Soros-Linked Nonprofit Led By Clinton & Obama Alum Spending Millions To "Stop" Kavanaugh

Today's edition of "George Soros Meddles" is brought to you by ten-week-old political advocacy group Demand Justice - a Soros-linked organization which has pledged $5 million towards a "multi-platform" campaign to stop Judge Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation to the US Supreme Court.

Headed by former Clinton campaign press secretary Brian Fallon and longtime Obama aide Christopher Kang as chief counsel, Demand Justice was created and financed by nonprofit organization the "Sixteen Thirty Fund," which has received millions from the Open Society Policy Center (OSPC), according to the Daily Caller's Kevin Daley and Andrew Kerr.

As we reported two weeks ago, Demand Justice intends to fight "Trump's hateful vision for America" by opposing his Judicial picks across the country - including the Supreme Court.  

The campaign will feature television spots promoting embattled Democratic Senate incumbents in West Virginia, Indiana, and North Dakota, who face competitive Republican challengers this November.

They will also run ads in Maine and Alaska, urging GOP Sens. Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski to oppose the nomination. Collins and Murkowski are pro choice moderates who have broken with their party on Obamacare repeal and federal funding for Planned Parenthood. The spots urge the senators to protect abortion access by withholding support for nominees who oppose the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision. -Daily Caller

The Sixteen Thirty Fund collected some $2.2 million in contributions from the OSPC between 2012 and 2016 - while more recent records are not available. The OSPC, meanwhile, is virtually indistinct from Soros's Open Society Foundations (OSF), the 87-year-old's grant-giving and philanthropic network. 

The [Sixteen Thirty] Fund is largely financed by a handful of donors. Financial statements filed with state oversight officials in 2014 show just three contributors accounted for 70 percent — or some $11.5 million — of the Fund’s total donations and grant revenue. Disclosure forms filed with the same agency in 2016 present similar facts. Fewer than five donors gave $13.3 million to the Fund, representing 63 percent of their donations.

One of those donors is the OSPC. The Center’s tax forms show the Soros group gave hundreds of thousands of dollars to the Fund each year between 2012 and 2016, the last year in which records are publicly accessible. The Center gave the Fund $350,000 in 2012, $772,000 in 2013, $125,000 in 2014, $550,000 in 2015, and $481,483 in 2016. -Daily Caller

The Caller reports that the OSPC has no staff of its own - rather, Open Society Foundation employees are compensated for work done on OSPC efforts. 

“OSPC has no employees,” the form reads. “Employees of Open Society [Foundations], a related section 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization, perform services for OSPC. OSPC advances funds to Open Society [Foundations] for their services based on the time they spend on OSPC matters. Their compensation is determined by Open Society [Foundations], and is based on market comparability data and is documented in Open Society [Foundations’] records.”

The Sixteen Thirty Fund created Demand Justice in May of this year in order to counter a network of conservative advocacy groups which "advertise and organize around judicial confirmations," according to the Caller

Republicans have significantly outpaced Democrats in this space in recent years, given conservative voters’ sustained interest in the federal courts.

Executive director Brian Fallon told The New York Times that DJ hopes to “sensitize rank-and-file progressives to think of the courts as a venue for their activism and a way to advance the progressive agenda.” -Daily Caller

Hillary Clinton threw her support behind her former Press Secretary's new political machine in a late June tweet:

"Long after Donald Trump is no longer our President, his takeover of our courts will keep alive his hateful vision for America for decades to come," their website reads. "Trump’s judges are overwhelmingly white men. Many are not at all qualified for their posts. And they consistently hold extreme, right-wing views."

"If we truly want to stop Trump, we can’t surrender this fight." -Demand Justice

Since the Sixteen Thirty Fund serves as Demand Justice's fiscal sponsor, it doesn't submit its own tax returns or disclose its supporters. As such, beyond the Soros network's $2.2 million contribution to Sixteen Thirty over five years - it's difficult to determine how much money individual donors like Soros have channeled directly to Demand Justice since its inception ten weeks ago. 

