Trump Says Scandal Plagued Scott Pruitt Has Resigned From The EPA

The Scott Pruitt saga is finally over: moments ago president Trump tweeted that he has accepted the resignation embattled EPA administrator Scott Pruitt, adding that "within the Agency Scott has done an outstanding job, and I will always be thankful to him for this." 

Trump also said that the EPA's deputy administrator, Andrew Wheeler, who was confirmed by the Senate in April, will assume duties as the acting Administrator of the EPA on Monday.

Trump concluded that he has "no doubt that Andy will continue on with our great and lasting EPA agenda. We have made tremendous progress and the future of the EPA is very bright!"


Pruitt has been engulfed in numerous high-profile scandals and under fire by both parties in recent months regarding spending taxpayer money for travel and security, his close relationships with lobbyists and industry and allegations he used government resources and staff for personal gain, among other controversies.  According to The Hill, he is facing more than a federal dozen investigations over the controversies, including from the EPA’s Office of Inspector General, the U.S. Office of Special Counsel and the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

Trump had expressed confidence in the embattled EPA chief as recently as June.  “Scott Pruitt is doing a great job within the walls of the EPA. I mean, we're setting records,” Trump said June 8, adding, “I'm not saying that he’s blameless, but we'll see what happens.”

But Pruitt had been losing the confidence of top White House officials and career staffers at the agency, and many of his closest aides left as the scandals grew.
 
“The president feels as though Scott Pruitt has done a really good job with deregulating the government, to allow for a thriving economy, that’s important to him, but these things matter to the president as well, and he’s looking into those,” Deputy White House Press Secretary Hogan Gidley told reporters July 3.

The most serious of Pruitt's scandals started earlier this year, following revelations that he flew first-class nearly exclusive while traveling on the taxpayers’ dime — costing at least $105,000 in his first year on the job — and that he had paid just $50 for each night he spent at the Capitol Hill condo owned by Vicki Hart, whose husband, J. Steven Hart, was chairman of lobbying firm Williams & Jensen.

Pruitt has defended much of the security spending as a necessary step, saying that he has faced an unprecedented number of threats, a contention that lawmakers have disputed. As for other scandals, Pruitt has largely blamed the missteps on staff, though conceded he may have been able to do more to stop them.

“Some of the areas of criticism are frankly areas where processes at the agency were not properly instituted to prevent certain abuses from happen,” he said in a May 16 Senate hearing.

“There have been decisions over the last or so 16 months that, as I look back on those decisions, I would not make the same decisions again.”

* * *

According to CAP Action (via Medium.com), there are now nineteen official open investigations on Pruitt’s actions, even after only a year in office.

To help monitor these ongoing investigations, this site will be tracking and updating the status of each. We will be updating this page as new investigations are opened or open ones are completed, so check back frequently for updates.

Open Investigations*

EPA Inspector General Investigations:

1. Inspector General (IG) investigation to explore the frequency, cost, and extent of Pruitt’s travel: On August 28, 2017, the EPA IG’s Office announcedthat it would be opening an investigation into the frequency of Pruitt’s travels to Oklahoma. The investigation was also intended to determine “whether EPA policies and procedures are sufficiently designed to prevent fraud, waste and abuse with the Administrator’s travel that included trips to Oklahoma.” The probe was expandedin January 2018 to include Pruitt’s travels through the end of 2017, including to Morocco, a trip which cost $100,000.

2. IG investigation into Pruitt’s meeting with an industry group: EPA IG opened an investigation in December 2017 to analyze Pruitt’s April 2017 meeting with a coal mining industry group, the National Mining Association. Reportedly, Pruitt urged association members in the meeting to request that President Trump pull the U.S. out of the Paris climate deal. Democrats from the House Energy and Commerce Committee released a letter from EPA IG Arthur Elkins Jr. confirming the review of the meeting.

3. IG investigation into Pruitt’s spending on a secure phone boothIn response to a request from House Oversight Committee Ranking Member Frank Pallone, the EPA IG in December 2017 opened an investigation into how the agency decided to spend “more than $25,000 installing a secure, soundproof communications booth” for Pruitt’s office. Since the start of the investigation, new spending details have been released indicating that the booth actually cost closer to $43,000. In a hearing before the House Energy and Commerce Committee, Pruitt claimed that he had no knowledge of the booth’s cost during its construction process, but rather that his staff had signed off on it.

