Pepe Escobar: China's Silky Charming Of Arabia

Authored by Pepe Escobar via The Asia Times,

President Xi Jinping has promised more than $23 billion in loans and aid to Arab states, as Beijing ramps up ties with the Middle East; this includes aid for Palestine; Beijing foresees importing a whopping $8 trillion from Arab states up to 2025

Under the radar, away from World Cup frenzy and the merger and acquisition of Cristiano Ronaldo Inc. and Fiat, the eighth ministerial meeting of the China-Arab States Cooperation Forum (CASCF), established in 2004, sailed on in Beijing, hosted by President Xi Jinping.

Amid the torrential pledge of loans and aid, China committed to invest right across the Arab world in transportation infrastructure, oil and gas, finance, digital economy and artificial intelligence (AI).

Significantly, Beijing will offer $15 million in aid for Palestinian economic development, as well as $91 million distributed among Jordan, Lebanon, Syria and Yemen.

Aid and loan package

A China-Arab bank consortium will be set up, with a dedicated fund of $3 billion tied up with the financial aid and loan package.

Beijing also foresees importing a whopping $8 trillion from Arab states up to 2025.

Predictably, once again Xi fully connected the whole Arab world with the expansion of the New Silk Roads, or Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).

And careful to navigate the geopolitical minefield, he urged “relevant sides” to respect the international consensus in the Israel-Palestine confrontation, calling for justice.

That may indicate a gradual, but sure departure from trademark Chinese passive or reactive policy across the Arab world, focused exclusively on energy and political non-interference.

Xi is now openly tying up Chinese financial aid and deals with nations across the Global South to an overall economic development drive; the only roadmap to solve intractable political and religious conflict.

And that includes full respect of international deals. As much as the Arab world, Iran is in Southwest Asia. A day before the China-Arab forum, Premier Li Keqiang, in Berlin, was warning of “unforeseeable consequences” if the Iran nuclear deal, known as JCPOA, were to be discarded, as the Trump administration wants.

Four US demands to new Iraqi regime

Now compare the Chinese approach to the US strategy in Iraq – 15 years after Shock and Awe.

The US Ambassador in Baghdad, Douglas Silliman, met with all the leaders of the winning Shi’ite bloc and parties in the latest elections – from Haider al-Abadi to Ammar al-Hakim. Silliman delivered a unanimous package of demands to all of them, in an “offer you can’t refuse” style.

These are Washington’s four demands to recognize the next Iraqi Prime Minister:

  1. 30% of all the oil in Iraq should be American-controlled – and it’s up to the US do what it wants with it.

  2. Washington must have full access and control of Iraqi banks.

  3. All business and trade with Iran must cease right now.

  4. The Hashd al-Shaabi, known as People Mobilization Units (PMUs), instrumental in the victorious fight against Daesh (Islamic State), must be immediately disbanded.

This comes from a top Iraqi official present at all the meetings who told Asia Times sources what happened in these exact same words. 

Virtually no political factions in Iraq trust the US – be they Shi’ite, Sunni, Yazidis and even most Kurdish factions. But the problem is the overwhelming majority of Iraqi politicians are involved in massive corruption, and a substantial number believe they need American “protection”.

If the Iraqi population, for all their divisions, was entitled to have a say about these demands, there’s no evidence any would be approved.

US presence in Syria ‘illegal’

Meanwhile, in neighboring Syria, Beijing has already made sure it is positioning itself as a major actor in the nation’s reconstruction, alongside Iran and Russia. China sees Syria upgraded as a BRI node.

Now, couple that with a parliamentary report at the Bundestag in Berlin ruling that the US presence in Syria is illegal.

This means that for the leading EU nation, Damascus cannot possibly be characterized as a pariah anymore. The EU could be on the same wavelength as Russia, which is working with Iran and Turkey for a Syria solution in Astana, and China, which supports the Astana process. 

What next? The EU in Syria copying China’s policy for the Arab world?


wisehiney Wed, 07/11/2018 - 22:29 Permalink

America should send me.

What a fucking great diplomat/representative I would be.

Telling you ZH er's, I could save the fuckin world.

American Rock and Roll.

And or whisky.

And their drugs.

Quick and easy it would be.

Brazen Heist II cankles' server Thu, 07/12/2018 - 17:08 Permalink

Wrong. China doesn't append bullshit ideological conditions to their involvement. They respect the country and its government and work with them rather than trying to change them. Its America's constant need to regime change and mold governments to their whims that indicate its greatest weakness - unable to work with mutual respect. It would be a welcome change if the US government also did business like the Chinese do, minus all the stoopid arrogant bullshit.

In reply to by cankles' server

. . . _ _ _ . . . Wed, 07/11/2018 - 22:43 Permalink

"Significantly, Beijing will offer $15 million in aid for Palestinian economic development, as well as $91 million distributed among Jordan, Lebanon, Syria and Yemen."

Palestine, of all places. Take sides, much?

"Beijing foresees importing a whopping $8 trillion from Arab states up to 2025"

Stick a fork in the petro$.

McDuff71 Wed, 07/11/2018 - 23:15 Permalink, how long will their tap continue to run??...over-extension has been the ruin of many whom considered an Empire their due, and even worse for those that deigned to hold them ;)))...great theatre but we've seen this before many times over...

Vigilante Thu, 07/12/2018 - 01:01 Permalink

Import 8 trillion from arab states? ...that's over 1 trillion per year

Wtf could those imports be?

I can't believe China imports that much in oil/gas per year

desertboy Thu, 07/12/2018 - 02:57 Permalink

More lengthy accounts from un-named sources, and Beijing infommercials, from Pepe Escobar.

The cynicism toward US politics is appropriate, but then remarkably absent elsewhere in these analyses.

archie bird Thu, 07/12/2018 - 09:02 Permalink

What choice does Iraq have if they reject the 4 demands?  I would say NO to every one of them. 

US Oil demanding 30% of the action?  Where do they get off?

Putting a Rothschilds bank in Iraq? OH. HELL. NO!

Not playing nice with Iran? Why not? If it benefits both countries and the people?


Yeah...US is being its usually self, a hegemonic BULLY.  

Omen IV archie bird Thu, 07/12/2018 - 10:14 Permalink

If the Iraqi Nationalists give Russia /Iran / China access to build permanent bases within the country and declare them "Partners" as Assad did,  then the turnover of control is inevitable. The Shiites are already a majority. Despite the corrupt politicians, I dont think this will last.

The demands reminds one of "Assad must go" echo chamber

In reply to by archie bird