The Solar War Syndrome
Those who see beyond the illusions of policy and rhetoric understand a deeper truth: cycles—not politicians—rule the tides of history. And among these, one force has loomed above all, both literally and metaphorically: the Sun.
For centuries, the solar cycle has acted as an unseen puppeteer, pulling the strings of the global economy. GDP booms and busts, interest rate pivots, inflation surges, and even the violent tremors of commodity markets—they all seem to dance to the rhythms of solar activity. But the influence doesn’t stop at markets. The Sun has ignited revolutions and unravelled empires. Every major spike in solar intensity has coincided with moments that reshaped the world. From the Paris Commune in 1871 (Cycle 11), through the Russian revolutions (Cycles 14 and 15), to the collapse of the Soviet empire during the peak of Cycle 22, history’s great ruptures seem to arrive on schedule—with the solar maximum as their herald. Even the Arab Spring, the most recent storm of rebellion, flared into life in lockstep with the fiery climax of Solar Cycle 24.
As the Sun is heading into another minimum probably starting as soon as July 2025—the world once again began to tremble. Revolutions ignited, social unrest erupted, and acts of terror pierced the illusion of order. These weren’t isolated incidents or random bursts of chaos. They were part of a familiar rhythm—a historical echo of what has played out time and again around past solar maximums. The patterns are undeniable. Just as in centuries past, when solar peaks coincided with upheaval and collapse, today’s turbulence follows the same celestial script. History, it seems, is not just repeating—it’s solar-powered.
On October 7, 2023, as Solar Cycle 25 surged toward its peak, Hamas unleashed the deadliest terror attack in Israel’s history—killing nearly 1,200 civilians and taking 251 hostages. Dubbed “Israel’s 9/11,” the assault mirrored the trauma of the 2001 al-Qaeda attack on the U.S.—not just in scale and shock, but in timing. Both attacks occurred near solar maximums: 9/11 just two months before the peak of Cycle 23, and 10/7 roughly a year before Cycle 25’s apex in October 2024.
In response, war erupted. Israel’s retaliation escalated into a regional conflict involving Hezbollah, the Houthis, and Iran—eerily echoing the U.S.-led invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq after 9/11. Then, in March 2024, terror struck Moscow. An ISIS-linked attack at Crocus City Hall killed 145 and injured over 550—proving this wave of violence wasn’t confined to the Middle East. As with past solar peaks, the world didn’t just heat up—it burned. The Sun may give us light—but during its peaks, it seems to cast shadows far deeper.
In August 2024, as sunspot activity surged to its highest monthly level of Solar Cycle 25—just two months before the official solar maximum—revolution erupted in Bangladesh. The sudden toppling of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina stunned the region, drawing immediate parallels to the 2022 uprising in neighboring Sri Lanka and evoking echoes of the Arab Spring, which had unfolded under the glare of Solar Cycle 24’s peak.
The timing was no coincidence. Just as Ukraine’s Maidan revolution in February 2014 peaked alongside the solar cycle—with sunspot counts at their highest—Bangladesh’s revolution followed the same solar rhythm. In both cases, the ousted leaders—Yanukovych and Hasina—fled to the very powers their people sought to resist. What followed was equally ominous. In 2014, Russia justified its annexation of Crimea by accusing the new Ukrainian government of violating minority rights. In 2024, India levels the same charge against the new authorities in Bangladesh, warning of alleged abuses against Hindus and other minorities. The solar clock ticks—and revolutions repeat.
In December 2024, the Assad regime—long thought unshakable—fell in a stunning collapse. A swift and coordinated offensive by the rebel coalition, led by Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) and backed by the Turkish-aligned Free Syrian Army (FSA), brought an end to 13 years of brutal civil war and toppled a regime that had clung to power against all odds since 2011. The speed and scale of the fall shocked not only global observers, but the Syrian people themselves. What follows now is uncertain—and ominous.
Will this new coalition usher in a modern Syrian renaissance—or resurrect darker ghosts of the past? The memory of ISIL still looms large. At the peak of Solar Cycle 24 in 2014, ISIL rose from the ashes of regional chaos, seizing vast swathes of Iraq and Syria and ruling over 12 million people with a $1 billion war chest and 30,000 fighters. It took a global coalition to crush its caliphate by 2019—but its affiliates remain entrenched, particularly in Africa. Now, at the height of Solar Cycle 25, history may once again be poised to repeat—or escalate. As the heat of Cycle 25 reaches its apex, the question lingers: who’s next?
