'Science' Discovers That "Sex Matters" For Sports Performance, Not 'Gender-Identity'
In an earth-shattering, mind-blowing, narrative-destroying new scientific study from PhDs at King's College, London, researchers found:
"...a sex gap in race times between athletes who identify as non-binary, and that there is no evidence that the gap between biological males and biological females is less for athletes who identify as non-binary."
In other words - saying you're a girl does not change the fact that you biologically a boy... and that's science.
Dr John Armstrong, Reader in Financial Mathematics at King's, said:
It is generally accepted that sports performance depends on a mixture of biological and social factors.
According to gender-identity theory, gender-identity is much more important than sex in determining almost all outcomes and this should include mass participation sport.
We did not find a reduction in sex differences in race times with the non-binary category.
Thus the data does not support gender-identity theory.
On the other hand, we did find that within the non-binary category sex was a powerful predictor of race times.
Thus the data supports the gender-critical theory that sex matters.
Even more remarkably, the study found that the trans-athletes were mediocre when considered against their biological sex cohort:
The results also indicate that non-binary athletes may have slower race times than other athletes once sex and age are controlled for.
The researchers conclude, callously disregarding non-PhDs expert feelings:
Given the lack of empirical evidence supporting gender-identity theory, one should not assume by default that gender-identity is a more powerful explanatory variable than sex.
Being an objectively measurable binary variable, sex has considerable explanatory advantages over gender identity.
Armstrong concluded:
“Gender identity is clearly important to many people, but nevertheless sex matters.
The 'experts' at King's College have a problem though - other 'experts' with 'science', believe otherwise...
Not according to Scientific American who believe "The inequity between male and female athletes is a result not of inherent biological differences between the sexes but of biases in how they are treated in sports." https://t.co/6klH6sPn8e
— John Armstrong (@johnarmstrong5) December 21, 2023
"Settled science?"
Un-scientific and un-American
— OmegaFive (@OmegaFiveOG) December 21, 2023
This shocking revelation from 'science' sparked world-tilting prompted an avalanche of stunned responses on social media:
Not to disrespect your work, but isn't this absolutely bloody obvious to the most casual observer?
— A spider (@SelfSpidey) December 21, 2023
In other words “non binary” runners are slower than other runners but the males are still faster than the females proving non-binary races are just a mechanism for slow male runners to win prizes and awards.
— DoryGenderAtheist 🦕🦖 (@NewFifeRight14) December 21, 2023
I’m sorry that you have to waste your time in order to state the bloody obvious. It must be utterly infuriating.
— Slarty Bartfast (@Poppy_yyyyyyyy) December 21, 2023
How have we reached a point of science denial where this even needs to be said?
— Le_Sorelle_Arduino KPSS (@Sorelle_Arduino) December 21, 2023
It is staggering that there are people who think women would run just as fast, row just as powerfully, box just as hard as men if only we tried harder because sex is clearly irrelevant 🙄 pic.twitter.com/xh0EQeObzL
Thank you John but it's mind-boggling we need this to demonstrate the bleeding obvious.
— Stuart (@stuartf100) December 21, 2023
Next we'll need studies to prove that water is wet!
Ivermectin works? Sex matters? What next from science? 'Diversity' is not our strength? Socialism does not promote utopia? Guns don't kill people?
