Headless Robespierre's Cautionary Tale For The 'Alt Left' Unleashed On America

Submitted by John Griffing,

America is on the cusp of something it has never truly experienced: mob rule.

To “feed” a mob, witch-hunts are essential. New enemies must be in constant supply to keep the mob moving. Problematically, witch-hunts never end well for the witch-hunters.

Just ask Maximilien Robespierre, one of the chief architects of the French Revolution and the infamous “Reign of Terror.”

It was 1794. Heads were rolling, literally, and “Madame la Guillotine” was more popular than ever. At first, the mob was content with the heads of King Louis XVI and Queen Marie Antoinette. The king bankrupted France by helping America win its independence with mountains of debt, all while a horrible famine ravaged the nation simultaneously. Many died of starvation. It was during the famine that the queen told her subjects, “Let them eat cake.”

With the king and queen gone, the mob's appetite grew. They now required the heads of the aristocracy.

After the aristocracy was gone, Robespierre’s Committee on Public Safety (a massive misnomer) began sending anyone and everyone to the Guillotine -- even other members of the committee itself -- in order to satisfy the appetite of the mob. Georges Danton, the other influential thinker behind the French revolution, was executed by the committee.

Royals lurked under every rock and behind every tree, and unsupported suspicion was the only thing needed to deprive a person of their head.

In the ultimate twist of irony, the mob eventually required Robespierre’s head.

The lesson? For mobs, it’s never enough. And communities that passively surrender to mob rule in the face of civil unrest are like those who feed a crocodile, hoping to be eaten last.

Replace the revolutionary French with the “alt left,” and a disturbing pattern emerges. With the violence perpetrated by the “alt left” reaching barbaric levels, it is time to stop tolerating lies about their motives.

The“alt left” is not against racism or white nationalism. They are for anarchy -- and that’s a big difference. In short, the “alt left” is a mindless mob.

And just like Robespierre’s “Reign of Terror,” the “alt left” mob may eventually accomplish its presumed objectiveforcibly removing President Donald Trump from office, one way or another. But that will likely not be enough to satisfy the moving target of "alt-left" bloodlust, because the stated objective is never the real objective.

For the mob, breaking stuff and hurting people (often for pay) is the real objective. And for Antifas, the ever-evolving “cause” is a facade to justify animal behavior unfit for a free and open society.

Sure, not all Democrats are Antifas, but all Antifas are undoubtedly Democrats. Consider that top Democrats -- many of them seasoned public servants -- now regularly incite violent riots and actively promote the president’s assassination.

Here's a list of 133 savage acts of documented violence (or incitement) by far-left Democrats against Trump supporters, Republicans and White House officials, including actor Peter Fonda's call to throw Trump's 11-year-old son Barron in a cage with pedophiles, and the latest example of outright assault against a person wearing a MAGA hat -- this time a young teenager.

The violence advocated by the far left makes them complicit in the breakdown of society and the subsequent rise of mob rule. And the advocates of mob violence are not just fringe radicals or a few nut-jobs. Their ranks also boast senior Democratic Party officials and members of former President Barack Obama's administration.

Only a week ago, California Democratic U.S. Rep. Maxine Waters openly called for the “harassment” and physical intimidation of Trump officials. Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer condemned Waters, but it must be remembered that last year he told New York state to pull police protection from First Lady Melania Trump and Barron. Democratic 2016 vice presidential candidate Tim Kaine called for riots in streets after Trump's victoryand was joined by former U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch, who also called for riots.

Former CIA Director John “Benghazi” Brennan -- a man who once voted for a Communist presidential candidate and may have converted to Islam -- twice called for a coup against Trump. Obama’s Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Rosa Brooks went as far as putting a plan for a military coup in writing around the same time CNN was running hypothetical "what if Trump was brutally murdered before the inauguration?" segments.

Democratic-aligned mainstream media and left-leaning entertainment icons are also guilty of perpetuating the rise of mob rule. Former MSNBC heavyweight Keith Olbermann begged foreign intelligence agencies to overthrow the U.S. government, and did not see the irony. More recently, the Washington Post's Jennifer Rubin asked mobs to harass Trump and White House officials for "life."

And what about entertainers? Well, they are getting a lot less entertaining, and a lot more felonious. Bill Maher joked that Ronald Reagan shooter John Hinckley, Jr. should be released, so that he can kill Trump, and only a few months ago, comedienne Kathy Griffin photographed herself holding a life-like wax model of Trump’s severed head in the style of ISIS. Last week, far-left filmmaker Michael Moore said he would lead a citizen army of "one million people" to "surround" Washington, D.C. in order to prevent lawful Supreme Court nominations by Trump. Famous musicians are also promoting violence. Madonna said she is "thinking" of bombing the White House to kill Trump, Snoop Dog released a music video depicting Trump’s murder and singer John Legend applauded Rep. Maxine Waters for advocating violence, while subsequently making similar appeals himself.

By any measure, Democrats now support mob ruleEvery single time a Democrat advocates violence in place of discussion, they are supporting mob rule, not democracy, and they should be treated as potentially hostile.

