One-Third Of Voters Think Civil War "Likely Soon" While 59% Say Anti-Trump Liberals Will Resort To Violence

A shocking 31% of voters say it's likely that the United States will experience a second civil war over the next five years, according to a new Rasmussen poll.

Breaking it down by race, 44% of blacks think a second civil war is likely in the next five years, while 28% of whites and 36% of other minority voters are similarly concerned.

Other highlights:

  • While 31% of voters say civil war is "likely" in the next five years, 11% say it's "Very Likely"

  • 59% of respondents are concerned that those opposed to Trump will resort to violence

  • 37% of Democrats and 32% of Republicans fear that a second civil war is imminent

  • Voters who believe the nation is divided has jumped from 50% before Trump's inauguration to 55% 

  • 42% of voters say the country is headed in the right direction - a figure which ran in the mid-to upper 20% range for most weeks during the last year of Obama's presidency

  • 51% of voters blame Trump for his poor relationship with the media, however only 40% think it's possible for the president to do anything the media will approve of. 

  • 51% of voters agree with Wisconsin Democratic gubernatorial candidate Matt Flynn, who said that his party is "pickled in identity politics and victimology." 

Given the spate of violence directed towards Trump supporters which began during the 2016 election which has most recently manifested itself in the form of stalking, public shaming and threatening Trump officials, it's easy to see how nearly 1/3 of voters think civil war is on the horizon. There are also scores of leftist hate groups roaming around looking for a fight, as well documented by Far Left Watch.

Remember these charming incidents? (there are hundreds)

Cheesecake Factory Employees Attack Black Man For Wearing MAGA Hat

Capitol Police Arrested Male Dem Operative For Assaulting Female Trump Admin Official

Trump supporter ‘brutally attacked’ in D.C. restaurant

NY: Danish tourist mugged at knifepoint over MAGA hat

Black Trump Supporter Spit On For Being a Black Man Wearing ‘MAGA’ Hat

MN: Conservative Students Say They Have Been ‘Violently Threatened’ at St. Olaf College

Chicago teens kidnap and torture a Trump supporter while they live stream from Facebook

Then there are the "fake hate" stories coming predominantly from the left...

And watch out conservatives... they're 'training'



TedFarr Wed, 06/27/2018 - 19:31 Permalink

ZeroHedge sounds too much like Faux News, always putting down liberals and promoting conservatives.

What happened to independent thinking?

IridiumRebel TedFarr Wed, 06/27/2018 - 19:33 Permalink

Go attack an aide. Isn’t that what you’re supposed to do, proglodyte?

There will be no major “war”. Just some city BS and “terrorism”. That’s about it. Where I live in SC, my district voted yesterday. Of the ballots, 192 Republican ballots and 4 Democrat ballots. Let the cities burn. 

....for everything else there’s the second amendment.  

In reply to by TedFarr

Fish Gone Bad gmrpeabody Wed, 06/27/2018 - 19:43 Permalink

There is sooooooo very much money to be made in rewards for finding the traitors.  $1000 for ratting out each of the local thugs.  The claimant will need to submit a form with photographic proof, name and address of the traitor, but soon enough, everyone will get rich off of finding who the local traitors are.  It will be the newest installment of The Purge.

In reply to by gmrpeabody

gregga777 wadalt Wed, 06/27/2018 - 21:47 Permalink

As a former US Marine I'd like to offer some information to the Democrats and their militant wing, Antifa. The following are just facts. 

From Viet Nam and onwards the US Marine has been the deadliest infantryman ever deployed to a battlefield in world history. Marines are programmed, conditioned, using sophisticated psychologcal techniques, to see his opponents on the battlefield as merely targets, not human beings, just targets deserving of at least a double tap. As shown in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere, his opponents cannot stand against him on the battlefield and has to resort to using IEDs and VBIEDs in order to stand any kind of chance in combat. I seriously doubt that Antifa and the Democrats are going to get much support from former and active Marines. They also tend to be programmed to support the Constitution against all enemies foreign or domestic. I doubt that Antifa and the like will stand much chance in battle against Marines. But I suppose that they can always give it a shot before getting a double tap themselves. 

In reply to by wadalt

SybilDefense UndergroundPost Thu, 06/28/2018 - 13:38 Permalink

Progressives can't shoot.  Thier fingers are to slimy from sticking them up each others ass n such.  Best to carry sani-wipes in your bug out bag.  You will be picking up lots of discarded weapons as they run away to their safe space (if they can still walk).  You'll want to be sure the LBGQT+/-(?) Squad didn't booby trap it with AIDS virus goo.  Just like a women to resort to poison, and these emotionally imbalanced left all behave like women in mass menses.

