Protests Planned As Students Already Hate Trump's "Racist, Negative" SCOTUS Pick (Before It's Announced)

Update: President Trump has reportedly made his decision on the Supreme Court nomination.

*  *  *

This month, Justice Anthony Kennedy announced he would be retiring from the Supreme Court of the United States, giving President Trump an opportunity to nominate a potential replacement.  But, as Campus Reform's Cabot Phillips notes, instantly, Trump’s political opponents began questioning the credentials of those who were thought to be on his shortlist for the position.

The same sentiment was seen on social media from pundits and members of Congress alike -- but what would college students have to say about the matter? Did they have substantive reasons for not trusting the potential replacement, or were they simply set on opposing any Trump nominee? 

To find out, I headed to New York University to ask students what they thought about who Trump had chosen to replace Justice Kennedy.

Despite the fact that Trump’s decision was still days away from being finalized, students unanimously condemned Trump’s move, harshly criticizing the president’s nonexistent nominee.  

“He’s quite extreme in his views,” said one student of the fictitious Judge.

“I saw it all over the news, that he’s like racist,” another student added, referring to the announcement that hadn’t yet happened.

“I saw the new nominee is like racist, and he’s starting a new wave of something very negative, and I’m really scared about the future and what choices he will make,” another pupil added.

When asked if she’d seen the online coverage of the event, one faculty member described witnessing “outrage… as it should be.” 

What else did students have to say? Did anyone realize the decision had not yet been made? 

Watch the full video to find out:

But, it gets even better, as The Daily Caller reports that the left-wing group Refuse Fascism is planning a nation-wide protest Monday night after President Donald Trump reveals his Supreme Court nominee.

The protests will go on regardless of who Trump chooses, spanning 12 American cities — Los Angeles, San Francisco, Houston, Honolulu, Chicago, Cleveland, Boston, Philadelphia, New York City, Atlanta, Detroit, and Seattle, according to its website.

“The Trump/Pence Regime poses a catastrophic danger to humanity and the planet, and that it is our responsibility to drive them from power through non-violent protests that grow every day until our demand is met,” Refuse Fascism, founded after the 2016 election, stated on its site.

The Facebook event photo for Monday night shows a Ku Klux Klan hood on the generic justice figure.

The Chicago chapter’s event page is titled “Keep Abortion Legal – No Fascist Supreme Court.”

Comments

Stu Elsample stormcrow Mon, 07/09/2018 - 15:10 Permalink

The stupidity of the fools being interviewed says it all.

CW II is coming. The left must 'educate' their brown shirts to do the dirty work, and the training begins at preschool age. Those clueless 'SJW' saps don't know who or what they'll be fighting (dying) for, or what will hit them.

In reply to by stormcrow

ted41776 I woke up Mon, 07/09/2018 - 15:16 Permalink

are these the types of protests where armed masked thugs run around setting shit on fire and assaulting people while cops stand by and do nothing or are these the types of protests where a bunch of people peacefully gathered with signs are told to stay inside a designated first amendment zone while they have machine guns pointed at them? just another fucking day in banana republic

In reply to by I woke up

inosent Chris2 Mon, 07/09/2018 - 17:40 Permalink

I think the question ought to be exactly whose country is the united States anyway? Prior to the (((luciferian cult's))) immigration [READ INVASION] act back in 1965, first, nary a soul from south of the border was let in. One could argue, then, on that basis, prior to 1965 at least, the country did not belong to hispanic people, who were (and are) racially and culturally foreign to those of European ancestry.

And I am fairly certain pretty much nobody from the third world got in either. Immigration laws were very strict.

Of course, those laws were side-stepped by the (((luciferian cult))), who, when asked before a senate committee sometime between 1900 and 1910 (I have to check the year), given that immigration laws were race based, and those to whom had the land wanted to keep out foreign races for a long list of logical reasons, the 'jew' argued 'jew' was not a race, but that it was a religion, even though for other purposes they, when it is convenient to do so, argue the exact opposite.

So, based on the lie of the (((luciferian cult))) (no surprise there!) they weaseled around immigration laws and came in all cozy like in their trojan horse, cultural malware as it were.

And before the 'jew' deception as noted, the only other third worlders were the africans, which 'jew' slave traders brought, and to their everlasting shame, even the 'enlightened' founders purchased. But these were slaves and at least from a founding member's view they were not intended to have a stake in the nation.

In other words, the ppl whose country this is are the ones who are of direct European ancestry, because they are the type that can appropriately assimilate, in that their race and culture, and notions of the same are generally consistent (well WERE before the juden MSM warped it all to hell, causing an epidemic of insanity amongst at least 1/2 of the world's remaining and dwindling white population) with those who already arrived (Jamestown in the south; Salem in the North).

Some will cry and boo hoo about the 'indians', but the indians sparsely populated the continent, they had absolutely no concept of property rights, no system to define those rights, and no way to record a land claim. In other words, you had a few clueless people running around on a gazillion square miles of prime real estate. Then, someone comes along with a very precise concept of land rights, civil laws, how to define it all, transfer them, utilize the natural resources, develop infrastructure, etc.

