The Downside Case for Gold

The Downside Case for Gold 

Written by David Brady,CFA - Sprott Money News

Many traders have been complaining recently about the relentless fall in Gold—and rightfully so—seeing it lower every time they open their screens in the morning. Despite having already fallen ~$158 from its peak at 1369 in April, I am, as usual, seeing an increasing number of calls for Gold to fall below $1000 again. This seems to occur every time Gold falls to any extent, and this time is no different. With this in mind, I decided to take a look at the other side of Gold today, the case for further downside.

I am writing this article fully cognizant of the likelihood that this marks the low in Gold.

Gold has already fallen $158, as mentioned above. In prior cases where Gold has fallen ~95 or more, this is what followed… 

So despite all the doomsayers, it is reasonable to expect “at least” a healthy bounce soon.

Now let’s review the technical case… Suffice to say from the outset, it’s not pretty.


Gold has broken its uptrend dating back to the low in Dec 2015.

It has also broken its prior low in Dec’17 at ~1240.

The 200-day moving average is now sloping down again, which is bearish. But it did this in Dec 2016 also, just before Gold bottomed at 1124 and took off to 1362. It was also sloping down prior to its low in Dec 2015.

However, Gold is extremely oversold and positively divergent based on its Daily RSI and both MACDs, which would suggest that at least a healthy bounce is overdue. 

The weekly chart shows that Gold has smashed through its 200-week moving average, which is bearish. Gold would need to break and close above 1235 to negate this breakdown. 

However, the weekly RSI is also extremely oversold below 30, which also suggests at least a healthy rebound is pending.

Both MACDs are negative and falling fast, which is clearly bearish, but a gap has opened up between the MACD Line and its Signal that suggests at least a bounce is possible before lower again.

In summary, the technical picture is definitely bearish but perhaps too bearish, justifying a sizeable bounce after a $158 drop, which is reasonable based on such declines in the past. But even if we get such a bounce, like in the second half of 2015, we may not have seen the low just yet. 


Gold’s spot DSI hit a low of 7 on July 2, when it was at 1242. Its lowest level since it hit 4 on Dec 15, 2016, at 1124 and then rallied to 1362 from there.

Its 21-day moving average (“21DMA”) hit a low of 12.5 on July 2 also. The last time it was lower was also in Dec 2016, when it hit a low of 9.7. Prior to that, you have to go all the way back to Aug 2015, when it hit a low of 12.

Could the spot DSI go much lower? Obviously not. But it can hang around here for a while as price continues to fall.

Alternatively, using Aug, Oct, and Dec 2015 as a guide (see 2015 chart above), the 21DMA could be signalling a significant bounce here as it did from Aug to Oct 2015, before falling to a higher low in the 21DMA in Dec 2015 but at a lower price, i.e. a positively divergent lower low.

Sentiment is a contrarian indicator. Suffice to say that Gold is extremely overbearish, which justifies a rebound, but it could become more overbearish based on the 21DMA in Dec 2016, or we could get a bounce in price and still see a lower low later this year, as in Dec 2015.

So Gold is extreme oversold on a daily and weekly basis and extreme overbearish also, but price continues to fall anyway for the time being.


We have seen open interest increase as Gold continues to fall through key technical levels. Is this Money Managers (aka “Funds”) trying to buy the dip and getting hosed by the Bullion Banks, or could it be the Funds loading up short and the Banks becoming increasingly long? We will likely get some insight from the COT data tomorrow but if the former, it supports further downside. If it is the latter and Banks are loading up long, then that is bullish after a long decline with extreme oversold and overbearish signals. 

Last week’s COT data, when Gold was at 1255, seems like an eon ago. That said, Funds were short for the first time since Dec 2015. Price has continued to fall since then, which suggests that Funds are becoming increasingly short. At the same time, Banks (aka “Swaps”) and Commercials remained short, while Other Reportables started adding to their long position again—their second highest long position on record. 