The National Council of Nonprofits says that fiscal sponsors provide “fiduciary oversight, financial management, and other administrative services” for its dependents, like Demand Justice. As such, many grants or donations DJ receives are awarded by way of the Fund. Both organizations are based out of the same Washington, D.C., address.

Supporters can also give to DJ through ActBlue Civics, a major fundraising platform for leftwing causes.

Given this structure, it is difficult to know how much money individual donors like Soros have channeled to Demand Justice. Daily Caller

Meanwhile, Capital Research noted last month that "coupled with the fact that Fallon recently spoke at the Atlanta Conference of the Democracy Alliance, a shadowy network of left-leaning donors including George Soros, it is clear that Demand Justice could be well on its way to becoming something much bigger than the obscure nonprofit it is now. As a (c)(4), it is allowed to engage in unlimited lobbying. But it can also support or oppose candidates for election (as long as that activity isn’t the organization’s primary purpose, which currently means spending no more than 49 percent of expenditures on electioneering)."

And just like that, the newly formed, Soros-linked, Obama and Clinton alum operated nonprofit has sprung up with a $5 million "multi-platform effort" to prevent Judge Brett Kavanaugh's ascension to the US Supreme Court.


Lordflin TeamDepends Mon, 07/16/2018 - 08:17 Permalink

Glad to see this open war on whites... perhaps it will finally wake those who have any hope of being wakened...

There was a time I gave no thought to skin color... still don't really, as I recognize it as a cultural issue... and I sympathize with those of other races who share my values and yet find themselves staring across a widening gulf, as the... what do I call them, elites, TBTB, demonic scum... pound the racial issue day after day. The sound of it is deafening, drowning out almost any attempt at dialogue.

I don't want a race war... just a few of the above mentioned scum in line of sight...

In reply to by TeamDepends

Bastiat Lordflin Mon, 07/16/2018 - 08:49 Permalink

Identity politics, by its nature, creates political division along racial, ethnic, and cultural lines.  It ignites fear and anger, agitating and manipulation various groups to move them to controlled activism.  It is a major source of racism and sexism. It deliberately causes distress and conflict.  This is at the heart of "progressivism."  Actually it's not at the heart, it's just a strategy--at the heart is an insatiable lust for power over others.

In reply to by Lordflin

Theosebes Goodfellow Occams_Razor_Trader Mon, 07/16/2018 - 10:40 Permalink

~ Demand Justice - a Soros-linked organization which has pledged $5 million towards a "multi-platform" campaign to stop Judge Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation to the US Supreme Court.~

Hmmm. Five mil buys a lot of street protesters. And MSM lackeys. The only way to stop this is to arrest these phoney-baloney protesters and fine them $1500 each.

In reply to by Occams_Razor_Trader

gladih8r boattrash Mon, 07/16/2018 - 09:37 Permalink

Marxist fuckers like Soros and his shit-slurping minions never give up.  Even when their preordained candidate loses an election they just re-double their efforts. 

This is a Marxist jihad they have embarked on and they won't stop because it's "hopeless", they just get more creative and find another angle to work.  Soros pays the leftists through his NGOs. That's what they do for a living.  If we sit on our asses and do nothing they will turn every corner of the earth into a leftist shithole.  The hate is strong with them, their target is you.

Apologies for the doom and gloom but as long as this shit goes on unimpeded it will go on unimpeded....

In reply to by boattrash

MoreFreedom HopefulCynical Mon, 07/16/2018 - 13:42 Permalink

Executive director Brian Fallon told The New York Times that DJ hopes to “sensitize rank-and-file progressives to think of the courts as a venue for their activism and a way to advance the progressive agenda.” 

Whatever happened to "If you don't like the law, change it"?   And what happened to the idea that "judges interpret the law, not make it from the bench" because that's what legislatures are for, and judges aren't elected?  I learned all this in grade school.

Democrats do this because:

  • They don't want to try changing the law because that would cause them to lose more elections when voters see what they want while few pay attention to court rulings
  • They appoint partisan judges and the RINOs don't stop them because RINOs also want more government power
  • They'd prefer judges to change the law rather than interpret it
  • And when they hold the White House, they can choose to not enforce the law

It's abuse of government power and is contrary to the rule of law.  And it's helping them lose elections.