Thus, the claim this is/was the indians land is, was, and always will be a joke.

This land belongs only to ppl who racially and culturally sync with it. Black ppl are like an albatross that had to be 'let in' because of the gross error to let them in in the first place. Sadly, that doesn't change the fact that black ppl racially and culturally (as a rule) do not sync, and really have no place here. They'd be much more comfortable in a more primitive cultural paradigm.

However, with every other third world POS, including the (((luciferians))), they can all get lost. At BEST al they are are guests, nothing more.

But here they come to my country, making demands on how my country should be, what sort of laws it should have, and making me pay for all their bulls-.

And THEN they call me a racist as if that gives them some morally superior advantage.

Well, third world, non-assimilating, good for nothing, whatever person, make sure to give me a call when my people invade your country, and start making the same demands and claims, telling you to speak in my language, to pay for my medical care, housing and education, to give me special advantages in employment and education while denying me the same, denouncing your leaders for not wanting to accede to my demands, and then fomenting riots when I don't get my way.

This is NOT your country, it never was, and never will be. This is NOT a 'nation of immigrants'. It is a nation built by a particular race of ppl, white ppl of European ancestry, not 'jew', not hispanic, not black, not asian. It is a country built and created for free white men, it was not intended for anybody else.

In other words, the claims of these sorts of ppl rings completely hollow. They are a 100% takeaway, and a completely divisive presence. The white ppl extended their hand, but we found out who the real racists are, the third world losers whose only goal is to impose their cultural crap on ours, and degrade it at the same time. They don't deserve to be accounted for.

In reply to by Chris2

Meat Bunny inosent Mon, 07/09/2018 - 20:03 Permalink

America is a piece of land filled with natural resources. It was taken over by a bunch of "ppl" who had no sense of sustainability or moral responsibility to take care of their own nest.

If the nest is big enough, you can shit all over in it for a couple of hundred years before it's wrecked.

My hat is off to these superior "ppl."

In reply to by inosent

inhibi Never One Roach Mon, 07/09/2018 - 16:29 Permalink

They must edit those video's out.

Then again, asking a college student is asking a high & possibly hung over, sex-driven, procrastinating, homework dodging 'adult'. When they say:

1) 'News' they mean the headlines they read on Snapchat/Twitter WHILE looking at their Tinder profiles. And we all know which they care about more.

2) 'Racist' they mean 'Republican'.

3) 'Trump' they mean 'Hitler'. 

4) 'Socialist' they mean 'Communist'.

5) 'Progressive' they mean 'Digressive'

6) 'White supremacist' they mean 'white guy'

In reply to by Never One Roach

FreedomWriter Looney Mon, 07/09/2018 - 16:31 Permalink

Looks like peak retardation has finally been achieved.

 

What if Trump nominated a Latino, pro-abortion, censorhip-friendly, trans-gender, communist judge? Would they still go out and protest? Could Trump change his mind afterwards? What would the founding fathers have done?

On second thought, don't answer that.... 

In reply to by Looney

chubbar Stu Elsample Mon, 07/09/2018 - 15:27 Permalink

Here's what is going on behind the scenes. We'd better pray that the SCOTUS pick is pro 2nd amendment, this shit is crazy.

http://www.investmentwatchblog.com/us-agrees-to-full-implementation-of-united-nations-gun-control-pact/

'While the United States is typically set apart from other countries when it comes to gun laws, a recent conference with the United Nations has raised major red flags, as the U.S. agreed to enact “full implementation” of an international agreement on gun control that will violate Americans’ constitutional rights by adding their personal information to a global database.

The Third Review Conference (RevCon) of the United Nations’ Program of Action (PoA) on Small Arms and Light Weapons was held in New York last week with a 2018 agreement, which states that its purpose is to serve as “a renewed commitment to prevent, combat and eradicate the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons in all its aspects.”

The city council in Boulder, Colorado, has followed suit by unanimously passing a ban on the sale and possession of assault weapons, high-capacity magazines and bump stocks, giving residents until July 15 to comply. Massachusetts and New Jersey have also passed statewide bans on bump stocks, and police were shocked to find that only a few people complied by turning in the newly illegal accessories.

On the national level, when gun control legislation was introduced in Congress last year, it came in the form of the Fix NICS Act, which was later rebranded as the STOP School Violence Act and signed into lawin March after it was quietly included in the 2018 Omnibus Appropriations bill. The legislation amends the agencies that have control over the National Instant Criminal Background Check System, which determines whether Americans are allowed to own guns.

As The Free Thought Project has reported, the changes to the NICS system—which received support from Democrats, Republicans, and even the NRA—put pressure on federal agencies and states to report as many names as possible, “making it only a matter of time before this list becomes so large that nearly any activity could serve to remove your Second Amendment rights.”

In reply to by Stu Elsample