What came next was the inevitable escalation of war in the Middle East. Israel’s strikes against Iran unfolded with a chilling precision—seeming to follow the relentless 11-year rhythm of the sunspot cycle. As solar activity surged, so too did the flames of conflict, as if the cosmos itself were fanning the region’s most dangerous fires.
Decades ago, Russian scientist A. Chizhevsky uncovered a startling truth: solar maximums often ignite waves of mass migration—fueling revolutions, social upheaval, and the great human tides that reshape nations. Today, this phenomenon is painfully clear. The flood of migrants into the U.S. and Europe has surged alongside Solar Cycle 25’s climb toward its October 2024 peak—throwing governments into turmoil and making migration a decisive issue in elections worldwide. In the U.S., Donald Trump’s November 2024 victory came amid this chaos, nearly coinciding with the solar maximum itself. Across Europe, countries from the UK to France and Germany grapple with the mounting pressure, where managing migration has become a political fault line threatening governments and societies alike.
History repeats: the same surges in migration marked past solar peaks, proving once again that the Sun’s cycles ripple far beyond the skies—into the hearts and borders of nations.
The war cycle is right on schedule—because nothing says “progress” like replaying history’s greatest hits every solar maximum. On June 13, 2025, Israel lit the fuse with a drone-heavy fireworks show in Iran, supposedly to stop a bomb, but maybe just to ruin Trump’s potential peace deal. A week later, the U.S. joined in—because what better way to promote global stability than bombing a sovereign nation during peak solar flare season? Meanwhile, the “Peacemaker-in-Chief” proves he’s really the “Warmonger-in-Chief,” or maybe just the “Egocentric-in-Chief”—treating geopolitics like a World Cup match where the Global South is the away team and everyone else is a benchwarmer. Facts don’t matter, perception fuels missiles, and diplomacy now comes with hashtags and bunker busters.
In short: welcome to the next episode of “World War: Solar Edition”—where the stakes are nuclear, the cast is delusional, and the ending? Probably not a happy one.
But don’t be fooled—the real puppet master may be sitting quietly in the East, watching the West burn itself out while making all the right moves in silence. After all, why start a war when your enemies are kind enough to do it for you? Every missile fired at Israel in recent months bears the unmistakable mark of Chinese manufacture. Iran, once feared for its own ambitions, has become a proxy for Beijing’s silent war. But here’s the twist: China is imploding. Xi Jinping, once the all-powerful emperor of the Communist Party, is now beginning to look like a ceremonial ghost. His loyalists have been purged. His slogans scrubbed from state media. Even his father’s memorial has been renamed—a brutal, public humiliation. The Party is speaking loud and clear: the emperor has no clothes. Inside the People’s Liberation Army, the purge is in full swing. Generals are falling. Power is shifting. And when Vice Chairman Zhang Youxia refused to salute Xi at the Two Sessions? That wasn’t defiance—it was a funeral bell.
Behind the stagecraft, a darker truth is emerging China’s neocons are seizing power, and the West, mesmerized by the Middle East, is missing the real storm brewing in Asia. What we’re witnessing isn’t just a regional war—it’s a global unravelling. And all of it, once again, is unfolding beneath a raging Sun. History doesn’t repeat—it escalates. And the war cycle, fed by solar fire and human folly, has only just begun.
Officially, China imported zero oil from Iran last year—because, of course, when it comes to international trade, we all take authoritarian regimes at their word. But energy researchers tell a different story. Iranian oil is still flowing—just not through the front door. Instead, it sneaks in through the back via shadowy transshipment routes, ultimately winding up in China’s smaller, conveniently less-regulated refineries. The U.S., ever the global hall monitor, has slapped sanctions on Chinese firms allegedly helping Iran skirt Western restrictions. And yet, over 90% of Iran’s sanctioned, bargain-bin crude still finds its way to China, often rerouted through middlemen in places like Malaysia—because nothing says “rules-based order” like a thriving black market. But the real irony? China's heavy energy dependence is still anchored in or around the Persian Gulf, where six of its top ten oil suppliers reside—right in the middle of a region now teetering on the edge of war. So while Beijing keeps a straight face and claims innocence, its energy lifeline runs straight through the chaos.
https://www.worldstopexports.com/top-15-crude-oil-suppliers-to-china/
Since Israel’s June 13th strike, whispers have grown louder: Iran might close the Strait of Hormuz—a move that would send global oil markets into panic mode and, theoretically, choke off China’s energy supply. But here’s the twist no one’s reporting it wouldn’t.
