Trey Gowdy: There's No Russia Collusion Evidence "Or Adam Schiff Would Have Leaked It"

Authored by Mac Slavo via SHTFplan.com,

Republican representative, Trey Gowdy from South Carolina said that in 18 months, he has not seen “one scintilla” of evidence that Donald Trump colluded with Russia.  He added that if that evidence existed, we could all be rest assured that it would have been leaked by now.

Since leaks from the White House are not few and far between since Donald Trump has taken office, Gowdy is likely onto something here. There are leaks about everything and regarding everything.

Leaks to the media have plagued Trump’s presidency since his first day in office, and a new report on leakers’ motives opens a window into the extent of the subterfuge. “To be honest, it probably falls into a couple of categories,” one White House official told Axios‘s, Jonathan Swan. “The first is personal vendettas. And two is to make sure there’s an accurate record of what’s really going on in the White House.”  Many of those with ties and puppet strings connecting them to the deep state are actually in Trump’s White House, according to The Washington Post.

A wave of leaks from government officials has hobbled the Trump administration, leading some to draw comparisons to countries like Egypt, Turkey, and Pakistan, where shadowy networks within government bureaucracies, often referred to as “deep states,” undermine and coerce elected governments. Though leaks can be a normal and healthy check on a president’s power, what’s happening now extends much further.

A former White House official who, according to Swan, “turned leaking into an art form,” said that “leaking is information warfare; it’s strategic and tactical — strategic to drive [the] narrative, tactical to settle scores.” –SHTFPlan

And Gowdy seems to see the writing on the wall.  Who was that said, “a lie told often enough times becomes the truth?” (It was infamous Marxist Vladimir Lenin, FYI).  That appears to be exactly what Democrats and their lapdogs in mainstream media continue to propagate. If they just repeat that Trump and Russia colluded enough times, the people will eventually buy that lie without any evidence.

I have not seen one scintilla of evidence that this president colluded, conspired, confederated with Russia, and neither has anyone else, or you may rest assured Adam Schiff would have leaked it,” Gowdy said on Fox News Sunday as reported by The Daily Wire.

Adam Schiff, a California Democrat, has been among the most vocal of Trump haters.

As head of the House Intelligence Committee, Schiff is privy to a lot of information that others are not and leaks of information have streamed out of the committee. “That’s why they’ve moved off of collusion onto obstruction of justice, which is now their current preoccupation,” Gowdy added alluding to the fact that if there was evidence of collusion, the public would have seen it months ago

Gowdy, though, noted that after 18 months, there’s been no evidence of any crime committed. And now, the probe led by special counsel Robert Mueller appears to moving into the sex realm. Trump’s former lawyer, Michael Cohen, reportedly recorded a conversation with Trump about a former Playboy model who claims Trump once had an affair with her.

That latest revelation, of course, has already leaked. So it does make sense: If anyone had anything on Trump, it’d already be out there. –The Daily Wire

Tags

Comments

Jim in MN z0na8an0z Mon, 07/23/2018 - 19:36 Permalink

Hey Tylers, check this out:  FAIR calling out MSNBC in an Action Alert for non-coverage of Yemen.

https://fair.org/home/action-alert-its-been-over-a-year-since-msnbc-has…

July 23, 2018

ACTION ALERT: It’s Been Over a Year Since MSNBC Has Mentioned US War in Yemen

Why is the No. 1 outlet of alleged anti-Trump #resistance completely ignoring his most devastating war?

For a bit more context, in the time period of July 3, 2017, to July 3, 2018, MSNBC dedicated zero segments to the US’s war in Yemen, but 455 segments to Stormy Daniels.

In reply to by z0na8an0z

MoreSun AbsoluteZero Tue, 07/24/2018 - 01:44 Permalink

It's the jew supremacists boy's & girls and it always has been.

Specifically jew supremacist foreign agent organization B'nai B'rith which changed its name to a more American sounding "Anti-Defamation League" or "ADL".