In reply to by HopefulCynical

VideoEng_NC Bastiat Mon, 07/16/2018 - 09:53 Permalink

Which is why most conservative folk, who just want to be left alone, are beginning to tire of this rhetoric & are more willing to act.  Liberalism & certain progressive values are one thing, coming after a group of people & willing to do "whatever" to achieve your goals is ultimately a death threat.  That's where the line gets crossed & people of all races are quickly seeing this reality as once "untouched" by progressive values are coming under scrutiny (Burrito truck in OR, NY school testing).  Your breakdown is spot on, nicely done.

In reply to by Bastiat

Karl Marxist VideoEng_NC Mon, 07/16/2018 - 10:01 Permalink

 Skin color exists because of what it took to survive in the evolution of man and cultures. Merit supersedes skin color but not to Soros who derides merit based on skin color as a game for profit. Talk about unqualified, he's a whitey who is the most unqualified to do a fucking thing because he produces nothing viable.

In reply to by VideoEng_NC

No Time for Fishing Karl Marxist Mon, 07/16/2018 - 10:38 Permalink

Racial differences exist because the races are genetically different and genetics is a major factor in intelligence, temperament, work ethic. All humans are the same species but we are not the same breed; just as all dogs are the same species but not the same breed. Just as different dog breeds posses differences in not only physical characteristics but intelligence, willingness to please, aggressiveness, task determination.... so do different breeds of humans. The difference in races is much greater than skin color. 

In reply to by Karl Marxist

lunaticfringe Bastiat Mon, 07/16/2018 - 10:03 Permalink

Ego. The false sense of identity that whispers, you are better than they are. You are smarter, faster, wiser. This is the single, common denominator in every leftist mind. They falsely believe they are better than you.

In other news, what's not to like?

Praised *dissent* in Roe
Criticized Roberts ruling on Obamacare
Says sitting POTUS can't be indicted/can fire special counsel whenever he wants
Opposes net neutrality
Opposes consumer bureau
Says assault weapon bans are unconstitutional

Holy shit! Someone disagrees with the statists in favor of the rule of law? Next thing you know, they'll try to indict people for breaking the law.

In reply to by Bastiat

Karl Marxist RagnarRedux Mon, 07/16/2018 - 09:57 Permalink

Race exists. Why should that define a person? Does it define the person or does the person define it? In life on a sentient level, one can choose to be, do and have. One can choose to be skin color as the importance. Or one can choose that skin color is merely a significance to all other dynamics of life and living life. Our God given right is to associate with whomever one chooses. Leftist communists work to force upon others those one would never wish to associate with by law and if one disagrees, one is severely punished. The rationale is .... because. It's a bullshit rationale because people and cultures are alive and prosperous to the degree they are left alone to flourish and prosper as they see fit, in the light of God's freedom. Force others in because of guilt on a global scale? Why didn't these others just tend to their own business first and foremost? Would would be a far better place if so.

In reply to by RagnarRedux

RagnarRedux Karl Marxist Mon, 07/16/2018 - 10:02 Permalink

Let me give you a clue, you don't choose your race or its physical & mental attributes. Race is absolutely biologically based, it is not simply a cultural construct and racial differences in aggregate matter most to society and the resultant culture. 

Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, And Confounding In Case-Control Association Studies

12% Of DNA Differs Amongst Human Races And Populations……

Deep Sequencing Identifies Ethnicity-Specific Bacterial Signatures In The Oral Microbiome

Biological Problems With Mixed-Race Families, Marriages Relationships & Adoptions…

Health And Behavior Risks Of Adolescents With Mixed-Race Identity

Biracial Asian Americans & Mental Health

Categorization Of Humans In Biomedical Research: Genes, Race And Disease

Reconstruction Of Human Evolutionary Tree Using Polymorphic Autosomal Microsatellites.

Genes May Cause Tumor Aggressiveness, Drug Resistance In African-American Prostate Cancer

Racial Differences And Other Risk Factors For Incidence And Progression Of Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Salisbury Eye Evaluation (SEE) Project.