4. IG investigation into Pruitt’s use of Safe Drinking Water Act hiring authorityIn January 2018, the EPA IG’s Office began an investigation into “the Office of the Administrator’s use of its authority to fill administratively determined positions created pursuant to the Safe Drinking Water Act Amendment of 1978.” Pruitt or his staff had used this specialized authority, intended for hiring experts quickly, to hire a number of political staff for his personal office.

5. IG investigation over questionable spending on Pruitt’s security detail:In April 2018, it was reported that the EPA IG was conducting a previously undisclosed probe into “questionable spending by [Pruitt’s] swollen security detail.” The team tasked with protecting Pruitt had been accruing expenses upward of $3 million from salary, overtime, and travel expenses, far morethan Pruitt’s predecessors.

6. IG investigation to audit compliance with Trump’s 2-For-1 order:In April 2018, the EPA IG’s office opened an investigation into the agency’s compliance with Trump’s executive order that directed agencies to retire two regulations for an new regulation issued.

7. IG investigation into Pruitt’s conduct in office:In April 2018, Congressman Ted Lieu and Don Beyer released an EPA IG letter to the public that confirmed his office was reviewing Pruitt’s conduct while in office. This includes a look into Pruitt’s $50-a-night condo rental from a lobbyist, and the agency’s ex post facto ethics approval of the arrangement.

8. IG investigation into Pruitt’s use of security detail on personal trips to Disneyland and the Rose BowlAfter a request from Senator Whitehouse, the EPA IG office confirmed in April of 2018 that they were looking into Pruitt’s use of a taxpayer-funded security detail on vacation to Disneyland, the Rose Bowl, and on other personal trips.

9. IG investigation into Pruitt’s condo rentalSeparate from #7, the EPA IG’s office confirmed in April 2018 that they were reviewing Pruitt’s $50-a-night condo rental and lease. This was after Democrats from both the House and Senate called on the IG to review the arrangement, which was between Pruitt and the wife of a lobbyist with energy clients who had business before the EPA at the time Pruitt lived in the condo.

10. IG investigation into Pruitt’s use of multiple email accounts: EPA’s IG Arthur Elkins released a letter on May 15 saying his office would investigate whether Pruitt complied with EPA policy and federal law when using multiple email accounts, in response to a request from Democratic Senators Tom Carper (DE) and Jeff Merkley (OR). The investigation will also explore whether all of Pruitt’s accounts were searched in response to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests.

EPA Inspector General Reviews:

11. IG review of EPA political appointee Samantha Dravis’ employment recordsAfter it was brought to light that EPA political appointee Samantha Dravis may have been absent from the agency for a number of months between November and February of 2017–2018, the EPA IG confirmed that he would open a review into whether she had reported for work or not while still receiving compensation.

U.S. House Investigations:

12. House Oversight Committee investigation into Pruitt’s first class flights and spendingHouse Oversight Chairman Trey Gowdy began investigating Pruitt in February of 2018 for his many taxpayer-funded first class flights. In April, the committee expanded its review to cover ethical questions around Pruitt’s $50-a-night condo rental on Capitol Hill.

Executive Office of the President Investigations:

13. White House internal investigation of Pruitt’s behavior: In April 2018, the White House began a review of Pruitt’s actions generally, after reports surfaced about his below-market-rate condo rental from the wife of an energy lobbyist.

14. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) investigation into Pruitt’s soundproof phone boothThe White House’s OMB opened an investigation into Pruitt and his agency’s spending of more than $43,000 on a secure, private phone booth in Pruitt’s office. OMB Chief Mick Mulvaney announced this investigation after a Government Accountability Office (GAO) report found that Pruitt had violated the Anti-Deficiency Act with the phone booth spending.

Government Accountability Office (GAO) Investigations:

15. GAO investigation into Pruitt’s involvement in a video with an outside stakeholder groupIn November of 2017, the GAO began examining whether Pruitt violated legal provisions that prohibit lobbying and propaganda that uses agency resources when he appeared in a video produced by the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association. The video requested that the Association’s members submit comments to EPA on its Waters of the United States rule revision.

