print-icon
print-icon

Credit Crash In AI Names

quoth the raven's Photo
by quoth the raven
Sunday, Nov 09, 2025 - 16:16

Submitted by QTR's Fringe Finance

When I first wrote about CoreWeave in July, in One Tech Stock I’m Hell Bent on Avoiding, I said that something about this company simply didn’t smell right to me.

I described how its IPO seemed forced out the door on life support, rescued by a $250 million order from Nvidia that prevented what would have otherwise looked like an outright failure. I pointed out that the relationship between the two companies—one serving as the other’s largest supplier, customer, and shareholder all at once—was the kind of circular, self-referential structure that markets tend to misunderstand right up until they suddenly don’t.

Since then, we’ve seen nothing but more circular relationships.

Over the past six months, Nvidia, OpenAI, Microsoft, and CoreWeave have formed a tightly interlinked web of circular investments and supply agreements. Nvidia pledged up to $100 billion to OpenAI, which in turn will buy massive amounts of Nvidia hardware; OpenAI restructured its Microsoft deal to keep Microsoft as both a major investor and cloud supplier while gaining flexibility; and OpenAI also signed a $12 billion infrastructure contract and took an equity stake in CoreWeave—another Nvidia-backed company that sells GPU cloud capacity and has a $6.3 billion guarantee deal with Nvidia.

The result is a self-reinforcing ecosystem where each firm simultaneously acts as investor, customer, and supplier to the others. And now, the credit market seems to be catching up to what the equity market has been willfully ignoring.

CoreWeave’s five-year U.S. dollar senior CDS spread has widened sharply to roughly 510 basis points, up from around 360 bps in early October and about 250–300 bps earlier in 2025. That’s not a small move; it’s a repricing of credit risk that suggests the market now demands more than a five percent annual premium just to insure against a CoreWeave default. For a company less than a year removed from an IPO that needed a bailout from its own supplier, that appears to me as an unmistakable sign that...(READ THIS FULL COLUMN HERE). 

Contributor posts published on Zero Hedge do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of Zero Hedge, and are not selected, edited or screened by Zero Hedge editors.
Loading...