The jew supremacist ACLU likewise is a blatant anti-American jew foreign agent oragaization that works daily to destroy American traditional values. "As a result of the work of the American Civil Liberties Union and their war on America, we now live in a country where the church has been progressively silenced, parental authority has been undermined, children are less safe, and human life continues to be cheapened-both at birth and death." 

Couple those two with the jew supremacist Frankfurt School founded & funded by marxist jews, which turned up on American shores in 1934.

"The Frankfurt school published a lot of popular material. The first of these was Critical Theory.

Critical Theory is a play on semantics. The theory was simple: criticize every pillar of Western culture—family, democracy, common law, freedom of speech, and others. The hope was that these pillars would crumble under the pressure.

Next was a book Theodor Adorno co-authored, The Authoritarian Personality. It redefined traditional American views on gender roles and sexual mores as “prejudice.” Adorno compared them to the traditions that led to the rise of fascism in Europe.

The school pushed its shift from economics and toward Freud by publishing works on psychological repression.

Their works split society into two main groups: the oppressors and the victims. They argued that history and reality were shaped by those groups who controlled traditional institutions. At the time, that was code for males of European descent.

From there, they argued that the social roles of men and women were due to gender differences defined by the “oppressors.” In other words, gender did not exist in reality but was merely a “social construct.”

"Jews, mostly Zionists, have spearheaded every movement that now threatens our destruction. Jews have extended their tentacles into all facets of our country squeezing every vestige of wholesome life out of America.

Along with Jewish expansionism comes the debauching of all peoples, all heritages, and all traditions, except for their Judaism and Hanukah Menorahs now erected during our Christmas on the White House Lawn. But no Nativity Scenes will the Jews allow! They are hypocrites! The Jews cry out “separation of church & state” don’t they? Except when it comes to their wretched Anti Christ menorahs!"

Remove all jew supremacists from all positions of power no matter how small-NOW!

Shut down & confiscate all funds of all jew supremacist foreign agent organizations on American shores by use of the Fara Act and Rico laws. jew organizations; Aclu, Adl, Splc, Zoa, Jwc, Cfr, and a thousand more.

http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=128

In reply to by AbsoluteZero

Chupacabra-322 El Oregonian Mon, 07/23/2018 - 20:19 Permalink

Adam and Eve Schiff are a husband and wife.

 

Eve runs the 'Sunlight Foundation' for the Rockefeller Family Fund (one of only ten funds).

 

The wealth of the Rockefeller's is est. at about $3 Trillion US $$$ A!

 

That's no typo folks (if anything its a lowball figure), and its run by the Kaiser Family.

 

Her husband 'adam (of eve)' is like all Rockefeller tools on the intelligence cmte.

 

Note:  You'll always find these well connected stool pigeons on defense or the appropriations cmte.

 

http://www.muckety.com/Rockefeller-Family-Fund/5024609.muckety

 

 

http://www.muckety.com/David-Kaiser/198874.muckety

 

In reply to by El Oregonian

PT El Oregonian Mon, 07/23/2018 - 22:54 Permalink

They raided the office of POTUS's lawyer and all they got was something about some sex that MIGHT have happened 12 years ago.

Is that a good reason to raid your lawyer's office?  Now Joe Sixpack might not have much to do with lawyers and the significance might be lost on him.  So what about Joe Chardonnay?  How many rungs do you need to go up before lawyers are an important part of your life?  If POTUS can't prevent the raiding of his own lawyer's office, do you think your own lawyer is safe?  Where is the outrage?  If there is no need for outrage now, what would it take for that to change?

On the one hand, through their actions the world is getting to see exactly how low they are prepared to go.
On the other hand, the world is also seeing the consequences of those actions.

Scott Adams' first impression straight after it happened:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBy1-Wc5uZk

He softened his opinion later but that was conditional.  We've had a couple of months now.  Was his first impression the correct one?

In reply to by El Oregonian

PT chunga Mon, 07/23/2018 - 23:26 Permalink

It's the ONLY way to play.

"We almost nearly got 'em this time but you have to vote so we can really get 'em."
"Put another 25c in the slot to see what happens next."
"Kick the ball, Charlie Brown."

