print-icon
print-icon

America's Debt Problem Gives It Two Choices

Portfolio Armor's Photo
by Portfolio Armor
Monday, Aug 11, 2025 - 7:47
Uncle Sam’s choice: build the future, or bleed it away.
Uncle Sam’s choice: build the future, or bleed it away.

The Debt Problem Is Even More Fundamental Than You Think

As Lance Roberts wrote in an article ZeroHedge published yesterday, The Debt and Deficit Problem Isn’t What You Think, America’s fiscal risk isn’t an imminent default, it’s the long-term drag from borrowing to fund consumption rather than production. As the article notes, non-productive debt—entitlement spending and interest costs—doesn’t expand the economy’s future capacity, while productive debt—investments in infrastructure, innovation, and education—can.

Before we dig deeper, a brief reminder about the the Portfolio Armor Substack: 

Subscription prices are going up from $30 per month/$300 per year to $40 per month/$400 per year on Wednesday, but current subscribers will be grandfathered into the current price. So if you've been thinking about joining, consider doing so now. If you want to see our recent performance first, click here. And if you join and decide it's not for you, you can get a prorated refund anytime.


Now, back to our post:

Productive Versus Non-Productive Debt

Roberts' distinction between productive and non productive debt is a useful one, and one we agree with. But in our view, it still understates the underlying issue.

As we wrote in America’s Debt Is A Symptom—Not the Disease, the size of the debt is a reflection of deeper structural imbalances—chronic trade deficits, an eroding industrial base, and a policy environment that prioritizes short-term consumption over long-term competitiveness.

That’s why, in How To Reduce the U.S. Debt Without Raising Taxes or Cutting Spending, we argued for a different approach:

  • Leverage America’s global capital attraction to fund large-scale, revenue-generating infrastructure—energy grids, ports, AI data infrastructure—through public–private partnerships.

  • Target projects with clear long-term returns that strengthen U.S. competitiveness in global trade.

  • Design investment structures so future cash flows service the debt directly, reducing reliance on taxation or austerity.

We also shouldn’t ignore other areas where policy changes could have a large fiscal impact. For example, deporting illegal aliens—most of whom are in an income range that consumes more in government resources (including emergency Medicaid) than they pay in taxes—would relieve federal, state, and local budgets. The funding passed in the One Big Beautiful Bill earlier this summer should facilitate such mass deportations, easing some of the fiscal burden on entitlement and emergency service programs.

Making Peace With Russia And China Means Less Debt

Defense spending is another area ripe for reform. Trump’s upcoming summit with Putin could pave the way for something he has floated before: an agreement between the U.S., Russia, and China to all reduce military spending. Coupled with serious defense procurement reform at home—eliminating cost overruns and focusing on cost-effective, strategically relevant platforms—this could materially reduce federal outlays. Achieving such a deal will require the U.S. to respect Russia’s and China’s respective interests in their own “front yards” (Ukraine and Taiwan), just as the U.S. already demands reciprocity in its own hemisphere under the Monroe Doctrine.

Time To Rethink The Problem

This reframes the debate. Instead of asking, “How do we pay for government?”, we should be asking, “How does government spending pay for itself?” The U.S. enjoys the “exorbitant privilege” of issuing the world’s reserve currency, but that privilege won’t survive indefinitely if the dollar’s productive base continues to erode.

The real trap isn’t just low growth from non-productive debt—it’s the political complacency that privilege enables. We don’t need to wait for an AI-led productivity miracle to act. We can start now by redirecting capital flows toward assets that expand future GDP, improve trade balances, and generate the revenues to stabilize debt-to-GDP without the false choice between higher taxes and spending cuts.

Treat The Disease Not Just The Symptom

And that same logic applies to the other reforms mentioned above. Reducing the net fiscal burden from illegal immigration and cutting wasteful or redundant defense spending both free up resources currently consumed by non-productive uses. Redirecting those resources toward productive investments—whether in infrastructure, technology, or strategic industries—would have a far greater long-term payoff than simply servicing debt or sustaining dependency.

If we keep treating debt as the disease rather than the symptom, we’ll keep misdiagnosing the cure—and wasting the time our reserve currency status is buying us.

Contributor posts published on Zero Hedge do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of Zero Hedge, and are not selected, edited or screened by Zero Hedge editors.
Loading...