Yet!

Authored by Simon Black via,

Earlier this week while most of the world was transfixed on the World Cup, the Trump/Kim handshake, or a multitude of other sundry events, Julius Malema, aka the Hitler of South Africa, was busy telling white people in his country that he’s not going wage genocide against them. Yet.

In an interview with TRT World News published this week, Malema said, “We have not called for the killing of white people. At least for now. I can’t guarantee the future.”

When the reporter mentioned that some people might view these remarks as a call to genocide, Malema responded, “Crybabies. Crybabies,” but later warned white South Africans that “the masses are on board” for “an un-led revolution and anarchy”.

Malema is a prominent politician in South Africa and at the forefront of his country’s movement to confiscate land from white property owners and redistribute it to the country’s black population.

No actual specifics about the plan have been revealed, of course.

So even if someone thinks this land grab is social justice, it’s at least reasonable to acknowledge the massive corruption that plagues South Africa’s government.

And presuming that a multi-billion dollar expropriation wouldn’t be fraught with graft is just plain naive.

There has also been zero acknowledgement that forced exprorpriation of private property would cause a wave of defaults on real estate mortgages, triggering a massive banking crisis and unforgiving recession.

South Africa already has a prime example about the economic consequences: Zimbabwe’s own land expropriation plunged that country into an economic cataclysm spanning two decades.

Yet these all seem to be irrelevant details.

Malema even went so far as to downplay Zimbabwe’s economic catastrophe, saying “You cannot [measure] the Zimbawean revolution based on the capitalist definition.”

I’m not sure what Marxist definition he’s using to measure success.

But we do know that two decades after land redistribution in Zimbabwe (which used to be considered the breadbasket of southern Africa), more than a quarter of the population is in danger of starving to death.

So even by the most basic metrics, Zimbabwe’s policies have been a total failure. Copying them is tantamount to suicide.

It’s truly astonishing that someone so dangerous and out of touch has been able to rise to power. And even more astonishing how quickly it’s happened.

A decade ago few people had heard of Malema. Now he commands millions and grows more powerful each day.

Swift, radical changes like this are common around the world, and throughout history.

In 1913, just a few years before the Russian Revolution, the Bolsheviks were a tiny group of radicals. Four years later they had taken over the entire country.

In 1928, the Nazi party was an obscure joke, winning a mere 2.6% of the votes in the national election that year.

Not even five years later, Adolf Hitler was German chancellor and had been awarded supreme power by the Enabling Act of 1933.

Point is, the world can change very quickly.

That’s why I’ve long been a strong advocate for having a Plan B.

It’s great to maintain a positive outlook and remain hopeful for the future. I certainly do. But sometimes circumstances don’t turn out like we hope.

Sometimes a tyrant rises to power. Sometimes financial markets crash overnight. Sometimes the most unexpected outcomes become reality.

Acknowledging these possibilities doesn’t make you a pessimist or an alarmist.

Rather, it’s rational and prudent to take basic, sensible steps to protect what you care about most, and what you’ve worked so hard to achieve.

For example, if you keep 100% of your wealth and investments domiciled in the same country where you live, you’re taking on unnecessary risk… especially if your home country is heavily indebted and legendary for civil asset forfeiture and frivolous lawsuits.

One sensible tactic would be to consider moving at least a small portion of your wealth to a different jurisdiction known for strong asset protection laws.

Another idea– some people may be surprised to discover that they’re eligible for citizenship in another country due to some long-lost ancestor.

Ireland, Poland, Italy, Spain, and a number of other countries all have laws making it possible for descendents of their nationals to become citizens.

And a second passport is a great asset . It ensures that, no matter what happens, you’ll always have another option… to travel, live, work, invest, do business, and bring your family.

That’s the whole point of a Plan B. You might not ever need it. But if you can prudently reduce your risk at minimal cost, there’s absolutely no downwide in having one. It just makes sense.

And to continue learning how to ensure you thrive no matter what happens next in the world, I encourage you to download our free Perfect Plan B Guide.


Expendable Container Government nee… Fri, 06/15/2018 - 19:50 Permalink

Black Communist South African leader Julius Malema  - who proposed to parliament the stealing of White owned land without compensation, illegal both nationally and internationally, just admitted that all Blacks in South Africa are foreigners - it was not their land:


In reply to by Government nee…

fleur de lis wadalt Fri, 06/15/2018 - 22:06 Permalink

Why are any whites still in South Africa?