Why? Because while Western analysts were busy obsessing over missiles and tankers, China and Iran quietly built a workaround. The long-forgotten ancient Silk Road has been resurrected—not by caravans, but by steel and freight. Enter the China-Iran railway link—a critical artery of Beijing’s Belt and Road Initiative, reviving imperial trade routes under the guise of modern infrastructure. This overland corridor, part of the China–Central Asia–West Asia Economic Corridor, relies on the Kazakhstan-Turkmenistan-Iran (KTI) railway, finalized in 2013, with freight rolling into Tehran as early as 2016. Today, it’s fully operational.
https://www.eurasiantimes.com/first-freight-train-from-china-wheels-into-iran/
So let Iran shut the Strait. Let the Houthis keep stirring the Red Sea. With the Hormuz chokepoint neutralized and the Suez Canal under pressure, Beijing’s energy strategy keeps humming along—thanks to railroads, not tankers.
It’s a brilliant piece of asymmetrical logistics. And it's nothing new. In antiquity, the city of Antioch grew fabulously wealthy by serving as the Silk Road’s gateway to the Roman world. From there came the famed purple dye—so prized it became exclusive to emperors. History, it seems, is color-coded and circular.
Now, with the West stuck in maritime thinking, China has quietly reasserted land power. Oil still flows. Ships can be stopped. But trains? Trains don’t sail through bottlenecks.
Yes, the Sunni-led monarchies—Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the UAE, and Qatar—sit on a mountain of oil. Together, they control a massive share of the region’s proven reserves. But don’t underestimate the Shia crescent. Iran and southern Iraq may not have the volume edge, but their reserves are deep, strategic, and dangerously concentrated in a region that lights up in every war cycle. Iran, after all, was a founding member of OPEC—and its influence extends far beyond its borders when things get hot.
But the real game-changer isn't under the ground. It’s what’s been laid above it: steel rails stretching from China to Iran. In recent years, the China–Iran railway corridor quietly came online. Trains now glide from cities like Yiwu and Xi’an, cut across Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan, and roll straight into Tehran. The last piece—Turkmenistan into Iran—is done. Operational. And transformative.
This is Beijing’s backdoor into the Middle East. No Strait of Hormuz. No Malacca chokepoint. Just a land bridge linking Chinese factories to Iranian petrochemicals, pistachios, saffron—and maybe soon, sanctioned oil rebranded and rerouted.
For China, it’s more than commerce. It’s national security. The railway reduces reliance on vulnerable sea lanes and embeds Iran into China's Eurasian grand strategy. For Iran, it’s lifeline meets leverage—a path to markets that bypasses Western sanctions and naval blockades.
This isn’t just infrastructure—it’s alignment. China and Iran are now linked by more than interests. They’re bound by steel. And in a region increasingly hostile to U.S. influence, this rail line may become the fault line of the next geopolitical rupture.
Closing the Strait of Hormuz won’t cripple China or Iran—it’ll cripple their rivals. Thanks to the overland China–Iran rail corridor, Beijing and Tehran have already built their escape hatch. But the real losers? Saudi Arabia and the UAE. These two central pillars of global oil supply are still heavily reliant on this narrow maritime chokepoint to export their crude. Shut it down, and it’s not Beijing or Tehran that panics—it’s Riyadh and Abu Dhabi. In other words, Iran holds the keys to a strait that can strangle its enemies while barely touching its friends. That’s not just leverage. That’s strategy.
Read more and discover how to trade it here: https://themacrobutler.substack.com/p/the-solar-war-syndrome
If this research has inspired you to invest in gold and silver, consider GoldSilver.com to buy your physical gold:
https://goldsilver.com/?aff=TMB
Disclaimer
The content provided in this newsletter is for general information purposes only. No information, materials, services, and other content provided in this post constitute solicitation, recommendation, endorsement or any financial, investment, or other advice.
Seek independent professional consultation in the form of legal, financial, and fiscal advice before making any investment decisions.
Always perform your own due diligence.