zerohedge logo
mobile-logohamburger-menu

print-icon
print-icon

Chaos Americana

VBL's Photo
by VBL
Sunday, Mar 15, 2026 - 10:53

 

Authored by GoldFix 

With regard to the Middle East, what we’re seeing from the United States is a pivot away from Pax Americana toward what we’ve been calling “Chaos Americana.”

The U.S. now seems primarily interested in keeping the Western Hemisphere as safe as possible. And “safe” is a relative term here. It also means safe relative to the East, meaning the rest of the world can look a little darker and more unstable by comparison.

Now with that in mind, think about China’s posture in all of this. One thing China is known for, for better or worse, is that they don’t rush into other people’s conflicts. They prefer to sit back, observe, and often benefit from other people’s mistakes rather than participate in them.

So if the United States is making a mistake, China isn’t going to stop us.

If Iran is making a mistake, China isn’t going to stop them either.

What matters to China is very simple: oil continuing to flow. As long as the energy supply they depend on keeps moving, they can tolerate a lot of geopolitical drama.

Now historically speaking, and I’ve watched several of these Middle East episodes play out over the years, Iran has always threatened to block the Strait of Hormuz, but they never actually did it. The reason was straightforward. They knew that if they truly shut it down, the response from the United States would be overwhelming.

In other words, we’d basically blow them off the face of the earth if they tried it.

But this time something is different. Whether we “allowed” it or not is beside the point. The strait is effectively blocked right now. And that tells me something important: Washington may not be that averse to a little chaos in that region.

Think back to Colin Powell’s famous line: “You break it, you buy it.”

Well today the dynamic may be different.

Now it’s closer to “we break it, China has to fix it.”

And that matters because while the United States hasn’t targeted Iran’s energy infrastructure directly, it absolutely could if it wanted to. If those refineries or export facilities were taken offline, everyone would feel the pain.

But after Iran itself, China would likely feel it the most.

So step back and look at the broader picture. The world is increasingly splitting into two spheres. And once you see it that way, U.S. strategy starts to look different.

Washington appears less concerned with maintaining stability in the Middle East or the Far East than it once was. The priority now seems to be maintaining stability in the Western Hemisphere.

And in that sense, this approach starts to look like a modern corollary to the Monroe Doctrine.

It signals that the United States is serious about confronting Iran, but it also signals something larger about how the U.S. is thinking about global order right now.

Continues here  


Free Posts To Your Mailbox

 

Contributor posts published on Zero Hedge do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of Zero Hedge, and are not selected, edited or screened by Zero Hedge editors.
Loading...

Today's Top Stories

Contact Information+

Assistance and Requests: Contact Us

Tips: tips@zerohedge.com

General: info@zerohedge.com

Legal: legal@zerohedge.com

Advertising: Contact Us

Abuse/Complaints: abuse@zerohedge.com