Before the vote:  "... or you would be in jail."
After the vote:  "... really fine people."
"Oh we almost nearly got 'em but blah blah blah ... oh look, elections, my doesn't time fly! ..."

Hmmmm, maybe it really is impossible for a President to make a difference.  In that case voting really does not matter.  "I'm done voting for the lesser of two evils.  From now on I'm voting for the candidate with the greatest amount of plausible deniability!"

"Yes, Mr Customer, I haven't put the new engine in your car but if you don't keep paying me then you'll never get that new engine.  I think it is in the next shipment."
 

In reply to by chunga

kudocast Mon, 07/23/2018 - 19:22 Permalink

"And now, the probe led by special counsel Robert Mueller appears to moving into the sex realm."

Exactly how it was when Clinton was President. What goes around comes around RepubTARDS.

fulliautomatix kudocast Mon, 07/23/2018 - 19:30 Permalink

Are you happy that the precedent has been made for the use of national assets (and those not constrained by the law of the land as it applies to [another class of] people) to spy on domestic political opponents? This gets reviewed and condemned or you lose the trust in your legal system, the fundamental basis on which it operates.

In reply to by kudocast

PT True Blue Mon, 07/23/2018 - 23:41 Permalink

I still maintain that Bill would have gotten away with it if, at that time, he was willing to do as he was told.  In my opinion, the ONLY reason it gained traction was because Billy wasn't doing what he was told.  If Billy was playing ball, he could have done anything and none of it would have become public.  Either Bill was way too careless and too hard to clean up after or he wasn't doing as he was told.

Sorry to repeat a link but "You were chosen randomly." :
http://dilbert.com/strip/1990-05-14

They had all they needed with Bill so they never had to escalate it to "colluding with the Russians".
And I have not forgotten that before Trump was accused of "colluding with the Russians" he was accused of "going to start WW3 with the Russians."

It's all generic dirt.  They would use it on anyone.
 

In reply to by True Blue

PT Slaytheist Tue, 07/24/2018 - 03:57 Permalink

Well in that case I guess he was just too careless and they couldn't be bothered trying to hide all his fuck-ups. 

It was a long time ago and I wasn't paying much attention back then. 
New President with a sex scandal and yet I'd heard nothing similar before he got voted in?  Sex scandal = Generic case = they use it on anyone = okay, maybe he did, maybe he didn't but the only reason you are hearing about it is because there was something else they aren't telling you.  He managed to hide it all that time and no-one knew, not anyone at all, everyone thought he was so good he should be President and there was no better alternative in the field at all!

It was many years before I heard about Arkancide and even longer before I believed it and a little bit longer before I heard about cattle-futures, people who no longer trust lie-detectors et al.

In reply to by Slaytheist

Boxed Merlot Blankenstein Mon, 07/23/2018 - 23:10 Permalink

...divert attention away from the White Water/ Rose Law firm crimes and the Vince Foster investigation...

And it worked, just like Seth Rich and Hillary's servers with the wikileaks/Anwans/DNC leadership collusion/misappropriation of sensitive national records have been successfully concealed to this point and the foreseeable future and remain unaddressed by the majority of potential voters. This national debt is every bit as serious, if not more so, than the one the Fed's been accumulating.

jmo.

In reply to by Blankenstein

booboo kudocast Mon, 07/23/2018 - 20:51 Permalink

In 1994, a woman by the name of Paula Jones accused then Governor Bill Clinton of dropping his pants and underwear, exposing “his penis (which was erect),”

Clinton agreed “to pay her $850,000” to drop the case...and...and...and Lewenski

Far as I can tell Trump ain't hiding consensual sex Hiltard

You idiots set the bar for saying.... what was it again..."SO WHAT" so own it bitch.

In reply to by kudocast

Debt Slave Mon, 07/23/2018 - 19:23 Permalink

2 years and all they can show is the ridiculous indictment of a dozen Russians that will never testify in a U.S. courtroom.

Midterm gamble fail. Game over.