When someone - anyone - starts a conversation with an assumption that the other person is evil, there can be no further conversation. Moreover, logical debate is not possible with violent mobs in ninja costumes viciously attacking those with whom they politically disagree.

History repeats itself, especially when mobs burn the pages on which it is written, and destroy monuments to the events history records. Tragically, Democrats only pay attention to history when it involves Nazis, and mostly fictional Nazis.

Robespierre speaks from the grave: mobs are never good, especially for the mobs.


fleur de lis boattrash Mon, 07/09/2018 - 07:48 Permalink

First of all the French Takedown was planned by the Rothschilds and Free Masons.

France was on the menu ever since the English takedown 100 years earlier.

And 100 after France, the European continent was roiled with various conflicts culminating in a massive war and the Russian, Ottoman, and Hapsburg takedowns.

Four Empires lasting centuries were taken down in a 4 years.

See a pattern?

WW2 was only a clean up for them.

It has been 100 since the Rus., Ott., Haps., takedowns, and running into 100 after WW2, so it looks like we are/were next.

The French people were subjected to the same kind of Antifa tactics we see today, and yes it was engineered and paid for.

Same for the others.

The famines were engineered too, and the reliable, long establish deliveries from the countryside to various towns were held up or diverted, so without communication, panic set in.

In all cases there were .gov psychopaths willing to work with central bankers toward the destruction of their own nations, and of course malcontents on the ground will to to anything to stick it to the ruler.

The nacent MSM in all cases distorted news and added to the carnage, just like their filthy spawn do today.

All wars are central banker wars.

In reply to by boattrash

Theosebes Goodfellow fleur de lis Mon, 07/09/2018 - 09:05 Permalink

~Sure, not all Democrats are Antifas, but all Antifas are undoubtedly Democrats. Consider that top Democrats -- many of them seasoned public servants -- now regularly incite violent riots and actively promote the president’s assassination.~

So what you're saying is that this is a leftist sickness. My vote says it's the koolaid. Let them try their "mob rule" in a red state and see how it goes over.

In reply to by fleur de lis

Free This Theosebes Goodfellow Mon, 07/09/2018 - 14:52 Permalink

Global Communism - when you boil all down to a thick gooey syrup! There are globalists in and around or govt and corporations, who would love nothing more than to enslave you!

Never give up your guns, your rights are important, especially your right to vote - throw that away and you have no say.

These globalists WANT us to fight each other, so they can take us over. That is why I rail against communists - even the deluded ones, I want them to THINK TWICE about taking to the streets with this pussy hat, open boarders, free shit revolution!

The masons were a good force at one time, until they were taken over by the likes of Albert Pike and the Illuminatti...now the rank and file have no idea how fucking evil that body is, doubt me all you want. I have been to hell and back following that outfit. Look no further than Aleister Crowley for their sickness. "Who would help a widow's son", my ass!

I will stand alone, if I fucking have to, shit!

Sic Semper Tyrannis

In reply to by Theosebes Goodfellow

dizzyfingers Hugh_Jorgan Mon, 07/09/2018 - 11:37 Permalink

The king of France took advantage of the Revolutionary war to help (toward the very end of the Revolution) the enemy (America) of his oldest enemy, France. That did not bankrupt France: the king's payments to the endless hangers-on surrounding France's crown did that. Read SEX WITH KINGS: it's very clear that the king's problem was his plethora of paid "friends". The last straw for the king was the king's increase in taxes on salt (which is required for human and animal life) during the devastation of the crop failures and ruin via rain-induced ergot fungus (think Joan of Arc and witch hunts) during the Little Ice Age (circa 1376-1820). Authors often ignore weather as a source of historical events, good, bad, or crazy.

In reply to by Hugh_Jorgan

Bemused Observer Gatto Mon, 07/09/2018 - 10:20 Permalink

The writer misused the word, as is too common these days. What he meant to say was 'chaos'. Anarchy simply means the absence of government...this was the original meaning. What happens in that anarchy is something different, and what we have seen is the violence and chaos that those calling themselves 'anarchists' have wrought. Thus, the word becomes associated in the public mind with chaos.

But all of those 'anarchists' were in fact promoting a different form of government, so they were not true anarchists at all. They just wanted to substitute their own form for the one prevailing at the time. 

Now, many people here don't think much of the Bible, but instead of seeing it as a religious book, try seeing it as an attempt by early writers to make important points. Perhaps these early writers were 'inspired' somehow, or maybe they were just a bit more astute than Jeremiah Six-pack, but there ARE some very sharp observations in there. You just have to dig them out from among all the 'begats' and other fluff.

A common 'thread' is the constant desire for people to have someone else tell them what to do. A normal human, absent mental disease, already knows that things like murder, theft, assault, etc are WRONG. That man does not NEED someone to write a law telling him not to do those things, and the problem with allowing that is that the 'someone' will not stop there, and will write MORE laws, and more, and more, until you end up with a Talmudic mess of 'Thou Shalt Not's' that bind men like slaves. True anarchy, the absence of such a human-created system of enslavement, is what God's plans for Man were after...it was the Hebrews that kept asking God to give them kings. And God basically kept trying to tell them no, you guys really don't NEED that, just do the few things I told you and you'll be fine.