In reply to by UndergroundPost

Endgame Napoleon E.F. Mutton Wed, 06/27/2018 - 20:21 Permalink

The original Civil War started with a succession attempt, and there are states in the USA with leftist sucessionist movements, claiming that parts of the USA belong to Mexico.

Since any white person who challenges anything a leftist with a skin-pigmentation-focused cause says is silenced as a racist, there are scenarios where the lawless law might side with those attaching the label “racist” to anyone seeking to preserve the Union, as Lincoln did.

After all, we have seen extreme examples of racial politics overriding anything and everything, including the most serious areas of the law, especially in states with sanctuary cities, like CA, which let the illegal alien who killed Kate Steinle off scott free. 

With so many above-racism workplaces, staffed with 80 to 90% racial minorities (and other unfairnesses) directed at current generations of whites who had nothing to do with past racial inequities suffered by the grandparents or great grandparents of [some] of these minorities, there are scenarios where whites might group in certain areas, pursuing the same type of goals. 

It is crazy to weaken the country in that manner, letting it break down into smaller, harder-to-defend units.

But if the globalists cannot have their kumbaya-technocrat paradise, with a constant supply of servants for their dual-high-earner palaces streaming in from Third World countries, buoyed by welfare for womb productivity, with most of the native-born population reduced to near poverty, they are going to stir up constant agitation over fake injustices that were resolved in many ways 150 years ago and in full 50 years ago.    

In reply to by E.F. Mutton

wisehiney gmrpeabody Wed, 06/27/2018 - 22:49 Permalink

Drove thru the countryside today.

By his decorated ancient stone.

Under a far, far and wide, lively pink,

And deathly purple,


Lord, Great, Great Grandad.

Who lost his arm in defense of Richmond.

I am certain that I will soon be asking for your oversight.

As I have to open up a extra large size.

Can of Whoop Ass.

They drew first blood.

In reply to by gmrpeabody

Endgame Napoleon Bill of Rights Wed, 06/27/2018 - 21:06 Permalink

Like other workers, police can form crony groups that do not perform the job with professionalism, but good luck working in a dangerous area of a city without the police. Some of them will go out of their way to patrol areas where workers are in dangerous situations. 

Snowflakes think a march—surrounded by tons of fellow marchers who will disperse to coffee shops and restaurants after the trendy, holier-than-thou social gathering—is as risky as working in a store alone late at night, counting down a lot of cash under florescent lights in a dangerous area of a city.

Look, we marched arm-in-arm with our college friends and thousands of other liberals in a high-crime area of a city! It was just like Woodstock!

Those idyllic “working families” do not seem as harmless when you are counting down cash after a long day’s work in a job that does not pay enough to cover rent, even though you have a bachelor’s degree and 4 licenses and meet their d*****d quotas every month. 

Say a young, scruffy guy peers into the window all day long, sticking his nose right up to the glass, as you wait on customers, opening the cash drawer with all of that money, time after time. Say are a small woman, working alone so that a momma can enjoy her daily, libertine amount of above-firing absenteeism.

You do not call the police. You do not want to be regarded as a racist, and besides, what has he done besides looking right at your cash drawer, time and time again?

Time for self-righteous snowflakes to put themselves at risk for little economic reward, counting down the cash late at night, knowing that they have to walk alone to their car, which is parked far away from the door as the company requires to clear parking spaces for customers. 

Time for snowflakes to do that, knowing that there have been gunpoint robberies in two other stores in this company and in other businesses in the strip mall.

Race-baiting liberals WOULD NEVER worry about the possibility of that peering-in-the-window guy, returning to the store late at night when they were doing the financial close-out, counting down thousands in cash. 

You can call your dad in such a situation, and he might even drive up there. But hey, many people in that situation have no one to call— the police. 

Funny how liberal snowflakes can imagine what it must be like to be in the shoes of a starving African 8,000 miles away, but they have no capacity to imagine themselves in far more common circumstances in their own country. 

It would never cross their white, non-racist minds to call the police, but funny thing, it does cross the minds of Black employees in that situation. They are just as scared as white employees and express it openly, with zero fear of being called a racist. 

In fact, Black people are THE most concerned to give advice—smart advice—on the best way to avoid being harmed in real, dangerous situations.  

But I have also seen Black, female managers call the police on harmless, Black people, like an elderly man, just getting out of the heat, chatting with employees. 

That manager was not thinking about racial loyalty to a fellow Black person. She regarded the loitering as something that might reduce the store’s sales numbers, lowering her bonus. All the white salesgirls—conscious of political correctness, while at the same recognizing that there was no danger in the case of this funny old man—did not want the police called in that case. But the Black manager did. 

Snowflakum show their lack of life experience in their attitudes. I understand why, in that I had that attitude for many years, but it just does not align with reality. 


In reply to by Bill of Rights