They should have been long since gone. 

There is no point in appealing to Western nations -- they are hypnotized with multiculturalism and see South African whites as inherently evil, so they will drag out the immigration process during which time the SA whites will be murdered.

Best bet for South African whites is Eastern Europe and Russia -- at least they and their farming skills will be put to work right away.

Waiting for things to get better is a death wish. 

In reply to by wadalt

BarkingCat fleur de lis Fri, 06/15/2018 - 22:25 Permalink

I agree with you. They could easily be accommodated between Russia, Poland, and Ukraine taking decent numbers and then Czech Republic, Slovakia and Belarus taking smaller numbers. 

Even Austria might be welcoming to them.


Or alternatively all the white South Africans could take 25% of the country and move there.

Then defend it with lethal force.

In reply to by fleur de lis

LiteBeeer BarkingCat Fri, 06/15/2018 - 23:21 Permalink

Useful idiots promoting the lies of the enemy. The globalist fake Jews are not ordinary Jews in Israel.

It's the Papacy/Edom/anti-Christ against Christianity in South Africa.

Roman Empire crucified Jesus.

Papacy persecuted European Christians.

Papacy manufactured Islam to hunt down Jews and Christians.

Wake up and smell the coffee. Blacks are communists, ruled by the King of Vatican.

In reply to by BarkingCat

Expendable Container LiteBeeer Sat, 06/16/2018 - 09:11 Permalink

We need to look above the battle ground and focus on the manipulator controllers of all wars, all national intrigues amongst all nations. Proof:

The international Money Power 'got rid of White rule' in South Africa (and Zimbabwe) and their Puppets are.......


"Who Is LORD ROBIN RENWICK? South African ANC Black President Ramaphosa & EFF Black Communist Leader Julius Malema's HANDLER":


The role of South African ANC Black President Cyril Ramaphosa, (a former mineworkers’ union leader) was on Lonmin’s executive board at the time. He urged government ministers to come down hard on the “criminal” workers. 34 striking miners were shot dead by security forces:


In reply to by LiteBeeer

fleur de lis BarkingCat Sat, 06/16/2018 - 09:10 Permalink

There is no point in the whites staying.

The rayciss card is far too valuable to Western globalists and third world losers alike.

It is the only word that can effectively control whites, so they will never do anything like applying it equally.

If the whites organize to fight back in any way, the UNsters and all its parasitic members will do the impossible and for once unanimously agree on a policy -- although that would be the destruction of the whites.

Arms dealers would make a fortune by flooding the South African market with weapons.

The whites would be killed off faster and with better weapons.

They would be lab rats to see how the weapons work in the field against an opponent willing to fight back.

Maybe just for testing the weapons dealers would send the whites a different set of weapons just to see how they measure up against the other weapons, then adjust accordingly.

South Africa is a lost cause.

It does not matter what the whites built or farmed. 

It's over, the South Africa of the past is gone and a version of Middle Eastern violence and tyranny is on the horizon.

The tables have turned and it is all in the hands of angry, violent, third world losers.

They are confiscating because they think that they are smart, but even with that everything is going wrong, so they need a scapegoat.

Being labeled a scapegoat is a very dangerous thing and that is exactly where the whites are.

Things in South Africa will deteriorate and the whites will be murdered, and things will continue to deteriorate and a civil war will ensue, and things will deteriorate even faster and a famine will follow, whereupon the white nations will provide food.

At that point there will be no whites left in South Africa, and the place will look like Thunderdome.

Any whites that are not in some other country will be dead where they grew up.


In reply to by BarkingCat

Expendable Container fleur de lis Sat, 06/16/2018 - 09:20 Permalink

"Things in South Africa will deteriorate and the whites will be murdered, and things will continue to deteriorate and a civil war will ensue"

Be warned:

Rhodesia yesterday, South Africa today, the rest of the White West next.

All White nations are being flooded with non-White (young males), then will come their whole extended families. All ethnic-European nations will become MINORITIES in their own nations by the 2040's already.

