print-icon

The Art of Counting Votes

SultanTipu's Photo
by SultanTipu
Thursday, Nov 05, 2020 - 9:00

Ms. Kimberley Strassel, one of the best examples of old school (but not old, to be clear) journalists left in the country, should not be confused, or given her experience, surprised. The Dem political machines have decades, if not a century, of experience counting votes towards desired outcomes. The Daley and Tammany Hall days are back!!! The only difference is now they have to contend with video cameras, social media, Veritas, and whistleblowers in the post office, of all places. Otherwise, what's a few 100k backdated envelopes between friends? Or maybe someone just hit 'send' eighteen times purely by accident....

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1324093624611532800.html

Main one pasted below.  Check link above for all comments....

 

Kimberley Strassel

   Twitter logo

17h, 9 tweets, 2 min read

1) I am legitimately interested/confused by this. I checked, and the top number is indeed Wisconsin's active registered voter number as of Nov. 1. The bottom is approx. what has been counted. That is a (not feasible) 89% turnout.

2) The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel is claiming a 71% state turnout. I'm not sure where it gets this, but that would make more sense, given even populous Milwaukee didn't exceed 83% turnout, and Dane lower. (Do math on what rest of state wud need to bump up state avg to 89) 

3) True, Wisconsin has same day voter registration. But to be at 71%, WI would have yesterday needed 900k same-day registrations. ( If I'm doing my math wrong--please tell me. 3,288,771 divided by 4,588,771 equals 71% . 4,588,771 minus 3,684,726 =900k) 

4) Is that possible/conceivable? That would be akin to increasing WI's registered voting population by up to 30%--in one day. It would also suggest that if those same-day registrations hadn't happened, WI would have had a ridiculously LOW turnout. 

5) I suppose it is possible WI's turnout was higher than 71% (again, not sure where MJS gets that). But that would be wild, given the state's own history and what we saw elsewhere yesterday. An even an 80% turnout would still require HUGE same-day registration. 

6)Surely a record/tally of those same-day registrations must exist. It would therefore seem a straightforward proposition to set the numbers/record straight?
Again, explain if I'm missing something. @WI_Elections 

7) So, more. I compared some vote totals to voter registration--by county. Nearly every county i've looked at so far--left and right--registered turnout of 89% or higher. (several at 93%) I suppose its possible--but still seems extraordinary. 

8) I think high voter turnout is great, and if WI truly did this, wow. I only question it because it is so strikingly at odds with any other state. 

9)One thing that makes more sense is if MSP number of 71% if referring to voting-eligible population (rather than registered voters). But still, wow--89% turnout of registered voters.... 

0