16. GAO investigation into Pruitt’s role in choosing members of Science Advisory BoardsAfter Pruitt essentially dissolved EPA’s Science Advisory Board and appointed a number of industry scientists instead, Senate Democrats requested that GAO open an investigation to examine Pruitt’s actions regarding the board more closely. The GAO accepted this request.

17. GAO investigation into EPA Tweet on Andrew Wheeler’s Confirmation:When Pruitt appeared in front of the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Interior and the Environment on May 16, 2018, Senator Udall asked GAO to review an April 13th tweet from the official EPA twitter account that included the phrase, “The Democrats couldn’t block the confirmation of environmental policy expert and former EPA staffer.” GAO has agreed to review the tweet given its partisan nature, to see if it violated laws against the use of government appropriations for publicity or propaganda.

U.S. Office of Special Counsel (OSC) Investigations:

18. OSC investigation into Pruitt’s potential retaliation against staff:The U.S. OSC, an independent investigative agency, is looking into whether Pruitt may have retaliated against EPA staffers questioning his excessive spending, and other decisions. As many as six EPA staffershave claimed that Pruitt has sidelined them after they questioned a spending or travel decision, either through demotions, reassignments or even firing.

And finally today (via The Daily Caller):

19: Two Democratic congressmen are seeking an investigation by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) into Scott Pruitt’s “secret” calendars, where he allegedly hid and altered records.

House Reps. Don Beyer (D-VA) and Ted Lieu (D-CA) wrote a letter to the EPA’s Inspector General on Thursday calling for the investigation into whether the actions of Pruitt’s office were in violation of the Federal Records Act.

Pruitt and his aides maintained the “secret” calendars and schedules in an effort to prevent controversial calls and meetings with industry representatives from becoming public, according to a report by CNN.

Pretty impressive - a rate of more than 1 per month since taking office.

Comments

Slaytheist Freeze These Thu, 07/05/2018 - 18:36 Permalink

I know you think that the world works the way you think it does, but it doesn't.  Do you have any experience working with inconceivably large human run and interconnected systems?  Ever negotiate with multiple agencies of government 'servants' to try to get some complex project done in your State?  No?  Then don't criticize what you don't understand.   Sometimes, you gotta surround yourselves with dirt, if you're doing the dirty work, and if you don't, you might just end up accidented or out of work.

I'm not fond of DT as a person, but I have no doubts that he's really trying to do something for us.   I'm under no delusion that it's for altruistic reasons, and if I had to guess, I'd offer that it's a legacy to his own ego.  But hey, I'm a pragmatist - I don't care about motive - just results.  I also don't care about feelings, or words/rhetoric, and frankly no one should.  Show me your work.  Show me what you did, and how it will help.  All else is propaganda, and spin. 

In reply to by Freeze These

dirty fingernails curbjob Thu, 07/05/2018 - 17:04 Permalink

Anyone who can't recognize that Pruit was damaged goods and was far too willing to take "gifts" from those he was supposed to be regulating has gone full retarded partisan.  Just because you are getting shit does not mean youbare doing the right thing or Sessions is a member of fucking Justice League and is kicking so much ass *in the open*. Don't go stupid with "sealed indictments" arguements.

Also, don't start using Obama's corruption and ineptitude as an excuse. Is Trump's administration fixing things or more of the same? Justice, lawfullness, or more of the same?

In reply to by curbjob

Scanderbeg dirty fingernails Thu, 07/05/2018 - 19:27 Permalink

Pruitt was a political appointment and the E.P.A is a notoriously corrupt and dysfunctional agency but you're right. 

There's absolutely no excuse for this level of corruption, narcissism or incompetence and whatever Bongo and Hildabeast were doing isn't relevant. Trumps cabinet is loaded with atrocious people and this administration has done tons of idiotic shit from bombing Syria and shilling for Israel to tax cuts for wall street. 

But all that being said it was still worth it.

Not just for the lulz but as a massive fuck you to the faggots who run this country. Trump is pushing the overton window to the right and far better on the immigration issue than any president in generations. And just based on that issue and gun rights alone he was worth supporting. 