To all those in power everywhere "SILENCE MEANS CONSENT"

so make noise



In reply to by fleur de lis

MK ULTRA Alpha cesar Sat, 06/16/2018 - 01:04 Permalink

The white population is over 5 million and the black population is over 45 million, another 3 million others, Indians and Asians. The military can field around 80,000 troops, 15% white. The last active militia, the commandos which were made up of whites was disbanded around ten years ago. The main national security problem has been preventing the massive waves of illegal immigrants from poor countries. The same problem South Africa has always had since it's beginning.

If the whites fight, then they will be fighting against the South African military.

Around 2 million whites are of military age, if armed, which most are, then a protracted war of attrition would run the whole gamut, it would cause a famine for the black population.

A race war could be won, but at a cost of around one million whites and over 20 million blacks killed from war and starvation.

The population numbers are not the same as Rhodesia, the transformation into Zimbabwe. A long process of repeated waves of whites leaving, culminating in the national farm confiscations. South Africa didn't have this and it was a relatively  peaceful and lasting transition until now.

Paraguay has been a destination for some whites, return to Europe, Australian immigration, many routes for years, and a general scattering of South African whites all over the world. The land owning farm and ranch whites stayed because of land ownership, not from any patriotic loyalty or monetary need, thus we may see an armed struggle in South Africa as whites with land holdings defend their land and their families.

The whites in South Africa haven't been worn down like what happened in Zimbabwe, this allowed the later and final confiscation of white owned lands. The South African whites know what happened in Zimbabwe and this may be a driver of a civil war.

The connection to the land, could be enough to set this off.

In reply to by cesar

jin187 MK ULTRA Alpha Sat, 06/16/2018 - 01:14 Permalink

I can't wait for the MSM to start pumping the news full of pictures of the evil whites committing genocide, just to avoid giving back that land they stole.

Let's be honest here.  In a bubble, I would take the white farmers at 3 to 1, but you KNOW the cocksuckers at the UN will say it's all the whites fault, while supplying, training, and supporting the blacks with spec ops.  It'll end up being those 2 million farmers vs 2 billion shithole dwellers and friends, just like Yugoslavia.  The UN tanks will roll in to help until the farmers start losing, then they will pull out, and turn a blind eye once the victorious blacks start committing genocide.

In reply to by MK ULTRA Alpha

Expendable Container MK ULTRA Alpha Sat, 06/16/2018 - 10:29 Permalink

Honest Black South African Academic speaks the truth on anti-White racism:
by Juju Mkize a Top Black Academic At the University Of Cape Town.

It includes the following, quote:

“This is the lie that is getting really old:-

'South Africans are psychologically sick as a result of violence inflicted upon the majority of the country’s people during the apartheid era', President Jacob Zuma.

"The history of black South Africans has always been that of violence, death and destruction – NOT inflicted upon them by white people in this country.

Shaka Zulu, during his 10-year reign butchered more than 2 million black people in South Africa, not counting the deaths during mass tribal migrations to escape his armies.

He had his warriors clubbed to death upon the merest sign of weakness. He neither took a legal wife nor fathered a son, for fear that his heir would plot against him, and had his concubines executed if he discovered they were pregnant.

When his mother died, he massacred thousands of his subjects so their families would mourn along with him. Shaka retained his throne through the worst kind of sheer terror, vast mass executions, torture and mindless butchery.

His brother, Dingane, was no better. He took power after the assassination of Shaka and started his reign by butchering those loyal to Shaka.That, amongst many other horror stories of black-on-black violence, is the history of Black South Africa…..

During the Apartheid era, from 1948 to 1994, the average life expectancy of black South Africans had risen to 64 years, on par with Europe’s average life expectancy. Infant death rates had by been reduced from 174 to 55 infant deaths per thousand…….

It ends:

“…More than 400 000 people have been murdered in South Africa under ANC rule.

The past 20 years have been the most violent in the history of this country since the death of Shaka Zulu…and NONE of it has anything to do with WHITE people or APARTHEID… but I guess if you repeat the lie often enough foreigners actually start believing the drivel coming from your mouth, Mr. Uneducated President !!!

