One misappropriated term making the rounds in dissident circles that really grinds my gears as an ostentatious pedant is the idea of the powers that be acting as social architects by implementing a strategy centered on the "Hegelian Dialectic."
While the dynamic they're describing -- one in which crises are manufactured in order to push solutions which reorganize social structures under their hegemony -- is an astute observation, the characterization of it as an application of Hegel's dialectical methodology is incorrect. Hegel did not invent the principle of dialectics afterall, that is credited to Zeno of Elea, the 5th century BC Greek philosopher and founder of the Eleatic School, by Aristotle. Hegel's contributions to the philosophy of dialectics would not be formulated until nearly 2 millennia later. While they were certainly poignant and have profound resonance on the modern study of dialectics, the system Hegel described does not meet the aforementioned description. Instead, that social engineering process of ascribing thesis > antithesis > synthesis as problem > reaction > solution is more accurately characterized as an example of the dialectic materialism of Karl Marx, which theorized that changing social conditions would facilitate a re-organization of society toward whatever goal those in power sought.
That philosophical diatribe aside, Moderna's recent announcement of a new drug it is developing is a picturesque example of that problem > reaction > solution framework that many point to as evidence of a pre-existent elitist motive which masquerades behind the guise of a manufactured problem. Amidst a global surge in episodes of cardiac disease, Moderna has announced it is developing an mRNA shot that will be injected directly into the heart in order to stop myocardial infractions or to put it more bluntly: heart attacks.
Upon announcing the development of this mRNA "treatment" Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel described it as “science fiction medicine." before going on to taught the forthcoming significance of the shot by saying “We have now in the clinic a super exciting program where we inject mRNA into people’s hearts after a heart attack to grow back new blood vessels to help revascularize the heart,” The shots would rely on the same technology that Moderna utilized in the development of its COVID-19 vaccine, which Bancel also announced his company would be quadrupling the original price of to $130 per dose.
The novel mRNA-0184 shots being developed by Moderna purportedly help the body produce relaxin, a hormone that increases bloodflow and thus potentially may reduce the risk of heart attacks. According to Moderna iyself, “mRNA-0184 encodes for relaxin, a naturally occurring hormone that is known to cause hemodynamic changes that are potentially beneficial for heart failure patients.” going on to explain “The mRNA sequence of mRNA-0184 is engineered to instruct the body to produce relaxin with an extended half-life, with the goal of producing a sustained clinical benefit in heart failure patients,” Moderna has stated that the mRNA-0184 shots are presently undergoing phase 1B clinical trials on patients who have stable cardiac disease.
In its business update which disclosed the current clinical trial status of the heart attacked shot, Moderna conveyed its larger over-arching strategy to flood the pharmaceutical market with mRNA products. That disclosure conveyed that Moderna is also running concurrent programs to develop mRNA treatments for COVID-19, Respiratory Syncytial Virus, seasonal Influenza, Cystic Fibrosis, Propionic Acidemia, and personalized cancer vaccines.
This pedal to the medal approach ignores the deleterious impact that the now seemingly ubiquitous adoption of mRNA technology has had on global public health. Since mRNA vaccines for COVID-19 became available, incidences of young people experiencing strokes and heart attacks despite having no pre-existing cardiac disease have drastically accelerated. This was a point of contention held by Dr. Doran Fink of the FDA who elucidated that men under 40 years old would be at greater risk of taking a COVID-19 vaccine than from contracting the disease itself. Dr. Fink's assessment was expressed during the FDA's first hearing on the safety of a then-potential booster campaign which has since became the latest cash grab scheme for the likes of Modern, Pfizer, et al.
Despite the complete cognitive dissonance that the American technocratic healthcare intelligentsia have managed to cultivate, even the CDC has recently announced the potential risk of mRNA vaccines increasing the likelihood of stroke. This comes long after the link between pericarditis and myocarditis and COVID-19 vaccines was made. Of course, any link between the rash of sudden deaths and COVID-19 vaccines will continue to be summarily dismissed as a "conspiracy theory" just as claims the big pharma cartel would devop drugs to treat known side effects was previously.
While the ramifications of ignoring those forewarnings have resulted in another public health crisis in which excess deaths following the COVID-19 pandemic have surpassed those during it by over 300,000, the catastrophe that has ensued has proven to be nothing more than another opportunity for the likes of Moderna to exploit.