The Taking of Nataliya Satsunkevich--And Why You Should Care

Nataliya Satsunkevich has been taken. There exists at this time no doubt about this. And in her future lies the balance of all of our futures.

Nataliya is an emigree. She survived the Nazi intrusion into Belarus and also the subsequent Soviet take over of her country, emigrating to the US a couple of decades ago. The former schoolteacher lived a quiet and unremarkable life in Euclid, Ohio in an apartment complex on Richmond Ave., where she resided following the death of her son around 18 years ago.

Until the day that APS came to her door and took her.

The taking of Nataliya is documented in a Euclid Police Dept report, reproduced here:







April Hill ( take note of that name as it will be figuring prominently in this article a bit later on) an investigator and worker with APS, features as the prime mover in this report.

Everything appears on the surface to be kosher, right? Nataliya--at age 84-- is a vulnerable adult who needs the protection of APS, which is only trying to help her, right?

If that is indeed the case, why did April Hill lie to the Cuyahoga County Probate court in pursuit of the taking of Nataliya? Hill's testimony to the court states that there have been several police interventions concerning Nataliya's disorientation and "wandering."


However, a records request of the EPD produced no such reports and Nataliya herself denies that this ever took place.

 Nataliya denied Hill's other allegations, that she was not taking her prescription medication. Nataliya did admit that she left the stove on at one point in time but denied that there was a fire.

It should also be noted that the attorney representing objector Mikhail Alterman, Tas Nadas, told this reporter in conversation this past week that he personally viewed no evidence of APS April Hill's allegations of "wandering" or of failure to take her medicine. Nadas also noted that the judge issued his ruling, approving Nataliya's confinement, before the attorney was able to call adversarial witnesses, as he had planned. This reporter has reviewed the transcript of the hearing, which supports the attorney’s perceptions.

Which brings us square into what is increasingly looking like a criminal conspiracy to deprive Nataliya of her freedom. Nataliya was subsequently put into Euclid Hospital and denied phone calls and visits. She was also denied her right to a hearing on this involuntary commitment, which is guaranteed by Ohio law codes.ohio.gov She has been subsequently moved from Euclid Hospital and put into Aristocrat Nursing Home in Berea, Ohio. The director of Aristocrat, Brian Appleby, has not returned this reporter's calls, questioning the legality of Nataliya's confinement.

This reporter has previously explored the two prongs motivating those seeking to confine the elderly. Adult guardianships, and Nataliya is facing such an utter revocation of her rights via action by APS in Cuyahoga County probate court, are generally launched for financial gain on the part of the court-appointed guardian and may target those with a significant nest egg. The other prong is simply and purely a negative eugenics effort. The Nazification of US Domestic Policy | ZeroHedge

As Nataliya is no longer able to respond to any inquiries, having been spirited away and denied access to the external world, it is not possible at this juncture to determine her financial status and which of the two prongs has resulted in her confinement.

However, it is possible to determine that the judge in her matter, Anthony Russo, as well as the APS Chief in the relevant office, Lawrence Vavro, have suspicious financial transactions, pointing to the possibility that they are using mortgages to fraudulently self enrich, This use of mortgages is called "loanbacking" and involves the use of mortgages as a means to launder money. As explained here, "Money laundering refers to the process by which individuals disguise the original ownership and control of proceeds through making such proceeds appear to be legitimately owned/acquired. Money laundering involves concealing the act of transforming profits earned from corruption and illegal activities into legitimate assets." The writer goes on to explain " Loans and mortgages are usually taken as a cover to launder money proceedings, and lump sum cash repayments are used to repay the loans or mortgages."

Loan Back Method of Money Laundering | Compliance Alert

In an email to Cuyahoga County Probate court this past week,Judge  Russo's extensive loan activity was questioned. The contents of the email are reproduced here--

"I am concerned about the extent of mortgage activity evidenced by Judge Anthony Russo. The documents below are attached to his wife, Patricia. I chose to research her activity due to the fact that there is more than one Anthony Russo on file with the Recorder's office.

The mortgage activity, as expressed in the trust deeds and reconveyances, may well be in excess of what Mr. Russo could reasonably be expected to pay off, given his stated salary as a judge. The use of mortgages to funnel bribes to public officials is called "loanbacking." You can read more here:  Loan Back Method of Money Laundering | Compliance Alert

 Pursuant to these grave concerns, which may reflect on judge Russo's independence and integrity, please send me proof (ic, canceled checks) proving that judge Russo paid off these loans and did not receive bribes through the loanbacking process.

Thank you,

Janet Phelan

EXILE, pub 2014

AT THE BREAKING POINT OF HISTORY, pub 2021"

Table 1 — Core Details

(Grantor, Grantee, Doc Type, Recorded Date, Doc Number, Book/Volume/Page)

A review of the Cuyahoga County Register of Deeds for the APS Chief, Lawrence Vavro, produced similar concerns about the extent of his mortgage activity, reproduced here--

The attorney for APS in this matter, Craig Morice, was contacted with questions about Vavro's loan activity and with a similar request--to produce evidence that Vavro himself paid off his loans. At the time of going to press, there has been no response from the court or from APS.

The hearing to finalize and approve Nataliya's guardianship will take place in Cuyahoga County Probate court on September 16. If the guardianship is approved, Nataliya will have as many rights as a sack of potatoes. Or as a Jew in Nazi-controlled Belarus. Her long time friend, Mikhail Alterman, is contesting the guardianship and is planning to appeal.

A criminal civil rights claim has also been filed with the USDoJ, alleging that April Hill perjured herself in order to achieve false incarceration. That case number is 663907-JQT. The complaint only deals with April Hill's alleged perjury, not with the loanbacking concerns. The DoJ has previously made it clear that it is not friendly to loanbacking reports.We will see if it is similarly unfriendly to perjury.