In summary, it is difficult to find much in the positioning data that supports the bearish thesis save for the risk that Funds are trying to buy the dips. Hence the increase in open interest, and Banks and Commercials remain short. Funds are short too, but I guess they could become even shorter, which is counterintuitively bullish.

Putting all of these traditional indicators together, prices could obviously continue to fall, but the elastic band is being stretched across technicals, sentiment and positioning, and similar such drops in the past justify a sizeable bounce soon. However, I don’t believe this means that we have seen the lows. This could be the second half of 2015 all over again, with a lower low to come.

Such lower lows could be driven by a crash in stocks this Fall. Listen to my interview with Craig Hemke on this topic here:

Crashes are deflationary by nature, which could weigh on Gold or we could see a repeat of 2008 with repetitive waves of shock selling by the Bullion Banks to depress Gold and support the dollar. Either way, this could precipitate a lower low in price similar to that seen in Dec 2015. If such a crash were to occur and were followed by a Fed reversal to QE, then Gold would just explode higher, as it did during QE1 and QE2, only more so in my humble opinion. 

Returning to the downside case… if USD/CNY continues to rise while XAU/CNY remains in a range of 8200-8360, then Gold could just keep falling straight down. As I stated in my previous article at I don’t believe this is likely, because the U.S. would not tolerate such a move. It would undermine the whole purpose of U.S. tariffs by making Chinese exports cheaper in dollar terms. But it remains a distinct possibility, especially given the break of 6.70 this week.

At the same time, the GOLD/SDR exchange rate also suggests a significant bounce is not only possible, but imminent. 

On a final note, if we do get new all-time highs in the S&P followed by a stock market crash later this year—something I have predicted since Feb—and the Fed is forced to reverse policy, then Gold will truly take off from that point in my humble opinion, regardless of what happens between now and then.

The Downside Case for Gold 

Written by David Brady,CFA - Sprott Money News

Get News and latest information on the precious metals industry to your inbox:Sign Up NOW

Check out these other articles by our contributors:

Crude Oil May Not Find Support Above $60 This Time - Chris Vermeulen (18/07/2018)

India Soaks Up Physical Silver Supply - Craig Hemke (17/07/2018)

Internet entrepreneur shops for a country - Peter Diekmeyer (17/07/2018)

A Path to Upgrade from Paper to Gold- Keith Weiner (16/07/2018)

Gold Bears Are Roaring Louder - Avi Gilburt (16/07/2018)


lunaticfringe Fri, 07/20/2018 - 10:26 Permalink

Buy low, sell high. I waited as long as I could and bought today. The recent fall was a little bit over a 10% correction and healthy. Just can't see the shiny dipping into the 1100's. 

Scrot DuckDog Fri, 07/20/2018 - 14:40 Permalink

In 30 years gold will be hovering around $1200. Can you wait that long? 


Gold is one of the worst investments in history.
-----$1 invested in the stock market in 1802 would be worth $755,163 in 2006.
----$1 invested in gold in 1802 would be worth only $1.98 in 2006.

In the last 5 years gold has actually lost value-- when inflation is factored in the losses are steep.

In reply to by DuckDog

mikka Scrot Fri, 07/20/2018 - 17:11 Permalink

scrotus, if you invested $1 in 1802 in the stock market, you could have lost it all  along the way.

If you "invested" $1 in gold in 1802, you would still have it, and probably could have saved you in a few rather unfortunate occasions.

As everybody around knows, gold is insurance, not investment.


In reply to by Scrot

Davidduke2000 Scrot Fri, 07/20/2018 - 22:02 Permalink

you know nothing.

I bought in 1975 a Buick Century with gold it cost me 100 oz of gold or $3500 usd.

the equivalent car today would be $40,000 and 100 oz of gold are worth $123500 usd or 3 times the price of the car today.

the usd lost it's purchasing power , while gold tripled it's purchasing power.