But again that doesn't excuse putting Goldman Sachs in charge, Bomber Bolton in the WH or having retards like Rick Perry or Pruitt running agencies. My assumption is most of these people are only getting these jobs because they are Trump loyalists. 

In reply to by dirty fingernails

BetterRalph dirty fingernails Thu, 07/05/2018 - 19:37 Permalink

the epa's become a proxy for the UN, the whining and targeting is directly from the progressive socialist democrats and greentard party. What they did to the epa is worse, it used to be about polution, but now it's about world control.  Makes the whole Pruit thing a joke in hindsight.  Go ahead add sprinkles to your ice cream, it's still going to melt.

In reply to by dirty fingernails

Benito_Camela IridiumRebel Thu, 07/05/2018 - 20:50 Permalink

Awww poor baby. Thinks the media actually accomplishes anything but keep us plebes at each others' throats.

 

You think Pruitt was doing a good job or not? B/C I'm sick to death of all this pussyfag pussyfooting around the actual issues. It comes down to whether you're for draining the swamp but ONLY when there's an "R" or a "D" after a guy's name - and be honest IR - You're a DYED IN THE WOOL NEOCON REPUBLICAN. 

In reply to by IridiumRebel

Posa Stan522 Thu, 07/05/2018 - 16:18 Permalink

Aside from living like a character from the ancien regime, Pruitt was doing the Koch Bros dirty work to poison our drinking water and fouling the air... A complete creep and scoundrel...

 

CO2 emissions are not pollution, but heavy metals in air and water ARE pollution... no one in his right mind would endorse such perfidy.

In reply to by Stan522

Posa artichoke Thu, 07/05/2018 - 22:59 Permalink

As long as coal plants use high end scrubbers I'm fine with them... the only choices we have to power the economy are fossil fuels and nuclear. I prefer nuclear... but whatever it takes.

Pruitt's sin, as stated, was to cut enforcement for clean air and water... even the Chinese get this... but I'm guessing the Libertarian Party isn't too big there.

In reply to by artichoke

vato poco Posa Fri, 07/06/2018 - 04:00 Permalink

"Pruitt's sin was to cut enforcement ... even the heathen chinee aren't THAT awful!"

uh-huh. and do the chinese have 50,000 environmental regulations? so arcane as to be incomprehensible; so numerous that many are the exact opposite of others? (but still enforceable with all the fuckin lawyers uncle sam can muster up)? 

do they do that too? no? why not?

In reply to by Posa

Benito_Camela BetterRalph Thu, 07/05/2018 - 20:54 Permalink

Allow me to translate your bullshit astroturf language for everyone else:

 

"I'm on the payroll of big energy to the detriment of many communities in this and other countries - AND/OR - I'm a military service member or active pensioner of the largest taxpayer funded social welfare make-work program in the world aka the U.S. "defense" department."

 

Amirite? One needn't be MARXIST or "GREEN" to call NEOCON warmonger "geopolitics" globalist state sanctioned crony capitalist bullshit when one sees it, right? Just because you vote "R" don't mean you're also not full of SHIT. 

In reply to by BetterRalph

Posa BetterRalph Thu, 07/05/2018 - 23:02 Permalink

I'm not a Green (far from it)... but I'm not suicidal either... I was around in the Fifties and remember how disgusting and obnoxious it was to get a face full of auto exhaust… in the cold weather it would hang on your clothes and skin…diesel exhaust from buses was especially pernicious… as late as the 80s European cars were still belching out fumes on folks in cafes… I think a few people at ZH need to experience the joys of the pre- Clean Air Act days...

In reply to by BetterRalph

Benito_Camela artichoke Thu, 07/05/2018 - 20:59 Permalink

HAHAHAHAHAH...You call $160,000 plane trips, super hardcore "security", special phone booths and the like "POLICY" moves? 

 

HAHAHAHAHAH...the guy was the EPITOME of "THE SWAMP"....GOOD RIDDANCE if you're REALLY genuinely in favor of Trump's larger agenda....or are you just a fucking stupid peon R/L tribalist idiot who only hates "libs" and allows his own side to abuse his own taxpayer money? 

 

Don't answer that - I already know you're in the second group. Fucking hypocrite. 

In reply to by artichoke