Unfortunately people from all over the world believe the lies you have spread and wrongly blame the Whites for Racism!" (end quotes excerpt from Mkize)

By: Juju Mkize”

In reply to by MK ULTRA Alpha

fleur de lis cesar Sat, 06/16/2018 - 09:21 Permalink

The Eastern European nations are actually still recovering from the two (central banker funded) world wars followed by years of Bolshevik abnormalities, so it would be to their benefit to bring the SA whites to their farmlands.

Forget the UN -- it is just a clubhouse with a lot of tax money to burn.

They couldn't even agree to stop attacking Syria, they are doing absolutely nothing for the disaster in Yemen, they stood by as Libya was obliterated for nothing, they are parasites.

All they are good for is wasting time on the Israeli-Palestinian issue which will never be solved unless the Swamp and Tel Aviv come to some agreement behind closed doors.

It does not matter what the UNsters think about it, they have no say in the matter although they have convinced themselves and the MSM that they are important.

They do not lift a finger for any real disasters -- they want to be a part of the most glamorous issues, like climate change, resources, population control, borders, restitution, etc.


In reply to by cesar

fleur de lis Clogheen Sat, 06/16/2018 - 09:29 Permalink

Better they stay alive and start with nothing in a new land.

It has been done since the dawn of time, and we see it happening every day.

The problem is that they are whites in the middle of the valuable rayciss paradigm and all its power,  so they cannot appeal on the usual refugee grounds.

If they stay they will be murdered, Rand or no Rand.

The Rand won't do them any good at this point other than passage out.

Eastern Europe is their best bet -- Australia and New Zealand are both hypnotized by the multiculturalism lie, and they are kept in line by the threat of the "rayciss" label. 

Western European nations cannot even protect themselves from their wild Islamic house guests from hell, or someone might call them the terrifying word "rayciss."

Better their own European women and children get molested, attacked, raped, and or killed by the wild Islamics than man up and face the fake control word "rayciss."

The socially terrifying and highly effective but fake control word "rayciss" is enough to stop the most heavily armed police officer or serviceman stone dead in his tracks for fear of a label.

The work "rayciss" has a very real hypnotic effect on its users and believers, and very real powers of destruction on any naysayers, so there is no way our slave masters would put it at risk just for South African whites.

Why would they care about them when they can use "rayciss" to control the whole of the Western world.

So Western Europe is a non-option since they would only be getting more of the same in a sophisticated but warped world of rayciss name calling.

And not that it matters now, but the whites with assets should have left a long time ago and taken their assets with them.

They simply could not accept that the place would spiral into a third world pit, and so they held onto  hope.

Now their only asset is their lives and it seems like they are still holding onto hope in spite of the veiled threat aimed at them.



In reply to by Clogheen

fleur de lis southpaw47 Sat, 06/16/2018 - 10:32 Permalink

There is nothing to fight for.

This would be a real race war and it would get very ugly quickly. 

At that point it would be impossible to get them out.

The whites would be left to the whims of their killers because Western nations are more concerned with fake "rayciss" labels than transferring an industrious and assimilable population elsewhere.

In reply to by southpaw47

Expendable Container The Grim Teacher Sat, 06/16/2018 - 10:09 Permalink

"How do I donate money to arm the whites?"

The suidlanders do not buy arms - moreover there are questions being raised about the leaderships' authenticity and non-accountability of donations. The fundraiser is pals with the ANC President Ramaphosa's extended family ie with the Enemy, and even lived in a outdoor room on their property. I smell a scam, sadly. discernment required

In reply to by The Grim Teacher

Sudden Debt Squid-puppets … Sat, 06/16/2018 - 09:15 Permalink

The blacks didn't turn stupid overnight.

they are sheep in need of a strong hand to guide them.

Give them Africa and led them build it like they want to. 

Ship all American blacks who want that same world to Africa also.

And let them kill each other how it will eventually turn out.


I was against colonialisme before but now I understand why the whites who build that nation handled them like children with a strong hand. 

In reply to by Squid-puppets …

The Ram JimmyJones Sat, 06/16/2018 - 08:48 Permalink

Exactly.  And that's why the blacks in South Africa will starve when the white farmers are gone.  Of course, the UN food trucks will soon arrive to feed them mush for some time, and the black South Africans can all sit in there refugee camps where photos will be taken and broad casted on western television showing the 'poor' blacks with flies all over them, begging for 'white' money to feed them.  Pathetic!

In reply to by JimmyJones