You have to have experienced gold to talk about. all what I hear are the bitcoin crowd blabbing out of their ass.

if gold is not fraudulently manipulated with papers, each single ounce would be over $25000, but since a ton of gold can fetch $1600 the oz, the stupid asshole who are talking below $1000 are stupid .

In reply to by Scrot

yvhmer Scrot Sat, 07/21/2018 - 02:18 Permalink

Dude, value ...ahem, yeah you know your classical economic books,  is a matter of perspective. 

Inflation is a matter  of manipulation, as is deflation. 

With the gold market not being a free market, your arguments are simply as worthy as the value of fiat currency. 

In reply to by Scrot

Farqued Up PT Sat, 07/21/2018 - 08:54 Permalink

For some reason Acme Buggy Whips keeps nagging my noggin, but I cannot find it’s price today. That’s the technique of the exchanges, if some stock is dragging on the hype just kick it to the curb. Toys ‘R Us seems to ring a bell as just 1 tiny example.

In reply to by PT

Bond Wizzerd Fri, 07/20/2018 - 11:59 Permalink

Gold is down, but why no comment on Silver or Platinum? Are you a purist? Platinum maple leafs are on sale on E-Bay - you can buy at 7% over spot. If you believe in RV, you wouldn't be buying gold here, you'd be buying Platinum.

Ban KKiller Fri, 07/20/2018 - 12:00 Permalink

I buy all the way down. Not buying for now...buying for later. 

Getting rid of fiat for gold? Ok, by me. It is JUST A HEDGE for the future. 

I can only look at the past where folks wished they had gold....say Venezuela or Mexico or any other place where their fiat was exposed. 

DoolieDoink Fri, 07/20/2018 - 12:15 Permalink

Telling the future by looking at the past is like driving a car whilst looking in the rear view mirror.


If you interrogate the data hard enough, it will confess to anything.

Scrot Fri, 07/20/2018 - 14:39 Permalink

Gold is one of the worst investments in history.

-----$1 invested in the stock market in 1802 would be worth $755,163 in 2006.
----$1 invested in gold in 1802 would be worth only $1.98 in 2006.

In the last 5 years gold has actually lost value-- when inflation is factored in the losses are steep.

Scrot Fri, 07/20/2018 - 14:42 Permalink

Finally a more realistic article on Gold.

Ever notice the people hawking gold as the greatest "opportunity" of all time make their living selling gold?

Worst investment ever...

Clock Crasher Fri, 07/20/2018 - 17:03 Permalink

The price of Gold can be whatever the Comex says it is.  

It effects 0.001% of the population of the West.  So it doesn't matter if its $5 or $5,000.  

Dragon HAwk Fri, 07/20/2018 - 20:46 Permalink

The more people who hold Physical Gold, the more Buyers you have around you, when you need to spread a little Liquidity

  Sell to another Holder, not a dealer, or Pawn Shop

PT Harvey's-Rabbi Sat, 07/21/2018 - 05:57 Permalink

I'll grow food when I can store it for a year and it doesn't degrade so then I can swap it for parts for my tractor.

Just kidding ya.  I doesn't has a tractor.

EDIT:  Big Macs for the mutha-fuckin' WIN!!!!  You can eat them plus they last forever!  Food PLUS a store of "value" plus store of "food"!  ... Divisible ...A one-year old Big Mac is worth the same when it is ten years old! ...

Actually, the smart fuckers use wine as a store of value ...
"It's worth $1000 becoz it is 300 years old.  Just don't try to drink it ..."

In reply to by Harvey's-Rabbi

Davidduke2000 Sat, 07/21/2018 - 06:42 Permalink

Sprott is a gold dealer and he knows that there is a big difference between the papers and the real thing.


Here is an example of 1 oz of Royal Canadian mint @ $1262.50 while the paper is at @$1232.50, that $30 usd premium.

In Canadian dollas the difference is even bigger 1 oz Royal Canadian  mint @$1676.60 while the paper is @$1620. that's a difference of $56.60 CND.

when the media and especially sprott talk gloom and doom that are blowing smoke up your asses.