MIT Technology Review: DNA Tests For IQ Are Coming

"Scientists have linked hundreds of genes to intelligence."…

Racial Average IQ Differences Are Largely Genetic…

Stefan Molyneux Expert Interview Series On Human Intelligence, Race And Behavior…

Blacks & Latinos Are TWICE (2X) As Likely As Whites To Have The MAOA-L Gene Variation Associated With Aggression, Violence, Crime And Sexual Abuse

"Black males are also 13.5 times more likely to have a rare version of the gene associated with “extreme violence and extreme aggression."………

In reply to by Karl Marxist

RagnarRedux Billy the Poet Mon, 07/16/2018 - 11:20 Permalink

A lone individual can be judged on their actions, but awareness of group characteristics and attributes is survival and just plain smart. Just because one apparent outlier grabs your egalitarian imagination, you don't simply ignore the 100 others who are not apparent outliers and display typical group behaviors. Nor do you promote integration and miscegenation with such an individual, simply because you find them agreeable. In navigating life we apply generalizations all the time, it's called inductive reasoning, and it's the foundation of science(scientific method). To ignore all the historical, scientific and empirical racial data available is beyond stupid, it's dangerous, on an individual level and a societal scale.

In reply to by Billy the Poet

Billy the Poet RagnarRedux Mon, 07/16/2018 - 11:38 Permalink

A lone individual can be judged on their actions, but awareness of group characteristics and attributes is survival and just plain smart


Are you implying that while an individual can be judged by his actions the members of a group should not be judged by their actions? Or is it true that members of a group can be judged by their individual choices in associating with a particular group involved in a specific activity?


egalitarian imagination


Judging an individual by his own actions is not the definition of egalitarianism. You imagined that.


Those who always judge a book by its cover limit their own opportunities. I prefer to avail myself of a wide variety of viewpoints. That being said, there's nothing wrong with in group loyalty. It's normal and natural to associate with those with whom you feel kinship. Mohammad Ali spoke strongly on the subject and not because he disliked white people and found fault with their genetics but rather because he loved black people.


"I want my kids to look like me!"



In reply to by RagnarRedux

RagnarRedux Billy the Poet Mon, 07/16/2018 - 11:50 Permalink

"Are you implying that while an individual can be judged by his actions the members of a group should not be judged by their actions?"

No, that would be you implying. I done stated an individual can be judged by their actions. 

"Judging an individual by his own actions is not the definition of egalitarianism. You imagined that."

Again, that would be you imagining I said that was a definition of egalitarianism.  

"Those who always judge a book by its cover limit their own opportunities."

Opportunity for what? I see racial awareness as an opportunity toward safety, survival, and essential to societal development and sustainability. See any black community in any geographical location on earth for an example of why.

In reply to by Billy the Poet

Billy the Poet RagnarRedux Mon, 07/16/2018 - 11:56 Permalink

No, that would be you implying

No, that would be me inferring.



I done stated an individual can be judged by their actions. 

And all groups are composed of individuals.

If the individuals in a specific group engage in a specific activity which concerns you then surely it's more practical to base your own response on the actions of the individuals in the group rather than the genetic make up of the individuals in a group.

For example, it makes sense to cross the street in order to avoid a group of individuals displaying thuggish behavior but it would be a waste of time to cross the street in order to avoid a choir filing out of a Baptist church.



Opportunity for what?

That which is lost on you is lost on you. I can provide no remedy.

In reply to by RagnarRedux

Karl Marxist RagnarRedux Mon, 07/16/2018 - 10:23 Permalink

Race is not paramount to self determinism. You're arguing against yourself -- that genetics has anything to do with one's choices which are made solely by the individual himself for whatever reason -- survival being the main reason. How does one survive in a violent culture? Be violent yourself to fit in. Your argument makes no mention of the impact of education on any "race," i.e., culture. At one time education transformed much of the world. Education in the forms of Buddhism and Christianity and to a large extent Islam who hosted one of the greatest centers of learning in the entire world. Communism (Soros, psychiatry) is all about degeneration, degradation that man is mud, cannot change, IQ will never change and genetics is all a man is, can't help himself because he's just mud, right?

In reply to by RagnarRedux