But they kept at it, insisting, and God finally said, Fine, if that's what you want, go for it. But don't blame Me when things go horribly wrong, which of course they did. For a long, long time. 

Then we have Bible-part 2-The Jesus Years, aka the New Testament. Which is basically about a Jew named Jesus who tried to remind them of the original POINT behind all of those sacred writings, and got waxed by the authorities for doing so. Then his followers went and set up the SAME HUMAN-LED SYSTEMS THEIR JEWISH PREDECESSORS DID. Thus showing that they too, had missed the point.

Human 'leaders' are by nature corrupt, and should NEVER be placed in positions of authority over others. Humans are supposed to work together cooperatively, but this is something that takes time to work out. Impatient people don't want to wait, they want it NOW, so they try to take the shortcut of appointing kings who will ORDER things to be done. This of course requires that punishments be administered for non-compliance, etc, etc, and the whole ball gets rolling.

THAT was what the Bible stories are trying to tell us. But it is a scary concept, and so we call it anarchy and portray it as pure chaos, with mindless destruction and violence. No, we scream, we absolutely CANNOT give up our kings, or things will be WORSE than they are now!

It never occurs to us that the reason things ARE as bad as they are now is because we WON'T give up our kings.

In reply to by Gatto

blindfaith Bemused Observer Mon, 07/09/2018 - 13:22 Permalink

Indeed, thus is so.  However, it doesn't work either unless you can enlighten me on where and when.  Be it cavemen, a tribe in Africa, 'Kibbutz' or 'flower people commune' or the hills are alive in Nepal, it fades to zero sooner or later.  If God or Jesus really wanted to make, or at least help to make it work, they missed the boat  Even a beehive has a Queen, so there seems to be a conflict between "God's Law" and Natures.  As I look around, it appears both are loosing ground.  Perhaps God and Jesus should have selected the 'pagans' as the ,so called (not), chosen people.  Since there were basically only two groups around in the old times, pagans and jews, there was a 50/50 chance of getting it right.

In reply to by Bemused Observer

NumberNone Dexter Morgan Mon, 07/09/2018 - 09:04 Permalink

You do understand that Trump wanted to pull out of Syria then suddenly the 'poison gas' was supposedly used by Assad (not) that caused an international shit storm.  Trump to appease the bloodlust bombed a mostly empty airfield and left his critics crying that he didn't do enough.  


Could he have done nothing...probably.  But he really didn't stand a chance against a non-stop barrage of dead and choking babies the MSM was willing to show every night as pressure for him to 'act' and keep troops in Syria.  Surprisingly his 'weak' action has not opened the door for more chemical attacks...despite the cries of the MSM. 

Since Trump's election the thin veil between conspiracy theory and reality of what's going on has been removed.  The reality that there is a grand alliance between the MIC, MSM, and Deep State is confirmed and it shows how sick this country has become.  The Left has proven itself easily manipulated and useful tools.  

In reply to by Dexter Morgan

any_mouse sheikurbootie Sun, 07/08/2018 - 23:37 Permalink

"The king bankrupted France by helping America win its independence with mountains of debt,"

"The king bankrupted..."?

The Parasites, the Moneylenders. They bankrupted France. Lending to finance a false event.

The American Revolution. Nobles and Peers of English Aristocracy rebelled against the King of England. Sure they did.

The colonies were corporate ventures from the beginning. Owned. The colonists were subjects of the corporate owners.

Still a corporate venture centuries later. Still Owned. Still subjects.

In reply to by sheikurbootie

HRH of Aquitaine 2.0 TeamDepends Sun, 07/08/2018 - 23:46 Permalink

I was hired to handle a stallion by that name. Hanoverian from Europe. Killed someone so they shipped him to the US. Fucker would try and pin you against a wall, kick, bite. I had to load and unload that SOB in a custom-built horse trailer that had bolts. Why? Before the custom trailer was built he had reached over the divide and ripped open the neck of a $80K show Arab. He was worth $250K and could breed so they simply beefed up the trailer.

You couldn't turn your back on that horse. Not for one second. I respected that horse. The owner? Not so much.

In reply to by TeamDepends

HRH of Aquitaine 2.0 RumpleShitzkin Mon, 07/09/2018 - 00:01 Permalink

Hahahaha. Yeah. Hard to kill a horse like that when the owners spent so much on it. He was a good mover, did Grand Prix level dressage. Beautiful mover but a bitch to handle.

Dressage is the one sport where you can compete as a man or a woman and the older the rider, and horse, the better you get.

This is freestyle dressage in Rio at the last Olympics, the winner: https://youtu.be/ch-QZ49WRTc

You don't see any obvious movements of her hands or legs or body. The end result is the result of decades in a horse barn and having legs and arms of steel.

In reply to by RumpleShitzkin